3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 hour ago, whatdrought said: Because regardless of weather or not she was abused in the 80's, she is being abused and victimized by the dems. What, did she get caught out in the rain or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) I hate the word "c u c k " but if I envisioned someone who embodies the word c u c k it would be Senator Blumenthal. Edited September 27, 2018 by Magox 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: again..the questions was " did your lawyer inform you"...conversations between client-attorney are privileged no? She then did answer the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: What, did she get caught out in the rain or something? ? The only thing that makes me hate myself is how often I make that mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandemonium Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Does blumenthal have a question here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 33 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: I thought the response meant" i stated there 4 boys there, she took as 4 boys in the room during the assault"..and I think that is consistent. Now, the ride home part is troubling..but I am not sure how the trauma would affect that memory..maybe someone with more experience with this type of issue could lend some expertise Not uncommon. Would write more, but have to run to a meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 What the hell is this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That should tell us ALL we need to know about this whole debacle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Not uncommon. Would write more, but have to run to a meeting. would appreciate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 The democratic line of questioning is: "you're doing a great job and you have our support." !@#$ em all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said: again..the questions was " did your lawyer inform you"...conversations between client-attorney are privileged no? She then did answer the question. She did not really answer the question. She said she was unclear on whether the Senate folks were willing to travel. Grassleyx knows what he wrote and it is documented. He now knows whether or not they communicated it properly to their client which is their duty. Would you put it past these people to make a pawn of someone like her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, KW95 said: Republicans love to rape their women before they murder them. You eat crayons and roll your feces into little balls 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 We need an FBI investigation to determine the date of this incident so that the FBI can investigate this incident. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Chandemonium said: Does blumenthal have a question here? He is an ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HamSandwhich Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Since when is it courage and credibility when a person forgets parts of a story? What is wrong with this world? Further, it's usually on things that would be important, how convenient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, 4merper4mer said: She did not really answer the question. She said she was unclear on whether the Senate folks were willing to travel. Grassleyx knows what he wrote and it is documented. He now knows whether or not they communicated it properly to their client which is their duty. Would you put it past these people to make a pawn of someone like her? 1 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 McCabe's attorney just cannot help himself. He NEEDS his camera time. "much longer than anticipated" (re the poly)... she was asked only TWO questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HamSandwhich Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, whatdrought said: We need an FBI investigation to determine the date of this incident so that the FBI can investigate this incident. She needs them to say the dates so that she can agree with something that is factual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 another plane ride? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Doesn't know if she took a polygraph on the day of her grandmother's funeral, or not. Doesn't know if she paid for the polygraph. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Jackson slipping McCabe's lawyer what looked to be a card of some kind... considering her history and ties, and his, I'd LOVE to see what was in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 I might get into trouble for saying this (again), but here goes: Hoax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 53 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: She was not raped. Yes, attempted assault. And it's still just he said/she said. But I refer to her as a "rape victim" simply to defuse the inevitable fallacious "You don't believe her" counter-argument. It moves the argument away from true/false to criminal justice and due process, which is where it belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 BTW @Deranged Rhino ..that flight is on Soutwest...want to talk about claustrophobia!!!! That pice absolutely hurts her credibility with me.still not decided where I lstand here. I like Kavanaugh..want him to be approved..but I cant excuse behavior that is alleged..and I grew up in this era..the drinking i have no issue with ..assault a whole other ballgame. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 I think It's time Mitchell turn to the actual incident and hammer some of the holes in the testimony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said: BTW @Deranged Rhino ..that flight is on Soutwest...want to talk about claustrophobia!!!! That pice absolutely hurts her credibility with me.still not decided where I lstand here. I like Kavanaugh..want him to be approved..but I cant excuse behavior that is alleged..and I grew up in this era..the drinking i have no issue with ..assault a whole other ballgame. 100%. If he did the things he's accused of it's absolutely a disqualifying offense in my opinion. Presumption of innocence issues aside (which are paramount in my mind) -- In 99.9999% of sexual assault cases there is very little benefit to the victim in making up the accusation. Considering the timing, politics, and the willingness of politicians (on both sides) to go to any length to score points, this seems to me to be one of the 0.00001% of cases where I think you have to remain open to that possibility. I wanted to hear her speak, and so far haven't been impressed. But Brett's testimony will be key to how it all plays out in terms of a confirmation. He has to be strong, the dems are going to come HARD after him. There won't be the kid gloves we're seeing Ford get treated with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 30 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Wellllll if hubby and I ever built a house together, we'd probably end up divorced (or the general contractor (or I ) would kill him). Still wouldnt trigger me to me to recall sexual assault memories. That's just because you were never sexually assaulted by a future Supreme Court nominee at an unspecified date, time, and place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: 100%. If he did the things he's accused of it's absolutely a disqualifying offense in my opinion. Presumption of innocence issues aside (which are paramount in my mind) -- In 99.9999% of sexual assault cases there is very little benefit to the victim in making up the accusation. Considering the timing, politics, and the willingness of politicians (on both sides) to go to any length to score points, this seems to me to be one of the 0.00001% of cases where I think you have to remain open to that possibility. I wanted to hear her speak, and so far haven't been impressed. But Brett's testimony will be key to how it all plays out in terms of a confirmation. He has to be strong, the dems are going to come HARD after him. There won't be the kid gloves we're seeing Ford get treated with. even if he did the things that were accused, i'm not sure that it amounts to much more than adolescent fumbling. lying about it, at an adult age, would however in my eyes be much more damning. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 I think he's right. They didn't frame this correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: 100%. If he did the things he's accused of it's absolutely a disqualifying offense in my opinion. Presumption of innocence issues aside (which are paramount in my mind) -- In 99.9999% of sexual assault cases there is very little benefit to the victim in making up the accusation. Considering the timing, politics, and the willingness of politicians (on both sides) to go to any length to score points, this seems to me to be one of the 0.00001% of cases where I think you have to remain open to that possibility. I wanted to hear her speak, and so far haven't been impressed. But Brett's testimony will be key to how it all plays out in terms of a confirmation. He has to be strong, the dems are going to come HARD after him. There won't be the kid gloves we're seeing Ford get treated with. Presumption of innocence is in a criminal matter. Presumption of politics is all that matters here. Every one of the 100 senators will vote based on what they think benefits them personally. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 How can they have this hearing when the other guy in the room is not being called? It's a he said-she said thing without him. And no investigation, even one for 10 days, is bad optics. Didn't Mitchell say early on that she wasn't going to ask about the incident? She has to ask about that. Right now, she's got flying, therapist note, and driving. Not much. Is Mitchell going to question Kavanaugh too, or will the Rs on the committee take up that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said: I think he's right. They didn't frame this correctly. Wondering how much the segmentation is throwing Mitchell. Hopefully they have time to come back to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, whatdrought said: Wondering how much the segmentation is throwing Mitchell. Hopefully they have time to come back to it. This format is a debacle for everyone. If I was Mitchell, I'd punch whoever agreed to that. At one point, Ford reviewed a document for over a minute (which was smart). Edited September 27, 2018 by BeginnersMind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said: How can they have this hearing when the other guy in the room is not being called? It's a he said-she said thing without him. And no investigation, even one for 10 days, is bad optics. Didn't Mitchell say early on that she wasn't going to ask about the incident? She has to ask about that. Right now, she's got flying, therapist note, and driving. Not much. Is Mitchell going to question Kavanaugh too, or will the Rs on the committee take up that? it's simple. it is going to go from a #shitshow to a #shittiershow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: I think he's right. They didn't frame this correctly. That is correct but their path to that goal was extremely narrow given how stories get spun. Whether or not she was abused by Kavanagh or someone else as a teen, she is getting abused by her lawyers, and Feinstein now. They can all sit up there telling her she is brave but they give #%^* zero about her personally. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts