Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 "This time they REALLY got him!" ********************** 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: A few months ago I extorted a new car out of a dealer by refusing to give them money until they gave me one. Well, I'm sure that we can get to the bottom of this quite quickly. Tibs, Transplant, Bob, and Gary will be heading a completely fair and transparent investigation, which will take place behind closed doors, with no one else present for the proceedings, whereupon then will produce a completely unbiased report that in no way cherry picks information to fit a predetermined narrative. 52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: <br /> Byron is wrong about one thing: investigating the wrongdoing committed during the 2016 election cycle actually is 'investigating Democrats.' 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 21, 2019 Author Share Posted October 21, 2019 Pelosi is so correct to describe Trumps thuggish actions as a "shake down" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Pelosi is so correct to describe Trumps thuggish actions as a "shake down" No, this is a shakedown. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 3 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Sweet fancy Moses! Partisan? Bob, step back for a second and contemplate the meaning of the word 'partisan'. 'Partisan' is utilizing the rules of the Senate to block a nominee of the opposing political point of view when given the opportunity. Partisan is the raising of questions that everyone with a pulse knows will not be answered by a nominee because it gives the opposition the opportunity to wax eloquently as to all the hidden reasons why a nominee isn't answering the question that everyone with a pulse knows will not be answered. You've reached a point where you're comfortable with a buzzer beater allegation that has no basis in fact, that evolved over the 60 days or so it was in the public eye (and crashed and burned thereafter), and have decided as a matter of equity that Kavanaugh probably "lied" about his friziging high school days. Was it the choice of tater tots when he said he had French fries? You get the government you deserve, and in many ways, the people who stand by and wring their hands about Trumps approach and demeanor watch dispassionately as the no-holds barred public execution of Brett Kavanaugh played out have gotten what they deserve. I'd no more like to see this happen to Merrick Garland than I would Brett Kavanaugh. What Feinstein, Harris, Booker et al oversaw was horrific and amounted to the pimping of the narrative of a couple drunken cockroaches that scurried from the darkness for 30 seconds of fame before scurrying back. It doesn't have to be this way Bob, you don't have to sit by dispassionately and stretch to reconcile the incompetence of the IC and Obama admin, you don't have to accept that Trump is out-of-line pursuing American interests and that Good Ole Joe was just doing good VP work, or even that John Barleycorn Must Die. I will meet you halfway and acknowledge that the only way other than massive pallets of cash to Iran to settle up for the Obama treaty was sending the moolah for mullah 18,000,000 refundable bottles of Mountain Dew because of "sanctions", and that solution would have required more planes and the carbon footprint would have been massive. Obama is actually the hero of the pallets of cash story. Fair? So, you don't wish to answer the Trump related questions and wish to discuss instead how you think that 'wronging' Kavanaugh means the Dems are worse than Trump? Is that what you are trying to do? Given what I just told you about both topics that is a bit disappointing to be honest. I told you everything I know about the Kavanaugh hearings and am only barely sorry you didn't like what I thought. - ASSUME SEVERAL WITNESSES TELL SIMILAR DRUNKEN KAVANAUGH FLASHING STORY TO DEMS. If, when a drunk college student, he had a habit of whipping it out at co-ed events, should that be an issue during the qualification hearing or should that not have been raised because it would embarrass the candidate? Remember the assumption. Regarding drinking, is the real person the sober, self controlled person or is the real person the uninhibited drunk? If you think the drunk may offer a glimpse behind the curtain, so to speak, one must wonder about serial flashers and if they have the normal perspectives on women and sexual issues. Again, not important for some jobs but certainly important to me for a lifetime appointment to the supreme court. Not a valid issue for you? Oh, just answer one of those Trump questions you are avoiding please. Where are the fruits of all the surveillance on the Trump campaign? Aside from the alleged spying itself, what actions can you point to that were done because of information gotten thru the surveillance on the Trump campaign? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 27 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Oh, just answer one of those Trump questions you are avoiding please. Where are the fruits of all the surveillance on the Trump campaign? Aside from the alleged spying itself, what actions can you point to that were done because of information gotten thru the surveillance on the Trump campaign? It was answered. In detail. You ignored it -- because it destroys your entire belief system. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 21, 2019 Author Share Posted October 21, 2019 53 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No, this is a shakedown. No, Trumps thing is literally a shakedown. Why do you support that criminal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: No, this is a shakedown. So is this. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, Trumps thing is literally a shakedown. Why do you support that criminal? Why are you so obsessed with Trump's thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, Trumps thing is literally a shakedown. Why do you support that criminal? When virtually everyone else is a criminal, the innocent guy is the outlier. The one that has to be eliminated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 21, 2019 Author Share Posted October 21, 2019 34 minutes ago, Dante said: When virtually everyone else is a criminal, the innocent guy is the outlier. The one that has to be eliminated. Were you at the game the other night? I stayed up and watched the whole though I was pretty tired and feeling no pain by the end 41 minutes ago, Doc said: So is this. Fake news?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Fake news?! Hardly. Joe himself said he extorted Ukraine by withholding funds to Ukraine until they did him a favor and fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter's company for corruption. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc said: Hardly. Joe himself said he extorted Ukraine by withholding funds to Ukraine until they did him a favor and fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter's company for corruption. Real: Schiff's made up summary of the phone call -- Fake: Actual video of Joe Biden bragging about extorting the Ukraine for his son's benefit. Not even Orwell could have conceived of this kind of delusion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 6 hours ago, DC Tom said: A few months ago I extorted a new car out of a dealer by refusing to give them money until they gave me one. Toxic muppetsculinity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 (edited) 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: i haven't had time to look at news yet. what was the outcome here? i'm sure it was a failed motion/bill/whatever. Edited October 21, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 22 minutes ago, Foxx said: i haven't had time to look at news yet. what was the outcome here? i'm sure it was a failed motion/bill/whatever. Same -- I'm still looking for the vote totals ... haven't heard boo since this morning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 27 minutes ago, Foxx said: i haven't had time to look at news yet. what was the outcome here? i'm sure it was a failed motion/bill/whatever. Hasn't happened yet. Dems will try to kill it first. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 Tom Shillue plays a great Pencil Neck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 (edited) The Censure vote looks to be going on now: https://livestream.com/fednet/house ------------------------------ Edited October 21, 2019 by Hedge 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2019/10/21/report-house-pushing-back-its-impeachment-timeline-to-between-thanksgiving-and-christmas/ Report: House pushing back its impeachment timeline to between Thanksgiving and Christmas CNN’s senior congressional correspondent Manu Raju is reporting Monday that the House Democrats are dragging their feet some more on President Trump’s impeachment, now saying that they hope to wrap things up and bring a vote to the floor between Thanksgiving and Christmas. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 The irony of all this impeachment nonsense is that if President Trump did have aspirations of taking over the government and ruling as a dictator, this kind of shake-up is exactly what he would need to seize control and dispense with the other branches. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 10 hours ago, B-Man said: https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2019/10/21/report-house-pushing-back-its-impeachment-timeline-to-between-thanksgiving-and-christmas/ Report: House pushing back its impeachment timeline to between Thanksgiving and Christmas CNN’s senior congressional correspondent Manu Raju is reporting Monday that the House Democrats are dragging their feet some more on President Trump’s impeachment, now saying that they hope to wrap things up and bring a vote to the floor between Thanksgiving and Christmas. I didn't see anywhere in that article what they were actually going to vote for. Seems to me as if they need to vote on an impeachment inquiry before impeachment. Like actually doing this in sunlight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 22, 2019 Author Share Posted October 22, 2019 How incredibly ignorant on so many levels Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) defended Trump’s use of the term ‘lynching’ to describe the impeachment process. “So yeah, this is a lynching in every sense,” Graham said at the Capitol. “This is un-American. I’ve never seen a situation in my lifetime as a lawyer where somebody’s accused of major misconduct who cannot confront the accuser, call witnesses on their behalf and have the discussion in the light of day so the public can judge.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How incredibly ignorant on so many levels Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) defended Trump’s use of the term ‘lynching’ to describe the impeachment process. “So yeah, this is a lynching in every sense,” Graham said at the Capitol. “This is un-American. I’ve never seen a situation in my lifetime as a lawyer where somebody’s accused of major misconduct who cannot confront the accuser, call witnesses on their behalf and have the discussion in the light of day so the public can judge.” I don't see it, but I guess as far as ignorance goes you should be an excellent judge, with tons of experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 22, 2019 Author Share Posted October 22, 2019 24 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I don't see it, but I guess as far as ignorance goes you should be an excellent judge, with tons of experience. What's a lynching? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 41 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How incredibly ignorant on so many levels Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) defended Trump’s use of the term ‘lynching’ to describe the impeachment process. “So yeah, this is a lynching in every sense,” Graham said at the Capitol. “This is un-American. I’ve never seen a situation in my lifetime as a lawyer where somebody’s accused of major misconduct who cannot confront the accuser, call witnesses on their behalf and have the discussion in the light of day so the public can judge.” Just leaving this here... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: What's a lynching? You keep failing your lords and masters such as Hillary Clinton and you are going to find out up close and personal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 ***************************** 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 22, 2019 Author Share Posted October 22, 2019 The latest CNN poll finds that by a 50-to-43 percent margin, Americans favor impeachment and removal of President Trump, a new high in the CNN poll. A remarkable 45 percent strongly think Trump should be impeached and removed. Support for impeachment mirrors Trump’s support (or lack thereof) among various cross-sections of the electorate. Independents favor impeachment 50 to 42 percent, women by 56-to-36 percent margin and college graduates by a 56-to-37 percent spread (white college graduates favor impeachment and removal 51 to 42 percent). In a perfect distillation of Trump’s standing in general, “26% of white men without college degrees favor impeachment and removal, but [that] ... more than doubles to 54% among white women who hold four-year degrees.” Moreover, “50% say the things that Trump has said publicly about his handling of US relations with Ukraine are mostly false. Fewer, 44%, think the President is mostly telling the truth about it, with views sharply divided by party (86% of Republicans say his public statements on it have been mostly true, while 83% of Democrats say mostly false).” 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Which Democrats? This is a stupid people's argument I see repeated on the right a lot. The Democratic Party of 1900? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 34 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The latest CNN poll finds that by a 50-to-43 percent margin, Americans favor impeachment and removal of President Trump, a new high in the CNN poll. A remarkable 45 percent strongly think Trump should be impeached and removed. Support for impeachment mirrors Trump’s support (or lack thereof) among various cross-sections of the electorate. Independents favor impeachment 50 to 42 percent, women by 56-to-36 percent margin and college graduates by a 56-to-37 percent spread (white college graduates favor impeachment and removal 51 to 42 percent). In a perfect distillation of Trump’s standing in general, “26% of white men without college degrees favor impeachment and removal, but [that] ... more than doubles to 54% among white women who hold four-year degrees.” Moreover, “50% say the things that Trump has said publicly about his handling of US relations with Ukraine are mostly false. Fewer, 44%, think the President is mostly telling the truth about it, with views sharply divided by party (86% of Republicans say his public statements on it have been mostly true, while 83% of Democrats say mostly false).” Which Democrats? This is a stupid people's argument I see repeated on the right a lot. The Democratic Party of 1900? Seriously, CNN? You are still wasting your time here and I hope that your masters realize this soon so you will be assigned elsewhere. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: What's a lynching? Extra-judicial punishment. You know..."cancel culture." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Just leaving this here... Classic whataboutism, you whatabouter! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) The lynch mob term seems to fit. Just check out the LEFTS current narrative. (A few comments above this is a good example) Its all about "polling" that shows a majority supporting removing him. that's the lynch mob mentality. Edited October 22, 2019 by Chris farley 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 22, 2019 Author Share Posted October 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Extra-judicial punishment. You know..."cancel culture." Thanks! Exactly. So you agree that Trumps stupid for saying that then, right? Or or are you saying its a punishment to be investigated for crimes? Please, don't revert to @GG level of response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 What does a lynch mob do? They disregard the law and normal procedures and go out and get their man and then precipitously hang him. Pretty much like what Adam Schiff & Company are trying to do to Trump. Yes, it's an attempted lynching. All of you SJW's with your twisted panties who can't take it for what it is are pussies. Dishonest pussies. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts