Jump to content

Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread


snafu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

On 11/14/2019 at 7:12 PM, row_33 said:

So how many Senators are going to have to be there for the entire impeachment trial all JanuAry and February when they want to be campaigning

Savvy move by Pelosi to keep the two most progressive candidates from campaigning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buttigieg surges ahead of his Democratic primary rivals in Iowa, new poll shows

 

The moderate mayor supported by 25 percent of respondents was followed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts with 16 percent;

former Vice President Joe Biden, 15 percent; Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, 15 percent; and Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, 6 percent.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/buttigieg-tops-new-iowa-poll-democratic-presidential-hopefuls-n1084231

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ALF said:

Buttigieg surges ahead of his Democratic primary rivals in Iowa, new poll shows

 

The moderate mayor supported by 25 percent of respondents was followed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts with 16 percent;

former Vice President Joe Biden, 15 percent; Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, 15 percent; and Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, 6 percent.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/buttigieg-tops-new-iowa-poll-democratic-presidential-hopefuls-n1084231

 

It will be interesting to see what smears the DNC comes up with to knock him off the top, so they can advance the chosen candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

It will be interesting to see what smears the DNC comes up with to knock him off the top, so they can advance the chosen candidate.

 

I would guess a moderate would have the best chance in 2020, who ever that is. Tulsi as a VP would be interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2019 at 7:06 PM, Koko78 said:

 

I have a feeling that Trump's streak of winning the Democrat debates will hold.

 

I so love Best Korean press releases.

 

EJXUbzZXsAEXdj1?format=png&name=900x900

 

The hyperbole is just hysterical.

Oh no! Now the North Koreans are interfering in the 2020 elections!

Schiff will dispatch his crack(head) team of researchers to find out Trump’s collusion with Kim. 

 

On 11/15/2019 at 8:15 AM, Joe Miner said:

 

In a way too early prediction, I think it will be Mayor Pete against Trump.

 

He's been the best so far at not saying anything people are paying attention to and not doing anything illegal.

 

He's got the best strategy.  Keep the crazy in check enough to get through the primaries.

 

?

On 11/15/2019 at 6:37 PM, RochesterRob said:

  Mayor Pete's sexual orientation does not play with certain blocks of the traditional Democratic voter base.  It truly will be desperate times if he is nominated at the convention.

Right. “Can I tell you about my husband?” doesn’t sound like a very strong campaign slogan. Just sayin. 

 

On 11/15/2019 at 7:52 PM, 3rdnlng said:

The dems would prefer to have the Senate dismiss the charges so they can say it was a coverup. If the House impeaches, a thorough trial in the Senate is what the GOP would prefer. In that scenario the dems will be crushed.

Several Republican Senators would relish the ability to call Brennan, Clapper, Biden, Obama, Biden Jr., Schiff, Ciaramella, and a host of other seditious bastards to the stand and put them under oath. Cocaine Mitch would have a field day with the rules by just following Schiff’s precedent. The Dems would be absolutely destroyed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nanker said:

 

Right. “Can I tell you about my husband?” doesn’t sound like a very strong campaign slogan. Just sayin. 

 

 

There's something appealing about not only Hillary not being the first woman president, but Bill not being the first "First Gentleman" or whatever they'd call him.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ALF said:

 

I would guess a moderate would have the best chance in 2020, who ever that is. Tulsi as a VP would be interesting

 

Tulsi will not happen. The DNC was out to sink her from her from the beginning (literally, the DNC smears started against her the week she announced,) and she took the original chosen one, Kamala, out of the running.

 

While Mayor Pete has victim credentials (being a gay veteran), he'll lose a lot of the minority vote. Blacks and Hispanics aren't typically fans of gays. That's not even counting the loss of black support he suffered when he gave an inadequate response to a white cop shooting a black man in his city a few months ago.

 

Though he's not as batschiff crazy as Warren and Bernie, he's not a moderate.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh goodie. When is National Save a Turtle Day, again? I want to gird myself for her tweet on that holiest of days.

Don't want to get blindsided like I was about "World Day of Remembrance for Traffic Crash Victims."

12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: 

 

Not laughing at the tweet -- laughing at how awful this pep rally thing is 

 

 

 

 

I'm not sure what's more amusing...that they performed that routine in public, or that they actually spent time practicing for it.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

Maybe she'd have more credibility if she spoke out about human trafficking and the sex slave industry. While traffic accidents are tragic they are not planned. Human trafficking is planned and it can be prevented.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

Traffic "Violence"? 

 

No disrespect to people who have lost family and friends in traffic accidents but she missed a golden opportunity to push the green new deal.  Cash for clunkers II.  Trade them in for bikes.

 

Or mandate roll cages, 5 point harnesses, HANS devices, fire suits and helmets for all cars and drivers.  Problem solved. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KRC said:

 

Maybe we should ban cars. If we didn't have cars, there would be no traffic crash victims. 

  Well, automobiles have long been a focus of the class war so there most likely is far more to it than your joke.  Banning cars in the liberal's mind would be a major step in achieving equality and saving the environment.  Talking about traffic fatalities is the breaker Warren is looking for in order to go to the ultimate goal of elimination.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Well, automobiles have long been a focus of the class war so there most likely is far more to it than your joke.  Banning cars in the liberal's mind would be a major step in achieving equality and saving the environment.  Talking about traffic fatalities is the breaker Warren is looking for in order to go to the ultimate goal of elimination.  

 

so what % of the US population is completely dependent on a car for shopping, family visits, work, doctor and other essential parts of their life?

 

included basically all the suburbs and fly-over land to start...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

so what % of the US population is completely dependent on a car for shopping, family visits, work, doctor and other essential parts of their life?

 

included basically all the suburbs and fly-over land to start...

 

  Good question but something that Warren and her liberal ninny friends are not concerned about.  They either think that public transportation runs everywhere or that "wealthy" suburban and rural folk should know the suffering of inner city people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RochesterRob said:

  Good question but something that Warren and her liberal ninny friends are not concerned about.  They either think that public transportation runs everywhere or that "wealthy" suburban and rural folk should know the suffering of inner city people.  

 

that's okay, none of the people living in suburbs or fly-over counties are their constituency

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

What the hell is “traffic violence”?

 

Seriously.

 

 

i've seen a few incidents of it while sitting there watching, not believing people are raining their fists on each other because someone didn't allow for a second car to turn right into the two-lane store entrance...... :(

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

that's okay, none of the people living in suburbs or fly-over counties are their constituency

 

 

  At present but what as to the future concerns me.  A young person is under a tremendous amount of influence from liberal themed education on the grade school and college levels.  When they take over we will not be referred to as a constituency in the long term but subjects or peasants or some other derogatory term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Well, automobiles have long been a focus of the class war so there most likely is far more to it than your joke.  Banning cars in the liberal's mind would be a major step in achieving equality and saving the environment.  Talking about traffic fatalities is the breaker Warren is looking for in order to go to the ultimate goal of elimination.  

I’m really looking forward to her “green” plan to ban all air conditioning. 

That’s a big vote-getter... especially down south. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...