Big Blitz Posted yesterday at 03:18 AM Posted yesterday at 03:18 AM 3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: What would really be interesting is the Top Ten players who played for the Bills but went on to bigger things after leaving. That’s better suited for a Sabres thread. Would get to 100 pages in a day. 2 Quote
BigDingus Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) So what's the difference between AFL MVP & AFL Player of the Year? I see that Cookie Gilchrist was the AFL MVP while Jack Kemp was the AFL Player of the Year & was kinda confused. Also didn't know they had AFL All-Pros & All Stars (I guess like Pro Bowlers). That's cool. My personal top 15: 1. Bruce Smith 2. OJ Simpson 3. Thurman Thomas 4. Josh Allen 5. Jim Kelly 6. Andre Reed 7. Joe DeLamielleure 8. Billy Shaw 9. Steve Tasker 10. Fred Smerlas 11. Cornelius Bennett 12. Kyle Williams 13. Darryl Talley 14. Eric Moulds 15. Ruben Brown (yeah, I said it!) I'm only confident in my top 6 though, the rest I bounce around (especially those I've only seen in replays & sports docs). Edited 23 hours ago by BigDingus Quote
AverageAllensSuspensor Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1. Scott Norwood 2. Aaron Maybin 3. EJ Manuel 4. J.P. Losman 5. Mike Williams 6. Sammy Watkins 7. Cierre Wood 8. Tom Cusineau 9. John McCargo 10. T.J. Graham 11. James Hardy 12. Lodis McKelvin 13. Trent Edwards 14. Ron Edwards 15. Erik Flowers 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 6 hours ago, Doc Brown said: 2002? Did you watch Music City Miracle and think SIGN ME UP!!!!! No I watched a dreadful Detroit - Buffalo pre-season game 😜 Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 17 hours ago, MJS said: I have Kelly over Allen as well. Kelly took us to 4 superbowls. It isn't a list of talent. Considering the overall Impact, I think Kelly did more. But I have no doubt that Allen will surpass him. There’s not one thing Kelly did better than Allen. In fact, Kelly was bad in the playoffs. Frank Reich was 2-0 in that span. Don’t confuse winning with a good QB for winning because of a good QB. The early 90’s Bills were the 2025 Eagles. The difference is Jalen Hurts is a better playoff performer than Kelly. There’s not a single thing that Jim Kelly was better at than Josh Allen. I used the Jalen Hurts argument earlier in the offseason. Jim Kelly was the Jalen Hurts of his day. He was a top 5ish QB that won a lot. Josh Allen is the MVP of the league. It’s not comparable. EDIT: I’m not sure what anyone is disagreeing with? What is there to disagree with? We can Google their statistics in the playoffs. I’m not sure that a reasonable argument can be made, skill wise as to anything Kelly did better than Allen. Toughness was Kelly’s best quality. Allen has that in spades as well. I’m not sure why the topic of Allen being better than Kelly bothers Bills fans? Honestly, it’s not very close. Edited 14 hours ago by Kirby Jackson 3 1 Quote
oldmanfan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: There’s not one thing Kelly did better than Allen. In fact, Kelly was bad in the playoffs. Frank Reich was 2-0 in that span. Don’t confuse winning with a good QB for winning because of a good QB. The early 90’s Bills were the 2025 Eagles. The difference is Jalen Hurts is a better playoff performer than Kelly. There’s not a single thing that Jim Kelly was better at than Josh Allen. I used the Jalen Hurts argument earlier in the offseason. Jim Kelly was the Jalen Hurts of his day. He was a top 5ish QB that won a lot. Josh Allen is the MVP of the league. It’s not comparable. I would suggest Kelly was better throwing the long ball. And you cannot discount that he called all the plays. I have no doubt that Allen will be with Bruce at the top of the list when all is said and done, but that does not mean one has to denigrate a first ballot HOFer in Kelly. 2 Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: I would suggest Kelly was better throwing the long ball. And you cannot discount that he called all the plays. I have no doubt that Allen will be with Bruce at the top of the list when all is said and done, but that does not mean one has to denigrate a first ballot HOFer in Kelly. All fair and it’s not denigrating Kelly in anyway (at least it isn’t intended to). He is a HOFer and he belongs there. He just a HOFer in the same way that Mike Mussina is a HOFer not in the way that Willie Mays is a HOFer. I’d argue, that he was the Jalen Hurts of his era. Hurts has been a Pro Bowler. Hurts has been an all pro. Hurts has led an elite roster to the Super Bowl multiple times. Hurts has consistently been one of the better QBs in the league but never considered at the top. The biggest difference is that Hurts has been elite in the Super Bowl. They are a lot more alike than people want to admit. If Hurts wins another, which he may, we are in for some tough conversations around here. Kelly in retrospect is much better than Kelly in actuality. The nostalgia of those teams have clouded the reality that Kelly was a very good QB and Marv a pretty good coach. Bruce was the guy. Thurman was next. Andre and Kelly were similar. The role players were outstanding and they were really good at the LOS. Those teams were so good. Much in the way though that Eagles fans want Hurts in the conversation with Burrow/Allen/Lamar/Mahomes, Bills fans want Kelly in the conversation with Marino/Elway/Montana and then Young/Favre. Edited 18 hours ago by Kirby Jackson 1 Quote
dcinmuncie Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 hours ago, AverageAllensSuspensor said: 1. Scott Norwood 2. Aaron Maybin 3. EJ Manuel 4. J.P. Losman 5. Mike Williams 6. Sammy Watkins 7. Cierre Wood 8. Tom Cusineau 9. John McCargo 10. T.J. Graham 11. James Hardy 12. Lodis McKelvin 13. Trent Edwards 14. Ron Edwards 15. Erik Flowers you forgot ko simpson and charles clay Quote
FireChans Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: All fair and it’s not denigrating Kelly in anyway (at least it isn’t intended to). He is a HOFer and he belongs there. He just a HOFer in the same way that Mike Mussina is a HOFer not in the way that Willie Mays is a HOFer. I’d argue, that he was the Jalen Hurts of his era. Hurts has been a Pro Bowler. Hurts has been an all pro. Hurts has led an elite roster to the Super Bowl multiple times. Hurts has consistently been one of the better QBs in the league but never considered at the top. The biggest difference is that Hurts has been elite in the Super Bowl. They are a lot more alike than people want to admit. If Hurts wins another, which he may, we are in for some tough conversations around here. Kelly in retrospect is much better than Kelly in actuality. The nostalgia of those teams have clouded the reality that Kelly was a very good QB and Marv a pretty good coach. Bruce was the guy. Thurman was next. Andre and Kelly were similar. The role players were outstanding and they were really good at the LOS. Those teams were so good. Much in the way though that Eagles fans want Hurts in the conversation with Burrow/Allen/Lamar/Mahomes, Bills fans want Kelly in the conversation with Marino/Elway/Montana and then Young/Favre. I think another example is Goff and Stafford in Detroit. We all know the Lions have had far better team success with Goff. But Lions Stafford was an absolute force at QB for quite a while. i think if Lions are listing their all time great QBs, Stafford is above Goff. Despite not having the same team success. Because they all know he was better. 2 Quote
chris heff Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 10 hours ago, Victory Formation said: Off the top of my head and in no particular order: Josh Allen (QB) Bruce Smith (DE) Jim Kelly (QB) Thurman Thomas (RB) Terrell Owens (WR) Andre Reed (WR) Jason Peters (T) Mario Williams (DE) Takeo Spikes (LB) London Fletcher (LB) Pat Williams (DT) Ted Washington (DT) Kyle Williams (DT) Aaron Schobel (DE) Jerry Hughes (DE) Eric Moulds (WR) James Lofton (WR) Stefon Diggs (WR) LeSean McCoy (RB) Travis Henry (RB) Nate Clements (CB) Jairus Byrd (S) Nate Odoms (S) Terrence McGee (CB) Tre White (CB) Jabari Greer (CB) Eric Wood (C) Mitch Morse (C) Dion Dawkins (LT) Darryl Talley (LB) Bryce Paup (LB) Cornelius Bennett (LB) Chris Spielman (LB) Steve Tasker (ST) Don Beebe (WR) Eric Moulds (WR) Stevie Johnson (WR) Jordan Poyer (S) Micah Hyde (S) Where is Joe Dufek? 1 Quote
Einstein Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 16 hours ago, FireChans said: Tasker too high, Kelly too high, Josh too low. Agreed. Kelly and Josh should switch places. 1 hour ago, wppete said: Josh Allen #1 already. He is very close. I can understand why some would put Bruce above him right now, but I wouldn't make any argent for Allen being #1 either. 1 Quote
corta765 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 18 hours ago, njbuff said: I’ll start with who belongs on be list and worry about the rankings later. Kyle Williams Thurman Thomas Jim Kelly Andre Reed Joe Delamielleure Eric Moulds Bruce Smith OJ Simpson Kent Hull Cornelius Bennett Josh Allen Billy Shaw Butch Byrd Cookie Gilchrist Steve Tasker Way to ignore Jeff Tuel Quote
Pete Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 18 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: The list is clearly made by outsiders. No knowledgable Bills fan has Kelly over Allen. The top 3 are: Bruce, OJ and Josh (in whatever order). Thurman is next. Andre and Kelly are the next 2. Joe D follows them. From there, it’s a little subjective. When I was young, my Father played basketball with Bills players. We went to cookouts at Joe D’s house- great memories! 1 Quote
Pete Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: All fair and it’s not denigrating Kelly in anyway (at least it isn’t intended to). He is a HOFer and he belongs there. He just a HOFer in the same way that Mike Mussina is a HOFer not in the way that Willie Mays is a HOFer. I’d argue, that he was the Jalen Hurts of his era. Hurts has been a Pro Bowler. Hurts has been an all pro. Hurts has led an elite roster to the Super Bowl multiple times. Hurts has consistently been one of the better QBs in the league but never considered at the top. The biggest difference is that Hurts has been elite in the Super Bowl. They are a lot more alike than people want to admit. If Hurts wins another, which he may, we are in for some tough conversations around here. Kelly in retrospect is much better than Kelly in actuality. The nostalgia of those teams have clouded the reality that Kelly was a very good QB and Marv a pretty good coach. Bruce was the guy. Thurman was next. Andre and Kelly were similar. The role players were outstanding and they were really good at the LOS. Those teams were so good. Much in the way though that Eagles fans want Hurts in the conversation with Burrow/Allen/Lamar/Mahomes, Bills fans want Kelly in the conversation with Marino/Elway/Montana and then Young/Favre. Hurts and Kelly is a great comparison imo. Today’s team benefits from Josh and all his skills and leadership. Kelly benefited from excellent skills players, Oline, DLine, CB, S, LB, and greatest special teamer ever- 89. Not to forget- Mark Pike Quote
EasternOHBillsFan Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 13 hours ago, Doc Brown said: If we're talking about career as a whole and not just with the Bills then you'd have to include Owens. If you're talking about career as a Bill I'd put Diggs and Evans ahead of Lofton. Lofton was an important part of our high scoring offense by stretching the field in most of our Super Bowl years. I never felt like TO, Diggs or Evans were as crucial as Reed, Lofton or Moulds. Quote
Florida Bills Fanatic Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago It's easy to knit pick the original list. I can't omit Tom Sestak. The guy was a beast and was dominant in the AFL championship years. 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said: Lofton was an important part of our high scoring offense by stretching the field in most of our Super Bowl years. I never felt like TO, Diggs or Evans were as crucial as Reed, Lofton or Moulds. By that standard Moulds shouldn't even make it then. Lofton was important but he wasn't the WR1 was like Diggs. Allen and his connection were the engine that drove the best four years of consistent offensive performance we've ever had. Plus, he was absolutely vital to Josh's development. To me four pro bowl caliber years leading to your team at minimum winning the division title four times in a row and going 2-2 in the Divisional round in what was a tougher conference now compared to the 90's is more impressive. Lofton only went over 1,000 yards once in the first three Super Bowl years. I'd put Diggs ahead of him. 1 Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 39 minutes ago, Pete said: Hurts and Kelly is a great comparison imo. Today’s team benefits from Josh and all his skills and leadership. Kelly benefited from excellent skills players, Oline, DLine, CB, S, LB, and greatest special teamer ever- 89. Not to forget- Mark Pike If you took a Kelly/Hurts conversation to an Eagles message board, 90% would side with Hurts. “He was great in the Super Bowl when they lost and won the other.” That’s what makes it a reasonable argument. Each fan base would argue for their guy. Reasonable Eagles fans wouldn’t try to make the case that Hurts is over Allen (and yes I see the vocal minority on the internet that think Hurts should be 1). Those aren’t the reasonable ones. Edited 14 hours ago by Kirby Jackson 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.