Jump to content

Rico or Hotrod?


Recommended Posts

You can design an Offense taylored to Tyrod, but teams will adjust to that quickly.. The fact is a QB's like TT who are limited in their ability to play from the pocket, and/or cannot hit timing routes with any consistency will always be an achilles heal no matter what.

 

both Dennison and TT will be replaced next season imo, but if its only 1 then TT is the one going

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PolishDave said:

 

Well, we'll see if McDermott has the balls to fire Rico after his first year.   I am not so sure he does. 

 

Tyrod is very likely done.

 

And this team is very likely to get worse next year, possibly a lot worse (if you can even imagine that) unless they truly hit on the QB in the draft.    Sad time to be a season ticket holder.

 

And for me that is why they should not have punted all this back a year.  If they wanted to rip off the band aid of what Rex and Whales left they should have done it in year 1.  Ditch Tyrod, ditch the big contracts, take a shot on their QB of the future in the 1st and pare the team back.  They just punted the pain for a year for more kitty QB play.  It was a wrong choice.  

Edited by GunnerBill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

"Tyrod isn't the right QB to run Dennison's offense."

 

"Dennison isn't the right coordinator to make maximum use of Tyrod's skill set."

 

We can argue which statement is more true, but I think it's plain to everyone that the Dennison/Taylor isn't a workable OC/QB combo.

 

So who goes next year?  Hotrod?  Rico?  Both?  

 

Bofe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

"Tyrod isn't the right QB to run Dennison's offense."

 

"Dennison isn't the right coordinator to make maximum use of Tyrod's skill set."

 

We can argue which statement is more true, but I think it's plain to everyone that the Dennison/Taylor isn't a workable OC/QB combo.

 

So who goes next year?  Hotrod?  Rico?  Both?  

 

 

With McD already utilizing Peterman i think the proof of what he wants to do was in the pudding when he pulled TT .

 

Now i really can't say as i blame him !! 

 

But as it goes in B/lo they will let him walk or trade him & like most other Bills players & coaches that have went elsewhere he will flourish .

 

But i think McD & company has a plan like all the other coaches that have been here i just hope his will work ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyrod is pretty much a goner (overdue in my book). The question is, how is our relationship with McCoy since he ditched us for Denver? 

We all know the NFL has figured out how easy it is to stop our Dennison/Taylor game plans.  Is Dennison able to get production & points out of this offense with a different QB?  

Go Bills!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like Tyrod to stay and Rico let go. However, I still want The Bills to go all out to get their QB in the draft. No reason to bring in a young QB who is forced by default to start day one in a pathetic offense. Get a better offensive philosophy and let the new guy take over when he is ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LittleJoeCartwright said:

 

The play call in the 4th Qtr on 4th and goal was ridiculous and Dennison should be canned just for that.  Yes, I know we've seen many teams do something similar but I just don't get it.  An empty backfield and a low percentage fade pattern?  UNACCEPTABLE!!!!

 

You could still have a spread formation with McCoy in the backfield so the defense can't tell whether you're going to run or pass but an empty backfield made no sense on 4th and goal from the one.  They were very effective running the ball on that drive up until then.  I'd rather see an attempt to power it in instead of a fade pattern by a rookie QB to a rookie WR. I wouldn't even call that if it was Larry FItzgerald.

 

 

 

Totally agree. Fade from the 1 yard line out of an empty backfield was about the lowest percentage play they could call there. To top it off they threw it to their #3 WR who was being covered by legit #1 CB (despite what a vocal faction on this board would have people believe.)

 

It made absolutely zero sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MDH said:

 

Totally agree. Fade from the 1 yard line out of an empty backfield was about the lowest percentage play they could call there. To top it off they threw it to their #3 WR who was being covered by legit #1 CB (despite what a vocal faction on this board would have people believe.)

 

It made absolutely zero sense.

I could not agree more! That play call should have gotten him fired on the spot. Horrible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...