The Mizzou/Yale/PC/Free Speech Topic

[bbb]

This whole wingnut campus stuff is going as well for Evergreen as it is for Mizzou:

Evergreen State sees 'catastrophic' drop in enrollment after social justice meltdown

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/12/evergreen-state-sees-catastrophic-drop-in-enrollment-after-social-justice-meltdown.html

[B-Man]

I don't believe anyone has posted on the ridiculous Tonight Show - Norm McDonald B.S. yet.........

 

YOUR DAILY TREACHER: We Must Destroy Norm Macdonald for Refusing to Join Our Outrage Mob.

 

 

Related: At Ricochet, Jon Gabriel explores “the Fatal Flaw in the New Morality:”

Norm quickly apologized on Twitter, which only encouraged the professionally offended. The online mob, however, ignored the most interesting part of the interview, which helped prove MacDonald main point.

 

The interviewer asked how we should treat people when they admit to screwing up. Here’s MacDonald’s answer:

The model used to be: admit wrongdoing, show complete contrition and then we give you a second chance. Now it’s admit wrongdoing and you’re finished. And so the only way to survive is to deny, deny, deny. That’s not healthy — that there is no forgiveness. I do think that at some point it will end with a completely innocent person of prominence sticking a gun in his head and ending it. That’s my guess.

By mentioning forgiveness, MacDonald reveals the biggest flaw in our new woke morality. The Church of Social Justice has more rules than a monastery during Lent and the list grows daily. But unlike traditional morality, there is no path to redemption.

 

For those celebrities who aren’t literally facing police investigations and/or trials such as Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, do the Twitter mobs believe they can banish the new daily History’s Greatest Monster into the cornfield forever?

 

[bbb]

I love Norm and never really get excited about a new show - for once I am, and if Netflix cancels his show, I'm going to be pissed! 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

I don't believe anyone has posted on the ridiculous Tonight Show - Norm McDonald B.S. yet.........

 

YOUR DAILY TREACHER: We Must Destroy Norm Macdonald for Refusing to Join Our Outrage Mob.

 

 

Related: At Ricochet, Jon Gabriel explores “the Fatal Flaw in the New Morality:”

Norm quickly apologized on Twitter, which only encouraged the professionally offended. The online mob, however, ignored the most interesting part of the interview, which helped prove MacDonald main point.

 

The interviewer asked how we should treat people when they admit to screwing up. Here’s MacDonald’s answer:

The model used to be: admit wrongdoing, show complete contrition and then we give you a second chance. Now it’s admit wrongdoing and you’re finished. And so the only way to survive is to deny, deny, deny. That’s not healthy — that there is no forgiveness. I do think that at some point it will end with a completely innocent person of prominence sticking a gun in his head and ending it. That’s my guess.

By mentioning forgiveness, MacDonald reveals the biggest flaw in our new woke morality. The Church of Social Justice has more rules than a monastery during Lent and the list grows daily. But unlike traditional morality, there is no path to redemption.

 

For those celebrities who aren’t literally facing police investigations and/or trials such as Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, do the Twitter mobs believe they can banish the new daily History’s Greatest Monster into the cornfield forever?

 

 

No, We Must Destroy Norm Macdonald Because He's Not Funny.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

.

[bbb]

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

.

 

I saw somebody who was arguing with a snowflake on youtube the other day say "Blow me or you're a homophobe"

[Nanker]

Who won?

Edited September 13, 2018 by Nanker

[Doc Brown]

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

I don't believe anyone has posted on the ridiculous Tonight Show - Norm McDonald B.S. yet.........

 

YOUR DAILY TREACHER: We Must Destroy Norm Macdonald for Refusing to Join Our Outrage Mob.

 

 

Related: At Ricochet, Jon Gabriel explores “the Fatal Flaw in the New Morality:”

Norm quickly apologized on Twitter, which only encouraged the professionally offended. The online mob, however, ignored the most interesting part of the interview, which helped prove MacDonald main point.

 

The interviewer asked how we should treat people when they admit to screwing up. Here’s MacDonald’s answer:

The model used to be: admit wrongdoing, show complete contrition and then we give you a second chance. Now it’s admit wrongdoing and you’re finished. And so the only way to survive is to deny, deny, deny. That’s not healthy — that there is no forgiveness. I do think that at some point it will end with a completely innocent person of prominence sticking a gun in his head and ending it. That’s my guess.

By mentioning forgiveness, MacDonald reveals the biggest flaw in our new woke morality. The Church of Social Justice has more rules than a monastery during Lent and the list grows daily. But unlike traditional morality, there is no path to redemption.

 

For those celebrities who aren’t literally facing police investigations and/or trials such as Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, do the Twitter mobs believe they can banish the new daily History’s Greatest Monster into the cornfield forever?

 

What?  Norm?  The most underrated comedian of the last 30 years.  They're smearing him.  **** that.

[4merper4mer]

1 hour ago, Nanker said:

Who won?

That was a lose lose situation.

[Foxx]

19 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

https://www.change.org/p/subramanian-swamy-voting-rights-for-cows

yep, cows are a diety in India. don't !@#$ with them.

[Nanker]

9 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

That was a lose lose situation.

Figured it might have been this guy:

 

[/dev/null]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-new-threat-to-democracy--from-the-left/2018/09/13/7e3fbb72-b790-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9e500c7bf3c5

 

[4merper4mer]

15 hours ago, Nanker said:

Figured it might have been this guy:

 

Geez McConaughey will take any role nowadays.

[B-Man]

Insanity. Doctors performing mastectomies on teen “transgender” girls

 

This story never seems to end. There are, apparently, doctors accepting cases of underage female children who “identify” as males and performing double mastectomies on them to avoid the trauma of developing breasts. The Federalist has the details.

 

Some physicians in the United States are performing double mastectomies on healthy 13-year-old girls. The justification is gender dysphoria (“transgenderism”)—the girls now identify as boys and therefore want to look like boys.

Sometimes this dysphoria doesn’t appear until adolescence, and often little or no psychological evaluation is done to determine the underlying cause of the teenager’s desire to mutilate her body. But these doctors are willing to give her what she thinks she wants. And your federal tax money is paying for research to validate this gruesome treatment (see here and here).

Reasonable people would be mystified, if not repelled, by the statements and actions of a leading researcher into transgender treatment. In a study funded by a $5.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers including Dr. Johanna Olson of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles are supposedly evaluating use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on dysphoric children.

 

 

t’s hard to even wrap your mind around this and consider how far our society has fallen. As I’ve stated here repeatedly, what adults do with their own bodies is up to them. If you want to have experimental surgery or modify yourself in some fashion that’s up to you. You can change your name through the normal channels and I’ll be fine with calling you by that name. (See: Chelsea Manning.) You can dress how you like and refer to yourself by whatever pronoun you wish as part of your right to free speech. (Provided you are polite enough to recognize my right to free speech and not agree with the description.) It’s still a relatively free country.

 

But we’re talking about children here. We’ve seen this trend growing over the past few years. There are doctors administering foreign hormones and chemicals to stave off the arrival of puberty in children who have been convinced they were born with “the wrong gender.” In states such as Oregon, children as young as 15 were offered the chance to have sex “transition” surgery without the informed consent of their parents.

 

Now we’re going to allow young girls to have their nascent breasts lopped off because they’ve become convinced that they were actually supposed to be boys?

 

A recent university study showied that social media and peer pressure increased the number of incidents where teens claimed to be transgender in social groups, but it was suppressed. One university in England canceled a study on transgender individuals who “detransition” because they specifically said it would be politically divisive to publish it.

 

This is insanity. We’re talking about children. If adults wish to pay to have their bodies altered to fit whatever social justice profile they identify with, that’s up to them and I wish you the best. But these are children. If their parents have failed them, the government and the medical community should not. What happens to young Sally when she “transitions” and has her breasts removed, only to realize in a year or so that she’d actually like to kiss a boy?

 

The doctors performing these procedures shouldn’t just have their licences questioned. They should be in jail. And our legal system is failing them.

[#34fan]

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

Insanity. Doctors performing mastectomies on teen “transgender” girls

 

This story never seems to end. There are, apparently, doctors accepting cases of underage female children who “identify” as males and performing double mastectomies on them to avoid the trauma of developing breasts. The Federalist has the details.

 

Some physicians in the United States are performing double mastectomies on healthy 13-year-old girls. The justification is gender dysphoria (“transgenderism”)—the girls now identify as boys and therefore want to look like boys.

Sometimes this dysphoria doesn’t appear until adolescence, and often little or no psychological evaluation is done to determine the underlying cause of the teenager’s desire to mutilate her body. But these doctors are willing to give her what she thinks she wants. And your federal tax money is paying for research to validate this gruesome treatment (see here and here).

Reasonable people would be mystified, if not repelled, by the statements and actions of a leading researcher into transgender treatment. In a study funded by a $5.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers including Dr. Johanna Olson of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles are supposedly evaluating use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on dysphoric children.

 

 

t’s hard to even wrap your mind around this and consider how far our society has fallen. As I’ve stated here repeatedly, what adults do with their own bodies is up to them. If you want to have experimental surgery or modify yourself in some fashion that’s up to you. You can change your name through the normal channels and I’ll be fine with calling you by that name. (See: Chelsea Manning.) You can dress how you like and refer to yourself by whatever pronoun you wish as part of your right to free speech. (Provided you are polite enough to recognize my right to free speech and not agree with the description.) It’s still a relatively free country.

 

But we’re talking about children here. We’ve seen this trend growing over the past few years. There are doctors administering foreign hormones and chemicals to stave off the arrival of puberty in children who have been convinced they were born with “the wrong gender.” In states such as Oregon, children as young as 15 were offered the chance to have sex “transition” surgery without the informed consent of their parents.

 

Now we’re going to allow young girls to have their nascent breasts lopped off because they’ve become convinced that they were actually supposed to be boys?

 

A recent university study showied that social media and peer pressure increased the number of incidents where teens claimed to be transgender in social groups, but it was suppressed. One university in England canceled a study on transgender individuals who “detransition” because they specifically said it would be politically divisive to publish it.

 

This is insanity. We’re talking about children. If adults wish to pay to have their bodies altered to fit whatever social justice profile they identify with, that’s up to them and I wish you the best. But these are children. If their parents have failed them, the government and the medical community should not. What happens to young Sally when she “transitions” and has her breasts removed, only to realize in a year or so that she’d actually like to kiss a boy?

 

The doctors performing these procedures shouldn’t just have their licences questioned. They should be in jail. And our legal system is failing them.

 

One of the few topics which you and I are in total agreement .

 

There's no way an eight year old boy or girl can fathom the consequences of permanent mutilation.  It should be forbidden before age 18.

 

 

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

4 hours ago, #34fan said:

It should be forbidden.

 

 

 

FTFY

 

[DC Tom]

6 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

One of the few topics which you and I are in total agreement .

 

There's no way an eight year old boy or girl can fathom the consequences of permanent mutilation.  It should be forbidden before age 18.

 

 

 

Ah, the ignorance of outrage.  You'd forbid a mastectomy to a 15 year old with breast cancer?

[Kevbeau]

On 6/13/2018 at 11:56 AM, TakeYouToTasker said:

The spread this moral and social rot has is incredible.

 

All joking aside, I agree. Too early.

 

Edit: Not sure why it quoted ToT from 3 months ago.

Edited September 17, 2018 by Kevbeau

[DC Tom]

On 8/15/2018 at 11:50 AM, LABillzFan said:

 

Oh, man. You suggested baskin do something. Now you won't see him here for weeks.

 

Y'know, you really nailed this one. 

[#34fan]

16 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Ah, the ignorance of outrage.  You'd forbid a mastectomy to a 15 year old with breast cancer?

 

It's nothing compared to the stupidity of snarkiness, which blinds morons to both subject matter, and context.

[BringBackOrton]

On 9/17/2018 at 3:26 AM, #34fan said:

 

One of the few topics which you and I are in total agreement .

 

There's no way an eight year old boy or girl can fathom the consequences of permanent mutilation.  It should be forbidden before age 18.

 

 

I am deathly afraid the medical community will be performing surgeries to make kids look emo when they go through that phase too.

[B-Man]

Inevitable: You can now order your “Slutty Handmaid” costume in time for Halloween

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/20/inevitable-you-can-now-order-your-slutty-handmaid-costume-in-time-for-halloween/

 

.........................

 

 

Even when the patriarchy loses it wins

 

 

 

.

[3rdnlng]

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Inevitable: You can now order your “Slutty Handmaid” costume in time for Halloween

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/20/inevitable-you-can-now-order-your-slutty-handmaid-costume-in-time-for-halloween/

 

.........................

 

 

Even when the patriarchy loses it wins

 

 

 

.

Have you pm'd Tom & Boyst about this yet?

[boyst]

7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Have you pm'd Tom & Boyst about this yet?

Tom already has it arriving tonight for me. I am making him dinner in this. He asked me to re-upy Netflix subscription, so I guess we will be watching a movie afterwards

[B-Man]

 

Quote

 

Variety‏Verified account @Variety

FollowFollow @Variety

"Sexy" #TheHandmaidsTale costume pulled following backlash http://bit.ly/2I3ZzjT 

 

 

 

 

..........I'd oppress that

[\GoBillsInDallas/]

https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2018/09/30

[LB3]

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

[DC Tom]

52 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Mike Nayna

@MikeNayna

For over a year now I’ve been documenting

@peterboghossian

 

@HPluckrose

and

@ConceptualJames

as they secretly submit bat-**** insane papers to peer-reviewed journals. Seven have been accepted and more are still on track for publication. FULL VIDEO: (link: https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k) youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k

0:58

62.7K views

8:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

[boyst]

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

I'd love to see the dissertation by Sisqo.

[3rdnlng]

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Now you're reviewing thongs? How far you've slipped.

[LB3]

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Peer review isn't intended to validate results, only methodology.  You can write the most batshit thong imaginable, and if you're methodology is sound it should pass review. 

 

Again: I recently read a published paper on the dietary requirements of the Loch Ness monster.

 

Thanks for clarifying.

[DC Tom]

19 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Now you're reviewing thongs? How far you've slipped.

 

Just my wife's. 

[boyst]

39 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Just my wife's. 

My Sisqo reference was much better.  But you're a nerd and didn't get it

 

 In the 90s you had your Tom petty, Nirvana, and other **** tier music

 

 

You weren't cool

[Joe Miner]

Spirit Fingers!

[B-Man]

WHY ARE FEMINISTS MINIMIZING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RAPE ?

 

Seen on Facebook: “I’m amazed at the progressives who argue that Kavanaugh should not have expressed anger that he has been accused of being a rapist, and that he shouldn’t have lashed out at such accusations even if they are entirely false.

 

If being accused of being a rapist isn’t a big deal, then rape isn’t a big deal.”

 

.

 

[B-Man]

Gotta love that Ivy League "diversity".....................?

 

EDUCATION: “Faculty and staff at the eight elite universities have contributed more than $190,000 to campaigns of Democrats in eight races rated as toss-ups by professional oddsmakers, according to records. But only one Republican had been blessed by the Ivies as of late last month — Sen. Ted Cruz, whose bid for re-election in Texas managed to attract $750 from one Yale University librarian.”

 

Edited October 4, 2018 by B-Man

[Koko78]

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Gotta love that Ivy League "diversity".....................?

 

EDUCATION: “Faculty and staff at the eight elite universities have contributed more than $190,000 to campaigns of Democrats in eight races rated as toss-ups by professional oddsmakers, according to records. But only one Republican had been blessed by the Ivies as of late last month — Sen. Ted Cruz, whose bid for re-election in Texas managed to attract $750 from one Yale University librarian.”

 

 

In unrelated news, Yale University announced today that, due to budget cutbacks, one librarian position has been eliminated.

[B-Man]

More silliness from the NY Daily News.....................

 

 

 

click here to read article

 

Ron Darling uses slur in reference to Masahiro Tanaka on TBS broadcast of Yankees/Red Sox Game 2

 

Never mind that "Chink" is a slur for someone of Chinese ethnicity and that Tanaka is Japanese.

 

Never mind that the announcer (Ron Darling) himself is of half Chinese-Hawaiian ancestry.

 

Never mind that "chink in the armor" is common phrase that has nothing to do with ethnicity.

 

He must be burned at the liberal PC stake. 

 

 

 

Talk about a slanted article......

 

 

[Chimp]

On 11/11/2015 at 2:51 PM, B-Man said:

After Yale, Mizzou, raise the voting age — to 25.

 

 

 

Christakis–the liberal Yale Professor who dared to question P.C. orthodoxy–has profusely apologized to the “offended” snowflakes who are now running the progressive asylums universities:

 

 

 

 

 

REAPING WHAT PROGRESSIVISM HATH SOWN:

 

Kevin Williamson on “Yale’s Idiot Children“:

 

 

 

On Friday, I was honored to be a guest of the William F. Buckley Jr. Program at Yale, where I participated in a panel on freedom of speech with the wonderful writer Harry Stein and Professor Bradley A. Smith, a noted law scholar.

 

 

 

The Yale kids did their screaming best to prevent us from having a conversation about free speech — the Yale kids are utterly immune to irony — but the event went much as planned. Coming and going, we were chanted at by idiot children screaming, “Genocide is not a joke!” . . .

 

 

 

If you’re wondering about the genocide thing, so were we. . . . The idiot children were screaming about Lukianoff because he said they were overreacting to Christakis’s criticism that they tend to scream and overreact. Well played, idiot children.

 

 

 

Of course, these idiot children aren’t children. These are young adults who can serve in the military, get married, buy firearms, drink alcohol, etc. They are at the beginning years of adult life, but they are entirely unprepared for adult life. . . .

 

 

 

As for me, I think that they’re clowns, and worse than that, really: They’re bad citizens, and defective people from defective families.

They aren’t motivated by good will, but by fear: of the dawning realization that they, as people, aren’t really all that important, despite having been told all their lives how important they are.

 

 

 

We’re all real sorry about your safe spaces and your pacifier and your stuffed puppy, Caitlyn. Really we are. Yet the perpetual revolution of configured stars continues in its indifference, and the lot of man is ceaseless labor, and though you may find the thought terrifying — and thinking itself terrifying — it may turn out to be the case that the screaming in the dark you do on campus is more or less the same screaming in the dark you did in the crib, the same howl for the same reason.

 

 

 

30 unless you are a member of the military.

[B-Man]

 

 

TRIGGER WARNING: Trump Celebrates Christopher Columbus On Columbus Day.

 

 

 

 

.