Jump to content

Boomer Esiason suggests the Bills should trade for Barkley


Greg S
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Billz4ever said:

The guy ain't barry sanders and if he's getting met in the backfield, he's not going to be creating much of anything. Not even mentioning what he would cost.

Look, I don’t agree with the economics of the whole situation and what it would cost. I’m just speaking on having him as a player. Nope, not Barry Sanders, but who really is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said:

Look, I don’t agree with the economics of the whole situation and what it would cost. I’m just speaking on having him as a player. Nope, not Barry Sanders, but who really is?

It simply seems like a lot of people have unrealistic expectations of what it means to bring in RB when your line hasn't been able to get a push or open holes even if that RB is better than what you have currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt a 3rd gets it done, and iam firm against signing rbs to contracts, and i still want to see cook actually get some work, but to put it in perspective if by the trade deadline and the bills are looking healthy and still front runners. A 3rd round pick for a guy that at a minimum is twice the rb we have and we instantly get twice as good at rb on a super bowl run doesn't sound crazy to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d offer Moss and a 4th for whatever kind of economically feasible upgrade we can get.  
 

If that means no upgrade, so be it.  Im not trading a Top 100 pick when we need those for OL/WR & potentially LB/S. 
 

We need an outside WR more than a RB right now.   Nobody is fearing a hobbled Davis and McKenzie.  (Crowder has been useless and it’s probably time to give Shakir his shot given the inevitable Crowder injury)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I would love Saquon on the team. But to put it bluntly that's a cap hit right there. If I'm spending resources at the midseason mark it's for a DB to cover for the multitude of injuries or WR for the same reason plus wanting an elite #2 because even healthy the Davis, McK, Crowder, Shakir, Kumerow combination has not been mind-blowing 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Warcodered said:

More people just want nice things for Barkley I guess.

 

 

The Giants are right in the thick of the Playoff hunt in the weak NFC. Barkley isn't going anywhere. Both Daboll and Schoen know how big a part of the offense this guy is. 

 

 

9 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said:

Better chance at Josh Jacobs?? 

Before yesterday? Probably. But after McDaniels finally realized he needs to run Jacobs to win? Not likely to happen now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we were to trade for Barkley, this week and maybe next week would be the weeks to make a move. I think this week would be great because we could potentially use him for the KC game. Schoen and Daboll weren't really in Barkley's canoe when asked about a potential trade of Barkley earlier in the year. I wonder how much of that has changed these first 4 weeks of the season. But can you imagine trading for him this week and having him for the KC game? 🍻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ok with looking around for a RB upgrade, but if I'm Beane, I'm more looking at what Moss and a 4th can bring back... if that's nothing, so be it.  

 

A 3rd gets pricey for a rental and anything higher is just ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...