Jump to content

Thurs. night football: Giants at Pats 8:20 ET (Fox, NFLN))


Recommended Posts

Starting Eli would have made more sense.  I get wanting to be consistent with QB play, but Jones isn't ready for this game.  Shurmur seems like he doesn't understand the Pats and what Belichick does to rookie QBs, or zone defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Gilmore said:

Starting Eli would have made more sense.  I get wanting to be consistent with QB play, but Jones isn't ready for this game.  Shurmur seems like he doesn't understand the Pats and what Belichick does to rookie QBs, or zone defenses.

No it wouldn't we like the idea of them using Eli to get the win but it makes no sense for them. They aren't aiming for the post season not really they're focused on getting their young QB experience.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:

Are we at 3 picks 2 fumbles and a special teams score yet?

 

We are actually - but it’s 1 fumble for each team

 

2 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Starting Eli would have made more sense.  I get wanting to be consistent with QB play, but Jones isn't ready for this game.  Shurmur seems like he doesn't understand the Pats and what Belichick does to rookie QBs, or zone defenses.

 

I think Shurmur may be one of those guys who is a great coordinator and way over his head as a HC

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have an incredible D and

1 minute ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Starting Eli would have made more sense.  I get wanting to be consistent with QB play, but Jones isn't ready for this game.  Shurmur seems like he doesn't understand the Pats and what Belichick does to rookie QBs, or zone defenses.

Maybe ............. or Maybe they have 2 less interceptions and have been sacked 5 more times with 2 more fumbles.  I agree Jones is being a rookie and BB is playing that but Eli is pretty limited.  Like Bledsoe in the Cowboy years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

No it wouldn't we like the idea of them using Eli to get the win but it makes no sense for them. They aren't aiming for the post season not really they're focused on getting their young QB experience.

 

Yeah, there's that.  Shurmur must be ok with taking losses in favor of on the job QB development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, london_bills said:

I would tend to believe people that say this if there was something to back it up.

 

They are 5-0, probably going to be 6-0. They are statistically the best team in football.

 

Who have also, in their first 6 games, played 5 of the worst teams in football.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

We are actually - but it’s 1 fumble for each team

 

 

I think Shurmur may be one of those guys who is a great coordinator and way over his head as a HC

They still need to have their back up throw an Int to end the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, london_bills said:

I would tend to believe people that say this if there was something to back it up.

 

They are 5-0, probably going to be 6-0. They are statistically the best team in football.

People have unreasonable expectations for the Pats. People were talking about how bad they looked in Washington last week. They won 33-7, with Brady passing for over 300 yards and three TD’s. How many teams would call that a bad week? Even against Washington. If they aren’t beating teams 50-0 with Brady throwing for over 300 yards every game, somehow they are declining. The reality is they are unbeaten, and winning games is the most important stat. Let’s give our team some credit too. Brady looked rotten against us, because the Bills have an elite defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SirAndrew said:

Let’s give our team some credit too. Brady looked rotten against us, because the Bills have an elite defense.

 

This is being noticed by player analysts on NFLN and Fox.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bubba Gump said:

 

Who have also, in their first 6 games, played 5 of the worst teams in football.

 

They have a stretch of @Ravens, @Eagles, Cowboys , @Texans and Chiefs starting in a few weeks.

 

We’ll learn a lot about them during that stretch.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Maine-iac said:

A) Slayton needs to get that.  B) Holy crap the Pats get to grab and pull at the WR's anywhere up and down the field.  I'm cool with letting them play or calling it close but you have to do it both ways. 

 

Ha.  This is the Pats.  Refs don’t have to do it both ways, any more than they need to call holding when Pats OL is practically stripping the jerseys every play

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SirAndrew said:

People have unreasonable expectations for the Pats. People were talking about how bad they looked in Washington last week. They won 33-7, with Brady passing for over 300 yards and three TD’s. How many teams would call that a bad week? Even against Washington. If they aren’t beating teams 50-0 with Brady throwing for over 300 yards every game, somehow they are declining. The reality is they are unbeaten, and winning games is the most important stat. Let’s give our team some credit too. Brady looked rotten against us, because the Bills have an elite defense.

 

We stop them from scoring on special teams and we are 6 and 0 and we basically are the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MDH said:

 

They have a stretch of @Ravens, @Eagles, Cowboys , @Texans and Chiefs starting in a few weeks.

 

We’ll learn a lot about them during that stretch.

 

I still think the Chiefs are the only potential challengers to the Pats (unless we get our offense together, so we can challenge them as well). The Ravens and Texans are much better than anyone they have played this season, but are also both overrated and not real contenders imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SirAndrew said:

I still think the Chiefs are the only potential challengers to the Pats (unless we get our offense together, so we can challenge them as well). The Ravens and Texans are much better than anyone they have played this season, but are also both overrated and not real contenders imo. 

 

You’re talking about in the AFC, right?

 

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

Not football related, but TNF related:

 

This new Midway movie is seriously pissing me off.  What a *****-looking movie.  Roland Emmerich is responsible for this bag of excrement, isn't he?

 

I’m too happy to see anything but a series of Tom Brady headshots to care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:

We stop them from scoring on special teams and we are 6 and 0 and we basically are the Pats.

Yep, but that doesn’t mean the Pats can’t be the best team in the conference. I actually think we’re close to being the best team in the conference behind the Chiefs and Pats, so that concept doesn’t change my opinion that the Pats are the team to beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

You’re talking about in the AFC, right?

 

 

I’m too happy to see anything but a series of Tom Brady headshots to care

Yes, in the AFC. The NFC’s strength is irrelevant as far as the Pats chance to win a title imo. The Super Bowl is just one game, and anything can happen in a one game winner take all championship. It’s getting there that’s such a challenge, and not much stands in their way in the AFC. 

Edited by SirAndrew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Gilmore said:

What a bunch of d-bags.  I can't wait for someone to run the score up on Belichick and NE, no one would deserve it more.

 

No one will, most coaches have more class in their pinky fingers than Belichick has in his whole fat sloppy man boobed body.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...