Jump to content

Which players on defense are you moving on from or releasing?


intimidatortj

Recommended Posts

In 2023 the Buffalo Bills will have a lot of defensive starters on pretty hefty contracts.
This is going to have an impact on the draft this month.   Beane needs to plan ahead.

 

Let's assume Beane wants to keep Tremaine and has to pay him $14 million a year, for 2023, 2024 and beyond.


Did you know the Bills Cap Hit for Matt Milano is $13 million in 2023 and $13 million for 2024?
And Jordan Poyer and Micah Hyde.   Do you pay them $11 million each, for 2023 and 2024?
Ed Oliver is $10 million a year just for 2023 and will be higher for 2024.
Tre White is costing $ 15-16 million / year.
Von Miller is $18 million and $21 million in 2023 & 2024.

 

To stay under the Cap long term, you need some starters making $2-3 million a year.  You need some players on rookie contracts.  

Honestly, signing Von Miller has made it almost a certainty some of the above players won't be on the roster/payroll in 2023.

 

So who would you move on from?  Who do you trade Or let go in Free Agency after 2022?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Edmunds will be 1 only because of the money he will want being a first round pick the second on your list is Poyer only because he changed agents & Rosenhaus is one greedy mo fo & will get him the cash he is looking for but i don't think it will be from Beane unless there is a compromise & that's not in Rosenhaus vocabulary .

 

I also think they could draft both of their replacements this year in the draft .

Edited by T master
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using your assumption of an extension for Edmunds, then Oliver is gone.

He is a very good starter but not a great DT. That said he will want to get paid top 10 money. 

You can possibly cut Milano next off-season but that adds dead money they can't afford on their books. Ideal scenario would be to get Milano to take a pay cut. I agreed and liked the deal Beane made for him but Milano was nothing but average last year. Another average year and he will look really expensive.

 

If I had to choose, I would rid myself of Edmunds and replace him this year and then look at replacing Milano and Poyer in 2023. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, T master said:

I think Edmunds will be 1 only because of the money he will want being a first round pick the second on your list is Poyer only because he changed agents & Rosenhaus is one greedy mo fo & will get him the cash he is looking for but i don't think it will be from Beane unless there is a compromise & that's not in Rosenhaus vocabulary .

 

I also think they could draft both of their replacements this year in the draft .

This is the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Paying the stars obviously leaves little for the rest.  I think the Bills mid tier depth and the special teams aces will have to go and we won’t lose as many of the name players as feared.  This means we keep less talented depth players and will cut better players in favor of younger and cheaper depth

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saftey.  Imo probably Poyer.  Makes more sense to give the 2 young guys extenstions.  Oliver and Edmunds.  Now I think both have to justify this year.  I think Edmunds is closer to the Bills extending than Oliver is at this point.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, george c said:

The cap grows every year folks. 
 

And not coincidentally, so do the contracts.

4 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

Saftey.  Imo probably Poyer.  Makes more sense to give the 2 young guys extenstions.  Oliver and Edmunds.  Now I think both have to justify this year.  I think Edmunds is closer to the Bills extending than Oliver is at this point.  

Not so sure about this point. I remember Oliver single-handedly destroying drives last year. When have we ever said that about Edmunds? Oliver is better at 3DT than Edmunds is at MLB.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cap figures to keep going up significantly each year. Money tomorrow is cheaper than money today.

I think Oliver and Edmunds are gone after this season (or earlier) unless they suddenly become all-pros. I'd very much like to bring Poyer back as I feel he's outperformed Hyde. Next year's cap space probably comes mostly from the projected increase + some restructures and maybe a surprise retirement from someone like Morse. Your only real FA's next year are Poyer, Edmunds and Singletary. I think you can easily keep one, if not two. The following year, we'll have a pile of cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Using your assumption of an extension for Edmunds, then Oliver is gone.

He is a very good starter but not a great DT. That said he will want to get paid top 10 money. 

You can possibly cut Milano next off-season but that adds dead money they can't afford on their books. Ideal scenario would be to get Milano to take a pay cut. I agreed and liked the deal Beane made for him but Milano was nothing but average last year. Another average year and he will look really expensive.

 

If I had to choose, I would rid myself of Edmunds and replace him this year and then look at replacing Milano and Poyer in 2023. 

Milano was better than average last year.  

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, T master said:

I think Edmunds will be 1 only because of the money he will want being a first round pick the second on your list is Poyer only because he changed agents & Rosenhaus is one greedy mo fo & will get him the cash he is looking for but i don't think it will be from Beane unless there is a compromise & that's not in Rosenhaus vocabulary .

 

Sadly you are probably right about Poyer.  Although, a lot of Bills players have used Rosenhaus and the Bills front office have a somewhat okay relationship with him.

 

I love Poyer, but drafting a safety early in this year's draft just is smart football.
Also drafting a LB would be smart too.

 

You have to prepare for the 2023 Cap....you have some big #s from Josh's contract, and Von Miller's and Tre White's......

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, intimidatortj said:

In 2023 the Buffalo Bills will have a lot of defensive starters on pretty hefty contracts.
This is going to have an impact on the draft this month.   Beane needs to plan ahead.

 

Let's assume Beane wants to keep Tremaine and has to pay him $14 million a year, for 2023, 2024 and beyond.


Did you know the Bills Cap Hit for Matt Milano is $13 million in 2023 and $13 million for 2024?
And Jordan Poyer and Micah Hyde.   Do you pay them $11 million each, for 2023 and 2024?
Ed Oliver is $10 million a year just for 2023 and will be higher for 2024.
Tre White is costing $ 15-16 million / year.
Von Miller is $18 million and $21 million in 2023 & 2024.

 

To stay under the Cap long term, you need some starters making $2-3 million a year.  You need some players on rookie contracts.  

Honestly, signing Von Miller has made it almost a certainty some of the above players won't be on the roster/payroll in 2023.

 

So who would you move on from?  Who do you trade Or let go in Free Agency after 2022?

 

Those are all small cap hits... why do you want to get rid of them? 

Hahaha long term Cap space, screw winning a Super Bowl let win the long term Cap space... even though the cap will be going up and those guys are all on good money contracts.

Edited by TBBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edmunds is a luxury that they can no longer afford after this year.  

 

I know that the coaches rave about his coverage skills, and leadership, and blah blah blah.

 

But we need to pay the guys who MAKE PLAYS. 

 

Edmunds might get better, but he sure is going to get more expensive

 

Let's get what we can from him on the field this year, but let's not be rolling out the checkbook for him unless he suddenly becomes a Top 3 MLB with the stats to back up that status.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Using your assumption of an extension for Edmunds, then Oliver is gone.

He is a very good starter but not a great DT. That said he will want to get paid top 10 money. 

You can possibly cut Milano next off-season but that adds dead money they can't afford on their books. Ideal scenario would be to get Milano to take a pay cut. I agreed and liked the deal Beane made for him but Milano was nothing but average last year. Another average year and he will look really expensive.

 

If I had to choose, I would rid myself of Edmunds and replace him this year and then look at replacing Milano and Poyer in 2023. 

I don't think getting rid of Milano, the single player who puts 100% into bringing the "SMACK" each play while not missing gaps/assignments is a good idea. Just my opinion.

Edited by BuffaloTX
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

The cap figures to keep going up significantly each year. Money tomorrow is cheaper than money today.

I think Oliver and Edmunds are gone after this season (or earlier) unless they suddenly become all-pros. I'd very much like to bring Poyer back as I feel he's outperformed Hyde. Next year's cap space probably comes mostly from the projected increase + some restructures and maybe a surprise retirement from someone like Morse. Your only real FA's next year are Poyer, Edmunds and Singletary. I think you can easily keep one, if not two.

 

The following year, we'll have a pile of cap space.

 

I will nit pick a little with the statement that we will have a pile of cap space in 2023.   Josh's contract is kicking in, and so is Von Miller's.   Any extra cap space available via the NFL raising the Cap will go poof.   

 

The Cap will not go up exponential every year.   Right now it is projected to be $220-223 million for 2023.   Josh's hit will be $39 million and Von Miller's $18.7 million.  That is $57.7 million for just those 2 players.

 

Beane has to mix in some rookie deals to the defense, while keeping as many veterans as possible.

  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TBBills said:

I can't believe you are all still talking about the cap after being so wrong this season, thinking all these players were gone and they couldn't sign anyone.

If Beane has proven one thing, it’s that if he truly values the player he’ll find a way to get a contract done.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eee1776 said:

If any of the top safeties in this year's draft fall to us in the third round like Cine or even Cook and Hill I think Poyes is gone after this year.

 

Daxton Hill could go bottom of the 1st round.

Cine and Nick Cross late 2nd?    Early 3rd?

I don't like our 3rd round pick, because it is towards the bottom of the 3rd....and a lot of nice players will be coming off the board early in the 3rd round.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mushypeaches said:

Edmunds is a luxury that they can no longer afford after this year.  

 

I know that the coaches rave about his coverage skills, and leadership, and blah blah blah.

 

But we need to pay the guys who MAKE PLAYS. 

 

Edmunds might get better, but he sure is going to get more expensive

 

Let's get what we can from him on the field this year, but let's not be rolling out the checkbook for him unless he suddenly becomes a Top 3 MLB with the stats to back up that status.

 

I know the argument is "he is young" but when do coaches start to acknowledge he has reached his ceiling.    Reactive playmaking skills are something a player has, or doesn't.  Yes, they can get better because of experience, and that helps them learn to take better angles, etc.   But the ceiling isn't going up dramatically.

 

It comes back to value.   Can you sign a MLB for say 1/2 the money that is pretty much as productive?   McBeane will have to decide that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not an Edmunds hater by any means...but if it came down to it, I would prefer to lose him over Oliver.

11 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

If Beane has proven one thing, it’s that if he truly values the player he’ll find a way to get a contract done.

It's very true.  Good teams find ways to keep their best players.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

Saftey.  Imo probably Poyer.  Makes more sense to give the 2 young guys extenstions.  Oliver and Edmunds.  Now I think both have to justify this year.  I think Edmunds is closer to the Bills extending than Oliver is at this point.  

 

Age isn't everything. Oliver plays 58% of snaps and Edmunds, well there are numerous threads about his play. We saw how DT is a position that can be added in free agency this year, and there's a good chance a rookie or second year MLB would be an upgrade over Edmunds.

 

On the other hand Poyer is coming off an all-pro season. The safety franchise tag isn't much more than Poyer's current cap hit, but I think they'll get a 1-2 year extension done soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said:

 

Age isn't everything. Oliver plays 58% of snaps and Edmunds, well there are numerous threads about his play. We saw how DT is a position that can be added in free agency this year, and there's a good chance a rookie or second year MLB would be an upgrade over Edmunds.

 

On the other hand Poyer is coming off an all-pro season. The safety franchise tag isn't much more than Poyer's current cap hit, but I think they'll get a 1-2 year extension done soon.

Cant extend everybody.  Imo Poyer would be easier replaced than Edmunds or Oliver. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TBBills said:

I can't believe you are all still talking about the cap after being so wrong this season, thinking all these players were gone and they couldn't sign anyone.

 

Exactly. It has to be the same people saying we have no cap space a couple months ago.

Just now, Mat68 said:

Cant extend everybody.  Imo Poyer would be easier replaced than Edmunds or Oliver. 

So sick of this foolishness, they CAN extend everyone currently on the roster. Hell, there's 16+ mil in dead cap for this year that will be gone going forward. Cap will go up, and Allen and others can restructure.

 

Now Edmunds and Oliver are not smart to extend IMO because one is replacement-level and the other is a part-time player (58% of snaps)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, intimidatortj said:

 

I know the argument is "he is young" but when do coaches start to acknowledge he has reached his ceiling.    Reactive playmaking skills are something a player has, or doesn't.  Yes, they can get better because of experience, and that helps them learn to take better angles, etc.   But the ceiling isn't going up dramatically.

 

It comes back to value.   Can you sign a MLB for say 1/2 the money that is pretty much as productive?   McBeane will have to decide that one.

While I do acknowledge 23/24 is young obviously, however it seems like that's been said for 2 years now. Anyways, imo we are past that now and considering he's been in the same Defense the whole time I think he would have learned enough to be comfortable at this point.

 

I'm not putting him down or anything, just saying imo his performance hasn't been as I had hoped or expected by now. All that being said, I have no idea what they end up deciding to do with him, but cool with me either way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said:

 

Exactly. It has to be the same people saying we have no cap space a couple months ago.

So sick of this foolishness, they CAN extend everyone currently on the roster. Hell, there's 16+ mil in dead cap for this year that will be gone going forward. Cap will go up, and Allen and others can restructure.

 

Now Edmunds and Oliver are not smart to extend IMO because one is replacement-level and the other is a part-time player (58% of snaps)

Warren Sapp doesn't play 60% of snaps in Buffalo either.  The talent Edmunds and Oliver possess are harder to replace imo than Poyer.  Saftey is not a premier position.  Imo, it comes down to what Poyer wants.  If he takes a team friendly deal sure you can bring back everyone.  If he wants top safety money than imo thats too much.  Dont get me wrong I love Poyer and everything he does for the defense.  At a point players start to decline.  Teams that have had sustained success NE, Gb, Pit for example get off vetran players earlier than most.  Buffalo is going to need to consider that model.  Otherwise you look around and are expensive and old without much options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

While I do acknowledge 23/24 is young obviously, however it seems like that's been said for 2 years now. Anyways, imo we are past that now and considering he's been in the same Defense the whole time I think he would have learned enough to be comfortable at this point.

 

I'm not putting him down or anything, just saying imo his performance hasn't been as I had hoped or expected by now. All that being said, I have no idea what they end up deciding to do with him, but cool with me either way

He is still about the age of the current draft class.  Now I do think his style of play is not what the majority of fans would want from a Lb.  That doesnt make him poor.  As much as Poyer and Hyde get credit for Buffalo having unreal pass coverage consistency, Edmund is as important if not more.  The best thing the defense has done is defend the pass.  Above average coverage linebakers do not grow on trees.  That is my concern.  

  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mushypeaches said:

Edmunds is a luxury that they can no longer afford after this year.  

 

I know that the coaches rave about his coverage skills, and leadership, and blah blah blah.

 

But we need to pay the guys who MAKE PLAYS. 

 

Edmunds might get better, but he sure is going to get more expensive

 

Let's get what we can from him on the field this year, but let's not be rolling out the checkbook for him unless he suddenly becomes a Top 3 MLB with the stats to back up that status.

With 32 nfl franchises, he has to be top 3? What if he's top 10? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

Cant extend everybody.  Imo Poyer would be easier replaced than Edmunds or Oliver. 

I don't know about easier, but the familiarity he and Hyde have may not be as easy replacing. They are considered the by very many to be the best pair of Safeties in the league for a reason.

 

But unfortunately all good things do eventually come to an end, however I think he stays, but also I think this will be his last season as a Bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

I don't know about easier, but the familiarity he and Hyde have may not be as easy replacing. They are considered the by very many to be the best pair of Safeties in the league for a reason.

 

But unfortunately all good things do eventually come to an end, however I think he stays, but also I think this will be his last season as a Bill.

Agreed.  Im also assuming Poyer is going to want top safety money.  I think Edmunds could be had for an easier cap hit.  He is young enough where a long contract will provide more flexibility.   I think we ride as is in 2022.  I can see Oliver and Edmunds having very good years with better play at 1 tech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

He is still about the age of the current draft class.  Now I do think his style of play is not what the majority of fans would want from a Lb.  That doesnt make him poor.  As much as Poyer and Hyde get credit for Buffalo having unreal pass coverage consistency, Edmund is as important if not more.  The best thing the defense has done is defend the pass.  Above average coverage linebakers do not grow on trees.  That is my concern.  

 

Yeah I get where you're coming from. As for his pass coverage, I think one could argue Milano is better in that department and possibly the best of all the LB's. I do agree Bills have done well defending the pass. I'm excited to see it being even better with improved pass rush this season. 

 

 

1 minute ago, Mat68 said:

Agreed.  Im also assuming Poyer is going to want top safety money.  I think Edmunds could be had for an easier cap hit.  He is young enough where a long contract will provide more flexibility.   I think we ride as is in 2022.  I can see Oliver and Edmunds having very good years with better play at 1 tech.

I don't see any reason to assume that. Many assumed the same with Diggs "demanding" that type of thing. I never thought for a second it would come to that and I feel the same with Poyer. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If two have to go, I would not be surprised if it is Hyde and Oliver.  Hyde appears to have lost a step.  Oliver has not had the kind of impact that the team should expect from a ninth overall pick in the draft.  I like both of these players but they are the two that are more easily replaced than the others.

 

We all need to keep in mind that the cap will continue to grow with the escalation of tv revenues and Beane has shown the ability to plan ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

 

Yeah I get where you're coming from. As for his pass coverage, I think one could argue Milano is better in that department and possibly the best of all the LB's. I do agree Bills have done well defending the pass. I'm excited to see it being even better with improved pass rush this season. 

 

 

I don't see any reason to assume that. Many assumed the same with Diggs "demanding" that type of thing. I never thought for a second it would come to that and I feel the same with Poyer. 

JMO, but Milano isn't as good as Edmunds in coverage. Nah.

  • Vomit 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

I can respect that...there's very many that believes he is. Also many says Milano is the best pass coverage LB we have. Like with everything opinions differ lol

Sheneneh was a trip!🤣🤣

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

 

Yeah I get where you're coming from. As for his pass coverage, I think one could argue Milano is better in that department and possibly the best of all the LB's. I do agree Bills have done well defending the pass. I'm excited to see it being even better with improved pass rush this season. 

 

 

I don't see any reason to assume that. Many assumed the same with Diggs "demanding" that type of thing. I never thought for a second it would come to that and I feel the same with Poyer. 

Still on paper Diggs got top 3 or 4 money.  Von same thing.  White aswell.  Poyer very well could want that.  And he would have every right to ask for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...