Jump to content

Zach Ertz released, BRING HIM HOME


FireChans

Recommended Posts

On 12/1/2023 at 5:04 PM, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

Ertz just knows it will be mid 2024-25 season before the coaching staff deems him ready for the intricacies of the Buffalo playbook.  Ergo, easy money before he sees live ammunition.

 

He does not need to sign with team - his salary is guaranteed.

He could sign with a team with backloaded salary since Cardinals need to pay different between his salary with signing team and what he is owed this year.

2 hours ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

The more worrying question is, why is this Ertz thread only up to 4 pages???? #doingmypart

 

 

Because @Simon is not doing his job merging threads?     KIDDING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm a little confused as to why we'd be interested. Kincaid is playing his ass off for a Rookie and I have to imagine Knox will be back soon. Unless Knox's recovery is going badly - it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. And yes, I know he has underperformed this season - but I find it highly unlikely McDermott would just bury him on the depth chart.

 

Either way, with the guys we have in house and our record - I have to assume he'll choose a different team anyways. The Ravens need a TE1 with Andrews having Ankle surgery. I'd bet he goes there.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

Yeah, I'm a little confused as to why we'd be interested. Kincaid is playing his ass off for a Rookie and I have to imagine Knox will be back soon. Unless Knox's recovery is going badly - it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. And yes, I know he has underperformed this season - but I find it highly unlikely McDermott would just bury him on the depth chart.

 

Either way, with the guys we have in house and our record - I have to assume he'll choose a different team anyways. The Ravens need a TE1 with Andrews having Ankle surgery. I'd bet he goes there.

What’s more confusing is that we’re interested in a TE after throwing ONE combined pass to the TE’s in the 2nd half of the last two games.  Zero vs Philly….who has had major struggles vs TEs this year. 
 

sigh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NewEra said:

What’s more confusing is that we’re interested in a TE after throwing ONE combined pass to the TE’s in the 2nd half of the last two games.  Zero vs Philly….who has had major struggles vs TEs this year. 
 

sigh

Blame Dorsey!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, CheshireCT said:

Is it possible and/or legal to run 10 TE sets - 1QB plus 10 Tight ends? Asking for a friend…..

As long as 5 are on the line of scrimmage and they aren’t eligible to receive, then technically yes it’s legal. 7 have to be on the line, but 2 are alway eligible. 

Edited by Araiza Curse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's it McDummy, bring him in!  And then let him do nothing AND get injured as we lose out the season...

 

Make the record for firing you as strong as possible, please.

 

Pegula isn't that bright.  He will need help in this.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2023 at 7:47 PM, Araiza Curse said:

As long as 5 are on the line of scrimmage and they aren’t eligible to receive, then technically yes it’s legal. 7 have to be on the line, but 2 are alway eligible. 

 

well seems like an innovative and logical formation then....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...