Jump to content

Allen was legendary (even better than 13 seconds Allen)


Einstein

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, klos63 said:

Our passing game was subpar, not blaming Allen, but 39 attempts for 186 yards? If not for his rushing, we're not even competitive. Brady called a terrible 2nd half. We are now a running team with not much of a passing attack.  Last 7 games only 1 over 300  yards passing, 3 under 200. 

 

Can't just depend on him running for TD's.

 

We can't get receivers deep. Even on play action. No separation downfield. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

We lost because of Allen. This fanbase sometimes doesn’t realize what they have at QB 

The Bills lost because of Josh Allen?  I don’t know what game you were watching.  Focus on your agenda I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Murdox said:

 

And we win because of Allen.  I hope you understand that as well.  We need to get a better receiver to help on the outside.  Our WRs started to disappear as the season went on, and they struggled to get separation against man defenses.

We win what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

You may figure it out once you realize that the QB isn’t all 11 positions on offense. For example, he can’t throw the ball, and catch it.

 

Example: He can’t throw it 60 yards downfield into Diggs bread basket AND run down and catch it for him.

image.thumb.png.60579f9008e4719121bb319c384a9a2b.png

 

Not to stand in the way of a "legendary performance" I mean, we did score seven 2nd half points. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bockeye said:

We win what?

 

We win games because of Allen.  You do know you have to win games to get to the Superbowl.  ;)  There are about 29 other teams that would have liked to have a regular season where they were seeded #2 in their conference.  Yes, I understand that you are focused on the Superbowl - I understand - but you have to be crazy to think we need to replace Josh.  We'd likely be back in another 20 year rut and I'd be dead before we got a replacement that was close to his level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

We can't get receivers deep. Even on play action. No separation downfield. 

We need new receivers and new OC. Diggs was non existent under Brady. One game over 50 yards under Brady.  Kincaid gets open downfield but for some reason, we don't do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mikie2times said:

image.thumb.png.60579f9008e4719121bb319c384a9a2b.png

 

Not to stand in the way of a "legendary performance" I mean, we did score seven 2nd half points. 

Well 13 of 21 for 250 would be alot better, but he can’t catch the ball himself. You do realize that right. Did you watch the game or just looking for stats to help your argument 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

image.thumb.png.60579f9008e4719121bb319c384a9a2b.png

 

Not to stand in the way of a "legendary performance" I mean, we did score seven 2nd half points. 

 

Thia is just straight up trolling considering the post you quoted explained these stats.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Allen unnecessarily went into hero ball mode. 
 

More than anything else, I think that is why we lost. 

 

Now now.  You know you can't blame Josh for anything around here.  

 

This was a team loss.  Plenty of blame to go around, including Josh.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eventually legendary has to actually mean legendary. It can't keep meaning legendary with conditions on why it wasn't actually legendary.  

Just now, Einstein said:

 

Thia is just straight up trolling considering the post you quoted explained these stats.

I don't blame Josh for the loss, but your post is trash

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KeLLy1278 said:

The Bills lost because of Josh Allen?  I don’t know what game you were watching.  Focus on your agenda I guess.

 

 He forgot the question mark so it made it look like a statement isn’t of an incredulous question. He agrees with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Gugny said:


Im not trolling and I don’t want you to get suspended. 
 

I don’t think there are many bills fans who have loved Josh Allen since day one like I have. 
 

he is not immune from criticism. 
 

This has been a season full of questionable decisions on his part and it was no different tonight. 
 

I believe we will win a Lombard with Josh Allen. 
 

Bit he will need to be better, situationally. 
 

I don’t think that’s an unfair assessment. 

You're a troll and only a blind bat wouldn't see it.  There is no point in even replying to your points as they're not made in good faith or in the spirit of an open & honest discussion.  And please with the "he is not immune from criticism" crap about Allen.

 

I hate the idea of putting trolling posters on "ignore" as it's like having to shut your blinds because the neighbor is running around naked down the street.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...