Jump to content

Bills cuts


Chandler#81

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Just jumped in the car and threw on WGR and they are talking A LOT about a potential Poyer trade…


Conjecture? Tasked and Brown are tools, can see them throwing that out there.

 

Right now they are talking about niners QB stuff.

Edited by davefan66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chandler#81 said:

Any reason/validation for their discussion??


Not sure.. I was only in the car for about 7 minutes, but the entire time they were discussing Poyer (presumably) on the heels of the Chauncey Gardner-Johnson trade today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Just jumped in the car and threw on WGR and they are talking A LOT about a potential Poyer trade…

I’ve talked a lot about many trades. None of them happened. I suspect this to be the case on this one as well. Jordan Poyer is an invaluable member of the 2023 Super Bowl champion Buffalo Bills.

Edited by MiltonWaddams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ILBillsfan said:

 

 

I think Sal was right about the special teams aspect.  They had him play a lot of snaps at ST in the Panthers game.  They wanted to see if he could do it.

Sal mentioned when he watched him, he wasn't strong enough and was just getting pushed around.  If you're going to be our 5th option at WR, you need to be able to play ST.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewEra said:

They did enough.  But it doesn’t change the fact that what they did in the offseason isn’t the only reason they won the SB.  If we win the coin toss vs the chiefs, it’s my belief that the rams wouldn’t have won the super bowl, leaving them “not doing enough”.  Front offices can only do so much.  Players performances, coaches, refs, luck, weather etc all play major roles.  
 

You say that if the FO addressed the OL differently last offseason than we would’ve been the #1 seed.  If we would’ve addressed the OL differently, we would’ve had to use resources we used in other areas to address it, which may have set us back in other areas and caused us to lose different games in different ways.  
 

if the weather was good in pats vs bills game 1 last season, we would’ve been #1 seed.  
 

I think multiple teams are capable of winning the SB in most years based on what their FO did in the offseason.  Some teams aren’t capable based on what their FO did.  Last year, we were capable (as were other teams imo).  
 

agree to disagree.

You blame weather I blame the piss poor run defense which lost us the 1st Pats game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, uticaclub said:

*our season ended because we were flat in the first half and our defense couldn’t make a play. 

 

Who won the coin flip in the AFC Championship?

But our season wouldn’t have ended if we would’ve won the coin flip…. There was a difference between how Josh allen was playing in the 2nd half of the divisional rd vs how Mahomes was playing in the 2nd half vs in the AFCCG.  They weren’t going to stop us, just like we weren’t going to stop KC.  
 

There are several reasons why teams win and lose each game.  I believe that if we win the coin flip, which is luck, we win the SB.  Jmo
 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Depth at tight end played a part in the Jacksonville game where we started Sweeney. Can't recall if he started other losses but he sucked that day in Jax. 

 

I agree most of it last year was on oline not on weapons. I am less convinced than you that they have "solved" the issues up there but it should be better to some extent. 

 

The point on WR depth is last year I thought we had 3 good players for 2 spots outside and 2 good players for 1 spot inside. This year I feel really good about the slot depth.... I am not sold at all we have depth outside. 

 

I also just disagree with you on Daboll. 

wasted money on the Jax game last year but everyone has a bad (very bad, not good, horrible) day.  Don't expect them to win every game this year.  but that was discouraging even for a fan that lived thru the 70's.  get the best players with the best chemistry and ensure they perform.  Get the best you can trading dead wood.. i think our coaches will/have .  national TV multiple weeks demands it.  we're good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheWeatherMan said:

You blame weather I blame the piss poor run defense which lost us the 1st Pats game.  

I couldn’t care less who you blame.  
 

if the weather was beautiful we would’ve hung 30+ on them. 
 

random variables.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

But our season wouldn’t have ended if we would’ve won the coin flip…. There was a difference between how Josh allen was playing in the 2nd half of the divisional rd vs how Mahomes was playing in the 2nd half vs in the AFCCG.  They weren’t going to stop us, just like we weren’t going to stop KC.  
 

There are several reasons why teams win and lose each game.  I believe that if we win the coin flip, which is luck, we win the SB.  Jmo
 

 

We won the coin flip in Tampa. How did that turn out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I couldn’t care less who you blame.  
 

if the weather was beautiful we would’ve hung 30+ on them. 
 

random variables.

What….not who genius.  In case you forgot we play at home, in Orchard Park, and the weather is more often unfavorable than favorable for throwing the football.  🤦🏻‍♂️ 

Edited by TheWeatherMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this team loves Kumerow and Sweeney in the locker room but both of those guys have been around multiple years and will never truly contribute much. Kimerow isn’t some elite ST player and Sweeney was abominable last year. Move on already. 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

Give me a break… I loved the Von Miller signing and was much needed… I’ve stated my opinion several times on their moves…. They went overboard with the resources dedicated to the defensive line and defense in general and have done so at the expense of the offense and offensive depth… their success offensively last year relied way too much on Josh Allen to be incredible.

 

We will find out these coming months if it will matter or not. 

 

 

 

LOL

"At the expense of the offense and offensive depth".  
Yep...we struggle on offense.  We can't score.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

Any reason/validation for their discussion??

I'm only half listening but they were mentioning the strong preseason play of Jaquan Johnson as a factor, and that the Bills might choose to extend Johnson instead of Poyer.  Mostly just talking outta their butts I'm thinking.

 

Also for anyone else that listens to WGR online, who can't wait for September 25 when we don't have to hear about the damn Goo Goo Dolls concert a few dozen times every commercial break??

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 518Buffalo said:

I know McBeane loves their ST specialists…but I’ll be disappointed if we couldn’t have let go at least ONE of Jones/Matakevich/Kumerow to make room for a guy like Hodgins

 

Especially because none of those guys are subject to waivers. They could have cut them and brought them back to start while sending Hodgins to the PS until one of our starters inevitably misses some time. Wouldn't have cost them anything to keep Hodgins. Same for Blackshear for that matter.

 

The only reason I can see to cut them is to give them a chance to sign somewhere else, but I'm sorry-- this is a business and we will regret not having some quality players to call up if any injuries happen.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Shakir is perfect for this team if that is how you are using him - a slot guy you can move around the formation in different looks. If one of the outside guys goes down and he is playing 75% of the snaps outside? Yea, I like that a lot less

 

 

I hear you, but even if wr1 or 2 is out, we don't run, or need to run two outside wr formations even 50% of the snaps. With all of the tight and bunch formations we use, and the use of TE's and RB's outside in 5 wide sets I don't see it being a big issue. 

Edited by Motorin'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...