Jump to content

Foster vs McKenzie


ILBillsfan

Recommended Posts

Last week they went w Foster .  I feel like McKenzie adds a bit more than Foster with the use in the run game as well.  They tried to use Williams last week and he was not able to threaten the edge like McKenzie brings.  

 

Im Hoping McKenzie is back in and Foster is on the inactive list

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Special K said:

I prefer McKenzie to be active over Foster. He has made plays when given the opportunity, whereas Foster has not.

Foster has been an invisible non factor all season.  Something is wrong with him and I don't have the answer. Playing McKenzie is the right call. He's made big plays and brings misdirection to our offense. Neither are great but right now McK is the better contributor. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

McKittrick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster.  All McKittrick does is make plays.  Foster didn't do ***** last week with his chance.  McD is supposed to be about playing those who produce, so no way McKittrick sits again. 

Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

Couldn't Andre Roberts fit that role McKenzie has while still having Foster if he ever decides to wake up.

 

I think McKenzie attacks the edges harder on offense than Roberts and is a more viable receiving option than Roberts.  McKenzie also offers more than Foster in the receiving game as well.  This year not sure what the deal is with Foster but he didn't even make an attempt for that ball that landed a bit behind due too the wind knocking it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ball tracking was a problem last year with Foster on the deep ball as well.  The miss at New England comes to mind.  It's whoever Allen is more comfortable with.  Foster is about five or so inches taller than McKenzie so you have to factor that in.

Edited by Doc Brown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Foster has been an invisible non factor all season.  Something is wrong with him and I don't have the answer. Playing McKenzie is the right call. He's made big plays and brings misdirection to our offense. Neither are great but right now McK is the better contributor. 

Foster has how many targets?  Only targets I recall are on deep balls and Josh hasn't been close to hitting them.  I don't know why they don't get him involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ILBillsfan said:

Last week they went w Foster .  I feel like McKenzie adds a bit more than Foster with the use in the run game as well.  They tried to use Williams last week and he was not able to threaten the edge like McKenzie brings.  

 

Im Hoping McKenzie is back in and Foster is on the inactive list

Why not have them both active and sit Senorise Perry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Warcodered said:

Couldn't Andre Roberts fit that role McKenzie has while still having Foster if he ever decides to wake up.

 

No. 

3 hours ago, MJS said:

Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name?

 

Dates back to when we signed him someone started a thread saying we had signed McKittrick and it has just stuck. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, McKenzie is more productive than Foster. He was missed last week as it seemed the Bills stupidly took what has been an effective aspect of their game and shelved it. Moreover, then they hardly used Foster (1 target).

 

Answer: McKenzie

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...