Jump to content

Brett Favre suing Shannon Sharpe and Pat McAfee🤣


Dablitzkrieg

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

They wanted him to plead to 5 counts of conspiracy and 13 counts of fraud, but he only pleaded to one each. You might be completely right, I’m not trying to defend Favre, just trying to look at things objectively, as we are just told lies by the media about politicians that also do nothing but lie to benefit themselves. Its also completely possible that McAfee and/or Sharpe false statements about him, I dont listen to all their content.

 

The only thing that can make this situation better is we draft 6 future hall of famers.

Well at least he didn't plead guilty to more crimes....that's an interesting silver lining.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

They wanted him to plead to 5 counts of conspiracy and 13 counts of fraud, but he only pleaded to one each. You might be completely right, I’m not trying to defend Favre, just trying to look at things objectively, as we are just told lies by the media about politicians that also do nothing but lie to benefit themselves. Its also completely possible that McAfee and/or Sharpe false statements about him, I dont listen to all their content.

 

The only thing that can make this situation better is we draft 6 future hall of famers.

He was sentenced to 90 years in prison, and has to serve at least 32. This has nothing to do with media spin etc. 

One last thing: you're confusing federal and state court. He was charged in both:

 

Hours after pleading guilty in federal court, Davis appeared in state court and pleaded guilty to five counts of conspiracy and 13 counts of fraud against the government. Hinds County Circuit Judge Adrienne Wooten gave Davis a 90-year sentence with 58 of those suspended and 32 to serve. She put him on house arrest until his federal sentencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Well at least he didn't plead guilty to more crimes....that's an interesting silver lining.

 

2 minutes ago, jlgarsh said:

He was sentenced to 90 years in prison, and has to serve at least 32. This has nothing to do with media spin etc. 

The whole point of this thread is the defamation lawsuit. Favre can be guilty of this and McAfee & Sharpe can also be guilty. Obviously crimes were committed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

 

The whole point of this thread is the defamation lawsuit. Favre can be guilty of this and McAfee & Sharpe can also be guilty. Obviously crimes were committed. 

How in the world could that possibly be true. How can someone be guilty, I think it's actually liable because it's not criminal, of defaming someone with something they're guilty of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

How in the world could that possibly be true. How can someone be guilty, I think it's actually liable because it's not criminal, of defaming someone with something they're guilty of?

How can Favre be guilty of one thing, while talking heads says things that aren't true about him and case, both be possible? If you are famous and you commit involuntary manslaughter and I have a platform that reaches million and say that you are a serial murder, rapist, arsonist, puppy kicker, etc. I would be guilty of defamation. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

How can Favre be guilty of one thing, while talking heads says things that aren't true about him and case, both be possible? If you are famous and you commit involuntary manslaughter and I have a platform that reaches million and say that you are a serial murder, rapist, arsonist, puppy kicker, etc. I would be guilty of defamation. 

Except it is about the one thing...

 

 

Haven't seen anywhere where it's about anything else.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Except it is about the one thing...

 

 

Haven't seen anywhere where it's about anything else.

Yes Favre was someway involved. If they said he was involved more than he was or made false claims about the case and details, then again its defamation.

Edited by uticaclub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Anyone defending or choosing Favre's side in this matter is revealing a lot about their own character.

I am not defending or choosing Favre’s side. I’m just saying multiple people can be guilty. Yes Favre may have committed a crime, while McAfee & Sharpe committed defamation covering the story.

Edited by uticaclub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uticaclub said:

I am not defending or choosing Favre’s side. I’m just saying multiple people can be guilty. Yes Favre may have committed a crime, while McAfee & Sharpe committed defamation covering the story.

 

Well if Favre wants to go through with the suits (he wont), he'll also have to go through discovery. And open himself to a real ***** storm.

 

Hence why these narcissistic blow hards never go through with their lawsuit threats. Because they know the truth would come out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

Yes Favre was someway involved. If they said he was involved more than he was or made false claims about the case and details, then again its defamation.

Yeah that's a terrible ***** case, you're not going to win arguing you didn't commit as much of a crime as they reported so they should give you money, that's just nonsense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Well if Favre wants to go through with the suits (he wont), he'll also have to go through discovery. And open himself to a real ***** storm.

 

Hence why these narcissistic blow hards never go through with their lawsuit threats. Because they know the truth would come out.

By narcissistic blowhard, are you referring to Favre, McAfee, Sharpe or all 3?

 

Favre also hasn't been charged criminally, only sued by the state.

 

There are three possible outcomes:
Favre drops the suit

settles out of court

it actually goes to court.

 

I’m hoping for the 3rd, so we know more of what really happened, but it’s probably going to be #2 because it's a ***** situation.

Edited by uticaclub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Well if Favre wants to go through with the suits (he wont), he'll also have to go through discovery. And open himself to a real ***** storm.

 

Hence why these narcissistic blow hards never go through with their lawsuit threats. Because they know the truth would come out.

 

Has any other professional athlete ever been WORSE at hiding the truth than this yokel?  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

By narcissistic blowhard, are you referring to Favre, McAfee, Sharpe or all 3?

 

Favre also hasn't been charged criminally, only suited by the state.

 

There are three possible outcomes:
Favre drops the suit

settles out of court

it actually goes to court.

 

I’m hoping for the 3rd, so we know more of what really happened, but it’s probably going to be #2 because it's a ***** situation.

 

Just Favre. The other two dont hurt people for their own enjoyment.

 

13 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Yeah that's a terrible ***** case, you're not going to win arguing you didn't commit as much of a crime as they reported so they should give you money, that's just nonsense.

 

I may have committed "light treason"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2023 at 9:19 PM, RichRiderBills said:

 

I agree. Macafee is enamored with himself. 

Can tell you havent watched. Theres a reason coaches, gms and players come on, drop the cliches and have open conversations, when none of them do that anywhere else. I dont use the term hater, but the guy is as successful as it gets at his job.

 

He reported what favre did, hardly loud mouth. Anytime i see ppl pooh on pat it smells of envy. Sry

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Anyone defending or choosing Favre's side in this matter is revealing a lot about their own character.

Ah yes, because your opinion is the end all be all. For the record, I’m playing devils advocate myself because no one is actually guilty unless they’ve had their day in court and we’re actually ruled guilty. Other than that it’s all window dressing and conjecture. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/9/2023 at 9:01 PM, Andy1 said:

Farve is an idiot. He’s trying to change the narrative about his behavior.

I’m not real familiar with the allegations regarding Farve, or the public statements made by Sharpe and McAfee, but if those guys publicly stated that Favre engaged in massive welfare fraud, and he did not actually do so, then he would potentially have a very strong, and very lucrative claim against them for defamation.

Edited by mannc
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mannc said:

I’m not real familiar with the allegations regarding Farve, or the public statements made by Sharpe and McAfee, but if those guys publicly stated that Favre engaged in massive welfare fraud, and he did not actually do so, then he would potentially have a very strong, and very lucrative claim against them for defamation.

true, but he did. and it voluntarily lead to more evidence (bad texts) coming to light lol pompous level of arrogance to make this kinda mistake

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mannc said:

I’m not real familiar with the allegations regarding Farve, or the public statements made by Sharpe and McAfee, but if those guys publicly stated that Favre engaged in massive welfare fraud, and he did not actually do so, then he would potentially have a very strong, and very lucrative claim against them for defamation.

So if I'm reading this right you're saying you haven't looked into this at all but if Brett Farve's legal claim is true then his lawsuit has a good case....🤔

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

true, but he did. and it voluntarily lead to more evidence (bad texts) coming to light lol pompous level of arrogance to make this kinda mistake

From the little I’ve read, the allegations against Farve are pretty complex and he’s not been criminally charged, which you would expect if he had engaged in a massive fraud scheme. It’s entirely possible that he did not defraud anyone, in which case Sharpe and McAfee may be in some serious legal jeopardy.

5 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

So if I'm reading this right you're saying you haven't looked into this at all but if Brett Farve's legal claim is true then his lawsuit has a good case....🤔

More or less.  The reaction here seems to be that Farve’s lawsuit is laughable, if not frivolous. I think that judgment is entirely premature.

  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2023 at 2:47 PM, DrDawkinstein said:

Favre turning this into a Barbara Streisand Effect, drawing even more attention to his misdeeds and only garnering more support for McAfee.

I care about Brett Favre as much as I do about Pat McAfee.

 

But this Barbara Streisand Effect you spoke of was foreign to me, until now.

 

Very interesting.

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e477nb1juqa8da7yijfis


 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mannc said:

More or less.  The reaction here seems to be that Farve’s lawsuit is laughable, if not frivolous. I think that judgment is entirely premature.

 

You should look into this case more.

 

Favre is going to look like more of an idiot than he already does by the time it's all said and done.  He should see jail time, actually.

Edited by Chicken Boo
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mannc said:

From the little I’ve read, the allegations against Farve are pretty complex and he’s not been criminally charged, which you would expect if he had engaged in a massive fraud scheme. It’s entirely possible that he did not defraud anyone, in which case Sharpe and McAfee may be in some serious legal jeopardy.

More or less.  The reaction here seems to be that Farve’s lawsuit is laughable, if not frivolous. I think that judgment is entirely premature.

 

So Mcafee has reported on the story and always used the word "allegedly" when speaking on the story. Bunch of people have or are about to be sentenced with one guy getting essentially life in prison as he would be in his 90s when he got out. Favre is trying to play the dumb card as if he didn't know what happened was illegal but just because you don't know something is illegal doesn't mean you don't get arrested. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

just because you don't know something is illegal doesn't mean you don't get arrested. 


But he did know, and his text messages prove he was trying to find a loophole. I’m sure he felt like people with his status get away with this sort of thing all the time and he could as well. He probably is right about the former but wrong about the latter.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

So Mcafee has reported on the story and always used the word "allegedly" when speaking on the story. Bunch of people have or are about to be sentenced with one guy getting essentially life in prison as he would be in his 90s when he got out. Favre is trying to play the dumb card as if he didn't know what happened was illegal but just because you don't know something is illegal doesn't mean you don't get arrested. 

And yet Favre has not been arrested or charged... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically you can see who has the weaker case by who is trying to use the “court of public opinion” vs the actual court system. 
 

If these were truly smoking gun texts, they’d save them for court. 
 

I’m always wary when lawyers start tweeting. 
 

🤷‍♂️

Edited by DaggersEOD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/21/2023 at 4:48 PM, aristocrat said:

 

He was forced to return the 1.1 mil he took and the investigation is still ongoing. 

 

Didn't he repay it preemptively to try and get out of it? 

 

Either way, they have him dead to rights if they want him. Let's see how many people he can buy in Mississippi now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2023 at 1:46 PM, mannc said:

More or less.  The reaction here seems to be that Farve’s lawsuit is laughable, if not frivolous. I think that judgment is entirely premature.

 

Anytime your inclination is to say something like "I don't know anything about this, but... " then you should probably rethink it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Southern_Bills said:

 

Didn't he repay it preemptively to try and get out of it? 

 

Either way, they have him dead to rights if they want him. Let's see how many people he can buy in Mississippi now.


no they had to force him to repay and he even tried to use the guy who is in prison to help him to get out of paying it. He still hasn’t paid the 250k in interest the state claims he owes

30 minutes ago, Saint Doug said:

Gosh, looking at Farve is like looking at a crystal ball focusing on Rodgers. Maybe they are even the same person. 


Favre sent Dick pics to girls and got them fired over it. What has arod ever done besides float retirement and just be a hippie? Let’s make sure we separate predatory and theft type behavior with a guy who just likes some fun drugs

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...