3rdnlng Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 32 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh great. Now I have that ***** song stuck in my head. "Oh Oh the Wells Fargo wagon is a comin' down the street......." Damn you LA. DAMN YOU TO HELL!!! Hey, he's already in California, give him a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 57 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh great. Now I have that ***** song stuck in my head. "Oh Oh the Wells Fargo wagon is a comin' down the street......." Damn you LA. DAMN YOU TO HELL!!! I URGE you to check out the Youtube link I posted earlier in the thread by Mr. Reagan. Explains everything. I've often thought the same sort of process was used for Barry. She's nothing. A fraud. She really is just a bartender. That's it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: That's actually a pretty good look for her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 39 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's actually a pretty good look for her. It's because her mouth is closed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 On 3/12/2019 at 4:11 PM, Koko78 said: This is why I don't do Congressional testimony (well, besides not being important enough to have anything useful to testify about, but I digress.) I'd just look at her and ask her, 'What the ***** are you talking about? Does the dingbat who wrote your questions for you even understand basic English, much less the concept of banking?' It's becoming clear in these hearings. Dems more senior to her are perfectly willing to have AOC ask the ridiculous questions that they would never have the guts to ask themselves and AOC is perfectly willing to accept the questions, rehearse them and make a complete ass of herself without even realizing she's just a prop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 I never knew how to properly apply the term ‘nit-wit’ until this young lady burst onto the scene. What in the world is going on? Is this our future? Are there no adults left in Congress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I never knew how to properly apply the term ‘nit-wit’ until this young lady burst onto the scene. What in the world is going on? Is this our future? Are there no adults left in Congress? Dems have quit and taken their football home to Mommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I never knew how to properly apply the term ‘nit-wit’ until this young lady burst onto the scene. What in the world is going on? Is this our future? Are there no adults left in Congress? The adults left the room long before AOC arrived on the scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Stephen Miller @redsteeze Saying thoughts and prayers do nothing in the immediate aftermath of people murdered while **praying** in their house of worship is the single dumbest ***** nuclear take I’ve ever seen on this website. Ever. 12:48 AM · Mar 15, 2019 · Twitter for iPhone 1K Retweets 4.3K Likes @redsteeze · 9h Replying to @redsteeze I don’t care who it came from. She’s an over exposed child. But *of course* it came from *that* person. Of course it did. Do yourselves a favor and mute her. Forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 It really amazes me how people refuse to realize how much these Democrat politicians pretend to be what they're not, and solely for their own advancement/power. Elizabeth Warren pretends to be a "person of color". Corey Booker pretends to have a spine and to "break the rules" (even though he clearly didn't). Kamala Harris pretends to have earned her keep, even though she ***** her way into power. Beto O'Rourke pretends to be Hispanic. Nancy Pelosi pretends not to be senile. Maxine Waters pretends not to be batshit crazy. Adam Schiff pretends to be honorable and looking for the "truth". Elijah Cummings pretends to give a ***** about "investigating" Trump, in a thinly-veiled partisan manner. Omar and Tliab pretend they're not pieces of crap. Bernie Sanders pretends to be a socialist, with 3 houses and a sports car. AOC pretends to be an "intelligent" woman from the "street". To top it off, they all pretend to be a victim when challenged on their bullschiff. Every single on of these things are corrupt, crooked, fake, and nasty creatures with no redeeming value. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 19 minutes ago, Koko78 said: It really amazes me how people refuse to realize how much these Democrat politicians pretend to be what they're not, and solely for their own advancement/power. Elizabeth Warren pretends to be a "person of color". Corey Booker pretends to have a spine and to "break the rules" (even though he clearly didn't). Kamala Harris pretends to have earned her keep, even though she ***** her way into power. Beto O'Rourke pretends to be Hispanic. Nancy Pelosi pretends not to be senile. Maxine Waters pretends not to be batshit crazy. Adam Schiff pretends to be honorable and looking for the "truth". Elijah Cummings pretends to give a ***** about "investigating" Trump, in a thinly-veiled partisan manner. Omar and Tliab pretend they're not pieces of crap. Bernie Sanders pretends to be a socialist, with 3 houses and a sports car. AOC pretends to be an "intelligent" woman from the "street". To top it off, they all pretend to be a victim when challenged on their bullschiff. Every single on of these things are corrupt, crooked, fake, and nasty creatures with no redeeming value. If you have a brain and aren't using it constructively for about 1200 hours a month then it's a lot of time to fill in, okay then 3000 for you heavily-billable... Congress isn't remotely mentally taxing, requires filling in at least 7 hours a day goofing around with the media and whatnot. They hate their existences, plain and simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Nancy Pelosi pretends not to be senile. In all fairness, she probably doesn't realize she is senile, so there is no pretending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Hedge said: In all fairness, she probably doesn't realize she is senile, so there is no pretending. That's just what the lizardmen clones want you to believe! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandemonium Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 6 hours ago, row_33 said: If you have a brain and aren't using it constructively for about 1200 hours a month then it's a lot of time to fill in, okay then 3000 for you heavily-billable... Congress isn't remotely mentally taxing, requires filling in at least 7 hours a day goofing around with the media and whatnot. They hate their existences, plain and simple That’s 40 hours a day... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chandemonium said: That’s 40 hours a day... ? 1200 Canadian. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 17, 2019 Share Posted March 17, 2019 On 3/3/2019 at 12:29 AM, Hedge said: Eating their own: Edit: And another. Follow-up: 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 On 3/17/2019 at 10:12 AM, Buffalo_Gal said: Follow-up: Google manages search results, not data. Most likely he was removed from somewhere else, and search results just reflect that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Google manages search results, not data. Most likely he was removed from somewhere else, and search results just reflect that. there is talk that Google, along with YouTube is altering their algos again. i don't know how true it is but they are saying that they are filtering out alt perspectives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Google manages search results, not data. Most likely he was removed from somewhere else, and search results just reflect that. Well, he's been scrubbed by Wikipedia, who now states: Quote Because Patrick Moore was among the crew of the first protest voyage and the beginning of the journey is often referred as the birthday of Greenpeace, Moore also considers himself one of the founders. Greenpeace used to list Moore among "founders and first members"but has later stated that while Moore was a significant early member, he was not among the founders of Greenpeace in 1970. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace#Founders_and_founding_time_of_Greenpeace It also cites a Greenpeace Founders article (revised on 3-12-2019) that simply refers to Moore as being on the boat. https://web.archive.org/web/20090301164350/http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/about/history/the-founders Google isn't scrubbing him from history, his own organization is. Edit: Oh, I should point out that not only was he just a guy on the boat, but he's the enemy: Quote Patrick Moore, a paid spokesman for the nuclear industry, the logging industry, and genetic engineering industry, frequently cites a long-ago affiliation with Greenpeace to gain legitimacy in the media. https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/ Edited March 18, 2019 by Koko78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 23 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Well, he's been scrubbed by Wikipedia, who now states: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace#Founders_and_founding_time_of_Greenpeace It also cites a Greenpeace Founders article (revised on 3-12-2019) that simply refers to Moore as being on the boat. https://web.archive.org/web/20090301164350/http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/about/history/the-founders Google isn't scrubbing him from history, his own organization is. Edit: Oh, I should point out that not only was he just a guy on the boat, but he's the enemy: https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/ Yep. I figured somebody retconned him out of Wikipedia and Google picked it up (just because those search results across the top always look like Wikipedia links). But really didn't care enough to dig in to it. Reminder: Wikipedia is not a primary source. Or secondary source. Or any kind of source. Any halfwit can change it, and the editors believe it's only true if it can be sourced on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 31 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Oh, I should point out that not only was he just a guy on the boat, but he's the enemy: Quote Patrick Moore, a paid spokesman for the nuclear industry, the logging industry, and genetic engineering industry, frequently cites a long-ago affiliation with Greenpeace to gain legitimacy in the media. https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/ next thing you know they'll start calling him a Republican or a Fox News Contributor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: next thing you know they'll start calling him a Republican or a Fox News Contributor Goddamn MAGA-hat-wearing international white nationalist Trump supporting Greenpeace founders. Edited March 18, 2019 by DC Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Google manages search results, not data. Most likely he was removed from somewhere else, and search results just reflect that. Since it is a carousel that is Google picking the images. Carousel images "could" come from a list in a specific post (and the newest SEO tactic to try and claim the carousel for a search term AND get the images into that carousel), however, I checked the SERP and the first 3 for "founder Greenpeace" are all wiki - with no individual image list. Again, even if it came from one individual post (which it isn't in this case) Google is choosing the carousel images. #4 is the dailycaller #5 greenpeace (no individual images, he is still listed) #6 climate depot #7 tweet #8 tweet #9 snopes #10 foxnews video Of these, #4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 all have to do with his being removed from the search carousel. He is not back in the carousel with these updated search engine results. My guess (as I cannot know) is Google manually removed him. To further give you an idea of what Google does with images... ever see the zero result at the top of a Google search result? You will see it in a box, and there will be a blurb + a link + an image. Google frequently sets an image that does NOT match that blurb and url (pissing people off who click based on that image). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Foxx said: there is talk that Google, along with YouTube is altering their algos again. i don't know how true it is but they are saying that they are filtering out alt perspectives. Google does tweaks to its algorithm daily. Larger updates may be announced (in the rearview). Moz , search engine land, the google webmasters central (what Google is willing to share), etc. Many of the seo tools or larger services keep track and share in a list or blog post. As far as filtering out a right or conservative perspective on a mass scale... wouldn't surprise me. The EAT update last fall cut out a LOT of websites, posts, etc that were related to health and well being by "non- experts". And how were those "non-experts" decided? Well, Google decided who wasn't an expert. And acted unilaterally (there is no appeal). It would not surprise me to see an alternative point of view from "Google's" biases to be banished from their SERP. People might want to get well acquainted with duckduckgo . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) Click the tweet, then the image in the tweet, for full effect: Edited March 19, 2019 by Hedge 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 5 hours ago, Hedge said: Click the tweet, then the image in the tweet, for full effect: ... as the businessmen slowly get stoned... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 14 hours ago, Hedge said: Click the tweet, then the image in the tweet, for full effect: Billy Joel is Q. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Billy Joel is Q. There are no coincidences. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hedge said: There are no coincidences. Future proves past. 2018: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 15 hours ago, Hedge said: Click the tweet, then the image in the tweet, for full effect: I want this meme to post without the "waitress is practicing politics...." in there to see how many people get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 20 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: I want this meme to post without the "waitress is practicing politics...." in there to see how many people get it. one too many for my concern.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 A bottle of red, a bottle of white It all depends upon your appetite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted March 19, 2019 Share Posted March 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: I want this meme to post without the "waitress is practicing politics...." in there to see how many people get it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) Do they shop at Fascist Island in Newport Beach? Edited March 23, 2019 by Chef Jim 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 The more you read the bartender's posts, the more clearly anhyone can see she's simply a portal through which a specific group is pushing their nonsense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 I would not be surprised - at all - if it comes out that she is not writing her own tweets. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 29, 2019 Share Posted March 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: I would not be surprised - at all - if it comes out that she is not writing her own tweets. I wouldn’t be surprised if it came out that she didn’t know how to write. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts