Jump to content

Say what you will about Belichick, but this is pretty awesome


dave mcbride

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Seriously, read it. It’s very interesting.

Historical memory at the drop of a hat, narrative of increasing specialization, and explanation why at the professional level, it's very difficult for a specialist to be good at other specialized positions (such as punter and kicker.) Obviously a bright guy and endearing if you like rooting for the dark side. I take rivalries in sports to be equatable with the antagonisms of professional wrestling. The difference is the particular obnoxious qualities of certain fan bases adds a charge to the animous. Anyway, it's fun to revile the Sith Lord and Tom Terrific. ESPN sycophancy over the years has also contributed to why they are fun to hate, but as human beings, of course, they possess admirable qualities . . . alright, folks, go ahead and report😈

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

He is the best defensive mind of all time and the best special teams mind of all time. 

 

 

Along with overconfidence off of the 51 - 3 drubbing of the Raiders and consequent partying to excess before the game, he's the main reason we haven't won a Super Bowl. But yes, a gifted SOB.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Historical memory at the drop of a hat, narrative of increasing specialization, and explanation why at the professional level, it's very difficult for a specialist to be good at other specialized positions (such as punter and kicker.) Obviously a bright guy and endearing if you like rooting for the dark side. I take rivalries in sports to be equatable with the antagonisms of professional wrestling. The difference is the particular obnoxious qualities of certain fan bases adds a charge to the animous. Anyway, it's fun to revile the Sith Lord and Tom Terrific. ESPN sycophancy over the years has also contributed to why they are fun to hate, but as human beings, of course, they possess admirable qualities . . . alright, folks, go ahead and report😈

After videotaping practices, stealing playbooks, videotaping super bowl walkthroughs, using late substitutions/formations that are banned the next season, misrepresenting injury reports, having “doctors” that aren’t medical doctors supplying “supplements” to the team, and having support staff that refers to himself as “the Deflator, 

we’re all super evil for expecting the worst from a superlative character who should probably replace Lombardi’s name from the trophy. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, benderbender said:

After videotaping practices, stealing playbooks, videotaping super bowl walkthroughs, using late substitutions/formations that are banned the next season, misrepresenting injury reports, having “doctors” that aren’t medical doctors supplying “supplements” to the team, and having support staff that refers to himself as “the Deflator, 

we’re all super evil for expecting the worst from a superlative character who should probably replace Lombardi’s name from the trophy. 

Keep that up, and this thread will get moved to 'P, P, & P'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, benderbender said:

After videotaping practices, stealing playbooks, videotaping super bowl walkthroughs, using late substitutions/formations that are banned the next season, misrepresenting injury reports, having “doctors” that aren’t medical doctors supplying “supplements” to the team, and having support staff that refers to himself as “the Deflator, 

we’re all super evil for expecting the worst from a superlative character who should probably replace Lombardi’s name from the trophy. 

Yeah, but the Nazis clearly had the best uniforms.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

Oh yeah, that mitigates everything. 🙄

*
😁

Naturally, one cannot condone illicit activities or grave evil, but sartorial splendour is underrated.

(Didn't want to answer seriously and thought the fella might implicitly recognize his ire was not apt for humorous badinage.)

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

An uncomfortable but true thing.

If one is being serious (against my intentions here, actually,) the fascist aesthetic as a whole, its heavy-handed "monumental" giganticism, the sort of thing evident in Speer's architecture for instance is grandiose, oppressive, obvious, as well as jejune. The idolization of heroic, youthful masculinity, when scrutinized, indicates a truly immature state, a lack of developed capacity to recognize beauty in the ephemeral, the imperfect, that which endures time and its complexities. All that said, they nailed the uniforms.

Edited by Dr. Who
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just didn't want to answer any other questions, so he took up all the time answering the least important question he received.

 

And he must be getting soft in his old age. Telling stories from the good old days of football to the young whippersnappers in the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

If one is being serious (against my intentions here, actually,) the fascist aesthetic as a whole, its heavy-handed "monumental" giganticism, the sort of thing evident in Speer's architecture for instance is grandiose, oppressive, obvious, as well as jejune. The idolization of heroic, youthful masculinity, when scrutinized, indicates a truly immature state, a lack of developed capacity to recognize beauty in the ephemeral, the imperfect, that which endures time and its complexities. All that said, they nailed the uniforms.

You are preaching to the choir. (But at least it’s an ethos!)

 

Btw, re: the uniforms, you know that Hugo Boss was a designer of them, right? A real ad:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.20a937c9087fe9a3a572bce7ef1128e2.jpeg

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MJS said:

He just didn't want to answer any other questions, so he took up all the time answering the least important question he received.

 

And he must be getting soft in his old age. Telling stories from the good old days of football to the young whippersnappers in the media.

I don't see it that way. He never answers anything from the media that is relevant to his teams circumstances. A reporter gave him a chance to talk about something he enjoys that's isn't relevant to his team in the moment and he showed he's happy to talk, was even thankful for being asked such a question. I think he respected the question more than anything, which is why he elaborated so much.  I found it interesting. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

I can say what I want? He is a proven cheater and every year without Tom he looks more like a great DC and a below average HC. 

To be fair. I can't think of any coach in the modern era that has won multiple Super Bowls without a good QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

You are preaching to the choir. (But at least it’s an ethos!)

 

Btw, re: the uniforms, you know that Hugo Boss was a designer of them, right? A real ad:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.20a937c9087fe9a3a572bce7ef1128e2.jpeg

 

Say what you will about the tenants of national socialism dude. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...