Deranged Rhino Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 I'm o-Zay with this pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Bills also have the Rams 4th this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY315 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) We still have the other 3rd right? Edited April 28, 2017 by CNY315 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianFan Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 OMG so stoked, this guy is A.J. Green clone, I am sooooo happy right now  Sure hands. I like that. I hope he earns Tyrod's *TRUST* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Did we need a solid #2 WR? Would he have been there at 44? Lots of good WR left. Why give up that extra 3rd? What a dummy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? Yes it was he would be gone at 44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Did we trade our 3rd round picks for this?only pick 91 we got from kc. They kept pick 75. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iverwig Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Great pickup for the Bills. Comes from NFL stock too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 damn, I thought they said our 5th Yeah, where is this 3rd and 4th switch coming from? NFL Network said we gave up the 3rd of our 3 5th Round picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 W O W I do need someone to throw to when Sammy is on injured list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Gilmore...out Tre Davious...in  Woods...out Zay ....in  The next pick must be to replace Gillislee or Robey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 28, 2017 Author Share Posted April 28, 2017 We still have the other 3rd right? Â Yep, still have #75. They gave up 44 and 91 to get 37 and 149. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? You never agree with anything. They could trade for Aaron Rodgers and you would find something wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Lots of good WR left. Why give up that extra 3rd? What a dummy Got a 4th back and a solid ass WR that would not have made it to 44, hence why we traded up. Relax before name calling like a child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Â The Bills lacked a fourth-round pick entering tonight but received one (No. 149) from the Rams in their trade. Buffalo got picks No. 37 and 149 and gave up No. 44 and No. 91 (third round). I can live with that. We moved up and swapped a late third for a fourth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big C Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Whaley didn't learn his lesson about trading up in round 2. Was that necessary? Â We still haven't seen Reggie play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) Gilmore...out Tre Davious...in  Woods...out Zay ....in  The next pick must be to replace Gillislee or Robey. Actually hoping it's a safety, RB can wait and Whaley loves the 5th rd gems for that. Edited April 28, 2017 by Real McCoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Yes it was he would be gone at 44 Ditto. Best WR available IMO. Would have been gone by 44 I'd wager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Did we need a solid #2 WR? Would he have been there at 44?i think so. And if you really want the guy, don't risk it, go get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Seems like they're targeting players who showed consistent production throughout their college careers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts