Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted Monday at 08:04 PM Posted Monday at 08:04 PM "Dalton, it's Brendan Beane. Stop by my office, and bring your current contract. Terry is very pleased with the new PFF rankings..." * 🤔🙄 Quote
longtimebillsfan Posted Monday at 08:05 PM Posted Monday at 08:05 PM Ertz is 30th!!! Maybe now is the time we can sign him!!! Getter done Beane!! 2 Quote
LEBills Posted Monday at 08:08 PM Posted Monday at 08:08 PM It’s not too surprising. The TE position is usually not as talent-laden as other positions. And despite the production not being great, Kincaid’s advanced metrics were improved on from his rookie year and pretty solid against his peers. Being on the field is the main issue, health is part of it, the offense is part of it, and his blocking is part of it as he was out snapped by Knox. In addition to that, he is much better at creating separation vs zone than vs man, and we faced the highest rate of man coverage in the league last year. If our outside receivers can punish man coverage this year, Kincaid will shine more. Quote
Doc Brown Posted Monday at 08:12 PM Posted Monday at 08:12 PM 17 minutes ago, dorquemada said: I want to see more Knox. Bring Kincaid along as slowly as necessary but Knox is a baller I want to see less Knox and more Kincaid in one tight end sets. Even in Kincaid's nightmare season last year he had better yards after catch, yards after contact, and a lower drop percentage than Knox. 2 Quote
DapperCam Posted Monday at 08:14 PM Posted Monday at 08:14 PM All I gather from this list, is that there aren’t a lot of great TEs out there. Knox is probably better than a bunch of these guys with starter snaps. 1 1 Quote
transient Posted Monday at 08:24 PM Posted Monday at 08:24 PM 17 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: "Dalton, it's Brendan Beane. Stop by my office, and bring your current contract. Terry is very pleased with the new PFF rankings..." * 🤔🙄 🤔... who? 🤔... Brendan? 🤔... is this Case Keenum punking me? 2 Quote
Mr. WEO Posted Monday at 08:46 PM Posted Monday at 08:46 PM 2 hours ago, Kornfed said: Anyone putting any stock in anything PFF has to say is pissing into the wind. .. You’re welcome what metrics do you use to rank TEs? Quote
Doc Brown Posted Monday at 09:00 PM Posted Monday at 09:00 PM 31 minutes ago, DapperCam said: All I gather from this list, is that there aren’t a lot of great TEs out there. Knox is probably better than a bunch of these guys with starter snaps. Knox did qualify. He had more of a snap participation rate (60%) than Kincaid (56%). Knox's PFF grade was 57.1. Kincaid's was 76.6. PFF ranked Knox as 20th as a run blocker and 27th as a pass blocker. Kincaid was ranked 9th in both. Don't kill the messenger. 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Posted Monday at 09:21 PM #1 rule of TBD; if any national media source says something positive about the Bills, it must be swiftly refuted. It cannot stand! Quote
Buffalo716 Posted Monday at 09:29 PM Posted Monday at 09:29 PM 28 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Knox did qualify. He had more of a snap participation rate (60%) than Kincaid (56%). Knox's PFF grade was 57.1. Kincaid's was 76.6. PFF ranked Knox as 20th as a run blocker and 27th as a pass blocker. Kincaid was ranked 9th in both. Don't kill the messenger. I'm on PFF right now and it says Dawson Knox does not qualify Do you have a link to where it says he does have a qualifying grade? Quote
RoscoeParrish Posted Monday at 09:30 PM Posted Monday at 09:30 PM 29 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Knox did qualify. He had more of a snap participation rate (60%) than Kincaid (56%). Knox's PFF grade was 57.1. Kincaid's was 76.6. PFF ranked Knox as 20th as a run blocker and 27th as a pass blocker. Kincaid was ranked 9th in both. Don't kill the messenger. Does it say how many snaps Kincaid pass blocked in? I don’t remember many but I could be very wrong Quote
Doc Brown Posted Monday at 09:39 PM Posted Monday at 09:39 PM 5 minutes ago, RoscoeParrish said: Does it say how many snaps Kincaid pass blocked in? I don’t remember many but I could be very wrong Not sure how many were runs but Knox's snap share percentage was 60.6% and Kincaid's was 56.7%. Quote
ShakAttack Posted Monday at 09:44 PM Posted Monday at 09:44 PM How many of the TEs ranked below him would have caught that final pass against KC? That's really all I care about. And those are the guys I want. Quote
YoloinOhio Posted Monday at 09:48 PM Posted Monday at 09:48 PM Kincaid vs Oliver as this year’s TBD whipping boy 1 Quote
oldmanfan Posted Monday at 10:21 PM Posted Monday at 10:21 PM Never look at pff regardless if good or bad for the Bills 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted Monday at 11:11 PM Posted Monday at 11:11 PM 50 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: Never look at pff regardless if good or bad for the Bills What do you suggest rather than just looking at the box score in US Today? Quote
JakeFrommStateFarm Posted Monday at 11:22 PM Posted Monday at 11:22 PM Did Kincaid go to Josh's wedding ? Quote
BADOLBILZ Posted Monday at 11:25 PM Posted Monday at 11:25 PM 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: Kincaid vs Oliver as this year’s TBD whipping boy I'm not sure why people don't recall why Kincaid fell out of favor. He was HORRIBLE in the playoffs. Even the one long catch he was credit for in the Denver game was clearly a drop that they got away with. 1 1 1 Quote
Maine-iac Posted Monday at 11:39 PM Posted Monday at 11:39 PM 3 hours ago, Doc Brown said: I want to see less Knox and more Kincaid in one tight end sets. Even in Kincaid's nightmare season last year he had better yards after catch, yards after contact, and a lower drop percentage than Knox. What source are you using? Pro Football Reference says Knox's drop % was 3 last year and Kincaid's was 8. Their career yards after catch averages are exactly the same and Knox has a greater ADOT. Rating when targeted is 102 for Knox and 92 for Kincaid. I think Kincaid is going to be fine. Hopefully a good TE for years to come but I feel about the same using a first round pick on him as I do paying Knox the contract we did. Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted yesterday at 12:06 AM Posted yesterday at 12:06 AM Not all that surprising, considering he is a pass catching TE on an offense that: 1. Is #1 scoring offense in the NFL 2. Has has no demonstrated #1 WR 3. Is built on the principle of wide spread (everyone eats) distribution of the football. 4. Has the best QB in football. IMHO., the fact that he’s only considered #10, is a detriment to his performance to date. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.