KellyToTasker Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, DuckyBoys said: Kincaid's been dropping his share past few weeks Mist be hanging out w Knox too much He pretty much only drops the poorly thrown passes. Knox drops many of the well thrown passes. They’re not the same. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextmanup Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, Buffalo Boy said: Now, if we could get one more sure handed guy and get rid of Knox Last year when we took Kincaid with such a high draft pick I said the team would move on from Knox, and my post got slammed with people disagreeing and thumbs downing, etc. Now comments like yours are increasingly common and don't seem to hit any friction. We will definitely move on from Knox when we can. His K is not tradable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToTasker Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 42 minutes ago, Einstein said: Your analysis of the game is a bit myopic in my opinion. Having those playmakers on the field, with their speed, was stressing the Steelers defense. Did you notice we had more open receivers this week (the first two TD’s were very open) than usual? It’s in part due to the stress that the speed on the field had on the Steelers. They had to compensate for it. And this man has to get the ball more: I 110% agree, it was crazy how much of a cushion they had at times. I hope Davis doesn’t play as much. Let the other guys play, it’s working. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 (edited) 10 is a baller. Get him the ball. 86,4 +10 on rookie contracts puts us in a good position. we just need to fend off injuries ffs. 🤦🏻♂️ Edited January 16 by NewEra 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwai San Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, Einstein said: Sigh. Knox is an enigma. He does so many good things… but then drops a wide open pass that hits him square in the hands. Frustrating. I’d also like to see Kincaid go up and get the ball too. He would have had a 2nd TD if he didn’t wait for the ball to get to him (allowed the defender to deflect it). If he had went up and hand-caught it (ala Gronk), he would unlock a new level. Ummmm - he is a rookie still.....let's give him some time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 3 hours ago, streetkings01 said: Gabe going up against his favorite team this week. Offense scored 31 points…..should’ve been 37. Ok. And they let Pittsburgh get back into the game before putting them away. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Boy Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 6 hours ago, Nextmanup said: Last year when we took Kincaid with such a high draft pick I said the team would move on from Knox, and my post got slammed with people disagreeing and thumbs downing, etc. Now comments like yours are increasingly common and don't seem to hit any friction. We will definitely move on from Knox when we can. His K is not tradable. , I was definitely not one of the slammers. Knox has not been dependable from the get go. He’s a good story and a nice guy but we have all seen enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 "The offense is better without Gabe Davis" i agree.... how many interceptions did josh throw ?......answer: NONE !......that's not a coincidence. 2 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 12 hours ago, Einstein said: Is refreshing. Gabe being out allowed us to get our playmakers like Hardy and Shakir on the field more often (more snaps to go around). And they both delivered at key times! And it’s not just the opponent. That Steelers defense was #6 in the NFL in points against, and that was the MOST points the Steelers gave up all season (and that’s even with TWO missed field goals). other than Diggs, the Bills WRs had 3 catches yesterday. Harty had a good RAC on his one catch yesterday but otherwise hasn't done anything the past 3 weeks. After the half, the Bills struggled---Murray was getting targets?! On their 1st series they punted. On the second series, 14 plays and only once was a WR targeted. FG was the result. Next series, 2 WRs targeted in 9 plays, TD. With the lead slipping away, Allen attempted 10 passes in the second half, only 3 to WRs. For the game, the RBs had more targets than Shakir and Harty. I think they could have used Davis out there for sure. This thread is just a cheap shot. 1 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streetkings01 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 6 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Ok. And they let Pittsburgh get back into the game before putting them away. We won 31-17…..we scored 30+ points and we kept the Steelers under 20. It’s the playoffs and that was a good dub! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjt328 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 The Steelers were very thin at Linebacker, and it's clear we focused on attacking them with our Tight Ends. Against the Chiefs, we may need some production from the outside receivers. Getting Gabe Davis back would be very good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted January 16 Author Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: other than Diggs, the Bills WRs had 3 catches yesterday. 4, actually. Including the game clinching TD. https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/topic/252550-the-offense-is-better-without-gabe-davis/?do=findComment&comment=8878849 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman#1 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 13 hours ago, Einstein said: The offense is better without Gabe Davis And it’s not just the opponent. That Steelers defense was #6 in the NFL in points against, and that was the MOST points the Steelers gave up all season (and that’s even with TWO missed field goals). It absolutely is just the opponent. Every opponent is different. Which often means different personnel groups and game plans work better against some teams than others. The offense is better varying personnel and tactics week to week and depending on the game plan and the defense's capabilities, personnel and specific game plans for the Bills offense. The Steelers are the 21st ranked defense. They aren't playing that badly right now, but without Watt they also weren't themselves at all. Oh, and don't act like you're being intellectually fair by mentioning the "TWO missed field goals" and then forgetting to mention that one Bill TD came on a 1-play 29 yard drive. Drives that start on your opponent's 29 yard line aren't mostly on the defense if you score. And one of the missed field goals came on a drive starting at the Pittsburgh 32. One more drive started at the Bills 44. Drive starts like that will greatly jack up your odds of scoring more. 10 hours ago, Nextmanup said: Last year when we took Kincaid with such a high draft pick I said the team would move on from Knox, and my post got slammed with people disagreeing and thumbs downing, etc. Now comments like yours are increasingly common and don't seem to hit any friction. We will definitely move on from Knox when we can. His K is not tradable. If by "definitely" you mean that it's not impossible, I'd have to agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted January 16 Author Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Thurman#1 said: It absolutely is just the opponent. The Steelers are the 21st ranked defense. 6th ranked actually, in points given up per game. Which is a far more telling stat than yards given up, wouldn’t you say? The offense tied the highest points output we have had in 7 weeks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: other than Diggs, the Bills WRs had 3 catches yesterday. Harty had a good RAC on his one catch yesterday but otherwise hasn't done anything the past 3 weeks. After the half, the Bills struggled---Murray was getting targets?! On their 1st series they punted. On the second series, 14 plays and only once was a WR targeted. FG was the result. Next series, 2 WRs targeted in 9 plays, TD. With the lead slipping away, Allen attempted 10 passes in the second half, only 3 to WRs. For the game, the RBs had more targets than Shakir and Harty. I think they could have used Davis out there for sure. This thread is just a cheap shot. The ‘struggle’ is a bit overblown imo…Steelers are a good defense even without watt…you’re not gonna score a td every time. A Tomlin defense giving up 31 and possibly more if we didn’t ice the game is very unusual 6 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: It absolutely is just the opponent. Every opponent is different. Which often means different personnel groups and game plans work better against some teams than others. The offense is better varying personnel and tactics week to week and depending on the game plan and the defense's capabilities, personnel and specific game plans for the Bills offense. The Steelers are the 21st ranked defense. They aren't playing that badly right now, but without Watt they also weren't themselves at all. Oh, and don't act like you're being intellectually fair by mentioning the "TWO missed field goals" and then forgetting to mention that one Bill TD came on a 1-play 29 yard drive. Drives that start on your opponent's 29 yard line aren't mostly on the defense if you score. And one of the missed field goals came on a drive starting at the Pittsburgh 32. One more drive started at the Bills 44. Drive starts like that will greatly jack up your odds of scoring more. If by "definitely" you mean that it's not impossible, I'd have to agree. 21st ranked defense? Lol theyre like 6th in DVOA and points allowed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibum Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 (edited) I think the Bills offense is better when they are playing the Steelers. Davis has had some big games vs. the Chiefs - they are going to need him out there. Edited January 16 by skibum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, Einstein said: 6th ranked actually, in points given up per game. Which is a far more telling stat than yards given up, wouldn’t you say? The offense tied the highest points output we have had in 7 weeks. I’ll genuinely never understand how people will talk our opponents up all week then we win and they’re like ‘well our opponent was bad’ 😂. Mason Rudolph was on a heater which prompted the benching of Pickett who was ready for the Vikings game but we beat a third string qb apparently and bad defense lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternOHBillsFan Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: other than Diggs, the Bills WRs had 3 catches yesterday. Harty had a good RAC on his one catch yesterday but otherwise hasn't done anything the past 3 weeks. After the half, the Bills struggled---Murray was getting targets?! On their 1st series they punted. On the second series, 14 plays and only once was a WR targeted. FG was the result. Next series, 2 WRs targeted in 9 plays, TD. With the lead slipping away, Allen attempted 10 passes in the second half, only 3 to WRs. For the game, the RBs had more targets than Shakir and Harty. I think they could have used Davis out there for sure. This thread is just a cheap shot. What, to run the wrong route or to drop the ball? Brady was game planning what the D was giving them and it worked. The WRs were getting open and the Stillers adjusted so Brady adjusted... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Kind of a small sample size, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.