RochesterRob Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, Joe in Winslow said: Picard wears silk robes Kirk > Picard Kirk beat the Gorn with a makeshift cannon. Picard would try to negotiate with the Gorn well after the Gorn was pummeling Picard into the ground. In any event I am surprised that anything resembling an alpha male captain would be allowed in 2020. "We must continue to negotiate with the Klingons. Counselor Troi, do you sense any hostility?" would be the final sentences uttered by a 2020 captain before his ship was blown into pieces. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Adam Schiff has shrunk his nose. Maybe Shifty is intentionally telling lies so that his nose grows long enough for some auto-erotic freakiness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/01/26/772057/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=772057&utm_content=0&utm_campaign=PostPromoterPro Democratic Reps. Jerrold Nadler (NY), Hakeem Jeffries (NY) and Zoe Lofgren (CA), who have excoriated the President in the Senate trial over withholding aid to Ukraine during a time of war, all said “nay” to House Resolution 2810, the National Defense Authorization Act, which included the funding for Ukraine. The video below shows them railing against Trump. Jeffries tells the Senators, “Ukraine is a fragile democracy under relentless attack from Russian-backed separatists. They desperately…need…our…support.” “Back in 2018, there was the National Defense Authorization Act. It had $250 million in aid to Ukraine and Nadler, Lofgren and Jeffries, all of whom are impeachment managers, voted against that legislation. And last year, on December 11, Nadler voted against $300 million in aid. That was two days after he chaired a Judiciary Committee hearing on impeachment and a week before he led the effort on the House floor to impeach the President of the United States. The hypocrisy of the Left on full display that their media minions hide to mislead America. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, RochesterRob said: Tiberius becoming increasingly aroused for some reason. Pencil neck and pencil nose. What's left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 57 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Well, on the bright side, it's not like the impeachment farce has anything to do with democracy. He won't be missing anything (you know, other than the continued dismantling of their bullcrap.) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 a primer on what to expect tomorrow. thread. https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1221101347518517248 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 What’s the final result of all of this? Does Tom Shillue get an award for portraying Adam Schiff? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, njbuff said: What’s the final result of all of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 right out of the Kavanaugh playbook. did we really expect anything different? the Dems are going to get crushed by the WHC defense so they needed something to distract and whala, Bolton to the rescue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 8 minutes ago, Foxx said: right out of the Kavanaugh playbook. did we really expect anything different? the Dems are going to get crushed by the WHC defense so they needed something to distract and whala, Bolton to the rescue. I still say, so f***ing what? I find it absolutely preposterous that a POTUS is not allowed to investigate possible corruption within our government. And during that investigation, protocol demands either those nations leaders communicate the investigations or the AGs work it out together. How well would an investigation work out of we just sent the FBI in unannounced to another country? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 15 minutes ago, Foxx said: right out of the Kavanaugh playbook. did we really expect anything different? the Dems are going to get crushed by the WHC defense so they needed something to distract and whala, Bolton to the rescue. Imagine that. A secret manuscript hits on a Sunday night. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Would anybody bother buying his book if he didn’t state those things? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Gary Busey said: Great. Dems have now relied on Trump' scumbag lawyer, a lifelong Republican FBI agent, an ambulance chaser porn star lawyer, and now one of the biggest neocons of the Bush administration to take down Trump. 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Gary Busey said: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Good to hear because at some point we have to hold politicians accountable for using their influence to enrich their families. We also have to hold aid recipients accountable for using aid funds for their intended purposes only. Edited January 27, 2020 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Glad I'm on record questioning Bolton's motives/honesty prior to this. Funny how Dems who thought he was a lying POS now hold him up as a great man of the utmost integrity. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Gosh ! What a surprise. Democrat impeachment manager ADMITS that House not pursuing witnesses was pretty much all politics . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Their "evidence" is a tell-all book…............? 3 hours ago, Gary Busey said: If it is what the NYT represents, it was weeks after the call when the idea of tying aid to investigating Biden corruption was first floated. It destroys the Democrat case, to the extent there ever was one. . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Great. Dems have now relied on Trump' scumbag lawyer, a lifelong Republican FBI agent, an ambulance chaser porn star lawyer, and now one of the biggest neocons of the Bush administration to take down Trump. politics makes strange bedfellows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: politics makes strange bedfellows An enemy of my enemy is my friend I guess, but maybe do some background work before putting your faith in people you would generally despise. This is a cash grab by Bolton for his book. He could've come out with this information a long time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: An enemy of my enemy is my friend I guess We saw how well that worked with Stalin and Mao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 A former advisor to the President and the NY Times turned impeachment hearings into a marketing strategy and there are still people wandering around wondering how we ever ended up with Donald Trump. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Great. Dems have now relied on Trump' scumbag lawyer, a lifelong Republican FBI agent, an ambulance chaser porn star lawyer, and now one of the biggest neocons of the Bush administration to take down Trump. who was it who picked such an upstanding citizen to be the National Security Advisor????? ...Trump sure knows how to pick em don't he LOL......can Bolton be a scumbag and be telling the truth regarding his ex-boss? I think his testimony won't matter (If he is even allowed to and even if he is telling the truth) the real jury will speak during the next presidential election.by way of .American voters .that's the way I see it. Trump supporters are cultish in their devotion to him this new relevation wont change a thing in the senates impeachment trial. Nada zippo not a thing. Minds are already made up along party lines I'd be shocked if this amounts to anything. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Margarita said: Trump supporters are cultish in their devotion to him this new relevation wont change a thing in the senates impeachment trial. You mean like Obama supporters and their "cultish" support? Or the "cultish" support that Bush supporters had for GW? Or like the "cultish" support that Clinton supporters had for Bill? Or for Reagan? What about the Bernie, Warren, Hillary, etc "cultists"? Why do you find it necessary to describe peoples' support for Trump as "cultish in their devotion"? Does that make it easier for you to wave off their support for Trump as being something irrational? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, Azalin said: You mean like Obama supporters and their "cultish" support? Or the "cultish" support that Bush supporters had for GW? Or like the "cultish" support that Clinton supporters had for Bill? Or for Reagan? What about the Bernie, Warren, Hillary, etc "cultists"? Why do you find it necessary to describe peoples' support for Trump as "cultish in their devotion"? Does that make it easier for you to wave off their support for Trump as being something irrational? I find it necessary to call them cultish because my opinion is his supporters wouldn't acknowledge any wrongdoing on his part even if proven beyond any doubt it existed there would be some sort of rationalization why which in my mind is irrational Yes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Margarita said: I find it necessary to call them cultish because my opinion is his supporters wouldn't acknowledge any wrongdoing on his part even if proven beyond any doubt it existed there would be some sort of rationalization why which in my mind is irrational Yes. Have you actually discussed this with any Trump supporters to the point where your opinion deems it necessary to label them cultists? It seems to me that your use of the word "rationalization" describes your thought process perfectly. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Azalin said: Have you actually discussed this with any Trump supporters to the point where your opinion deems it necessary to label them cultists? It seems to me that your use of the word "rationalization" describes your thought process perfectly. me thinks you protest too much not a single peep regarding any other point of my OP but one word in regards to his followers triggered you....interesting 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 8 minutes ago, Margarita said: I find it necessary to call them cultish because my opinion is his supporters wouldn't acknowledge any wrongdoing on his part even if proven beyond any doubt it existed there would be some sort of rationalization why which in my mind is irrational Yes. Question: Have you acknowledged the fact that the Russian collusion/conspiracy narrative was a complete hoax, fomented and pushed by the previous administration while they abused the massive powers of surveillance and the intelligence communities in an effort to overturn a legitimate election? Trump didn't do that. Obama did. That's not theory. It's proven fact. Have you acknowledged it, or accepted it? Have you personally held accountable the news sources who lied to your face (knowingly) for three plus years in an effort to divide the country, not report truth? Or nah? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Margarita said: me thinks you protest too much not a single peep regarding any other point of my OP but one word in regards to his followers triggered you....interesting I'm more interested in getting to the bottom of your prejudice. You paint with a very broad brush and attempt to justify it by calling it opinion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Question: Have you acknowledged the fact that the Russian collusion/conspiracy narrative was a complete hoax, fomented and pushed by the previous administration while they abused the massive powers of surveillance and the intelligence communities in an effort to overturn a legitimate election? Trump didn't do that. Obama did. That's not theory. It's proven fact. Have you acknowledged it, or accepted it? Have you personally held accountable the news sources who lied to your face (knowingly) for three plus years in an effort to divide the country, not report truth? Or nah? **eyerolls*** laughs....you all have a nice night . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 49 minutes ago, Margarita said: who was it who picked such an upstanding citizen to be the National Security Advisor????? ...Trump sure knows how to pick em don't he LOL......can Bolton be a scumbag and be telling the truth regarding his ex-boss? I think his testimony won't matter (If he is even allowed to and even if he is telling the truth) the real jury will speak during the next presidential election.by way of .American voters .that's the way I see it. Trump supporters are cultish in their devotion to him this new relevation wont change a thing in the senates impeachment trial. Nada zippo not a thing. Minds are already made up along party lines I'd be shocked if this amounts to anything. I didn't vote for Trump and won't in the next election. I don't like him and most of his domestic policies. Bolton's a grifter who's playing the Resistance for profit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Margarita said: **eyerolls*** laughs....you all have a nice night . So which one is cultish and unwilling to accept reality? I can prove what I said — you cannot prove the inverse. The media spent three years telling you what was false was actually true — while calling trump a liar. Cognitive dissonance hurts. But you can work through it if you’re willing to be honest and reassess what you think you know. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: So which one is cultish and unwilling to accept reality? I can prove what I said — you cannot prove the inverse. The media spent three years telling you what was false was actually true — while calling trump a liar. Cognitive dissonance hurts. But you can work through it if you’re willing to be honest and reassess what you think you know. Good luck with that. From previous posts, it appears you are trying to have a discussion with a person who is all about “feelings.” Edited January 27, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 hours ago, Margarita said: I find it necessary to call them cultish because my opinion is his supporters wouldn't acknowledge any wrongdoing on his part even if proven beyond any doubt it existed there would be some sort of rationalization why which in my mind is irrational Yes. So, like Obama supporters. 48 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Good luck with that. From previous posts, it appears you are trying to have a discussion with a person who is all about “feelings”. Yes. "She" is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 22 hours ago, Gary Busey said: @Tiberius - they miss you! Happy Monday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 7 hours ago, Azalin said: Have you actually discussed this with any Trump supporters to the point where your opinion deems it necessary to label them cultists? It seems to me that your use of the word "rationalization" describes your thought process perfectly. He probably picked it up off of his favorite Democratic talking point website. Cultist is just another way to smear Trump and his supporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts