Jump to content

Tucker Carlson


T&C

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

And it takes Ol' Tarheel to provide the 10 second summary.

 

Could someone pass him a message that I thank him from the bottom of my heart.

 

Love,

TFR

in all that time you could have actually gained knowledge.

 

but chose to troll for replies and talk about other posters.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Glad to see we have another participant here who also thinks journalists should behave like politicians.

Tucker went from being a never Trumper to cheerleading for Trump to saying he hates him passionately to ... cheerleading for Trump. Getting richer all the way.

Have you been paying attention?  Journalism in the traditional sense died after the 2016 election.  With few exceptions, they're all activists pushing one view or another.     

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

in all that time you could have actually gained knowledge.

 

but chose to troll for replies and talk about other posters.

 

between this low-end, trolling and you guys going full blown racist on the GOP debate thread, you outed yourselves as being what you claim to hate.

 

 

 

Finding Qanon was much less of a bore when he was finding Qanon around every corner.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Oh, I gained knowledge all right. 600 pages of "Q Analysis," enthusiastically supported and honored by many still here today.

I had no idea how lost and insane some people are.

???  from the video you didn't watch?

 

but do agree that quite a few people still talk about blue anon conspiracies nonstop in here.  but then again, they have absolutely no integrity left and should just be ignored.  they offer nothing but lies and script.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

???  from the video you didn't watch?

 

but do agree that quite a few people still talk about blue anon conspiracies nonstop in here.  but then again, they have absolutely no integrity left and should just be ignored.  they offer nothing but lies and script.

 

 

 

I guess that's why you didn't adopt the moniker "DR's Little Brother"

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Court Jester better get on his meds!

 

JUST IN — Tucker Carlson is reportedly in discussions to interview Vladimir Putin, as reported by RT.

 

Notably, the NSA spied on Tucker Carlson to prevent a pre-war interview with Putin, potentially stopping the American public from gaining insight into Putin's perspective before the US-Russia proxy war in Ukraine.

 

Tucker's reputation for asking insightful questions, particularly those critical of the U.S. military-industrial complex, coupled with his potential to provide Putin with an unfiltered platform, adds a notable layer of significance.

 

Ironically, those who champion democratic ideals while advocating for an escalation of the conflict between major nuclear powers seem determined to impede America's most viewed journalist from conveying Russia's viewpoint through its President.

Given an intensifying conflict between nuclear superpowers, shouldn't the public have access to all perspectives to better understand the situation?

 

Shouldn't Western democracies allow citizens to form their own judgments from the available information?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Court Jester better get on his meds!

 

JUST IN — Tucker Carlson is reportedly in discussions to interview Vladimir Putin, as reported by RT.

 

Notably, the NSA spied on Tucker Carlson to prevent a pre-war interview with Putin, potentially stopping the American public from gaining insight into Putin's perspective before the US-Russia proxy war in Ukraine.

 

Tucker's reputation for asking insightful questions, particularly those critical of the U.S. military-industrial complex, coupled with his potential to provide Putin with an unfiltered platform, adds a notable layer of significance.

 

Ironically, those who champion democratic ideals while advocating for an escalation of the conflict between major nuclear powers seem determined to impede America's most viewed journalist from conveying Russia's viewpoint through its President.

Given an intensifying conflict between nuclear superpowers, shouldn't the public have access to all perspectives to better understand the situation?

 

Shouldn't Western democracies allow citizens to form their own judgments from the available information?

 

 

 

Does he really need to do an interview with Putin Tucker? Carlson spits out Russian propaganda on a daily basis

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

 

 

 

Full transcript of exclusive Putin interview with NBC News' Keir Simmons

Full transcript of the interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin by Keir Simmons of NBC News, which took place in Moscow on June 11, 2021.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/transcript-nbc-news-exclusive-interview-russia-s-vladimir-putin-n1270649

 

 

 

Barbara Walters Interviews Vladimir Putin

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/video/barbara-walters-interviews-vladimir-putin-1103971/

 

 

 

Charlie Rose interviewed the Russian president on an episode of “60 Minutes” in 2015.

https://charlierose.com/videos/22696

 

 

Look at all those Putin lackeys..............LOL

 

.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Did you get that from Schiff?

 

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

I got that straight off of Tucker Carlson show

 

You wouldn’t see it because you’re too far droned

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Full transcript of exclusive Putin interview with NBC News' Keir Simmons

Full transcript of the interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin by Keir Simmons of NBC News, which took place in Moscow on June 11, 2021.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/transcript-nbc-news-exclusive-interview-russia-s-vladimir-putin-n1270649

 

 

 

Barbara Walters Interviews Vladimir Putin

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/video/barbara-walters-interviews-vladimir-putin-1103971/

 

 

 

Charlie Rose interviewed the Russian president on an episode of “60 Minutes” in 2015.

https://charlierose.com/videos/22696

 

 

Look at all those Putin lackeys..............LOL

 

.

There is a bit of a difference here
Those same reporters came back and did not parrot what Putin said whenever they got the opportunity

 

Tucker Carlson parents, what Putin says, without even interviewing him

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Does he really need to do an interview with Putin Tucker? Carlson spits out Russian propaganda on a daily basis


Im sorry, is an entire media apparatus pushing pro-Ukraine propaganda daily across every major news outlet not enough for you?

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I got that straight off of Tucker Carlson show

 

You wouldn’t see it because you’re too far droned

There is a bit of a difference here
Those same reporters came back and did not parrot what Putin said whenever they got the opportunity

 

Tucker Carlson parents, what Putin says, without even interviewing him

How do you square your statements defending politicians spreading propaganda about illegitimate/stolen elections v a guy in the media doing it?  
 

If it’s acceptable in pursuit of service in higher office, why is it a problem here?  

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Which part of it do you feel is propaganda I see a beat the ***** country that got invaded by another country. Do you see something different?

Was the euro maiden organic or a western action to take out a Nonwestern supportive leader?  wouldn't be the first time?  follows the /Kissinger doctrine of proactive actions for the benefit of the west/EU

 

Or even the fact it's about an energy source to EU?  We kind of have this bad record of doing about anything for that.

 

 

 

 

Nolan giving out cookies in the middle of it, didn't help the optics.

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Which part of it do you feel is propaganda I see a beat the ***** country that got invaded by another country. Do you see something different?


Yes, I see propaganda. 
 

Regardless of how you feel, our media’s role is not to root for a side in such a way that it affects their reporting, thus cosplaying like it’s a Hollywood war flick. 
 

Our media has fallen for fake story after fake story… they suppress any talk regarding the history of Ukraine/Russia, areas like the Donbas & corruption within the country. 
 

They barely question our country for blank checks and unsupervised spending. 
 

We have no idea what’s actually going on over there because positive developments for Ukraine are reported on while negative developments are downplayed. 
 

Western media is simply an extension of the government when it comes to war. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2023 at 5:16 AM, SCBills said:


Yes, I see propaganda. 
 

Regardless of how you feel, our media’s role is not to root for a side in such a way that it affects their reporting, thus cosplaying like it’s a Hollywood war flick. 
 

Our media has fallen for fake story after fake story… they suppress any talk regarding the history of Ukraine/Russia, areas like the Donbas & corruption within the country. 
 

They barely question our country for blank checks and unsupervised spending. 
 

We have no idea what’s actually going on over there because positive developments for Ukraine are reported on while negative developments are downplayed. 
 

Western media is simply an extension of the government when it comes to war. 

Just which part of this do you feel is fake

On 8/30/2023 at 7:22 PM, SCBills said:

Too accurate ha…

 

 

Hey, how did they get the facial recognition exactly right on Tucker? That’s exactly what he looks like on a daily basis.

On 8/30/2023 at 1:17 PM, BillsFanNC said:

 

Given, who has been assassinated, who has been a president or holds the presidential position this is very foolish. It’s the Republicans who are making the threats and they’re mindless drones.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Episode 21:

 

 


Agrees with Portnoy that both Biden and Trump are too old to be President .. going to be interesting to see if he goes on a Truth Social rampage against him. 
 

I “think” he’s smart enough to leave that alone.  He doesn’t want smoke with Tucker. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Given, who has been assassinated, who has been a president or holds the presidential position this is very foolish. It’s the Republicans who are making the threats and they’re mindless drones.

LMAO.  Any more MSM narratives you want to share.

 

while calling others drones.

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ALF said:

Cool another conspiracy 

How is this a conspiracy? These people aren’t hired as whistleblowers AGAINST the agencies. They’re generally hired because they AGREE with the agencies. That doesn’t make them evil….it just makes them normal! The mistake is thinking that what they report is objective journalism. 

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clapper, Brennan, Dilanian, Figlizzi etc..

 

All former IC individuals now "contributors" in corporate media fueling much of the BS of the past eight years.

 

What Tucker claimed about anchors at these very same outlets should surprise no one outside of the usual useful idiot crowd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Clapper, Brennan, Dilanian, Figlizzi etc..

 

All former IC individuals now "contributors" in corporate media fueling much of the BS of the past eight years.

 

What Tucker claimed about anchors at these very same outlets should surprise no one outside of the usual useful idiot crowd. 

I'm positive the AG is preparing conspiracy and false statement charges against these former IC officials and others for the knowingly false statements about the Hunter laptop origin that imisinformed 2020 voters and interfered with the election.

 

Sadly, I jest. As we all know no such thing is going to happen as these chaps are above the law.

 

And there's no proof!  Just a publicly published letter full of lies.  But again, no proof,!  Say it again, no proof.  Now say it like you believe it!

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...