Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Doc said: So Lindsey Graham is going to send a letter to Nancy telling her the Senate won't convict Trump, so don't waste everyone's time. Or, he's afraid that he will have to vote to exonerate an obviously guilty man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 14 minutes ago, Doc said: So Lindsey Graham is going to send a letter to Nancy telling her the Senate won't convict Trump, so don't waste everyone's time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 11 hours ago, Hedge said: So that means the whistleblower is using federal resources and influence to influence the election... You couldn't make this ***** up if you tried. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 31 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Or, he's afraid that he will have to vote to exonerate an obviously guilty man. No, just telling Nancy to move on. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 41 minutes ago, Doc said: No, just telling Nancy to move on. Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal. Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. When these senators are running a few years hence, they will still have to defend their votes on this. It will be harder to explain when he is even unpopular among the former cultists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: if the House won't vote, why should the Senate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 12 minutes ago, Foxx said: if the House won't vote, why should the Senate? Huh? The House should vote, so should the Senate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 29 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal. Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. We ALREADY hate Trump, you ignorant ****head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: We ALREADY hate Trump, you ignorant ****head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial. Edited October 9, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 2 hours ago, B-Man said: I love the pennies. LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 55 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal. Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. When these senators are running a few years hence, they will still have to defend their votes on this. It will be harder to explain when he is even unpopular among the former cultists You mean like Dems are with Biden? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Doc said: No, just telling Nancy to move on. 25 minutes ago, Foxx said: okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial. If I were Trump, I’d tweet to Pelosi, “Bring it, B word!” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1181757119286140929 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2019 Author Share Posted October 9, 2019 39 minutes ago, Doc said: You mean like Dems are with Biden? No, I was talking about in the reality based world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 32 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, I was talking about in the reality based world So you have definitive proof Trump is a criminal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 9 minutes ago, Albwan said: So another "we have to pass the bill so we know what's in it? " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 3 hours ago, Foxx said: okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial. Yes, but we all know that Nasty Nancy won't hold a vote for two reasons: 1.) She doesn't actually have the votes; and 2.) She would virtually guarantee that the Democrats lose the House in 2020. 3 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1181757119286140929 Seriously, whose Mayor Willie do I have to Kamala Harris to get these $166,000 per month no-show jobs? 2 hours ago, Chef Jim said: So you have definitive proof Trump is a criminal? He beat Hillary, that conclusively PROVES that Trump is guilty! "Facts" are for the weak minded; we must be morally correct as a society, regardless of petty stupid things like reality. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 5 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1181757119286140929 First it was $50K/month ($600K/year). Then I heard $83K/month ($1M/year). Now it's $166K/month ($2M/year)? Yeah, that's not crooked. 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: No, I was talking about in the reality based world Sure you were. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 Tibs is on his own today. His handlers in CA had their power cut off!? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 (edited) John Solomon is the journalist mentioned. Edit: And here he is: Edited October 10, 2019 by Hedge 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/TheTiginator/status/1182178007554953216 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 Ukraine president says 'no blackmail' in phone call with Trump - Fox... Ukraine's president says 'no blackmail' in Trump call - BBC ... Ukraine president: 'No blackmail' in conversation with Trump - MSN Ukraine president says there was 'no blackmail' in call with Trump - PBS... . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 Whistleblower lawyer acknowledges client had 'contact' with presidential candidates Fox News, by Gregg Re Original Article Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, the attorneys representing the whistleblower at the center of Democrats' impeachment inquiry, acknowledged in a statement on Wednesday that their client "has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties" -- but insisted that the contact involved the politicians' roles as "elected officials – not as candidates." The lawyers' abrupt disclosure came shortly after The Washington Examiner reported that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers the whistleblower worked “or had some type of professional relationship” with one of the Democratic presidential candidates, citing three sources familiar with Atkinson’s interview with lawmakers on Friday. (It's nice posting Fox articles this morning, knowing that the board's left has declared them "honest" now.....? ) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 40 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: They are going all out to steel the election next year. According to the indictment, Parnas, Fruman and other defendants “conspired to circumvent the federal laws against foreign influence by engaging in a scheme to funnel foreign money to candidates for federal and state office so that the defendants could buy potential influence with the candidates, campaigns, and the candidates’ governments.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/two-business-associates-of-trumps-personal-lawyer-giuliani-have-been-arrested-and-are-in-custody/2019/10/10/9f9c101a-eb63-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 43 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They are going all out to steel the election next year. Galvanized? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 REALCLEARINVESTIGATIONS: Here Are the Giuliani-Ukraine Notes Few Have Seen. Notes of Rudolph Giuliani’s interviews with two former Ukrainian prosecutors include one’s allegation that then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko warned him against investigating energy firm Burisma Holdings “as it was not in the interest of Joe and/or Hunter Biden.” The prosecutor was later fired, under what President Trump says was pressure from Vice President Biden. His son Hunter had a lucrative role on the Burisma board. . . . In addition to the fired Shokin’s claim that President Poroshenko warned him not to investigate Burisma because it was not in the Bidens’ interest, the notes say, the prosecutor also said he “was warned to stop” by the then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey R. Pyatt. The State Department declined to explain this assertion about Pyatt, who was ambassador to Ukraine from 2013 to 2016 and now is Ambassador to Greece. The Biden presidential campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Read it all. Related: Document reveals Ukraine had already reopened probe of Hunter Biden-linked firm months before Trump phone call. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Galvanized? I think he meant Steele. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: I think he meant Steele. I meant undermining our republic, they are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 Yup. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I meant undermining our republic, they are Why are you so worried if even your very own Alfred E. Newmann would beat Trump? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Why are you so worried if even your very own Alfred E. Newmann would beat Trump? That is a good question and the answer is that he is literally attempting to steal the next election which would be an even bigger crisis if it simply allowed to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: That is a good question and the answer is that he is literally attempting to steal the next election which would be an even bigger crisis if it simply allowed to happen. In Tibs world “ steal” = make the public aware of Democrats shady dealings. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said: In Tibs world “ steal” = make the public aware of Democrats shady dealings. No, Trump and his slimy conspirators are literally trying to undermine our elections. I'm sure that once Trump is gone the lid will come off on much more. Like why did he want information on every single voter in the country for his election commission? No way was that legit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, Trump and his slimy conspirators are literally trying to undermine our elections. I'm sure that once Trump is gone the lid will come off on much more. Like why did he want information on every single voter in the country for his election commission? No way was that legit So maybe stuff will come out in 2025 after Trumps second term is concluded, but I doubt it. Voter knowledge is the exact opposite of undermining an election. It’s empowering the electorate. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2019 Author Share Posted October 10, 2019 Just now, Boatdrinks said: So maybe stuff will come out in 2025 after Trumps second term is concluded, but I doubt it. Voter knowledge is the exact opposite of undermining an election. It’s empowering the electorate. Not even the red states trusted this gang of thieves with that info and refused to hand it over, probably thinking it would be sent to Putin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts