Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

 

Schiff is arguing that there's a pattern of election interference that goes back to 2016 (Russia).

Now the WH Counsel (if they want) can just bring up Mueller Report Part 1.  They can also bring up the mishandling of Crossfire Hurricane investigation.  They can bring up Comey's leaks, they can argue everything in response.  Or they can just ignore it and say there's never been any proved collusion.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't NOW the time that Schiff reveals his evidence that Trump colluded with Russia in the 2016 election?

NOW would be the perfect time for the big reveal.  He said he's got it.  He repeated that he's seen it.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

Demings says Trump ‘bragged’ about obstruction earlier Wednesday

Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), one of the House impeachment managers, argued Wednesday that Trump had provided more evidence of obstruction of Congress during a news conference he held in Davos, Switzerland, earlier in the day.

Responding to a question about the impeachment trial, Trump told reporters: “We’re doing very well. I got to watch enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material.”

“The second article of impeachment was for obstruction of Congress: covering up witnesses and documents from the American people,” Demings said in a tweet. “This morning the president not only confessed to it, he bragged about it.”

In a subsequent television appearance, a clip of Trump’s comments was played for Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

“Well that was an obvious confession by the president of the United States,” Van Hollen said in response on CNN. “Here you have the president of the United States saying, ‘Hey, I have a lot more evidence, and I’m not going to give it to yo

 

Shoot someone of fifth avenue...Constitution be damned 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Foxx said:

the trial is working off the precedent established in the Clinton trial. nothing different here. outside of the hypocrisy displayed by both sides.

 

Clinton  got a BJ and lied about it. 

 

 We all would love to get one from time to time and not lie about it. 

 

The US citizens (non 1% ers)  are getting screwed by the Snake Oil Salesman.  His solid FAN base is giving Don a  BJ daily.

 

Speaking as someone who has had a security clearance  YOU do not do half the ***** he or his son's done and not end up in jail . 

 

 

Edited by SlimShady'sGhost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

Clinton  got a BJ and lied about it. 

 

 We all would love to get one from time to time and not lie about it. 

 

The US citizens (non 1% ers)  are getting screwed by the Snake Oil Salesman.  His solid FAN base is giving Don a  BJ daily.

 

Speaking as someone who has had a security clearance  YOU do not do half the ***** he or his son's done and not end up in jail . 

 

 

 

How are the 99% getting screwed?  Give me your top 5. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Albwan said:

Someone dies pro trump and tibtard thinks its funny. 

Anti american trash rat.

 

Was I laughing?  Or did you assume I was laughing?  

 

Just now, keepthefaith said:

 

How are the 99% getting screwed?  Give me your top 5. 

 

You've heard the line ...

 

 If I have to explain it to you  ...   You wouldn't understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

Clinton  got a BJ and lied about it. 

 

 We all would love to get one from time to time and not lie about it. 

 

The US citizens (non 1% ers)  are getting screwed by the Snake Oil Salesman.  His solid FAN base is giving Don a  BJ daily.

 

Speaking as someone who has had a security clearance  YOU do not do half the ***** he or his son's done and not end up in jail . 

 

 

i assume you have proof to back these claims up. additionally, i'm sure the House Managers would love to hear from you.

 

 

3 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

... You've heard the line ...

 

 If I have to explain it to you  ...   You wouldn't understand.

maybe explain it for those  who would understand?

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's the House's job. They didn't do their job. It's not the Senate's job to do their work for them. And it's not a trial. Not really. It's politics. 

Kinda thought that it was the Senates job to get to the truth...you know...the oath and all that

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

Was I laughing?  Or did you assume I was laughing?  

 

 

You've heard the line ...

 

 If I have to explain it to you  ...   You wouldn't understand.

 

That's your answer?  You get an F. 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

Was I laughing?  Or did you assume I was laughing?  

 

 

You've heard the line ...

 

 If I have to explain it to you  ...   You wouldn't understand.

tibtard

not the sharpest tool in the shed are you

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

welcome to politics forever  

 

nothing has changed. the swamp just got worse 

 

Just imagine how Trump will behave AFTER he gets acquitted.

Seriously, good luck keeping your head from exploding.  Maybe you should strap on a bucket to contain the inevitable mess of scalp, hair and brains.

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Correct. The Dems know, for certain, they cannot beat Trump at the ballot box. They also know, for certain, the Senate won't vote to remove. So what's this all about? What's the point of this show? 

 

It's to de-legitimize Trump's second term. 

 

That's it. 

 

And they're doing it, knowing full well how damaging and dangerous that kind of partisan warfare is. But they don't care. Because they're enemies of the republic, of truth, of justice, and our way of life. They crave power. And will do anything, legal or no, to obtain it again. 

 

***** them all.

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cimahilo said:

When is this impeachment story over?

 

Next week, barring witnesses. 

 

Then, of course, the dems will launch a new one as they've said they would. Because this isn't about truth or the constitution. It's a naked attempt to seize power through illegal means since they cannot win at the ballot box. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Correct. The Dems know, for certain, they cannot beat Trump at the ballot box. They also know, for certain, the Senate won't vote to remove. So what's this all about? What's the point of this show? 

 

It's to de-legitimize Trump's second term. 

 

That's it. 

 

And they're doing it, knowing full well how damaging and dangerous that kind of partisan warfare is. But they don't care. Because they're enemies of the republic, of truth, of justice, and our way of life. They crave power. And will do anything, legal or no, to obtain it again. 

 

***** them all.

How can't you understand that Trump is abusing power to influence the election. You can't even hear that argument? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Just imagine how Trump will behave AFTER he gets acquitted.

Seriously, good luck keeping your head from exploding.  Maybe you should strap on a bucket to contain the inevitable mess of scalp, hair and brains.

 

 

 

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

There's never been an attack on Senators launched like yesterday from the floor of the Senate itself -- by sitting House members. 

 

It is different. It's more hostile. Thanks to the tactics deployed by the left/establishment. Who are trying their best to destroy the rule of law and our institutions -- while pointing the finger at 45 saying he's to blame for their actions. 

 

It's a kindergarten argument by Schiff/Nadler/Pelosi and their ilk. And it's going to cost them the House, Senate, and White House in November. It's going to be a slaughter at the ballot box. 

I hope so but I think this nonsense is being pursued in the hopes that the dems can take the Senate. It seems that they are trying to make senators take difficult votes. I'm hoping that they are as delusional as they appear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

Not allowing witnesses..  This is a trial right?  Witnesses are supposed to testify 

 

I'm starting to think it wasn't the topic that made TBD push you over to PPP.

 

I'm starting to think it's how quickly you are able to show how absolutely little you genuinely understand about what is going on.

 

I supposed next you're going to explain to us that it isn't the House that needs to prove their accusations for the impeachment, but rather it's the Senate that needs to prove the accusations wrong.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snafu said:

Holy crap, Schiff just quoted George Washington about how over reliance party politics can ruin our democracy.

 

He quoted Reagan a few times too. There were Southern California news reports about an earthquake but it was determined that it was just Ronald Reagan turning over in his grave. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

Kinda thought that it was the Senates job to get to the truth...you know...the oath and all that


It is the role of the House to compile evidence, and then bring their case to the Senate.

 

It is the role of the Senate to hear the House’s fully established case, and render a verdict based on the evidence presented.

 

New evidence is not introduced during the Senate proceedings.  Witnesses are limited to those who testified during House proceedings in order to clarify, if necessary, existing evidence.

 

The House broke with this tradition, and did not do their jobs because they sought to restrict the President from having due process, did not wish to present fact witnesses of their own in order to protect narrative, and wanted to rush the process for political reasons.

 

Now they’re asking the Senate to break with tradition, and to do the job they failed to do in their rush to maximize political damage.

 

The Senate is telling them to pound sand.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...