Jump to content

AAF needed $250m emergency investment to make payroll


Alphadawg7

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Another headline grabbing wild exaggeration.  *8 teams, 52 players, $250k piece over THREE YEARS,  that is $104 million and they needed $250 million over a few days?. Even double the number for coaches, AAF personnel, refs,etc, $250 mil in emergency cash infusion laughable exaggeration.

 

Payroll could’ve down the line of a number of other expenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, K-GunJimKelly12 said:

XFL needs to become an alternative to college where 18-23 year olds get paid for playing football.  That could be hugely successful if done right.

 

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

is there that much interest out there to make it profitable?

 

 

 

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Thats interesting, although I am not sure they are going that route, but also I have not been following it as closely this second time around.  

 

In other words, instead of trying to go up against the NFL they go against College...hmmm.  Although I would expect the NFL would side with College football and make this direction also a very difficult coup to pull off with the XFL. 

It has NO CHANCE of competing with college football.  No one grew up a Birmingham Iron’s fan but they will kill a man who says “War Eagle.” For some realistic perspective there was a better chance of the Buffalo Destroyers replacing the Bills than there is the Iron’s replacing Alabama.

 

Big 10 schools get $51M each, every year, from their media deal. That is just the media deal!! How is some XFL or AAF team ever going to recruit a kid that has an offer from OSU, Clemson, Alabama, ND, etc?!? It is never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever going to happen. These leagues aren’t competition. They NEVER will compete with the Power 5 conferences or the NFL. 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

 

It has NO CHANCE of competing with college football.  No one grew up a Birmingham Iron’s fan but they will kill a man who says “War Eagle.”

 

Big 10 schools get $51M each, every year, from their media deal. That is just the media deal!! How is some XFL or AAF team ever going to recruit a kid that has an offer from OSU, Clemson, Alabama, ND, etc?!? It is never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever going to happen. These leagues aren’t competition. They NEVER will compete with the Power 5 conferences or the NFL. 

 

So............maybe???

 

The thing they might have going for them is a spring option for football in a football obsessed country. BUT, the NFL has managed to own the spring as well, between Free Agency, the combine and the draft. The NFL is a 12 month sport now. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

 

It has NO CHANCE of competing with college football.  No one grew up a Birmingham Iron’s fan but they will kill a man who says “War Eagle.” For some realistic perspective there was a better chance of the Buffalo Destroyers replacing the Bills than there is the Iron’s replacing Alabama.

 

Big 10 schools get $51M each, every year, from their media deal. That is just the media deal!! How is some XFL or AAF team ever going to recruit a kid that has an offer from OSU, Clemson, Alabama, ND, etc?!? It is never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever going to happen. These leagues aren’t competition. They NEVER will compete with the Power 5 conferences or the NFL. 

 

I agree with you...just said that is interesting thought.  But not only will College Football have an insane amount of money to prevent that, the NFL will certainly back College ball too with all its resources.

 

Like I said earlier, XFL should just fold now and save the money as they won't last again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Certainly but they also have revenue TV, ticket sales, concessions, paraphernalia, etc, the number $250 million doesn't work.

 

 

There is no TV revenue.

6 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Yeah, every football league is going to struggle.  Their best is to link up with the nfl as a minor league.  As awful as Goodell is, the nfl prints money. 

 

 

And this is why the NFL won't bite on a doomed money loser.

 

If a "minor league" ever made financial sense, the NFL would have created one decades ago.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

There is no TV revenue.

 

 

And this is why the NFL won't bite on a doomed money loser.

 

If a "minor league" ever made financial sense, the NFL would have created one decades ago.  

Exactly!! They don’t need to invest. They get it for free and it may be the 2nd biggest sport in the country. The NFL isn’t in the business of lighting money on fire.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

 

Yes i could expand this discussion and yes I didn't list every possible expense item, not did i list every possible revenue generator. If three weeks into the season they needed "$250 million to make payroll" then they are the most inept businessman I have ever seen.  Makes zero sense.

 

And yes a lot of money has already been spend, they started with alot of money, you thin they went through it all in three weeks?  Laughable.

 

And i dont know for a fact is they made money on TV, you cite reason why they didn't, i will only  say football, even bad football,  is a hell of a lot more popular in the US than soccer or Rugby.

 

Borderline impossible, that is my entire point.

 

You seem to be shooting from the hip a lot. How do you know they started with a lot of money?

 

Why would anyone involved, including the future chairman of the league allow knowledge of a 250 million dollar investment? It's not a good look at all. 

 

This story has been on espn.com, bleacher report, si.com, ny daily news for a business day now and they haven't refuted it.

 

Odds are you're the one who is wrong.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

I dont care about any disrespect, you and i disagree.  You clearly have more experiences starting up leagues, never been involved and never put any money into them, they are for people with big egos imo, money pits. But i am painfully aware of startups and the hidden costs put a $250 mil cash infusion to meet payroll after 2-3 weeks is absurd, that is my only point.   

 

And as for Soccer-rugby-football popularity,  confusing world popularity  vs US.  Good luck getting a TV contract for second rate US rugby league.  And yes soccer is popular in the US.  But all the soccer fans I know watch Premier League,  Bundes, etc, they watch the world class soccer, not the third rate MLS.

 

AAF viewership has been very strong.

 

Good luck getting a TV contract?  

 

You mean like the TV contract Major League Rugby already has with CBS Sports, ESPN+, and ATT since it’s inaugural season?  

 

Or do you mean good luck with all the other networks who are already preparing to submit multi-million dollar bids for the broadcast rights that come available again this summer?

 

Third rate MLS?  You mean the same MLS league that’s a multi billion dollar corporation?  The same MLS whose average team value was $20m just fifteen years ago and now average team value is around $250m value?  The same MLS with big revenue TV deals?

 

Maybe stick to chastising things you are more familiar with ;) 

 

I mean it’s all good to not be as familiar with these sports or leagues, or not agree.  But I don’t really see the point in just making meritless claims about something you don’t really know a lot about. 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mark80 said:

 

He bought ownership into the league with that $250M.  Its not the amount used to pay for payroll.  Its a cash infusion.  Potentially missing payroll may have prompted the search for additional funding, but it has nothing to do with what that figure of $250M represents.  Its just the number they negotiated for whatever % ownership in the league he gets.

 

Generally, the league pays the actual payroll.  Contracts are negotiated by the teams, but the league is actually who employs the player directly and pays their paychecks.  Players are assigned to their teams but employed by the league, not the team.  So that’s why the article and the quote from the league talked about player paychecks that could have been delayed.  So this $250m very much impacted players pay checks.

 

Teams have an annual cash call that includes player salaries and any additional capital the league needs to operate for the season if it’s not yet profitable which AAF of course is not and likely won’t be for first 3-5 seasons.

 

The question is why was there a fiscal issue this early in the first season.  Wonder if they had some expected incoming capital fall out or if it was more of a cash flow issue.   

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

 

It has NO CHANCE of competing with college football.  No one grew up a Birmingham Iron’s fan but they will kill a man who says “War Eagle.” For some realistic perspective there was a better chance of the Buffalo Destroyers replacing the Bills than there is the Iron’s replacing Alabama.

 

Big 10 schools get $51M each, every year, from their media deal. That is just the media deal!! How is some XFL or AAF team ever going to recruit a kid that has an offer from OSU, Clemson, Alabama, ND, etc?!? It is never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever going to happen. These leagues aren’t competition. They NEVER will compete with the Power 5 conferences or the NFL. 

 

That might matter if they were playing in the fall. But they play in winter when there is no football, and there are players from those beloved college teams on their rosters. That was the idea. To keep playing and maybe get another shot at the pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

That might matter if they were playing in the fall. But they play in winter when there is no football, and there are players from those beloved college teams on their rosters. That was the idea. To keep playing and maybe get another shot at the pros.

Yeah, they took players that weren’t good enough from those schools. Someone suggested that they may recruit the top guys like Don Yee’s league is trying to.  It just isn’t going to happen. This league is another low end attempt to tap into football’s popularity. They try it every few years and it fails always. They are looking for a cash call a week in. Why should we believe that this league will be any different? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Yeah, they took players that weren’t good enough from those schools. Someone suggested that they may recruit the top guys like Don Yee’s league is trying to.  It just isn’t going to happen. This league is another low end attempt to tap into football’s popularity. They try it every few years and it fails always. They are looking for a cash call a week in. Why should we believe that this league will be any different? 

 

I guess because they have games on real TV networks, including NFL Network. That tells me the NFL at least favors them, if they aren't financially involved.

 

I still think it's weird that they needed extra cash 2 weeks in. What was the business plan? What went sideways after just two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

 

 

 

And i dont know for a fact is they made money on TV, you cite reason why they didn't, i will only  say football, even bad football,  is a hell of a lot more popular in the US than soccer or Rugby.

 

 .

 

There is no TV money because each network that is broadcasting games isn't paying the AAF to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Wow, the AAF has had a successful launch, yet they just faced a major financial crisis that needed a $250 million dollar investment to just make payroll. I do think this league will be successful, but just goes to show just how immense it is to both start a new league and then operate it.  Another reason why I think XFL will fail after one season again.

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2821459-report-aaf-needed-250-million-emergency-investment-to-be-able-to-make-payroll

 

I would have thought the TV contracts would have covered that at least ?? They must be on a prove it deal !! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

There is no TV money because each network that is broadcasting games isn't paying the AAF to do so.

 

" the Alliance of American Football, will kick off its inaugural regular season Feb. 9, 2019, and will include a modest broadcast deal with CBS, league executives announced Tuesday."

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2018/03/20/alliance-of-american-football-to-kick-off-after-super-bowl/?utm_term=.13bfc5944628

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

" the Alliance of American Football, will kick off its inaugural regular season Feb. 9, 2019, and will include a modest broadcast deal with CBS, league executives announced Tuesday."

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2018/03/20/alliance-of-american-football-to-kick-off-after-super-bowl/?utm_term=.13bfc5944628

 

 

 

Lol, you just keep going down this path.  I love how you want to dispute they needed $250M after they said they did and went and got $250M.

 

https://xfl2k.com/news/aaf-not-making-any-money-on-tv-deals/

 

https://triblive.com/sports/aafs-officials-pleased-with-opening-weekend-tv-ratings-but-remain-cautious/

 

"Charlie Ebersol, founder of the Alliance of American Football (AAF) was making the rounds last week after their debut. With the ratings seemingly a success, we’ve since learned some new information about the type of TV deals the AAF has acquired. While speaking with the Alternative Press, Ebersol said “The league is not receiving rights fees from networks. Ebersol described the league’s relationships not as time-buys but as “partnerships that extend beyond just broadcasts.”

 

“What we are looking to do is create a structure that is equitable for the network,” Ebersol said. “People paying for media rights are losing money. In the modern tech world, you want to get people engaged in the product, and there is an enterprise value. CBS has been buying into technology companies, and Turner bought Bleacher Report a couple years ago.”

 

Like I said, they are NOT making revenue off the TV deal right now.  “Modest” doesn't mean revenue right now, or even revenue at all. Took 1 second to google that by the way, even though I didn't need to.  

 

 

 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

" the Alliance of American Football, will kick off its inaugural regular season Feb. 9, 2019, and will include a modest broadcast deal with CBS, league executives announced Tuesday."

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2018/03/20/alliance-of-american-football-to-kick-off-after-super-bowl/?utm_term=.13bfc5944628

 

 

 

 

Yeah the "deal" is.....we aren't paying to televise your games.  Some have speculated the the AAF is paying networks to show these games.

 

"The league is not receiving rights fees from networks. Ebersol described the league’s relationships not as time-buys but as “partnerships that extend beyond just broadcasts.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Yeah the "deal" is.....we aren't paying to televise your games.  Some have speculated the the AAF is paying networks to show these games.

 

"The league is not receiving rights fees from networks. Ebersol described the league’s relationships not as time-buys but as “partnerships that extend beyond just broadcasts.”

 

Yeah, here is how these deals really work.

 

League will do a TV deal, usually 2 to 3 years (its in leagues best interest to do 2 years though) where its really a one year deal with an 2nd year option almost every time.  First year never has revenue, and year 2 usually does not either.  However the reason year 2 is an option is in case there is a fast start in popularity and the rights start to have early value, the league can opt out and negotiate a new deal that may include revenue with the same network or others.  

 

Thats highly unlikely though and what will most likely happen is the league will opt in year 2 (assuming they have an option) under same terms and then look to do a revenue generating TV deal after the term of this one where they have some leverage (assuming the league is succeeding and growing).

 

Someone has to pay for the production of the game, and that responsibility is on the league given its their product.  So the league can often get the production costs covered in the deal with the Network, but only on the games that Network airs.  This is about the best case scenario for a new league like this.  

 

Now, in some cases, you may have to buy the airtime too.  So the league may actually be paying the Networks to show their games.  In which case, they are paying the production costs and for the air time.  Given how sought after sports rights are as well as hard they are to get (most are tied up long term in huge deals) I doubt they have had to pay for the air time though.

 

Major League Rugby didn't even have to do that in the deals with CBS Sports, ESPN+, and ATT Streaming.  Their deal is a 2 year with 1 year option (the exercised second year) and CBS Sports pays for the production of the games that air there, MLR pays for the production of the games that air on the 2 streaming services.  But they do not pay for the air time nor do they generate revenue from it.  Their deal is up after this season and there are networks looking to bid on the rights now.  AAF is football, a bigger sport in this country, and has the relationship with the NFL.  

 

So its possible they are buying the airtime, but I seriously doubt they are...and if they did, they got a bad deal and should fire the guy negotiating the rights and hire me so I can get them a better deal season 2 :)

 

NOTE:  People also commonly think that leagues make money over the season on TV revenue based on ratings and have money coming in over the season from it.  Not accurate, the deal is negotiated before the games are even played.  Ratings impact the future rates, not the current season and the rights fees are already paid before the first game is even paid.  

 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I said after week 1: not having northeast teams is suicide. Professional sports need Ny, phi or Boston. Or all 3. None is senseless. They almost didn’t even make it to week 2. Embarrassing. This isn’t college. You need the real sports cities. Most of them are up here.

 

Agreed, and it's likely they already have them in development.  First season are the teams/cities ready to play, but as they are building the league and as interest expands, they have new groups coming in to buy teams for other cities but won't have enough time to build a new team and be ready for first season.

 

For example, Major League Rugby launched with just 7 teams its inaugural season even though it had 10 teams in the league which included NY, DC, and Dallas too but came in too late to be ready for inaugural season.  Now there are 4 more teams not currently playing in season 2 but will be part of season 3 in January of 2020 because they came on during the offseason and need time to set the team up.  

 

So AAF almost certainly has more teams in their pipe I am sure, and I would expect it will be in some of those territories you mentioned because you are absolutely correct, they are high value locations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I said after week 1: not having northeast teams is suicide. Professional sports need Ny, phi or Boston. Or all 3. None is senseless. They almost didn’t even make it to week 2. Embarrassing. This isn’t college. You need the real sports cities. Most of them are up here.

 

NYC metro area already has 2 bad football teams, 2 bad NBA teams, 1 bad and one pretty good  NHL team, 1 bad MLB team and another decent one.  They aren't hurting for a minor league football team to follow.

 

Boston has a perennial SB contender, a recent World Series winner and a good NHL team.  They wouldn't even notice that there was a minor league football in town.

 

35 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

 

 

.

So its possible they are buying the airtime, but I seriously doubt they are...and if they did, they got a bad deal and should fire the guy negotiating the rights and hire me so I can get them a better deal season 2 :)

 

 

 

 

 

If that's the only deal they could get to have the games on TV, they have to sign that deal...

 

Maybe that's why they needed the 1/4 billion cash infusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

NYC metro area already has 2 bad football teams, 2 bad NBA teams, 1 bad and one pretty good  NHL team, 1 bad MLB team and another decent one.  They aren't hurting for a minor league football team to follow.

 

Boston has a perennial SB contender, a recent World Series winner and a good NHL team.  They wouldn't even notice that there was a minor league football in town.

 

 

 

If that's the only deal they could get to have the games on TV, they have to sign that deal...

 

Maybe that's why they needed the 1/4 billion cash infusion.

And despite the Knicks being terrible they sell out every game every year. You put the teams in places with the most people who care about sports. It’s the league that needs ny, not the city that needs the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

And despite the Knicks being terrible they sell out every game every year. You put the teams in places with the most people who care about sports. It’s the league that needs ny, not the city that needs the league.

 

 

Because generations of NYers have gown up with the Knicks.  No one will care about an AAF team in NYC.     Don't believe me?  Go to check out a Westchester Knicks game...

 

Plus, NYC is a baseball (or basketball, depending on where/when you grew up) first.  Football town last.

 

These minor league football teams belong where they are.

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Because generations of NYers have gown up with the Knicks.  No one will care about an AAF team in NYC.     Don't believe me?  Go to check out a Westchester Knicks game...

 

Plus, NYC is a baseball (or basketball, depending on where/when you grew up) first.  Football town last.

 

These minor league football teams belong where they are.

I live 50 mins from the city. I know what the attitude towards sports are around here. I live nowhere near Buffalo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wtf do they need an ADDITIONAL $250 million for?!

Their players get paid $250k over 3 years, so with only 8 teams of 52 players, that'd be $34.6 million a year. Assuming they've already been paid each week, that number would be even less to cover all the remaining contracts for the year.

Factor in coaching salaries, which we can pretend add up to half of that (which there's no way in hell, but just for laughs), that'd be $51.9 million. Even accounting for venue costs, operations, marketing, etc. that wouldn't come out to more than the player contracts, but let's throw another imaginary $34 million (again, there's no possible way with their size anything is costing nearly that much), and that would total $85.9 million for the entire year.

So assuming the players have been getting paid up until this point, and assuming they're not bringing in $0 dollars in revenue (no, not profit, just revenue), how could they possibly need $250 million, and an "EMERGENCY" $250 million at that!!???!

Another poster pointed out that in order to operate the entire NFL, running all 32 teams and paying all players & employees, it costs $180 million a week total. Yet this small startup with 8 teams, is going to just need $70 million more than that?! Even the XFL isn't going to require that much... Vince McMahon said it's going to cost $500 million over 3 years, which breaks down to $166 million per season. And you know damn well that's going to include a lot more marketing & spending than this league, so how did it just suddenly need $250 million out of nowhere? 

Did some regular fan just walk into a bank & say "hey, can you give me a blank check to start a football league?" without a dollar to his name, all while getting everything for free up until this point, and just suddenly realize "oops, I need to pay for things tomorrow!" Point is, I don't get the amount, or the "emergency" aspect of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BigDingus said:

Wtf do they need an ADDITIONAL $250 million for?!

Their players get paid $250k over 3 years, so with only 8 teams of 52 players, that'd be $34.6 million a year. Assuming they've already been paid each week, that number would be even less to cover all the remaining contracts for the year.

Factor in coaching salaries, which we can pretend add up to half of that (which there's no way in hell, but just for laughs), that'd be $51.9 million. Even accounting for venue costs, operations, marketing, etc. that wouldn't come out to more than the player contracts, but let's throw another imaginary $34 million (again, there's no possible way with their size anything is costing nearly that much), and that would total $85.9 million for the entire year.

So assuming the players have been getting paid up until this point, and assuming they're not bringing in $0 dollars in revenue (no, not profit, just revenue), how could they possibly need $250 million, and an "EMERGENCY" $250 million at that!!???!

Another poster pointed out that in order to operate the entire NFL, running all 32 teams and paying all players & employees, it costs $180 million a week total. Yet this small startup with 8 teams, is going to just need $70 million more than that?! Even the XFL isn't going to require that much... Vince McMahon said it's going to cost $500 million over 3 years, which breaks down to $166 million per season. And you know damn well that's going to include a lot more marketing & spending than this league, so how did it just suddenly need $250 million out of nowhere? 

Did some regular fan just walk into a bank & say "hey, can you give me a blank check to start a football league?" without a dollar to his name, all while getting everything for free up until this point, and just suddenly realize "oops, I need to pay for things tomorrow!" Point is, I don't get the amount, or the "emergency" aspect of this.

 

It said they needed emergency capital, not $250m in emergency capital.  They needed some amount of capital urgently, but the exact amount that was urgent was not disclosed, only the total amount he put in.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

If you put a team in NYC it would work. Certainly better then the places the AAF picked. No doubt. There aren’t any football teams there and there are so many people in the area, you would have a good shot.

 

 

Other than the Jets and the Giants?

 

Anyway, NYC isn't starving for minor league sports teams.  That really doesn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Other than the Jets and the Giants?

 

Anyway, NYC isn't starving for minor league sports teams.  That really doesn't make sense.

Neither of those teams play in nyc. You keep saying the city isn’t asking for the team. It’s not about that. The LEAGUE needs the north east markets. That’s exactly what I have been saying from the start here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

Neither of those teams play in nyc. You keep saying the city isn’t asking for the team. It’s not about that. The LEAGUE needs the north east markets. That’s exactly what I have been saying from the start here.

 

 

Oh come on.   Those are NYC teams.  You’re attempt at claiming they are NJ teams does nothing to further your point.  If the AAF had a team playing....where in the city?? Icahn Stadium?  The meadow in Central Park?  It wouldn’t matter.  No one would come see them. 

 

I may NEED to be with Adriana Lima.  That doesn’t get me past her driveway, however....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Oh come on.   Those are NYC teams.  You’re attempt at claiming they are NJ teams does nothing to further your point.  If the AAF had a team playing....where in the city?? Icahn Stadium?  The meadow in Central Park?  It wouldn’t matter.  No one would come see them. 

 

I may NEED to be with Adriana Lima.  That doesn’t get me past her driveway, however....

 

I have no skin in the game here. The point has been missed 3 or 4 times. Without the north east sports markets the league will fail. That’s my point. NYC will be fine regardless. It’s turning into something it shouldn’t be. I barely care anyway. The league almost folded already. It won’t make it. The AAF needs teams in the north east. That’s my point. It will be the right one too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...