Jump to content

Speculation and discussion on Bills final roster cuts


Simon

Recommended Posts

Some speculating Reid Ferguson will get cut for a day so they can get Spector to in-season IR giving them the option of bringing him back at some point during the year.  Then will resign Ferguson again tomorrow. Perfect candidate since he has no guarantees in his contract and is not subject to waivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Turk said:

Some speculating Reid Ferguson will get cut for a day so they can get Spector to in-season IR giving them the option of bringing him back at some point during the year.  Then will resign Ferguson again tomorrow. Perfect candidate since he has no guarantees in his contract and is not subject to waivers.


This team has an addiction to below average depth LB's that never see the field 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Do we keep 9 or 10 OL? 
 

Dawkins   Van Demark
McGovern  Edwards

Morse  
Torrence   Bates

Brown     Veteran
 

Gouraige? Alec Anderson?

 

Gouirage was cut with intention of bringing him back on the PS as found in the cut thread...Anderson made the team

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

Some speculating Reid Ferguson will get cut for a day so they can get Spector to in-season IR giving them the option of bringing him back at some point during the year.  Then will resign Ferguson again tomorrow. Perfect candidate since he has no guarantees in his contract and is not subject to waivers.

So what determines whether or not someone is subject to waivers?  I noticed that comment make about some veterans, and some rookies.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


This team has an addiction to below average depth LB's that never see the field 

 

He does see the field, on ST. Backup LB's typically have a very large role on Special teams.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, buffaloboyinATL said:

So what determines whether or not someone is subject to waivers?  I noticed that comment make about some veterans, and some rookies.  

 

"Players with fewer than four accrued seasons in the NFL are subject to waivers, meaning any other team can claim them. Veterans with four or more accrued seasons in the league, however, are released instead of waived, making them free agents who can sign with any team of their choosing."

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems the bills whether by design, because the talent warrants it or maybe because the top heavy salary cap numbers demand it are going with some youth.

 

Youth makes less money but brings more mistakes generally.  When you have superstars like this team does you have to essentially do this and cut veteran backups and save where you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said:

Seems the bills whether by design, because the talent warrants it or maybe because the top heavy salary cap numbers demand it are going with some youth.

 

Youth makes less money but brings more mistakes generally.  When you have superstars like this team does you have to essentially do this and cut veteran backups and save where you can.

 

It is the KC Chiefs way to go with the youth over middling costing vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...