Afghanistan

[Tenhigh]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ya I know, when has this country ever accepted immigrants! It's crazy, right? 

 

👩‍🎓

I was going to make a joke about spitting your mom's basement into TWO rooms, but I am trying to be nicer today. 

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

I was going to make a joke about spitting your mom's basement into TWO rooms, but I am trying to be nicer today. 

Where would we put the hot water heater??? 

[Tenhigh]

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Where would we put the hot water heater??? 

You'll have to store your hot plate on top of the mini-fridge.  

[B-Man]

 

 

                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Ya I know, when has this country ever accepted immigrants! It's crazy, right? 

 

👩‍🎓

Here's a fun fact.  Are you aware that moving people from 3rd world countries into the US contributes to climate change? How you say?  Because the carbon footprint and the resource consumption rate of an average American is multiples of the carbon footprint and resource consumption rate of people in the 3rd world.  And as they adopt a US type lifestyle their carbon output increases to a US lifestyle which incrementally increases the overall US carbon footprint at a rate greater than it decreases the carbon output rate in their previous country. 

 

So either you're into unlimited immigration which floods the country with energy consuming and carbon producing new residents or fighting climate change by keeping everyone in their home country with their lower carbon output, but you can't do both.  My suggestion is we ship two climate change virtue signalers to the 3rd world for every immigrant entering the country, allow them to adopt that low carbon footprint lifestyle, cut overall carbon emissions, convert their virtue signalling into virtue action, and save the planet.  Send them to say Guatemala.  Good idea? 

Edited September 9, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

No one does global capitalism better than china

 

https://nypost.com/2021/08/16/china-ready-to-deepen-relationship-with-afghanistan/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=message_app

 

 

[Westside]

34 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

No one does global capitalism better than china

 

https://nypost.com/2021/08/16/china-ready-to-deepen-relationship-with-afghanistan/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=message_app

 

 

I wonder if they will send china joe a thank you gift basket for handing over Afghanistan’s natural resources to them?

 

I’m sure the “big guy” will get his ten percent.

[Motorin']

48 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

No one does global capitalism better than china

 

https://nypost.com/2021/08/16/china-ready-to-deepen-relationship-with-afghanistan/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=message_app

 

 

 

And yet nearly all of their major banking and fiance corporations are owned by the state. 

 

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

17 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

And yet nearly all of their major banking and fiance corporations are owned by the state. 

 

 

When I say global I mean outside of China. They are one massive hyper capitalist corporation that’s buying up the world. 

[Motorin']

34 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

When I say global I mean outside of China. They are one massive hyper capitalist corporation that’s buying up the world. 

 

I know, and that corporation is owned by the Chinese government. 

 

Unless you can buy share? 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

31 minutes ago, Bidens_basement said:

I wonder if they will send china joe a thank you gift basket for handing over Afghanistan’s natural resources to them?

 

I’m sure the “big guy” will get his ten percent.

I’ve finally understood something that makes a little more sense about the hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan ceding control to the Taliban, the Chinese basically being ceded the mineral exploration and gladly taking, Biden family connection to a Chinese ev battery firm and the objective, Major us corporations looking to source cheap ev tech 

[Doc]

8 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I’ve finally understood something that makes a little more sense about the hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan ceding control to the Taliban, the Chinese basically being ceded the mineral exploration and gladly taking, Biden family connection to a Chinese ev battery firm and the objective, Major us corporations looking to source cheap ev tech 

 

That's why he's called Beijing Biden.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

1 hour ago, Motorin' said:

 

I know, and that corporation is owned by the Chinese government. 

 

Unless you can buy share? 

No that corporation is the Chinese government.  And business is booming, really shows what you can do when you have people motivated to work, hungry mentally tough and not coddled by a nanny state.

 

 

CNY is one way to buy in… it’ll probably be on par in 10 years. 

[SoCal Deek]

On 9/9/2021 at 9:08 AM, Tiberius said:

Ya I know, when has this country ever accepted immigrants! It's crazy, right? 

 

👩‍🎓

OK wise guy

My grandparents had to live on two continents until my grandfather could prove he could support my grandmother and mother. 
Catch a frickin clue!!!

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

                                    

[B-Man]

 

 

Remember when Biden talked to Ghani about how important optics were?

 

Then after the terror bombing in Kabul he struck quickly, claiming to have killed two high level ISIS people that they wouldn’t give us the names of?

 

Another lie, as we actually droned the innocent family of Zemari Ahmadi. 

 

The car that was supposed to be filled with explosives? It was water he was bringing home to his family.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000007963596/us-drone-attack-kabul-investigation.html

 

 

 

 

 

[Big Blitz]

McCaul: Interpreters Still in Afghanistan Are ‘Gone’ – ‘The Taliban Will Not Allow Them to Leave’ and They’re ‘Already Being Executed’

 

 

On Monday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Situation Room,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Michael McCaul (R-TX) stated that there are around 10,000 interpreters who worked with U.S. forces still in Afghanistan, and they “are gone. The Taliban will not allow them to leave.” And are “already being executed."

 

McCaul said, “The interpreters who worked with our special forces, they are gone. The Taliban will not allow them to leave.”

 

McCaul responded, “Special Immigrant Visas, these are the guys that worked right with our special forces. The Taliban views them as the worst of the worst. Because they betrayed, in their view, their country and they worked with the infidel.”

 

Blitzer then asked, “How many people are you talking about?”

 

McCaul answered, “We’re — about 10,000, and if you multiply it by family, that’s about three times that.”

 

Blitzer then asked, “So, you think they’re going to be stuck? They’re never going to get out?”

 

McCaul responded, “They’re already being executed. We’re already getting stories of families and interpreters being executed by the Taliban.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/09/13/mccaul-interpreters-still-in-afghanistan-are-gone-the-taliban-will-not-allow-them-to-leave-and-theyre-already-being-executed/

[Big Blitz]

 

[Doc]

Not only is bombing in innocent family terrible on its own, the fact that there was no terrorist attack afterwards means they don’t have any intelligence at all in the region.

[B-Man]

 

 

Pentagon defends drone strike in Kabul that reportedly killed civilians

by Mark Lungariello & Steven Nelson

 

The Pentagon defended a deadly August drone strike in Kabul on Monday – despite a report that the attack actually killed an innocent man and his family. 

 

https://nypost.com/2021/09/13/pentagon-defends-kabul-drone-strike-that-reportedly-killed-civilians/

 

 

[BillStime]

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Pentagon defends drone strike in Kabul that reportedly killed civilians

by Mark Lungariello & Steven Nelson

 

The Pentagon defended a deadly August drone strike in Kabul on Monday – despite a report that the attack actually killed an innocent man and his family. 

 

https://nypost.com/2021/09/13/pentagon-defends-kabul-drone-strike-that-reportedly-killed-civilians/

 

 

 

Very sad and unfortunate, right?

 

BTW, how many civilians did Trump mistakenly kill via drone strikes on his watch?  Did you report upon those?

 

Another question - why did Trump do this?

 

Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths

The Trump administration said the rule was "superfluous" and distracting.

 

Oh:

 

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

[B-Man]

23 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

BTW, how many civilians did Trump mistakenly kill via drone strikes on his watch?  Did you report upon those?

 

 

 

He just can't help himself.

 

He drags around the picture of the poor Sandy Hook children, using as a prop,

 

and then when someone comments on the LIE that the Biden administration told about their disastrous drone strike,

 

what do we get ?

 

 

Trump, Trump, Trump.

 

Sad indeed.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

He just can't help himself.

 

He drags around the picture of the poor Sandy Hook children, using as a prop,

 

and then when someone comments on the LIE that the Biden administration told about their disastrous drone strike,

 

what do we get ?

 

 

Trump, Trump, Trump.

 

Sad indeed.

 

 

 

The typical response by someone who can’t handle his own reality when confronted w really inconvenient facts.

 

To be expected from the cult.

[B-Man]

 

 

Thanks Joe.

 

 

 

 

 

What a illustrative  response from Billzy, talks about not facing reality when his own posts reak of it.

 

Correction.

14 minutes ago, BillStime said:

The typical What about Trump response by someone who can’t handle his own reality when confronted w really inconvenient facts.

 

To be expected from Billstime

 

 

 

Edited September 14, 2021 by B-Man

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Thanks Joe.

 

 

 

 

What a illustrative  response from Billzy, talks about not facing reality when his own posts reak of it.

 

Correction.

 

 

 

You really wanted to put some distance between your absurd comments about drone strikes didn’t you? 
 

[B-Man]

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

You really wanted to put some distance between your absurd comments about drone strikes didn’t you? 

 

Heck no !

 

Again that is YOU, not me.

 

My posts are pertinent to the thread, yours are....................well, attempts at distractions is the nicest way to put it.

 

 

Posted 15 hours ago

 

Remember when Biden talked to Ghani about how important optics were?

 

Then after the terror bombing in Kabul he struck quickly, claiming to have killed two high level ISIS people that they wouldn’t give us the names of?

 

Another lie, as we actually droned the innocent family of Zemari Ahmadi. 

 

The car that was supposed to be filled with explosives? It was water he was bringing home to his family.

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000007963596/us-drone-attack-kabul-investigation.html

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Heck no !

 

Again that is YOU, not me.

 

My posts are pertinent to the thread, yours are....................well, attempts at distractions is the nicest way to put it.

 

 

Posted 15 hours ago

 

Remember when Biden talked to Ghani about how important optics were?

 

Then after the terror bombing in Kabul he struck quickly, claiming to have killed two high level ISIS people that they wouldn’t give us the names of?

 

Another lie, as we actually droned the innocent family of Zemari Ahmadi. 

 

The car that was supposed to be filled with explosives? It was water he was bringing home to his family.

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000007963596/us-drone-attack-kabul-investigation.html

Thats why you spammed the board with almost 20 tweets in a row?

 

Hysterical Bonnie

 

[wnyguy]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Very sad and unfortunate, right?

 

BTW, how many civilians did Trump mistakenly kill via drone strikes on his watch?  Did you report upon those?

 

Another question - why did Trump do this?

 

Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths

The Trump administration said the rule was "superfluous" and distracting.

 

Oh:

 

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

Come on Billstime for once, just once, have a response to the incredible incompetency that the current administration is displaying without bringing up Trump. Just admit, despite all of Trumps mistakes and failures, that the current administration is an embarrassment to you and me.

[BillStime]

53 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

Come on Billstime for once, just once, have a response to the incredible incompetency that the current administration is displaying without bringing up Trump. Just admit, despite all of Trumps mistakes and failures, that the current administration is an embarrassment to you and me.

 

Trump set the bar low... real low.

 

Take off your sugar coated Trump glasses for once.

 

[B-Man]

Sugar-coating.

 

 

To this point, not a single resignation from the Biden administration has been tendered, and Blinken is busy at work gaslighting the American people about what transpired. Yet, while most of the hearing is only serving as an opportunity for grandstanding, Sen. Mitt Romney did elicit one damning admission.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

Well, isn't this qute:

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

5 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Very sad and unfortunate, right?

 

BTW, how many civilians did Trump mistakenly kill via drone strikes on his watch?  Did you report upon those?

 

Another question - why did Trump do this?

 

Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths

The Trump administration said the rule was "superfluous" and distracting.

 

Oh:

 

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

That' might be a good question.  I don't know the answer.  But I'm not hear to defend Trump.  The problem is Democrats get judged by different set of criteria and so do others that serve the needs of their elite 1% masters.   

 

When a republican (unless they're Bush's or Chaney's or some other American "royal" family) lies or is involved in an act of indiscretion or some other negative situation they get exposed and have to deal with the consequences.  And if that doesn't work it gets taken to the next level and the government and the media make up a bunch of stuff and push those narratives. 

When a democrat lies or is involved in an act of indiscretion or some other negative situation nothing ever happens.  There are no government investigations or charges or hearings and the media whitewashes the story, suppresses any voices communicating or reporting on it, and ignores it until it goes away. That's today's reality. 

 

You can bet if somebody outside the protected political class screwed the pooch like Biden did on the Afghanistan withdrawal there would be House and Senate hearings already scheduled and talk of invoking the 25th or Impeachment.  But senile Old Joe gets a full pass.  Because he's protected.  If this was a Mafia operation, a characterization which hits close to the truth, you'd call him a Made Man.  So he gets a pass, for his "successful" withdrawal.  I heard it put best.  The administration's spin on the successful withdrawal is like celebrating the sinking of the Titanic as the most successful life boat rescue mission ever. 

 

[Doc]

5 hours ago, BillStime said:

Very sad and unfortunate, right?

 

BTW, how many civilians did Trump mistakenly kill via drone strikes on his watch?  Did you report upon those?

 

Another question - why did Trump do this?

 

Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths

The Trump administration said the rule was "superfluous" and distracting.

 

Oh:

 

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

 

Same question, but about Obama.

[sherpa]

Can we possibly stop conversations about presidents killing people with drone strikes?

The assignment of blame is a senseless, idiotic exercise.

 

The way this works is that the CIA, NSA, or some other intel agency suggests a strike on a specific target.

The president either approves it or he doesn't, but generally he does, if that is the recommendation from those authorities.

[B-Man]

 

 

Looks like the WH has chosen their "fall guy"

 

 

 

[BillStime]

4 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That' might be a good question.  I don't know the answer.  But I'm not hear to defend Trump.  The problem is Democrats get judged by different set of criteria and so do others that serve the needs of their elite 1% masters.   

 

When a republican (unless they're Bush's or Chaney's or some other American "royal" family) lies or is involved in an act of indiscretion or some other negative situation they get exposed and have to deal with the consequences.  And if that doesn't work it gets taken to the next level and the government and the media make up a bunch of stuff and push those narratives. 

When a democrat lies or is involved in an act of indiscretion or some other negative situation nothing ever happens.  There are no government investigations or charges or hearings and the media whitewashes the story, suppresses any voices communicating or reporting on it, and ignores it until it goes away. That's today's reality. 

 

You can bet if somebody outside the protected political class screwed the pooch like Biden did on the Afghanistan withdrawal there would be House and Senate hearings already scheduled and talk of invoking the 25th or Impeachment.  But senile Old Joe gets a full pass.  Because he's protected.  If this was a Mafia operation, a characterization which hits close to the truth, you'd call him a Made Man.  So he gets a pass, for his "successful" withdrawal.  I heard it put best.  The administration's spin on the successful withdrawal is like celebrating the sinking of the Titanic as the most successful life boat rescue mission ever. 

 

1%:

 

 

Nothing happens to Democrats?

 

Katy Hill, Al Franken, and Andrew Cuomo would love a word with you… meanwhile, the twice impeached loser of a president got off with everything as he pissed all over his oath and constitution. 
 

No government investigations? Are you serious? How many Benghazi investigations did the Republicans host that resulted in how many indictments?

 

Democrats hold their people accountable - meanwhile - you elect this:

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

19 minutes ago, BillStime said:

1%:

 

 

Nothing happens to Democrats?

 

Katy Hill, Al Franken, and Andrew Cuomo would love a word with you… meanwhile, the twice impeached loser of a president got off with everything as he pissed all over his oath and constitution. 
 

No government investigations? Are you serious? How many Benghazi investigations did the Republicans host that resulted in how many indictments?

 

Democrats hold their people accountable - meanwhile - you elect this:

 

If memory serves me well nobody was held accountable for Benghazi.  It was all  act.  Also, we never did find out who in the Obama administration gave the stand-down order to the rescue mission that was in-flight during the attack.  So no accountability there either.  

 

So beyond the ridiculous idea that Trump is to blame (and curiously that they could change everything his administration put in place except this) for there terribly timed and executed withdrawal "plan" who is or will be held accountable for the Afghan withdrawal disaster?  How many people will resign or be fired?  I suggest we put a pin back in the grenade on this one until this all plays out but my bet is nobody in the Administration, the Pentagon, or the Intelligence Community is going to be held accountable.  The nobody could have seen this coming excuse will prevail.  And the party operatives in the media will work overtime to bury the story until it fades.

[BillStime]

3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

If memory serves me well nobody was held accountable for Benghazi.  It was all  act.  Also, we never did find out who in the Obama administration gave the stand-down order to the rescue mission that was in-flight during the attack.  So no accountability there either.  

 

So beyond the ridiculous idea that Trump is to blame (and curiously that they could change everything his administration put in place except this) for there terribly timed and executed withdrawal "plan" who is or will be held accountable for the Afghan withdrawal disaster?  How many people will resign or be fired?  I suggest we put a pin back in the grenade on this one until this all plays out but my bet is nobody in the Administration, the Pentagon, or the Intelligence Community is going to be held accountable.  The nobody could have seen this coming excuse will prevail.  And the party operatives in the media will work overtime to bury the story until it fades.

 

What would you do without conspiracy?

 

And January 6 is the result of Trump never being held accountable for anything during his presidency.

 

Get out of here with your bs.

 

[TSOL]

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

What would you do without conspiracy?

 

And January 6 is the result of TRUMP

 

never being held accountable for anything during his presidency.

 

Get out of here with your bs.

 

  

 

Did someone activate the Trump signal?  

[B-Man]

6 minutes ago, TSOL said:

  

 

Did someone activate the Trump signal?  

 

 

No.

 

He is just trying (and failing) to distract from the real Afghanistan news.

 

 

 

 

No conspiracy.......................fact.