Recap of what the media is telling you about the J6 hearings. Aka liars telling you more lies about what liars are saying on capitol hill..

[The Frankish Reich]

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Just another example of dumb straw man arguments from you. One of these days, you may actually post something of value here, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. 
 

I am looking at the evidence like sworn testimony. The kind of thing that people can go to jail for lying about. 
 

You can continue to trust people who lie to your face and then tell a very different story when they can get into trouble when they lie. Just doesn’t make you very convincing. 

You are attempting to argue with the poster previously known as Deranged Rhino, or the poster currently spewing Deranged Rhino’s nonsense under the moniker DR’s Ghost. 
Unfortunately, many of the choicest DR cuts here were eliminated when he (I think it’s a he, but …. they?) was banished from this fair and resplendent land. A brief reminder may be in order:

-  All-in on QAnon. The magnificent stupidity of the 500 page “Q Analysis” thread is, I hope, preserved somewhere. 
- A UFO conspiracist too!

- Fully believed the Hilary’s arrest warrant was signed, and that Trump would be gloriously restored to the throne before the inauguration/within weeks/by the following summer/umm, someday real soon. 
- Completely sold on the Baby-Eating Fountain of Power cult idiocy that inspired the Pizzagate would-be shooter to go looking to shoot up the basement of a DC pizza restaurant where kids were held in captivity, only to find that said restaurant actually had no basement 

 

Who wouldn’t be inspired by such a mind? He’s doing his own research!

[Nineforty]

2 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

And you are putting your faith in........... Glenn Greenwald. and people named Mollie. lol... ill go with the facts of the day. the facts leading up to the day. and the facts after january 6th. and by facts, I mean looking at the evidence presented and making my own determination as to what it means.

 

they all point to Donald Trump inciting an insurrection, a coup of sorts. defrauding the United States. The U.S. sitting president, trying to stop the certification. not saying every person on the grounds was looking to overthrow the gov't. but Donald Trump was. The Proud Boys were. The Oath Keepers were. 

 

and that my friend, is treason in my book. maybe not legally, but in my mind, Donald Trump is a traitor and doesn't deserve to breathe. ill settle for shackles. 

Edited June 21, 2022 by Nineforty

[LeGOATski]

7 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

You are attempting to argue with the poster previously known as Deranged Rhino, or the poster currently spewing Deranged Rhino’s nonsense under the moniker DR’s Ghost. 
Unfortunately, many of the choicest DR cuts here were eliminated when he (I think it’s a he, but …. they?) was banished from this fair and resplendent land. A brief reminder may be in order:

-  All-in on QAnon. The magnificent stupidity of the 500 page “Q Analysis” thread is, I hope, preserved somewhere. 
- A UFO conspiracist too!

- Fully believed the Hilary’s arrest warrant was signed, and that Trump would be gloriously restored to the throne before the inauguration/within weeks/by the following summer/umm, someday real soon. 
- Completely sold on the Baby-Eating Fountain of Power cult idiocy that inspired the Pizzagate would-be shooter to go looking to shoot up the basement of a DC pizza restaurant where kids were held in captivity, only to find that said restaurant actually had no basement 

 

Who wouldn’t be inspired by such a mind? He’s doing his own research!

I wish he got back into the UFO stuff. That was DR at his best. Truly entertaining.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

5 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

and that my friend, is treason in my book. maybe not legally, but in my mind, Donald Trump is a traitor and doesn't deserve to breathe. ill settle for shackles. 

You've made a compelling case here.  Maybe not rationally, or unemotionally, but most definitely in a John Hinkley sorta way. 

[ChiGoose]

9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

You are attempting to argue with the poster previously known as Deranged Rhino, or the poster currently spewing Deranged Rhino’s nonsense under the moniker DR’s Ghost. 

Oh thank god. I thought DR stood for doctor and I was really worried we had  someone dispensing medical advice without a brain. 

[All_Pro_Bills]

27 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Just another example of dumb straw man arguments from you. One of these days, you may actually post something of value here, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. 
 

I am looking at the evidence like sworn testimony. The kind of thing that people can go to jail for lying about. 
 

You can continue to trust people who lie to your face and then tell a very different story when they can get into trouble when they lie. Just doesn’t make you very convincing. 

This committee is not a court of law.  But if a witness committed perjury giving testimony to the committee a couple things would need to happen in order to charge and prove they lied.

 

1. Who or how could anyone know they lied?  My assumption is their testimony would be in contradiction with other witnesses, facts and figures, audio or video evidence, other submitted evidence, or previously provided depositions.  

2. Who would need to indict and try them for that offense?  My understanding is it would be referred to the DOJ for investigation and potential prosecution. 

 

Does that sound right?  

 

My problem with the perjury angle here is that every single witness testifying supports the States case.  So whether they are telling the truth or not telling the truth, as long as their testimony supports the States case why would the State want to indict any witnesses for lying?  As long as the committee gets a "conviction" do you really believe they care if witnesses are telling the truth or not?  There just no potential for consequences or penalties for lying.  Period. 

 

Absent skeptics and doubters being allowed to ask questions and provide testimony I propose they don't care one way or the other.  That's the problem with this 1/6 circus.  

Edited June 21, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills

[B-Man]

 

 

9 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

 

 

9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

 

 

1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

 

 

 

What compelling response to the "Recap of what the media is telling you about the J6 hearings" thread.

 

Oh wait, no they're not.

[BillsFanNC]

8 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

I wish he got back into the UFO stuff. That was DR at his best. Truly entertaining.

 

Love that the ghost of a former poster has so many triggered.  I wish I knew how to contact him as I'm sure he would enjoy knowing you clowns are still as useless as ever.

[ChiGoose]

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

My problem with the perjury angle here is that every single witness testifying supports the States case.  

I think this is important but not in the way you may agree with. 
 

The committee wants testimony from those who publicly disagree but they refuse to testify. If it is all a partisan hack job, then they should testify and completely blow up the committee’s narrative, but they are doing everything in their power to avoid that. 
 

Not to mention that any time one of them has been under oath, the do not say the same things they say publicly. They evade, plead the fifth, or admit everything said publicly was a lie. 
 

And so far, basically every witness has been a Republican and many were very invested in Trump winning. They aren’t having the AOC’s of the world testify, they are getting Trump’s actual campaign manager, Ted Cruz’s mentor, and even the guy behind the plan to have Pence not certify the vote. 
 

At what point does it start to seem that those publicly arguing against the committee’s case but privately telling a different story are acting in bad faith?

[The Frankish Reich]

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

What compelling response to the "Recap of what the media is telling you about the J6 hearings" thread.

Huh?

[BillsFanNC]

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

What compelling response to the "Recap of what the media is telling you about the J6 hearings" thread.

 

Oh wait, no they're not.

 

But it's still fun watching them get all worked up about a guy who hasn't been here for almost two years.

 

DR and the Ghost in your heads.

[LeGOATski]

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

What compelling response to the "Recap of what the media is telling you about the J6 hearings" thread.

 

Oh wait, no they're not.

Isn't there a new Tweet you should be copy-pasting right now?

[B-Man]

1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Huh?

 

 

Exactly.

 

 

1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

Isn't there a new Tweet you should be copy-pasting right now?

 

Nope.   

 

Reacting to your childishness is part of my day also.

 

 

4 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Love that the ghost of a former poster has so many triggered.  I wish I knew how to contact him as I'm sure he would enjoy knowing you clowns are still as useless as ever.

 

Oh I have told him.

 

 

[Nineforty]

13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You've made a compelling case here.  Maybe not rationally, or unemotionally, but most definitely in a John Hinkley sorta way. 

you can be a traitor or a Traitor. there is a difference. 

[LeGOATski]

2 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Love that the ghost of a former poster has so many triggered.  I wish I knew how to contact him as I'm sure he would enjoy knowing you clowns are still as useless as ever.

This is the first haunting I've ever experienced. I'm just trying to be present in this moment. Or to quote Roy Neary "I just want to know that it's really happening."

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Reacting to your childishness is part of my day also.

 

That seems to be it. You spend a lot of time here. I usually come back to about 100 more Tweets you've pasted.

9 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

But it's still fun watching them get all worked up about a guy who hasn't been here for almost two years.

 

DR and the Ghost in your heads.

Does this mean you're not going to get into any UFO stuff, or....

 

🙏🏻

[BillsFanNC]

6 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

Isn't there a new Tweet you should be copy-pasting right now?

 

Nah.  But since you asked so nicely I give you a youtube link instead.

 

 

 

[LeGOATski]

1 minute ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Nah.  But since you asked so nicely I give you a youtube link instead.

 

 

 

Lol, I love it. 

 

(But make sure you log back in as B-Man before responding for B-Man.)

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

20 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

you can be a traitor or a Traitor. there is a difference. 

It's all anyone talks about these days, obviously. 

[BillStime]

A recap of what the liars ( @DRsGhost @B-Man ) won’t tell you:

 

 

[Jauronimo]

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

You are attempting to argue with the poster previously known as Deranged Rhino, or the poster currently spewing Deranged Rhino’s nonsense under the moniker DR’s Ghost. 
Unfortunately, many of the choicest DR cuts here were eliminated when he (I think it’s a he, but …. they?) was banished from this fair and resplendent land. A brief reminder may be in order:

-  All-in on QAnon. The magnificent stupidity of the 500 page “Q Analysis” thread is, I hope, preserved somewhere. 
- A UFO conspiracist too!

- Fully believed the Hilary’s arrest warrant was signed, and that Trump would be gloriously restored to the throne before the inauguration/within weeks/by the following summer/umm, someday real soon. 
- Completely sold on the Baby-Eating Fountain of Power cult idiocy that inspired the Pizzagate would-be shooter to go looking to shoot up the basement of a DC pizza restaurant where kids were held in captivity, only to find that said restaurant actually had no basement 

 

Who wouldn’t be inspired by such a mind? He’s doing his own research!

This is blatantly false.

 

The Q-Drops thread was over a thousand pages before it vanished.

[B-Man]

 

 

Repost:

 

The point of the Media response thread.

 

 

 

[SoCal Deek]

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

A recap of what the liars ( @DRsGhost @B-Man ) won’t tell you:

 

 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

A recap of what the liars ( @DRsGhost @B-Man ) won’t tell you:

 

 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

A recap of what the liars ( @DRsGhost @B-Man ) won’t tell you:

 

 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

mmmmmhmmmmm 

[BillsFanNC]

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

Actually those are words said by lawyers all the time. 

 

Every once in awhile someone quotes this moron. Always entertaining. 

 

Hey @BillStime ***** off!

[BillsFanNC]

Recap:

 

More lies and narrative building.

 

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

[ChiGoose]

1 hour ago, DRsGhost said:

Recap:

 

More lies and narrative building.

 

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

 

Yes, this is exactly what Trump's people are doing. Thank you for calling it out.

[BillsFanNC]

1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Yes, this is exactly what Trump's people are doing. Thank you for calling it out.

 

You're lost dude. I'd call it a sham  if it was an all republican committee with a Manchin like dem or two thrown in. I suspect you would as well in that case. You've been bamboozled.  Willingly, it seems

[ChiGoose]

9 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

You're lost dude. I'd call it a sham  if it was an all republican committee with a Manchin like dem or two thrown in. I suspect you would as well in that case. You've been bamboozled.  Willingly, it seems

 

I know that @DRsGhostis simply a troll with a skull so thick that no facts could possibly hope to penetrate it, but in case anyone else reads their statement and thinks they might be making a point, I would look at the witnesses who have testified under oath versus the witnesses that have been called to testify under oath but refuse. The answer lies in those two lists.

[BillsFanNC]

5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I know that @DRsGhostis simply a troll with a skull so thick that no facts could possibly hope to penetrate it, but in case anyone else reads their statement and thinks they might be making a point, I would look at the witnesses who have testified under oath versus the witnesses that have been called to testify under oath but refuse. The answer lies in those two lists.

 

Kash Patel did. I noticed you excluded him from your list of those who testified. And he wants his testimony released. In full. Since you've been watching this sham in its entirety to provide us with updates, why don't you tell us how much of Kash Patels testimony, who was a key government player involved in providing security on J6, has been shared by this committee?

 

I don't need to watch any of it to tell everyone it's been zero, zip, zilch, nada.

 

You're a moron.

[Wacka]

How many days did this liberal circle jerk go on?

[BillsFanNC]

Just now, Wacka said:

How many days did this liberal circle jerk go on?

 

It will go on right up to election day. Bank on it.  It's all they think they have.

[BillStime]

49 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

You're lost dude. I'd call it a sham  if it was an all republican committee with a Manchin like dem or two thrown in. I suspect you would as well in that case. You've been bamboozled.  Willingly, it seems

 

idiots 

[ChiGoose]

2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Kash Patel did. I noticed you excluded him from your list of those who testified. And he wants his testimony released. In full. Since you've been watching this sham in its entirety to provide us with updates, why don't you tell us how much of Kash Patels testimony, who was a key government player involved in providing security on J6, has been shared by this committee?

 

I don't need to watch any of it to tell everyone it's been zero, zip, zilch, nada.

 

You're a moron.

 

I didn't include Patel as someone whose testimony we've seen because we have not seen it. I know that comprehension is difficult for you, but maybe give it a shot some time. Also, it's already been noted that the committee plans to release all of the transcripts in September. Patel is just grandstanding because he knows that gullible people will believe there's some bombshell the committee is hiding. He is hoping that the same people who are easy marks for obvious grifting will also swallow the unbelievable line that all of the Trump employees, campaign workers, appointees, and supporters who are testifying under oath are partisan hacks.

 

If you did watch the hearings, you would have heard Donald Trump on tape committing a crime. You also would have heard sworn testimony that he was taking actions that he had been informed multiple times were illegal. But your ignorance is your bliss, and you must be incredibly blissful.

 

You're a barely literate troll and I feel bad for anyone who thinks you've ever contributed anything of merit to any discussion.

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

15 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I didn't include Patel as someone whose testimony we've seen because we have not seen it. I know that comprehension is difficult for you, but maybe give it a shot some time. Also, it's already been noted that the committee plans to release all of the transcripts in September. Patel is just grandstanding because he knows that gullible people will believe there's some bombshell the committee is hiding. He is hoping that the same people who are easy marks for obvious grifting will also swallow the unbelievable line that all of the Trump employees, campaign workers, appointees, and supporters who are testifying under oath are partisan hacks.

 

If you did watch the hearings, you would have heard Donald Trump on tape committing a crime. You also would have heard sworn testimony that he was taking actions that he had been informed multiple times were illegal. But your ignorance is your bliss, and you must be incredibly blissful.

 

You're a barely literate troll and I feel bad for anyone who thinks you've ever contributed anything of merit to any discussion.

 

 

 

Let's make a bet right now.

 

If they release all of Kash Patels testimony, IN FULL, by the end of September I will leave here forever. I will personally PM SDS and ask him to delete my account.

 

If they don't release his testimony,  iN FULL, by the end of September you will do the same.

 

Deal?

 

Or are you the coward that I know that you are?

[716er]

^^^^

 

your brain on Trump

 

 

[Doc]

13 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Let's make a bet right now.

 

If they release all of Kash Patels testimony, IN FULL, by the end of September I will leave here forever. I will personally PM SDS and ask him to delete my account.

 

If they don't release his testimony,  iN FULL, by the end of September you will do the same.

 

Deal?

 

Or are you the coward that I know that you are?

 

That's not a fair bet.  Even Chi knows they won't release it.  And knows why they won't.

[ChiGoose]

21 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Let's make a bet right now.

 

If they release all of Kash Patels testimony, IN FULL, by the end of September I will leave here forever. I will personally PM SDS and ask him to delete my account.

 

If they don't release his testimony,  iN FULL, by the end of September you will do the same.

 

Deal?

 

Or are you the coward that I know that you are?

 

The problem is that even if they release it in full, Patel will likely claim that it's doctored. Nor do I have any trust that you, someone who has yet to have an original thought, would be trustworthy enough to actually follow through on this.

 

But if they do not release Patel's testimony, I will change my icon to a picture to one of Tom Brady for a full year. I do not require any action on your part.

[BillsFanNC]

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

The problem is that even if they release it in full, Patel will likely claim that it's doctored. Nor do I have any trust that you, someone who has yet to have an original thought, would be trustworthy enough to actually follow through on this.

 

But if they do not release Patel's testimony, I will change my icon to a picture to one of Tom Brady for a full year. I do not require any action on your part.

 

Yep. Coward.

[716er]

Also who would bet a poster to leave if said poster has been banned multiple times yet continues to return as someone else?

[ChiGoose]

15 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Yep. Coward.

 

Reeks of the pathetic "debate me" garbage of the Ben Shapiro types. What a joke.