Jump to content

We're on to Cincinnati(Bengals coming to OP). Sunday 1/22 at 3pm. Opening Line Bills -5


Big Turk

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

The Bengals have scored over 30 points three times this year. It was against the Falcons, Steelers and Panthers. Looking at their roster, it seems like they should score 35 points at will, but for some reason they don’t.

 

I haven't watched more than a couple Bengals games but i get the impression they try to establish the run game, and stick with it.  That will run the clock and keep the scores lower, and theoretically the games closer.  I know they can go off and throw a bunch when they want to as well, but maybe they try to stick to the run first formula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zow2 said:

 

I haven't watched more than a couple Bengals games but i get the impression they try to establish the run game, and stick with it.  That will run the clock and keep the scores lower, and theoretically the games closer.  I know they can go off and throw a bunch when they want to as well, but maybe they try to stick to the run first formula.

I’ve watched every game, but I’ll let the numbers tell the story. The Bengals have the 4th fewest rushing attempts in the NFL. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, buffalobillswin said:

Yes never his fault. All 30 ints and fumbles this year were on the receivers and o-line. 
 

 

That's not what people are saying.  In several games Allen has been reckless and made poor throws that resulted in INT's. The Jets & Vikings games come to mind.  But yesterday neither of the INT's were poor throws. 

 

The first INT was a play that EVERY Bill's receiver should know how to execute - when the pocket breaks down and Allen is on the move head for the end zone.  Brown seemed lost on that play.  But I don't fault him as the bigger problem is why are the Bills using WR's who two months ago was out of the game?  The 2nd INT was a good throw that bounced off Beasley's hand/chest into the hands of a Dolphin player.  On top of that there should have been a flag for interference on that play.  Now we all know that stuff like this happens in the NFL and it's just a bad break.  But in NO WAY was that pass reckless or poorly thrown.

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, buffalobillswin said:

In your opinion is Allen the only one who deals with dropped passes and wrong routes? I get it he’s our guy but he isn’t playing well right now. 
 

And the Diggs play was a clear incompletion. We didn’t get jobbed on anything that play. 

You do understand it’s a unit right? It’s not just Allen on the field. If a WR breaks off a route, that’s not Allen. If a pass hits a guy in the chest and get picks off, that’s not Allen. The fumble, that was Allen. A couple off target passes thrown to WRs, that was Allen. I’m sure if you broke down the sacks, some could be on Allen and some could be on the oline.  All year this offense has been inconsistent with the exception of Diggs. We can go through player after player picking apart their play, Allen  is the only guy whose play is really effected by everybody though. 

Edited by BananaB
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

The Bengals are scary. However, their performance last night makes me fear them a bit less. 

Bengal fans are saying the same thing about the Bills. This is playoff football. Every team still standing is dang good.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zow2 said:

 

I haven't watched more than a couple Bengals games but i get the impression they try to establish the run game, and stick with it.  That will run the clock and keep the scores lower, and theoretically the games closer.  I know they can go off and throw a bunch when they want to as well, but maybe they try to stick to the run first formula.

They came out pretty aggressively throwing the ball in the Monday night game against us, so we'll have to see if they stay with that or try to establish the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Buffalo Boy said:

Was it the multiple TDs, the deep balls that were dropped, the TD to Diggs we got jobbed on…..????

A little more specificity please.

You can make an argument that both interceptions were not his fault. The Diggs reversal was the right call. His left foot didn't stay on the ground long enough for securing possession. Shakir has gotta make that long catch but he did redeem himself later.  The JA fumble and td was all on Josh. He saw the blitz but couldn't secure the ball properly. The Bills have been winning sloppy games all year. Maybe that's our destiny. I don't think we're ever having that perfect game in all 3 phases. We're going to need to grind out sloppy performances into a W. As simple as that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I'm taking Van Miller's advice and installing a seat belt on my recliner for Sunday's game!

 

Secondly, I'm not going to think that Ken Dorsey and Josh Allen are going to change the way they game plan.

It's all about big plays down the field.  Josh loves his sugar and Ken is giving it to him like undiluted Queen-O syrup.

(That reference is for all you fellow "old timers" on the board.)  LOL.

I'm all in on that because that's the way it is and if there was ever a QB in NFL history that can do that, it's Josh Allen.

 

Finally, knowing now the way it is, I can pace my cocktails accordingly to prevent my liver from further damage for the duration

of this Superbowl run.

 

Go Bills.

 

 

image.png.ca35bbb7dcd5e1a5cebda5d8b708db35.png

Edited by ColoradoBills
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ColoradoBills said:

First off, I'm taking Van Miller's advice and installing a seat belt on my recliner for Sunday's game!

 

Secondly, I'm not going to think that Ken Dorsey and Josh Allen are going to change the way they game plan.

It's all about big plays down the field.  Josh loves his sugar and Ken is giving it to him like undiluted Queen-O syrup.

(That reference is for all you fellow "old timers" on the board.)  LOL.

I'm all in on that because that's the way it is and if there was ever a QB in NFL history that can do that, it's Josh Allen.

 

Finally, knowing now the way it is, I can pace my cocktails accordingly to prevent my liver from further damage for the duration

of this Superbowl run.

 

Go Bill.

 

 

image.png.ca35bbb7dcd5e1a5cebda5d8b708db35.png

 


Miami played a ton of Cover 1 and Cover 0....so the excessive deep throws make sense

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BananaB said:

You do understand it’s a unit right? It’s not just Allen on the field. If a WR breaks off a route, that’s not Allen. If a pass hits a guy in the chest and get Pisces off, that’s not Allen. The fumble, that was Allen. A couple off target passes thrown to WRs, that was Allen. I’m sure if you broke down the sacks, some could be on Allen and some could be on the oline.  All year this offense has been inconsistent with the exception of Diggs. We can go through player after player picking apart their play, Allen  is the only guy whose play is really effected by everybody though. 

Exactly. Every member of this team, on both sides, contributes. What's pretty special about Allen is that he's got the mental and emotional skill to handle the pressure that falls on a QB. He's a tremendous leader.

 

The going is getting tougher and everyone on this team needs to improve a bit, just a bit, for us to win next Sunday.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

I can’t wait for all the mad people on here when we win 41-38

41-38 in a win the defense stinks and we won't be able to beat KC. If we win say 24-21 the offense stinks and we won't be able to beat KC lol. That's what I'm expecting on this board if we win either way tbh

Edited by BillzFreak
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

 

And it's not like Cincy won on a 99 yard fumble return off a backup Ravens QB. 


Ravens were physical on both lines of scrimmage, ran the ball effectively, controlled clock, and were able to stack multiple stops defensively in the second half. They match up well with the Bengals to at least be competitive even without a QB. The fact that game was close does not reflect on how the Bills match up with the Bengals.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 


Miami played a ton of Cover 1 and Cover 0....so the excessive deep throws make sense

 

It's not about yesterday's game.  Josh looks for the deep pass first regardless of what the D is playing.  It's just their style.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Airseven said:


Ravens were physical on both lines of scrimmage, ran the ball effectively, controlled clock, and were able to stack multiple stops defensively in the second half. They match up well with the Bengals to at least be competitive even without a QB. The fact that game was close does not reflect on how the Bills match up with the Bengals.

I struggle to say the Ravens did much of anything effectively. Same with the Bengals, outside of that first quarter. I do agree with your last point though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...