Jump to content

Who Should the Bills take at #28 (TSW Mock 2.0 2024) *Mitchell has been removed please revote!


Pick 28 v2.0 2024 TSW mock   

166 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should the pick be?

    • Xavier Legette WR South Carolina
    • Trade Back with Green Bay. Bills receive 41 (490) 58 (320) and 88 (150) Packers Receive 28 (660) 60 (320)

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/12/2024 at 07:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Mitchell is likely the best long term answer on that list.  I'd prefer double dipping though, because I feel like hitting on WR this draft is absolutely critical to the long term success of the Bills.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chuck Schick said:

I am really coming around to McConkey.  Allen often talks about how so much of his game is based on being on the same page with his receiver, almost by feel as opposed to rigid timing and routes.  Of all the prospects, I can picture Allen maximizing that with McConkey compared to the others.

 

I just can't get excited about a route running specialist in the 1st round. Diggs was the best route runner in the NFL for three seasons. It was great in the regular season, but as we saw in the playoffs that skill set can be erased by physical DBs. The 1st round should be about physical traits.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Visits list and the recent Tweets by ECB are to be believed...

The Bills have done the most work (wide receiver wise) on McConkey, Worthy, Franklin, and Pearsall.

I notice a common them there: lighter, faster guys and route technician types. Following in the footsteps of John Brown, Emmanuel Sanders, and Stefon Diggs.

Just thought it was interesting, and y'all can take it with as big a grain of salt as you like.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, section122 said:

 

Fat fingers lol. I will be surprised in the real draft if one of those guys isn't still sitting there however I didn't really hate any of the logic/fits for people and where they went so perhaps I will be wrong.

 

I think the best chance the Bills have of a trade back is someone coveting a qb.  Without that bait I don't see it.  Also as I mentioned, I really don't see how the value lines up to get a 3rd back.  If they do trade back, it will be for an additional 4th which maybe gets paired with 60 to trade back up but I'm not sure I just don't see a good trade back partner/scenario.

Someone is going to jump for JJ McCarthy. It's going to be hilarious. That noodle arm dweeb isn't the next bom trady

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boyst said:

If @Virgilcan package those two Carolina picks in the 2nd for our third and first I think it is worth it. That 5th year option for Carolina is important, especially if you want a QB this year. The problem is there isn't a good QB for you... so... hmm.

 

@Alphadawg7 the 1st for our first does not get us in the second. we need youth now.

 

 

 

Wait, do the Bills have a 3rd this year?  I thought we traded our 3rd for Rasul Douglas mid-season, and only got a 4th in comp for Edmunds.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legette if we stay put. I base that off whom I feel may be available at #28 and there strength and weakness profile. Sounds like Legette is a hand catcher and can climb the ladder to snag the catch which I think compliments Allen well. 


I though about Mitchell but his weaknesses seem like something I want to avoid.
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the short list, I think my order of preference would be:

 

1. Mitchell

2. Legette

3. Worthy

4. McConky

 

But I could probably swap 3 & 4 depending on how the wind is blowing.

 

I dont think Mitchell is available at 28 irl. Guess I'd be happy with any of the remaining 3, and even Franklin. Maybe not overly excited, but happy they at least addressed the WR position.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

From the short list, I think my order of preference would be:

 

1. Mitchell

2. Legette

3. Worthy

4. McConky

 

But I could probably swap 3 & 4 depending on how the wind is blowing.

 

I dont think Mitchell is available at 28 irl. Guess I'd be happy with any of the remaining 3, and even Franklin. Maybe not overly excited, but happy they at least addressed the WR position.

the RAS is a facotr with Mitchell. I think that offers a lot.

 

I would love a chance to trade down and still get Mitchell and then double dip with McConky. I think Mitchell is gone by 28 though.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I voted Legette. McConkey and Worthy were also to be considered. A trade back getting 2 would be ideal. 


I agree. Would love a trade back a few spots take Legette with the first pick and then  McConkey, Worthy or Tez Walker, whoever is available at #60 in that order. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

 

no love for Mitchell?  :cry:

I think his ceiling is high. I think that his floor is too low for where he will be picked. I’ve said it before but he gives me George Pickens vibes in terms of effort. If I could get McConkey and Mitchell, sure. If the Bills go Mitchell they are going to HAVE to have someone that can handle a lot of targets immediately. You can’t have 2 low floor guys when you have 200ish targets available.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuck Schick said:

I am really coming around to McConkey.  Allen often talks about how so much of his game is based on being on the same page with his receiver, almost by feel as opposed to rigid timing and routes.  Of all the prospects, I can picture Allen maximizing that with McConkey compared to the others.

Me too. I voted for the Ladd. He’s gonna be a good pro - right away!

 

the consolation prizes aren’t far behind, if at all. Which flavor I suppose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...