Gary M Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Why he was allowed to stay on after Trump was elected, I have no idea. I think all new Presidents should clean house down to the janitors. Trump knew they spied on his campaign, he likely knew about dossier as it was being made, I am sure he knew about the "coup". He needed them to have an inside guy so this would play out. He has been in front of it the entire time. Always ten steps ahead. Edited November 11, 2019 by Gary M 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Gary M said: Trump knew they spied on his campaign, he likely knew about dossier as it was being made, I am sure he knew about the "coup". He needed them to have an inside guy so this would paly out. He has been in front of it the entire time. Always ten steps ahead. But, but, but ... #OrangeManBad #OrangeManStupid yada yada I agree he has known about a lot of this (or at least the possibility of this) since the Admiral Rogers meeting. I am not sure he realized it was a soft-coup immediately. I am one who believes that if the Ds had shown any sign of willingness to work with his agenda, he'd have let bygones by bygones. Once they went after him and his family though, well, there is a reason he has written and has spoken lovingly about revenge. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 28 minutes ago, Gary M said: Trump knew they spied on his campaign, he likely knew about dossier as it was being made, I am sure he knew about the "coup". He needed them to have an inside guy so this would play out. He has been in front of it the entire time. Always ten steps ahead. So he is like a mob boss. “Keep your friends close...” 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 So if the whistleblower is ‘backed up by multiple witnesses’ as the title reports...why can’t we speak his name now? Is he the prophet Mohammed? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 Why can’t they have the Whistleblower testify and respond to questions from inside a sealed booth? That works on the Dating Game! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 1 hour ago, Doc said: So he is like a mob boss. “Keep your friends close...” That was Abe Lincoln’s M. O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 12 minutes ago, Nanker said: That was Abe Lincoln’s M. O. JWB was a mistake... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 Question: What was the nature of corruption displayed by the "corrupt prosecutor" Biden had fired. Don't get me wrong, I know the guy is Eastern European thus probably corrupt, but I find it odd that months into this no specifics have been given. Maybe I missed them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Question: What was the nature of corruption displayed by the "corrupt prosecutor" Biden had fired. Don't get me wrong, I know the guy is Eastern European thus probably corrupt, but I find it odd that months into this no specifics have been given. Maybe I missed them. The only added information given on this topic came from John Solomon's work and his release of documents/depositions of people involved. The push to out the prosecutor, per these documents (which are biased because of the people giving the testimony, but that doesn't mean they're untrue because of that) it was a coordinated smear job by multiple countries (the Atlantic Council I think, I forget the think tank behind it all) to remove him BECAUSE he wasn't playing ball with the west. Not because he was corrupt. Here's the Solomon stuff: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 28 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Question: What was the nature of corruption displayed by the "corrupt prosecutor" Biden had fired. Don't get me wrong, I know the guy is Eastern European thus probably corrupt, but I find it odd that months into this no specifics have been given. Maybe I missed them. These people must think we are all STUPID! The United State is holding up a BILLION dollars in aid because we want some prosecutor that nobody has ever heard of fired? Does any of this make any sense to anyone? That was the official State Department policy? Or was Biden going rogue with a personal endeavor? Take a guess! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: So if the whistleblower is ‘backed up by multiple witnesses’ as the title reports...why can’t we speak his name now? Is he the prophet Mohammed? Nah, the Prophet Mohamed had a more objectively believable story. 2 hours ago, Doc said: JWB was a mistake... Never trust actors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 and another week pissed away with this charade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 LOL 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The only added information given on this topic came from John Solomon's work and his release of documents/depositions of people involved. The push to out the prosecutor, per these documents (which are biased because of the people giving the testimony, but that doesn't mean they're untrue because of that) it was a coordinated smear job by multiple countries (the Atlantic Council I think, I forget the think tank behind it all) to remove him BECAUSE he wasn't playing ball with the west. Not because he was corrupt. Here's the Solomon stuff: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story Has anyone asked Biden in an interview about the corruption he wanted ceased? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: Question: What was the nature of corruption displayed by the "corrupt prosecutor" Biden had fired. Don't get me wrong, I know the guy is Eastern European thus probably corrupt, but I find it odd that months into this no specifics have been given. Maybe I missed them. Everyone was happy to see him go. Now STFU. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: Question: What was the nature of corruption displayed by the "corrupt prosecutor" Biden had fired. Don't get me wrong, I know the guy is Eastern European thus probably corrupt, but I find it odd that months into this no specifics have been given. Maybe I missed them. Taking bribes, not prosecuting corruption cases, . https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/world/europe/political-stability-in-the-balance-as-ukraine-ousts-top-prosecutor.html "The United States and other Western nations had for months called for the ousting of Mr. Shokin, who was widely criticized for turning a blind eye to corrupt practices and for defending the interests of a venal and entrenched elite." Which basically amounted to insufficient revolutionary fervor. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/joe-biden-ukraine.html?module=inline It's interesting to track the timing of the stories, too. Hunter Biden joins Burisma in April 2014; VP Joe Biden addresses the Rada in December 2015, calling for "an overhaul of the office of prosecutor general [and] change in the energy sector..."; Biden strong-arms the Ukraine into ousting Shokin in March of 2016. Then news articles from therein are about "Biden's Ukraine problem," right up to April of 2019 when Hunter Biden leaves Burisma. Within three months of that, the stories morph from "Biden's Ukraine problem" to "Trump's Ukraine scandal." 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilsner Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 7 hours ago, Nanker said: We’ve been naïve. All along we’ve been led to believe that Page and Strok’s “insurance policy” was the Steele dossier. It wasn’t. Brennan’s hand picked mole Eric Ciaramella was. These people need to be tried and convicted of sedition and sentenced to Gitmo for decades. Many also need the noose. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL The President likes to turn that sun bytch sideways and stick it straight up the Dems candy ass. - A Rock reference there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 I'm surprised Joe Biden hasn't told us that Hunter was put on that board to prevent corruption. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, keepthefaith said: I'm surprised Joe Biden hasn't told us that Hunter was put on that board to prevent corruption. Give him time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, keepthefaith said: I'm surprised Joe Biden hasn't told us that Hunter was put on that board to prevent corruption. I’ve heard some libs claiming Joe wanted Shokin gone because he wouldn’t investigate corruption at Burisma. LOL! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 15 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: So if the whistleblower is ‘backed up by multiple witnesses’ as the title reports...why can’t we speak his name now? Is he the prophet Mohammed? Does that mean we can't draw pictures of the WB, either? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 The Whistleblower has been backed up by multiple witnesses including Trump ally Sondland The extortion trap laid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The Whistleblower has been backed up by multiple witnesses including Trump ally Sondland The extortion trap laid I love the extortion line. How does it work again? “I’m not giving you money that I don’t owe you unless you give me information you don’t owe me, but I’ll give you the gift anyway even if you don’t give me the information.....or something like that. I’ll call you after the election when I’ll have more flexibility!” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, SoCal Deek said: I love the extortion line. How does it work again? “I’m not giving you money that I don’t owe you unless you give me information you don’t owe me, but I’ll give you the gift anyway even if you don’t give me the information.....or something like that. I’ll call you after the election when I’ll have more flexibility!” Ya extortion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ya extortion I see you got today's memo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ya extortion Did you say that to your mom on Christmas morning when you didn’t get the roller skates you asked for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 LOL This outta be good. The Bidens may have indulged in the graft, but they were certainly not alone. I want to see how he approaches some of the others like the Clintons, and John McCain. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I'm a Trump cultist No way, really? 14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL This outta be good. The Bidens may have indulged in the graft, but they were certainly not alone. I want to see how he approaches some of the others like the Clintons, and John McCain. No witnesses, no evidence, no whistleblower, just the word of a compulsive, corrupt liar who has every motive to lie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No way, really? No witnesses, no evidence, no whistleblower, just the word of a compulsive, corrupt liar who has every motive to lie Well then, that would make it just like this whole impeachment farce. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc said: Well then, that would make it just like this whole impeachment farce. Aside from the fact there is literally piles of good evidence. Criminal president Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Aside from the fact there is literally piles of good evidence. Criminal president There's piles of schiff. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, westside2 said: There's piles of schiff. No, it's the truth or I wouldn't post it. That at pile you saw was probably Trumps breakfast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, it's the truth or I wouldn't post it. That at pile you saw was probably Trumps breakfast Lol, you have a big fat nothing burger and you know it. I don't think you've ever told the truth here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, westside2 said: Lol, you have a big fat nothing burger and you know it. I don't think you've ever told the truth here. I am the fountain of truth. Trump extorted a foreign reign country to make up dirt on Biden because his little dick is afraid of Sleepy Joe. He's afraid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: No witnesses, no evidence, no whistleblower, just the word of a compulsive, corrupt liar who has every motive to lie You know, other than the transcript of the actual call, which was verified by the war hero who received a purple heart and is, therefore, completely unimpeachable as a witness. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: You know, other than the transcript of the actual call, which was verified by the war hero who received a purple heart and is, therefore, completely unimpeachable as a witness. Sondland said there was a quid pro quo going on. That's Trump boy. Ambassadors, administration officials and a decorated war hero all against the biggest liar in American history. Who you going to believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sondland said there was a quid pro quo going on. That's Trump boy. Ambassadors, administration officials and a decorated war hero all against the biggest liar in American history. Who you going to believe? Tell us, do you know if it was 1st, 2nd or 3rd degree Quid Pro Quo? Also, what are the sentencing ranges for committing a Quid Pro Quo under the different degrees? Is Quid Pro Quoing a federal crime only or an international one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 is this hoax over yet? can't they come up with another one to get us all hot and bothered for 3 days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts