Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Lets look at the tone and intent of these posts.  Some of us are excited and posting updates...some are doing otherwise.  I'd bet at least half of my posts are calling you out for your negativity.

 

So you’re crusading against me… and my 14 total posts in this thread in the last six months.

 

Got it

  • Eyeroll 2
Posted
47 minutes ago, Einstein said:


Hold on....

In the last 500 posts of this thread - that is going back 6 months - I have posted a total of 14 times in this thread.

But you? You have posted 17 times in that same period. You have posted more than me in this thread in the past 6 months!


If you think I am 'crusading', then you must be leading an entire holy war.

It's the body of your work that is working against you. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

So you’re crusading against me… and my 14 total posts in this thread in the last six months.

 

Got it

 

No, you clearly don't.  But nice deflection.

 

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Mr Info said:

It appears his ( @eball) point is not the volume of posts but the perspective and gist of your posts in this thread.

 

Oh i’m aware.

 

Post 100 times about how great the stadium is = not a problem.


Post 14 times (in a 6 month span) about how you don’t like aspects of the stadium = crusading!!!

 

The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

 

Last time I checked, the thread title isn’t “post great things about the stadium”. It’s stadium discussion. The good, the bad, the ugly, the interesting, the not interesting - everything stadium discussion. 

 

 

Edited by Einstein
  • Eyeroll 2
  • Disagree 1
Posted
On 6/3/2025 at 11:00 PM, Einstein said:

 

There is absolutely no way you can look at the two stadiums and say with a straight face that there is not a large difference.

 

One looks like it was built in 2010 and the other looks like it was built in 2025.

 

Ggt_N_vW8AA2x6M

 

syp439nvcblefymgwwwe

 

Then there is the Browns new stadium - which is the ugliest stadium I think i’ve ever seen. But it does at least look like it is being built this decade. 

 

Boy is it hideous though.

 

e4ddec10-fc40-478d-a5c3-e2a377c5eeed_192

I looked at the two pictures several times and am having an extremely hard time identifying any significant difference between the two, besides the glass roof. Please explain to me how the Titans stadium is more modern looking than the Bills? Or is this just another disguised dome debate?

 

I am not a fan of the new Bills stadium because I think they should have built a dome. But for an open air it's perfectly fine. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

Oh i’m aware.

 

Post 100 times about how great the stadium is = not a problem.


Post 14 times (in a 6 month span) about how you don’t like aspects of the stadium = crusading!!!

 

The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

 

Last time I checked, the thread title isn’t “post great things about the stadium”. It’s stadium discussion. The good, the bad, the ugly, the interesting, the not interesting - everything stadium discussion. 

 

 

 

Your crusade is consistent and persistent.  At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome and how the Bills are “obviously” cheaping out on everything, doing nothing new, and taking everyone for a ride.  Last month you made the brilliant observation that the Bills aren’t installing cushioned seats in an outdoor venue, assuming that fans will be unhappy — and then included pictures of seats in domed stadiums to back up your argument!  That’s classic.  Now it’s that the design is apparently old and there’s no way technology has improved.

 

Keep doing your thing, man…

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, eball said:

 

Your crusade is consistent and persistent.  At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome and how the Bills are “obviously” cheaping out on everything, doing nothing new, and taking everyone for a ride.  Last month you made the brilliant observation that the Bills aren’t installing cushioned seats in an outdoor venue, assuming that fans will be unhappy — and then included pictures of seats in domed stadiums to back up your argument!  That’s classic.  Now it’s that the design is apparently old and there’s no way technology has improved.

 

Keep doing your thing, man…

 


Same old song in the PSL thread. Always harping on the negative. Relentless. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, eball said:

 At least twice a month you let us know (again) that you’re unhappy with Pegula’s decision not to build a dome

 

Now I know you’re confusing me with someone else. I am not, and have never been, a domer (someone who cares deeply about wanting a dome). If it was my choice, I probably would have chosen a dome - but as my post history shows, I have always said I am fine with open air too.

 

In fact, the last time I mentioned the word “dome” in a post was 7 MONTHS ago when I said I’m surprised they didn’t build a dome just because of the liability of slick steps. And before that? It was a 16 MONTHS ago that I last mentioned anything about a dome - that time it was to joke around with the domers. 

 

So… 1 post in 7 MONTHS is “at least twice a month” to you? Or maybe it was 2 posts in 16 MONTHS that put it over the top for you?

 

And before all that, you hit me with the accusation that I was “crusading” in this thread—only for it to come out that I account for just 14 of the last 500 posts, and that you account for more. Then, suddenly, you changed your tune and the issue wasn’t how often I post, but that you just don’t like my opinions. Well, sorry, but not liking my opinions is not crusading; that’s just disagreement.


Question for you: What are you going to completely fabricate and lie about next!?

 

Edited by Einstein
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Now I know you’re confusing me with someone else. I am not, and have never been, a domer (someone who cares deeply about wanting a dome). If it was my choice, I probably would have chosen a dome - but as my post history shows, I have always said I am fine with open air too.

 

In fact, the last time I mentioned the word “dome” in a post was 7 MONTHS ago when I said I’m surprised they didn’t build a dome just because of the liability of slick steps. And before that? It was a 16 MONTHS ago that I last mentioned anything about a dome - that time it was to joke around with the domers. 

 

So… 1 post in 7 MONTHS is “at least twice a month” to you? Or maybe it was 2 posts in 16 MONTHS that put it over the top for you?

 

And before all that, you hit me with the accusation that I was “crusading” in this thread—only for it to come out that I account for just 14 of the last 500 posts, and that you account for more. Then, suddenly, you changed your tune and the issue wasn’t how often I post, but that you just don’t like my opinions. Well, sorry, but not liking my opinions is not crusading; that’s just disagreement.


Question for you: What are you going to completely fabricate and lie about next!?

 

 

Uh, that's me. Dome, dome, dome, dome....

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
20 hours ago, RiotAct said:

you guys sound like my parents a few months before they officially separated and I had to get used to a new school district.

 

After the divorce, dad gets the old stadium and mom gets the new one and puts a dome on it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Sorry for a question that may have addressed 50 pages ago.  What about the grass?  Does grass grow in December with average temps in the 30s and a gray sky.  I know about the heat coils but will those make the grass grow?  I think not.  At Lambeau they mix in synthetic fibers.  Will the Bills do the same?

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Ga boy said:

Sorry for a question that may have addressed 50 pages ago.  What about the grass?  Does grass grow in December with average temps in the 30s and a gray sky.  I know about the heat coils but will those make the grass grow?  I think not.  At Lambeau they mix in synthetic fibers.  Will the Bills do the same?


https://stadiumdb.com/news/2025/04/usa_new_highmark_stadium_to_feature_stateoftheart_grass_support_system

 

The system will incorporate sub-air technology (airflow beneath the field), advanced irrigation, wireless temperature and humidity control, hydronic heating, and grow lights — all designed to enable grass to thrive regardless of the weather. The Bills’ new home will be only the second NFL stadium to feature such an advanced year-round grass growth system.


Good video here:

 

Edited by Jukester
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted

Interesting, but I think Lake Erie may say pffftt...

Hold my beer! 

 

Also, does anyone really say say state of the art anymore?

How old is that? 

 

Posted

In all the many years I spent pushing a lawnmower around my parents WNY lawn never once did I think to myself that it was really hard to grow grass in Buffalo. 😂

  • Haha (+1) 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...