Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I thought not.

 

You're an intellectual fraud. And yes, a hypocrite.

 

 

1. I call out your hypocrisy.

2. You tell me to reconcile YOUR opinions.

3. You call me a hypocrite when I can't?

 

Brilliant. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

1. I call out your hypocrisy.

2. You tell me to reconcile YOUR opinions.

3. You call me a hypocrite when I can't?

 

Brilliant. 

 

 

 

 

 

I think your memory's a bit faulty, hypocrite.

 

1) I call YOUR hypocrisy out pointing out your unending devotion to "science" and indefinite lockdowns.

2) you get redass

 

Yes, it was rather brilliant if I say so myself.

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

So this is nothing about George Floyd..............Thanks,

 

Your statement that the guilty policemen will get off wasn't serious..........

 

 

 

 

Who was paying ?

 

Yes the officer would have gotten off without video. Also the DA said there was evidence that supports not criminally charging the officer. So yes it's very likely that officer would have walked without the protests.

 

This has happened over and over again, no matter who is President.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

So this is nothing about George Floyd..............Thanks,

 

Your statement that the guilty policemen will get off wasn't serious..........

 

 

 

 

Who was paying ?

 

 

Is this true?  about the tear gas?  Not that it substantively matters to me, because they were asked to move and they didn't listen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I think your memory's a bit faulty, hypocrite.

 

1) I call YOUR hypocrisy out pointing out your unending devotion to "science" and indefinite lockdowns.

2) you get redass

 

Yes, it was rather brilliant if I say so myself.

 

 

Set the record straight then Joe. Below is where you have stood on the issues.  How does this make sense?

 

Government force used to impose quarantines: Tyranny 

Government force to restrict hours on private enterprise: Tyranny

Military force to enforce curfews, dispel assembly, and put down looting/civil unrest: Justified

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Times like this bring out the libtards like when a house is fumigated for roaches.  They are coming out of every nook and cranny.  This country needs to be fumigated and all the roaches  removed.?

So I take it you support the use of gas on the peaceful protesters yesterday in DC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Yes the officer would have gotten off without video. Also the DA said there was evidence that supports not criminally charging the officer. So yes it's very likely that officer would have walked without the protests.

 

This has happened over and over again, no matter who is President.

 

The answer is to criminally charge people in this country when a loud mob of people say we should, regardless of the actual evidence?

 

*not saying that is the case in the Minneapolis case, but your post seems to indicate that is a good strategy going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

So I take it you support the use of gas on the peaceful protesters yesterday in DC?

Peaceful is not throwing stuff at the cops or setting a church on fire..

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Magox said:

 

Is this true?  about the tear gas?  Not that it substantively matters to me, because they were asked to move and they didn't listen. 

 

Yes.

 

It was smoke canisters.

They were warned 3 times, they refused to move back. These were NOT peaceful protesters

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

So I take it you support the use of gas on the peaceful protesters yesterday in DC?

 

 

False .............as usual.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jauronimo said:

 

Set the record straight then Joe. Below is where you have stood on the issues.  How does this make sense?

 

Government force used to impose quarantines: Tyranny 

Government force to restrict hours on private enterprise: Tyranny

Military force to enforce curfews, dispel assembly, and put down looting/civil unrest: Justified

 

 

 

 

Oh. My. God.

 

You're obtuse aren't you? I CALLED YOU OUT FOR YOUR HYPOCRITICAL VIEW THAT:

 

Government force used to impose quarantines: JUSTIFIED

Government force to restrict hours on private enterprise: JUSTIFIED

Military force to enforce curfews, dispel assembly, and put down looting/civil unrest: NOT SO MUCH

 

So let's sum this up for you since you're having difficulty on the topic.

 

If you think *I* am a hypocrite for what you posted, then you're also tacitly admitting your OWN hypocrisy. Ya dig?

 

That clear enough for you? Or are you too wrapped up in the emotion of your own blisteringly hot virtue signalling to SEE just what a complete and utter jackass you actually are?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want everyone to know, that Governor Murphy from New Jersey believes this:

 

Quote

 

Governor Phil Murphy began his daily COVID-19 briefing by honoring the peace actions of the weekend seeking justice for the late George Floyd, killed by police in Minneapolis, Minnesota a week ago.

“I support these protests and I thank the thousands of residents who peacefully and respectfully took part,” said Murphy. “This is a transformational moment of our time. …Peaceful protesting is the way we get to a better place.”

He addressed the apparent disconnect between his own executive order shutting down nonessential businesses and his support for the protests, which concentrated populations in violation of social distancing.

“It’s one thing to protest – I don’t want to make light of this and I’ll probably get lit up by everybody who owns a nail salon in the state, but it’s one thing to protest what day nail salons are opening and it’s another to come out in peaceful protest overwhelmingly about somebody who was murdered right before our eyes.


 

 

 

In other words, via his dictate, those law abiding rubes who were protesting about their livelihoods being destroyed, again by DICTATE, that the protests from "nail salon" owner's isn't nearly as important as those that protest for social justice.

 

Who the ***** is he to say something like that?

 

These people disgust me.  I don't know if I have felt as angry about our political discourse than what we are having right now.  The counter argument is completely vacuous and bankrupt.  They don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Magox said:

I want everyone to know, that Governor Murphy from New Jersey believes this:

 

 

 

In other words, via his dictate, those law abiding rubes who were protesting about their livelihoods being destroyed, again by DICTATE, that the protests from "nail salon" owner's isn't nearly as important as those that protest for social justice.

 

Who the ***** is he to say something like that?

 

These people disgust me.  I don't know if I have felt as angry about our political discourse than what we are having right now.  The counter argument is completely vacuous and bankrupt.  They don't have a leg to stand on.

 

He's almost as big a douchebag as Jauronimo.


Almost.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Yes.

 

It was smoke canisters.

They were warned 3 times, they refused to move back. These were NOT peaceful protesters

 

 

 

 

 

False .............as usual.

 

 

 

 

 

So no tear gas?

 

Wasn't that the justification that was used for "warfare"?

 

If true, it just gets worse and worse for these people attempting to make these INFOWAR sort of looney claims.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

He obviously appealed to people's prejudices running for office. He didn't scapegoat immigrants for a non-existent crime wave for no reason. He scapegoated immigrants as criminals for a reason. To win votes 

He didn't scapegoat immigrants, period. He absolutely platformed on border control and cracking down on people entering the country illegally. He correctly called out that specific group as criminals because they entered illegally. Conflating that group with legal immigrants is akin to Conflating the Westboro baptists with Christians. It is disingenuous and counterproductive.

 

Perhaps a more relevant comparison, it is like conflating violent agitators and rioters with protesters. Don't do that.

Edited by BuffaloHokie13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Peaceful is not throwing stuff at the cops or setting a church on fire..

 

Was the church burning at the moment gas was used?  And were “cops” under duress at the moment the gas was used? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sig1Hunter said:

The answer is to criminally charge people in this country when a loud mob of people say we should, regardless of the actual evidence?

 

*not saying that is the case in the Minneapolis case, but your post seems to indicate that is a good strategy going forward.

Not at all. When someone loses a life due to poor judgement by police then the police should be charged accordingly. 

 

I always respect and will continue to respect police. I won't judge police based on a bad few. I don't judge anyone based on a bad few.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said:

He didn't scapegoat immigrants, period. He absolutely platformed on border control and cracking down on people entering the country illegally. He correctly called out that specific group as criminals because they entered illegally. Conflating that group with legal immigrants is akin to Conflating the Westboro baptists with Christians. It is disingenuous and counterproductive. 

If you can’t admit an obvious truth then there is no use talking to you. He obviously scapegoated immigrants, murderers, rapists, drug dealers, everything bad under the sun, and said only he could protect us. At least admit the ugly truth about this guy. It’s who he is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dante said:

Have you hears about the random skids of bricks conveiniately placed around the country for rioters to access? Think Soros funded that?


Yeah, I've been posting the photos the last 3 (or so) days as I have found them on twitter.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LB3 said:

The TBD Sandbox is lit this morning. Wanting antifa led rioting to stop is now considered racist. Despite the fact that antifa is terrorist organization mainly comprised of overeducated white socialists who can't get jobs with their worthless degrees so they cosplay as righteous vigilantes. Better to name everyone they disagree with fascists than to own their uselessness and silly white guilt.

 

Also, OrangeManBad is officially, definitely Hitler. ?

 

See!

 

dIMxjqc.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

So this is nothing about George Floyd..............Thanks,

 

Your statement that the guilty policemen will get off wasn't serious..........

 

 

 

 

Who was paying ?

 

Augenstein well respected locl reporter in DC..interesting reporting. I was watching the news as they were doing the clearing, sure seemed like it was coordinated with the Trump Rose Garden speech, but certainly i could be wrong, and appears i was.

13 minutes ago, Magox said:

 

Is this true?  about the tear gas?  Not that it substantively matters to me, because they were asked to move and they didn't listen. 

Watching live last night..(on Fox i might add, Baird is the only guy that i think us even half truthful anymore) , sure seemed like some kind of gas/crowd scatter thing was being used. Did not appear to be harmful, to me looked like it was more meant to scare.

 

What i saw on camera is cops would form a line, wait a few minutes, then run for about 30 seconds forward and establish another line...accompanying with those blast/gas things.

 

I have a place less than a mile from Lafayette Park..every once in a while for fun i go there and lose $5 or $10 playing chess in like 4 minutes!

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

Ever notice how the white people who insist whites should shut up and listen on racial issues because we can't possibly understand the black experience are constantly lecturing us on what the black experience is like.

 

You're literally describing football media twitter right now... Absolutely unbearable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Oh. My. God.

 

You're obtuse aren't you? I CALLED YOU OUT FOR YOUR HYPOCRITICAL VIEW THAT:

 

Government force used to impose quarantines: JUSTIFIED

Government force to restrict hours on private enterprise: JUSTIFIED

Military force to enforce curfews, dispel assembly, and put down looting/civil unrest: NOT SO MUCH

 

So let's sum this up for you since you're having difficulty on the topic.

 

If you think *I* am a hypocrite for what you posted, then you're also tacitly admitting your OWN hypocrisy. Ya dig?

 

That clear enough for you? Or are you too wrapped up in the emotion of your own blisteringly hot virtue signalling to SEE just what a complete and utter jackass you actually are?

 

 

Settle down, snowflake.  You're so uppity when you get called on your disparate and inconsistent opinions.  You're freaking out! You just dropped an OMG basically interspersed with little claps.  Do you smell toast?

 

I'm actually not a big fan of government force in any of the above applications but I am happy to find middle ground with you and agree to move on with our new lives as admitted and unabashed hypocrites!  It feels pretty good.  You gonna make it?

 

And what's up with everything you disagree with as virtue signalling now?  There could be no other reason for having an opinion that differs from Joe in Winslow except someone wanting to demonstrate virtue?? And me of all people, who has no virtue as demonstrated throughout this thread, what could I possibly have to signal?  PPP has agreed I support violence against cops for ***** sake! You're becoming a caricature. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

If you can’t admit an obvious truth then there is no use talking to you. He obviously scapegoated immigrants, murderers, rapists, drug dealers, everything bad under the sun, and said only he could protect us. At least admit the ugly truth about this guy. It’s who he is 

Proving my point yet again. I appreciate that you're at least willing to admit that you see all immigrants as the same whether they came through legal channels or not. Personally, I think that's fairly disrespectful to all of the great Americans who did come here from somewhere else legally, but to each their own.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said:

 

I have a place less than a mile from Lafayette Park..every once in a while for fun i go there and lose $5 or $10 playing chess in like 4 minutes!

 

 

You any good? (aside from losing to the professional hustlers :P )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Not at all. When someone loses a life due to poor judgement by police then the police should be charged accordingly. 

 

I always respect and will continue to respect police. I won't judge police based on a bad few. I don't judge anyone based on a bad few.

When anyone dies as a result of criminal activity, the perpetrator should be charged. Probable cause must exist. In this case it certainly does. That doesn’t mean that the civilian mob decides when that probable cause exists, though.

 

I believe he would have been charged in this case, even without the protest. Misbehaving cops are charged often. They don’t get away with things as much as the media would like you to believe. Just because the media doesn’t cover it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, LB3 said:

The TBD Sandbox is lit this morning. Wanting antifa led rioting to stop is now considered racist. Despite the fact that antifa is terrorist organization mainly comprised of overeducated white socialists who can't get jobs with their worthless degrees so they cosplay as righteous vigilantes. Better to name everyone they disagree with fascists than to own their uselessness and silly white guilt.

 

Also, OrangeManBad is officially, definitely Hitler. ?


How ANYONE can approve of the rioting, looting, killing from these mobs is beyond my comprehension. I guess it is all "righteous" until your (generic your) house is torched, until your business is looted, until your child is hurt, until your spouse is beaten-up. At that point, when it impacts them personally, maybe those idiots will finally figure out... these people ain't your friends. They ain't representing anything you want to be associated with.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


How ANYONE can approve of the rioting, looting, killing from these mobs is beyond my comprehension. I guess it is all "righteous" until your (generic your) house is torched, until your business is looted, until your child is hurt, until your spouse is beaten-up. At that point, when it impacts them personally, maybe those idiots will finally figure out... these people ain't your friends. They ain't representing anything you want to be associated with.

 


Sorry, who has approved of the rioting, looting and killing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, plenzmd1 said:

i stink

 

lol. 

 

I got really into it only (and still play occasional) but I plateaued at like a 1200 rating where 3000 is grand master, or something like that. Put into perspective that I'm not the amazing genius I feel like after embarrassing friends and family around the holidays... The idea of those parks scares the crap out of me and my marginal skills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Reality Check said:

This is the face of the New World Order. Any more questions?

 

...I think you're being harsh.....she's classy and has Chicago under control...…..

 

82 shot, 22 fatally, over Chicago’s most violent weekend of 2020

More than half of the weekend’s victims were shot on Sunday as the city reeled from violent protests Saturday night that led to hundreds of arrests and the implementation of a curfew.

By Sun-Times Wire Updated Jun 1, 2020, 10:09pm CDT
 
 
 

 

…….and "classy"...………..

Chicago mayor tells Trump 'F-U' after tweet about Minneapolis looting

By Louis Casiano | Fox News

 

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot blasted President Trump and invoked an expletive Friday in response to his tweets after three days of protests in Minneapolis, Minn., when he called the protesters "THUGS" and tweeted that "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."

 

“Donald Trump’s comment last night was profoundly dangerous,” Lightfoot said Friday during a news conference to discuss plans to reopen the city. “And we must stand firm in solidarity and say this is totally unacceptable no matter who is the speaker."

“He wants to show failures on the part of Democratic local leaders, to throw red meat to his base," she added, according to WGN9. "His goal is to polarize, to destabilize local government and inflame racist urges. We can absolutely not let him prevail. And I will code what I really want to say to Donald Trump. It’s two words. It begins with F and it ends with U.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chicago-mayor-f-u-trump-george-floyd-minneapolis-looting-tweet

 

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

When anyone dies as a result of criminal activity, the perpetrator should be charged. Probable cause must exist. In this case it certainly does. That doesn’t mean that the civilian mob decides when that probable cause exists, though.

 

I believe he would have been charged in this case, even without the protest. Misbehaving cops are charged often. They don’t get away with things as much as the media would like you to believe. Just because the media doesn’t cover it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.

Why do you believe he would be charged? Again the DA came out before all the riots and said evidence supports no criminal charges. 

 

It's happened for as long as time. It's upsetting to think about but it's just a fact. 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...