SoonerBillsFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, FLFan said: Moore is not an X receiver. No way. Coleman plays. Exactly right. I loved that he put those two clowns in their place. How do you figure? Quote
The Wiz Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Simon said: My only question is "Why in the ***** does he even know who these clowns are or what they're saying?" WGR Official Radio station of the Buffalo Bills .....for now. I mean seriously, can they not get better than AM radio? Edited 5 hours ago by The Wiz 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago The Bills play positionless at WR. When are people going to realize this. Guys aren’t Xs and Zs and Fs. They move guys around based on the packages they want to play. 3 5 2 Quote
Low Positive Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 3 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: How do you figure? He's not wrong in the way that WRs have been traditionally deployed, but Joe Brady likes to move pieces around so both Shakir and Moore will line up all over the place. As will Coleman. Just now, gonzo1105 said: The Bills play positionless at WR. When are people going to realize this. Guys aren’t Xs and Zs and Fs. They move guys around based on the packages they want to play. We just both said the same thing but you put it better because you know ball a lot better than I do. 3 1 1 Quote
Redblood Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: How do you figure? Word is that coleman has added muscle this yr. Maybe he can be stronger on contested balls 1 1 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Low Positive said: He's not wrong in the way that WRs have been traditionally deployed, but Joe Brady likes to move pieces around so both Shakir and Moore will line up all over the place. As will Coleman. This offense,and I said this last year, doesn't have a true "X". The X receiver can be anyone at anytime. Just now, Redblood said: Word is that coleman has added muscle this yr. Maybe he can be stronger on contested balls And can you imagine him in a 3 wide spot running up the seam on a nickle back? 1 1 Quote
Augie Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Simon said: My only question is "Why in the ***** does he even know who these clowns are or what they're saying?" I think he was on hold for 2-3 minutes. That’s all it takes, at least for me. 1 Quote
boyst Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 23 minutes ago, FLFan said: They are very different players with different skill sets obviously. If Coleman gets up to speed, they will not miss Hollins in the least. They're vastly different players. Hollins was limited in his role but impactful in his time. Coleman needs to have a bigger impact with more time. Steep hill and hard row to hoe for the young man. Quote
BuffaloBillsGospel2014 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 21 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: Well the guy this hurts the most is Shavers. Guy went from # 5 WR and STs ace to hoping that the Bills decide to keep 6 WRs for his ST ability So beat them all out and there wont be a problem, won't hurt him if he's good enough. Any one of these WR's other than Shakircan win those outside WR spots imo, time to earn it. Quote
Dr. Who Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, BuffaloBillsGospel2014 said: So beat them all out and there wont be a problem, won't hurt him if he's good enough. Any one of these WR's other than Shakircan win those outside WR spots imo, time to earn it. Correct. Beane recognizes that part of what will make the DL improve is competition. We need genuine competition in the WR room, too. Quote
Victory Formation Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Shakir Coleman Palmer Samuel Moore 3 2 1 Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, JaCrispy said: Now Beane seems like a fool for how he behaved on wgr…clearly he felt like he needed another receiver, yet attacked the radio hosts for suggesting as much… To avoid this situation, all he had to say was that the offseason wasn’t over, and that they are always looking to upgrade…Unfortunately his emotions got the best of him… Needing a WR and wanting to improve your WR competition are two very different scenarios. I'd be willing to bet Mr. Coleman's job to lose is the WR spot opposite Palmer. 2 Quote
H2o Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago This is depth. We have some 2's, solid Slots, and depth guys. Josh will still be Josh. Another 40+ combined TD season. Hopefully, Moore can catch a few of those. 2 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Watched a few "every target" videos from his time with Cleveland. Here's a game reel that gives you a good look at his pros and cons: I like that he is getting some decent separation. He has good vertical speed. Not sure he can consistently get through physical press coverage but he can run past defenders. The one deep catch in this reel it didn't look to me like he actually stayed inbounds even though they called it a catch, but you can see the speed and the ball tracking on that play. Biggest concern that jumps out is he plays small. He has no catch radius at all. Flacco sucks, that much is obvious, but I thought a couple of the incompletions here would have been caught by a more physically gifted WR. Also he isn't elusive with the ball in his hands. So kind of a low margin for error WR and I think he'll have trouble breaking into the lineup over Shakir and Samuel. But there is a baseline NFL skill set there at least. 4 1 Quote
FLFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, boyst said: They're vastly different players. Hollins was limited in his role but impactful in his time. Coleman needs to have a bigger impact with more time. Steep hill and hard row to hoe for the young man. I agree - very different players but playing a very similar role, minus the special teams. Had Coleman continued to improve after his injury, Hollins role on the field would have been continually reduced. He took on more than his share because Coleman hit a wall. He is a more talented player than Hollins. He will be expected to start living up to his draft position this year. Who will pick up Hollins ST role is a more apt question. It’s a big challenge for the young man but it is now or never. Quote
Dunkirk Donski Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 45 minutes ago, FLFan said: They are very different players with different skill sets obviously. If Coleman gets up to speed, they will not miss Hollins in the least. “If Coleman gets up to speed” Enough with the slow jokes dude 🧐 1 1 1 1 Quote
FLFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 29 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: The Bills play positionless at WR. When are people going to realize this. Guys aren’t Xs and Zs and Fs. They move guys around based on the packages they want to play. Fair point. Thanks. Quote
Success Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Victory Formation said: Shakir Coleman Palmer Samuel Moore That, to me, is a very mid WR corps. And by mid, I mean middle of the pack in the NFL - which is very good w/ me if we're building a true top-tier defense. Nowhere near the worst in the league, as has been discussed here. 4 Quote
VW82 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Good signing. Now we have five WRs with vet experience / pedigree. The ridiculous part of Beane's rant was always about the depth. If two of our top four had gotten hurt at the same time, we would've been F'd. At least now we have someone proven to step in. Edited 6 hours ago by VW82 1 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, HamptonBillsfan said: He had over 60 receptions with 3 different QBs last season. I’m predicting upwards of 80 this coming year. Our most receptions last year was Shakir with 76. Next highest was Kincaid at 44... There's no way Moore is getting more than 80. First he has to make the team. 3 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.