Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

Thats stupid! The oil company money was well spent to tell you what to think. They talk, you walk 

Tibs...May I ask if you’re walking everywhere? Is your home solar powered? Have you purchased anything made from plastic this year? If you haven’t personally made these changes STFU!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Tibs...May I ask if you’re walking everywhere? Is your home solar powered? Have you purchased anything made from plastic this year? If you haven’t personally made these changes STFU!!!!

 

used to know a WASP who boasted he never needed to take more than 60 paces on Sundays

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Are you one of the faithful who think the scientists are in a conspiracy about this? 

 

Thats stupid! The oil company money was well spent to tell you what to think. They talk, you walk 

You have to find a way to rebrand.  Expressions like "Oil Company Money", "BIG OIL", 'fair share' and the like are so 1990s.  

 

Some people believe in toxic-white-masculine-planet warming.

Some do not. 

 

The end.  Or, if you prefer, The end?

 

 And with respect to SoCal's post above, sincerely, what are you doing to save the planet?  I was speaking to a person-made-climate change disciple the other day who happens to be a friend, he was telling me all about the established timeline to destruction.  He told me he was reading about it on his new computer, dropped off at his very doorstep via UPS after being being delivered to a far-off harbor on a massive container ship.  I asked him if he had any idea the size of his carbon footprint but he didn't hear me because he had his air conditioning running full blast. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

You have to find a way to rebrand.  Expressions like "Oil Company Money", "BIG OIL", 'fair share' and the like are so 1990s.  

 

Some people believe in toxic-white-masculine-planet warming.

Some do not. 

 

The end.  Or, if you prefer, The end?

 

 And with respect to SoCal's post above, sincerely, what are you doing to save the planet?  I was speaking to a person-made-climate change disciple the other day who happens to be a friend, he was telling me all about the established timeline to destruction.  He told me he was reading about it on his new computer, dropped off at his very doorstep via UPS after being being delivered to a far-off harbor on a massive container ship.  I asked him if he had any idea the size of his carbon footprint but he didn't hear me because he had his air conditioning running full blast. 

 

 

No, its just the truth. Big Oil obviously hates green energy and are spending billions to brain wash people that science is bad, scientists are engaged in a conspiracy and that science has turned into a religion. All stuff that is beyond stupid. But it's believed on the right. "Understanding" through faith and belief is a medieval way of looking at the world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The USA is leading the world in reduction of carbon emissions. No signatory to the Paris Accord has even come close to matching our progress. The catalyst to that improvement is our increased use of natural gas. While China opens up more coal mines we are doing our part by using clean energy. Meanwhile, the Left gets their panties all in a wad over straws and water bottles.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

No, its just the truth. Big Oil obviously hates green energy and are spending billions to brain wash people that science is bad, scientists are engaged in a conspiracy and that science has turned into a religion. All stuff that is beyond stupid. But it's believed on the right. "Understanding" through faith and belief is a medieval way of looking at the world. 

I disagree. The medieval way involves the tyranny of hypocrisy, where party A invokes visions of death, destruction and lays a framework for morality that he, himself does not practice. The good news was the masses were offered an out--tithe regularly, tithe often and most importantly "ask ye not where thoust money goes, it doth assureth you eternal salvation...".

 

Climate change theocracy in under 100 words.

 

But, since you espouse the gospel of the prophet Algore....you prob didn't realize there was a second part to my post (and of So Cals before). 

 

Think Sean Connory is The Untouchables, after he's shot by Frank Nitti.

 

"...《gasp》....what....are ye prepared...to do?".

 

Seriously, how are you saving the world, and in keeping with the spirit of true carbon credit fascists everywhere, are you offsetting enough for me?  My Prius lease is up soon and I'm leaning toward a GMC pickup. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I disagree. The medieval way involves the tyranny of hypocrisy, where party A invokes visions of death, destruction and lays a framework for morality that he, himself does not practice. The good news was the masses were offered an out--tithe regularly, tithe often and most importantly "ask ye not where thoust money goes, it doth assureth you eternal salvation...".

 

Climate change theocracy in under 100 words.

 

But, since you espouse the gospel of the prophet Algore....you prob didn't realize there was a second part to my post (and of So Cals before). 

 

Think Sean Connory is The Untouchables, after he's shot by Frank Nitti.

 

"...《gasp》....what....are ye prepared...to do?".

 

Seriously, how are you saving the world, and in keeping with the spirit of true carbon credit fascists everywhere, are you offsetting enough for me?  My Prius lease is up soon and I'm leaning toward a GMC pickup. 

 

 

 

So you have no clue at all what you are talking about. No problem bud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

So you have no clue at all what you are talking about. No problem bud. 

You're strong on overwrought emotional posturing and preciously soft on any sort of details. 

 

I gotcha though...it's everyone else causing the problem and you've done your part by having the courage to start the dialgoue.  Pollute away little polluter.

 

I did think of a way I can help though--I'm thinking of getting the GMC Denali package so I can check the performance of my energy stocks right on the dashboard. That will save me from having to drive home, grab the newspaper whenever I want to check stock prices. 

# considercarbon/offset

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You're strong on overwrought emotional posturing and preciously soft on any sort of details. 

 

I gotcha though...it's everyone else causing the problem and you've done your part by having the courage to start the dialgoue.  Pollute away little polluter.

 

I did think of a way I can help though--I'm thinking of getting the GMC Denali package so I can check the performance of my energy stocks right on the dashboard. That will save me from having to drive home, grab the newspaper whenever I want to check stock prices. 

# considercarbon/offset

 

 

 

Make sure you get it set up for natural gas so that you won't feel guilty for getting the big V-8.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No, its just the truth. Big Oil obviously hates green energy and are spending billions to brain wash people that science is bad, scientists are engaged in a conspiracy and that science has turned into a religion. All stuff that is beyond stupid. But it's believed on the right. "Understanding" through faith and belief is a medieval way of looking at the world. 

Tibs you’re clearly more concerned about the word BIG than the word OIL. I predict you’ll be on here in a few years complaining about BIG GREEN! Let’s face it...you just can’t stand the fact that other people are out there making stuff while you’re sitting on your mothers basement sofa with a degree in English Literature and a minor in Social Justice.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No, its just the truth. Big Oil obviously hates green energy and are spending billions to brain wash people that science is bad, scientists are engaged in a conspiracy and that science has turned into a religion. All stuff that is beyond stupid. But it's believed on the right. "Understanding" through faith and belief is a medieval way of looking at the world. 

 

Wouldn't it be awesome if they rose this high?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

(The push for socialism, through climate activism, is more important than people's lives...)

 

Eh, if we have to sacrifice a few hundred million people to ensure a .001 degree decrease in the Earth's temperature by 2150, it's worth it. I mean, not to them, but who cares what the sacrificial lambs think?

 

I, for one, will sleep better at night knowing their noble sacrifice will mean something 6ish generations down the line.

Edited by Koko78
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I just registered the name Atlantis and am taking bids from cities like Miami, New Orleans and Orlando to rename their cities before the waters come.

 

New Orleans put itself half area below sea level, with other bad engineering goofs

 

I trust Miami and Orlando weren't this foolish?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more things change the more they stay the same !!!!!

 

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Eh, if we have to sacrifice a few hundred million people to ensure a .001 degree decrease in the Earth's temperature by 2150, it's worth it. I mean, not to them, but who cares what the sacrificial lambs think?

 

I, for one, will sleep better at night knowing their noble sacrifice will mean something 6ish generations down the line.

 

On ‎8‎/‎10‎/‎2019 at 11:27 AM, B-Man said:

 

Screen-Shot-2019-08-04-at-11.31.39-AM.png?resize=580%2C574&ssl=1

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

Eh, if we have to sacrifice a few hundred million people to ensure a .001 degree decrease in the Earth's temperature by 2150, it's worth it. I mean, not to them, but who cares what the sacrificial lambs think?

 

I, for one, will sleep better at night knowing their noble sacrifice will mean something 6ish generations down the line.

 

 

download.jpeg

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SWATeam said:

Anyone have any witty jokes about the burning Rainforest?  

I'm working on one but priorities are priorities and I'm just finishing up my Infanticide trilogy. I'm looking for other jokes to go with "Infanticide is a horrific form of smotherly love." Any help I can get from you guys here to help me finish my trilogy means I can start the laugh train on the rainforest peccadillo. Off the top of my head I'm thinking I could sort of center it around a "fireside chat" theme.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Court rules Obama EPA violated law on Waters of the United States Rule
 

More than nine months after the last hearing in the case, and nearly nine months to the day of the briefing deadline for that hearing, U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood handed a victory to the state of Georgia and nine other states that sued the federal government over the Obama administration’s 2015 Waters of the United States Rule.
 

Wood stated that the rule, which was intended to provide better protection of the nation’s water, violated the Clean Water Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, and she remanded it back to the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers for further work.
 

</snip>
 

The ruling only affects the states that are parties to the case, where an injunction was already in effect — Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia. Wisconsin was a party to the suit but dropped out in April.
 

</snip>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad week for the global warming crowd, I guess. The post below is loaded with links to click:
 

Michael Mann, creator of the infamous global warming ‘hockey stick,’ loses lawsuit against climate skeptic, ordered to pay defendant’s costs
 

Michael Mann, a climatologist at Penn State University, is the creator of the “hockey stick graph” that appears to show global temperatures taking a noticeable swing upward in the era when humanity has been burning fossil fuels and dumping CO2 into the atmosphere. The graph was first published in 1998, prominently featured in the 2001 UN Climate Report, and formed part of Al Gore’s 2006 movie, An Inconvenient Truth.
 

The graph’s methodology and accuracy have been and continue to be hotly contested, but Mann has taken the tack of suing two of his most prominent critics for defamation or libel. One case, against Mark Steyn, is called by Steyn likely to end up in the Supreme Court. But another case, against Dr. Tim Ball was decided by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, with Mann’s case thrown out, and him ordered to pay the defendant’s legal costs, no doubt a tidy sum of money. News first broke in Wattsupwiththat, via an email Ball sent to Anthony Watt. Later, Principia-Scientific offered extensive details, including much background on the hockey stick.
 

</snip>
 

Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the ‘working out’) behind the world-famous ‘hockey stick’ graph (shown below).
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIRE IN THE MINDS OF (CLIMATE) MEN

 

“Fire in the minds of men” is a phrase from Dostoyevsky’s great novel about revolutionary madness, The Possessed, and certainly it appears the climatistas are possessed by a panic that proceeds from their monomania. Once again last night I saw a segment on one of the network news broadcasts about how the Amazon “rain forest”—the “lungs of the earth,” don’t you know!—are burning up! With a record area on fire! There are pictures! And satellite photos. Surely this is proof that carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming 80 years from now.

 

There’s just one problem with this story: many of the main claims aren’t true, or are grossly distorted. (I know what you’re thinking: Gee, this never happens.)

 

Consider this assessment:

Natural fires in the Amazon are rare, and the majority of these fires were set by farmers preparing Amazon-adjacent farmland for next year’s crops and pasture. Much of the land that is burning was not old-growth rain forest, but land that had already been cleared of trees and set for agricultural use.

 

 

What climate denier said this monstrous thing? Oh, right, it was the New York Times last Friday.

 

 

,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://babylonbee.com/news/scientists-climate-change-killed-us-years-ago-and-the-trump-presidency-is-some-sort-of-lost-final-season-situation

 

Quote


But now climate scientists have revealed the worst news of all: Climate change killed us years ago, and the Trump presidency is some purgatory-like trial similar to the last season of the TV show Lost.

“We’ve been crunching the data, and it’s the only thing that makes sense,” explained climate scientist Andrew Halloway at a press conference presenting the findings. He warned that their scientific conclusion is considered a spoiler for the final season of Lost but also said that the season was “terrible” and that “no one should watch it.”

 

 

:lol:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...