Jump to content

How did the Patriots maintain a top team for 17 years?


Success

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, HugeHeffner11 said:

NFL is rigged.  They use the refs to rig the games they want.

 

If that was the case, then why not rig it for the NFL's darling franchises. Cowboys, Giants, Bears, Packers, Steelers. What is so special about NE or KC?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

75% of it was Tom Brady covering up for all the deficiencies on the roster. Don't get me wrong, they had good players and good teams, but it wasn't often you looked at their roster and thought "Damn, this is the most talented roster in the NFL!"

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Primarily developed a raw QB talent using film and deceit.

 

They got caught, but Brady had taken it upon himself to actually understand why they were telling him X when they knew the defense was doing Y, and then eventually learned how to diagnose Y on his own.

 

Also, Belichick embraced the "if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying" mentality. That's a foreign concept to our coaches, some would call it dignified, others might wish a ring or two had been earned through some guile. Belichick is a wily defensive coach, but many times his best defense was having that QB who could close out the game with the necessary points to win.

Edited by pocoboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget their mastery of the compensatory draft selection process.

Not only were they fine with letting almost anyone walk per the next man up mentality, they managed to get extra draft picks for doing so.  Taking no-name players on cheap deals and plugging them into their system allowed this to happen year after year.  Those players would produce for the Patriots and this garnered other teams' interests in those players as potential free agents.  

And if those plug-and-play players wanted a new deal before their contract was up, the Patriots would still usually get something out of it by trading those players away and letting someone else overpay them.

By increasing their number of draft picks, they were able to find more plug-and-play players to fill their ranks, which meant they didn't need to sign as many free agents.  Fewer free agents means you're more likely to get a compensatory draft pick, and more draft picks mean fewer free agents.

It's a brilliant strategy but requires a discipline that a front office can only afford when they are a perennial winner on the field already.  

Edited by Capco
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An accurate QB that always had elite slot options and excellent protection. Wear down defenses with 4 yard gains the length of the feild, don't turn the ball over. Then on defense always take away the opposing offenses best weapon. And 9/10 belichick would take away the run game and force qbs to win with their arm. Usually worked out for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2023 at 2:44 AM, SoMAn said:

Not sure if it was already mentioned, but to expand in # 4, letting players walk (basically, before their pay to performance value is a detriment), has the added benefit of compensatory draft picks, which they used to increase their odds of getting contributing players or bundled and traded to improve draft position. 
Being a contender always has the advantage of being an attractive destination for free agents who may be willing to take less pay than they might for a bottom feeder team.

 

 

And it wasn't always comp picks.

 

They got a 1st rounder for Richard Seymour before the last year of his contract. That got them Nate Solder and probably let them feel they had the freedom to take their original 1st rounder that year and trade it for a 1st and a 2nd the next year. 

 

Always more picks.

 

https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/new-england-patriots/patriots-still-reaping-rewards-seymour-deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2023 at 11:38 AM, TheFunPolice said:

Oh, and the Belichick deserves no credit. Even though he has 8 SB rings and Brady will always have fewer. 


Eh I don't really count his two rings as DC. Guys like Toilet Bowles has a ring as a DC and McDaniels has multiple rings as OC. They can't ***** coach and drag their teams to winning records to save their lives. DC/OC success doesn't translate to HC success. You can be the best DC an just be an average and even trash coach. 
 

But to be fair to Belichick, he is an above average coach and like any other coach in that tier, can win with the right roster. But like any other above average coach he has a ceiling without the GOAT qb (see Andy Reid now that he has a qb better than Alex Smith). The problem is he doesn't seem to have a clue how to build his roster without prime Brady as a crutch to cover all the deficiencies/dumb decisions he has been making. He has always seemed allergic to getting his qb offensive help. That may have worked with Tom Brady dragging short white receivers to the super bowl (other than the two years they had Moss and the one day they had AB) with Gronk hurt half the time, but Mac Jones needs a LOT more help. Until he figures that out (or Mac Jones suddenly becomes Mahomes lol), the Pats will be flopping around with maybe a playoff appearance here and there, but never over the hump. 

Edited by MafiaMio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2023 at 11:38 AM, uticaclub said:

They didn't beat themselves and had 1 or 2 games during that entire stretch where they just didn’t show up. Also the Bills, Jets & Dolphins were all terrible. Brady went 33-3 against us, that's ridiculous against a division opponent. 

Crazy to see Mahomes doing that to his entire division!! He’s definitely getting the Brady treatment in his division, his opponents are garbage! Denver and Las Vegas aren’t going to be good any time soon, and I’d be willing to bet the Chargers miss the playoffs next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

Crazy to see Mahomes doing that to his entire division!! He’s definitely getting the Brady treatment in his division, his opponents are garbage! Denver and Las Vegas aren’t going to be good any time soon, and I’d be willing to bet the Chargers miss the playoffs next year

And he has 12 more years to go to reaching Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2023 at 11:04 AM, Gregg said:

Brady the GOAT, Belichick the GOAT. Built a solid roster around #12. The Bills, Dolphins, Jets = Three stooges. Division was a joke as NE would usually have it clinched by late Oct/ early Nov. Because of it they usually had the #1 or #2 seed so they rarely had to play on WC weekend.

All of that is true, plus a lot of cheating. They had the perfect system. Only got slapped on a wrist for the few times they got caught cheating, but totally worth it as they won six championships. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2023 at 12:45 PM, Success said:

 

The QB situation in the AFC is WAY better now.  Brady basically had to get past Manning to get to the SB.  Rivers never had the teams to compete, and wasn't close to Brady/Manning level. Big Ben was never in the top tier, imo.

 

The AFC is completely stacked right now.  Maybe there are only 3 at the "elite" level, but there are 3-4 more knocking on that door.  The QB play is so much better today than it was 10 years ago.

 

I think the reason there is a perceived amount of "stacked" talent at qb compared to previous eras is because everyone is starting out and in their physical primes. Nobody knows what these qbs careers are going to eventually look like, so they're judged based on what their futures could be, thus everyone is "good" and the league is "stacked". Guys like Herbert and Lawrence are talented but haven't proven anything. Lamar seems like a one hit wonder in 2019 and cannot stay healthy. Guys like Cam Newton and Russell Wilson started out hot then slowly flamed out as they aged. Thus when you look back at the previous era, it looks less "stacked" because only a select handful actually remained competitive year in and out.
 

Ultimately time will show only 2 or so of these qbs will actually be HoF worthy, and you'll look back at this era as less stacked because only those qbs remained relevant. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MafiaMio said:


Eh I don't really count his two rings as DC. Guys like Toilet Bowles has a ring as a DC and McDaniels has multiple rings as OC. They can't ***** coach and drag their teams to winning records to save their lives. DC/OC success doesn't translate to HC success. You can be the best DC an just be an average and even trash coach. 
 

But to be fair to Belichick, he is an above average coach and like any other coach in that tier, can win with the right roster. But like any other above average coach he has a ceiling without the GOAT qb (see Andy Reid now that he has a qb better than Alex Smith). The problem is he doesn't seem to have a clue how to build his roster without prime Brady as a crutch to cover all the deficiencies/dumb decisions he has been making. He has always seemed allergic to getting his qb offensive help. That may have worked with Tom Brady dragging short white receivers to the super bowl (other than the two years they had Moss and the one day they had AB) with Gronk hurt half the time, but Mac Jones needs a LOT more help. Until he figures that out (or Mac Jones suddenly becomes Mahomes lol), the Pats will be flopping around with maybe a playoff appearance here and there, but never over the hump. 

Will the Bills get over the hump? 

 

Six years of Allen and fizzling out in playoff appearances seems like the norm.

 

This year's appears to be an uphill battle with roster holes on the O and D line, WR, and safety positions. 

 

Limited cap space and decisions on free agents like Edmunds and Poyer.

 

Questionable O and D coordinators and an apparent difficult 2023 schedule. 

 

Hopefully, things fall in place. Lots of work to be done this off season. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You basically had the best QB of all time taking hometown discounts.  Brady never had a contract that had a cap hit of more than 20m a year: in fact during his prime years in NE he was only making 10-15m a year.  
 

It’s absurd how great of deal they got during all those years. Different times now.  You have guys like Prescott taking up 25% of total cap which really restricts what a team can do and no way could repeat anything the Pats were able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...