Jump to content

Thank you President Biden


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Unemployment down from 6.3% to 4.8% since he took office.

Stock market continues to set records.

Most jobs created by any president in history over the first eight months of taking office.

Delivered on promise to remove all troops from Afghanistan.

189 million fully vaccinated Americans.

Passed a provision in the rescue plan that no one must spend more than 8.5% of what they earn on health insurance premiums.

 

Point by point- unemployment is down mainly to people not looking anymore- the labor participation rate is at its lowest since the mid 70's

Stock market is rising high off of govt money, so if that is all you need than Trump gets the credit.

Most jobs created because liberals shuttered the most jobs. The vast majority of those jobs were simply ones they had stopped. 

Afghanistan was a mess and a disgrace but we are out.

Over a million Americans were vaccinated per day at the end of the Trump presidency, 189 seems like a small goal but ok.

Insurance premiums do not discuss deductibles so the law simply moves it from one pot to another. 

 

All in all it seems you are impressed easily. You must have thought Trump was the greatest president ever if you are impressed by Biden.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Point by point- unemployment is down mainly to people not looking anymore- the labor participation rate is at its lowest since the mid 70's

Stock market is rising high off of govt money, so if that is all you need than Trump gets the credit.

Most jobs created because liberals shuttered the most jobs. The vast majority of those jobs were simply ones they had stopped. 

Afghanistan was a mess and a disgrace but we are out.

Over a million Americans were vaccinated per day at the end of the Trump presidency, 189 seems like a small goal but ok.

Insurance premiums do not discuss deductibles so the law simply moves it from one pot to another. 

 

All in all it seems you are impressed easily. You must have thought Trump was the greatest president ever if you are impressed by Biden.

You and I actually agree about the stock market being on a treasury sugar high (at least to a certain extent; I think there are multiple catalysts for growth, but that’s a different conversation for a different time.) “Crediting” Trump for that, though, is where we part ways.  The national debt exploded under that fool.  And that’s without 9/11 (Bush) or the Great Recession (Obama) demanding increased government spending.  Trump’s income tax cuts principally benefitted the rich—not, with respect, the vast majority of the people who read this, judging by their grammatical skills—and, at the same time, he spent wantonly and indeliberately.  I don’t know what conservative means these days, but I struggle with how one could conclude that conservative principles are consistent with his fiscal  . . . approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Point by point- unemployment is down mainly to people not looking anymore- the labor participation rate is at its lowest since the mid 70's

Stock market is rising high off of govt money, so if that is all you need than Trump gets the credit.

Most jobs created because liberals shuttered the most jobs. The vast majority of those jobs were simply ones they had stopped. 

Afghanistan was a mess and a disgrace but we are out.

Over a million Americans were vaccinated per day at the end of the Trump presidency, 189 seems like a small goal but ok.

Insurance premiums do not discuss deductibles so the law simply moves it from one pot to another. 

 

All in all it seems you are impressed easily. You must have thought Trump was the greatest president ever if you are impressed by Biden.

I suspect the indicators and statistics will show the economy is close or already in recession and the stock market is mis-pricing the impact of inflation and a contracting economy.  One thing masking this is that about 20 to 25 large cap companies represent the majority of the market's capitalization.  Watch these big cap stocks closely.  When they start to break down that is a signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I suspect the indicators and statistics will show the economy is close or already in recession and the stock market is mis-pricing the impact of inflation and a contracting economy.  One thing masking this is that about 20 to 25 large cap companies represent the majority of the market's capitalization.  Watch these big cap stocks closely.  When they start to break down that is a signal.

 

I think we’re already in a recession.  The reality is that we have two economies: one for people who invest in the stock market, and another for laborers, etc., who don’t.  I agree with your point about large caps carrying the market.  One of the ironies there is that Amazon—the bane of Trump’s existence—basically carried the market for him through the first roughly seven or eight months of last year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I think we’re already in a recession.  The reality is that we have two economies: one for people who invest in the stock market, and another for laborers, etc., who don’t.  I agree with your point about large caps carrying the market.  One of the ironies there is that Amazon—the bane of Trump’s existence—basically carried the market for him through the first roughly seven or eight months of last year.  

 

Laborers who don't?  What in the ***** kind of bigoted nonsense it this? 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Laborers who don't?  What in the ***** kind of bigoted nonsense it this? 

 

 

Glad you’re back, Chef Jim Crow.  Hoax.  I don’t care whether you post.  Maybe you should consider asking Santa for a dictionary this year so that you can learn the definition of bigot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Glad you’re back, Chef Jim Crow.  Hoax.  I don’t care whether you post.  Maybe you should consider asking Santa for a dictionary this year so that you can learn the definition of bigot.  

You care.  It’s odd how much, but you care playa.  
 

It’s 2021, men have babies, girls have veggie stix,  our president believes himself arbiter of blackness and laborers surely invest.  
 

The Chef souffléd you here, rightly so, and you should take the hit.   

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Thanks Doc

 

I’m actually quite pleased you gave it a try. But I’m sure you know that with the exception of Afghanistan (which was a disaster), the rest aren’t things Biden did. They’re just things that ‘improved’ while he’s been President. 

It was a facetious response.  You did ask though.  I think the vaccine roll out is about the only thing his administration showed any competence in thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Glad you’re back, Chef Jim Crow.  Hoax.  I don’t care whether you post.  Maybe you should consider asking Santa for a dictionary this year so that you can learn the definition of bigot.  

 

You are a bigot saying that laborers don't participate in the market.  Maybe YOU need to understand what the term bigot really means. 

 

Regardless why single out laborers?  Please explain your reasoning here.  

Edited by Chef Jim
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

You are a bigot saying that laborers don't participate in the market.  Maybe YOU need to understand what the term bigot really means. 

 

Regardless why single out laborers?  Please explain your reasoning here.  

 

I think you need to worry less about me and more about your standing with Santa.  You have a desperate need for that dictionary, and I’d hate to see you miss your chance for that book based on avoidable naughty behavior between now and Christmas Eve.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I think you need to worry less about me and more about your standing with Santa.  You have a desperate need for that dictionary, and I’d hate to see you miss your chance for that book based on avoidable naughty behavior between now and Christmas Eve.  

 

What's your beef against laborers bigot?  

 

You get caught saying stupid ***** all the time and when you get called out on it you post even stupider *****.  

 

Carry on bigot.....look it up.  

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

What's your beef against laborers bigot?  

 

You get caught saying stupid ***** all the time and when you get called out on it you post even stupider *****.  

 

Carry on bigot.....look it up.  

That the kind of thing that’s going to get you on both the hoax list and the naughty list.  Not good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

That the kind of thing that’s going to get you on both the hoax list and the naughty list.  Not good.  

 

Oooooooh scary stuff. 

 

I hope any laborers you associate with going forward know you're feelings about them.

 

Carry on bigot.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Oooooooh scary stuff. 

 

I hope any laborers you associate with going forward know you're feelings about them.

 

Carry on bigot.  

 

 


With every post it becomes becomes clearer that the dictionary is an urgent need for you.  It is critical that you do your best not to upset Santa and to stay off the naughty list.  I wish I could at that you’re (proper usage) succeeding there, but that would be a hoax. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:


With every post it becomes becomes clearer that the dictionary is an urgent need for you.  It is critical that you do your best not to upset Santa and to stay off the naughty list.  I wish I could at that you’re (proper usage) succeeding there, but that would be a hoax. 
 

 

A Bigot......

 

a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group......such as laborers.  

 

Carry on bigot. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

You and I actually agree about the stock market being on a treasury sugar high (at least to a certain extent; I think there are multiple catalysts for growth, but that’s a different conversation for a different time.) “Crediting” Trump for that, though, is where we part ways.  The national debt exploded under that fool.  And that’s without 9/11 (Bush) or the Great Recession (Obama) demanding increased government spending.  Trump’s income tax cuts principally benefitted the rich—not, with respect, the vast majority of the people who read this, judging by their grammatical skills—and, at the same time, he spent wantonly and indeliberately.  I don’t know what conservative means these days, but I struggle with how one could conclude that conservative principles are consistent with his fiscal  . . . approach. 

It scares me how much I agree with what you wrote- I am really questioning myself.🤔 But the reason I "support" Trump is he is better on spending than Biden, though he is a long way from being great that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

You and I actually agree about the stock market being on a treasury sugar high (at least to a certain extent; I think there are multiple catalysts for growth, but that’s a different conversation for a different time.) “Crediting” Trump for that, though, is where we part ways.  The national debt exploded under that fool.  And that’s without 9/11 (Bush) or the Great Recession (Obama) demanding increased government spending.  Trump’s income tax cuts principally benefitted the rich—not, with respect, the vast majority of the people who read this, judging by their grammatical skills—and, at the same time, he spent wantonly and indeliberately.  I don’t know what conservative means these days, but I struggle with how one could conclude that conservative principles are consistent with his fiscal  . . . approach. 

I’m fed up with this tax cuts for the rich narrative. Under Obama my taxes were raised from the Bush level because I was told I needed to help out in the time of the Great Recession. I didn’t complain. Trump just put the top rate back where it was because the Recession had ended. I don’t call that a tax cut. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

It scares me how much I agree with what you wrote- I am really questioning myself.🤔 But the reason I "support" Trump is he is better on spending than Biden, though he is a long way from being great that way.


Nobody has been thrifty since Clinton.  

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’m fed up with this tax cuts for the rich narrative. Under Obama my taxes were raised from the Bush level because I was told I needed to help out in the time of the Great Recession. I didn’t complain. Trump just put the top rate back where it was because the Recession had ended. I don’t call that a tax cut. 

Technically it is.  But whatever.  The bigger point is that, like George W. Bush, Trump cut receivables but still spent like crazy. GWB had, to an extent, a good excuse - he had to fund a war in Afghanistan (but totally screwed up in Iraq).  Trump didn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:


Nobody has been thrifty since Clinton.  

Technically it is.  But whatever.  The bigger point is that, like George W. Bush, Trump cut receivables but still spent like crazy. GWB had, to an extent, a good excuse - he had to fund a war in Afghanistan (but totally screwed up in Iraq).  Trump didn’t. 

The Executive Branch can only spend what they've been given authorization to spend by Congress.  It's a complex dance.  Tax rates are not revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The Executive Branch can only spend what they've been given authorization to spend by Congress.  It's a complex dance.  Tax rates are not revenue.

That's fair.  Tax levy, tax rate, and taxes realized are different things.  But the point remains: the tax cuts were a Trump goal, he has a significant "say" with respect to the budget, and he participated in knowingly reducing inflow without commensurately reducing outflow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

That's fair.  Tax levy, tax rate, and taxes realized are different things.  But the point remains: the tax cuts were a Trump goal, he has a significant "say" with respect to the budget, and he participated in knowingly reducing inflow without commensurately reducing outflow.  

Not true. It’s the endless fiscal policy debate:

35% of $100 is a bigger number than 37.5% of $500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2021 at 9:55 AM, Tiberius said:

Now let's go after the Klan, Proud Boyz, insurrectionists and other scum bags like that! 

 

Don't forget those dam parents that want to attend school board meetings & the bank tellers so they can let the IRS know when you spend to much of your own hard earned money on what you want to .

 

This Pres. has given us so much Inflation, insecure boarders, helped in lessoning our energy independence while pissing off our closest ally , rectifying shooting and killing unarmed people.

 

This about says it all and Nadler the jack a** that he is later on stops him from showing a video to prove a point these people are on a power grab to take away every right we have .

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, T master said:

 

Don't forget those dam parents that want to attend school board meetings & the bank tellers so they can let the IRS know when you spend to much of your own hard earned money on what you want to .

 

This Pres. has given us so much Inflation, insecure boarders, helped in lessoning our energy independence while pissing off our closest ally , rectifying shooting and killing unarmed people.

 

This about says it all and Nadler the jack a** that he is later on stops him from showing a video to prove a point these people are on a power grab to take away every right we have .

 

 

 

JIm Jordan should spend more time reporting child sexual abuse and less time doing whatever it is that Jim Jordan does all day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2021 at 10:26 AM, SectionC3 said:

For defeating Antifa.  We were told that we would have to fight Antifa on the beaches, on the landing grounds, in the fields and in the streets of our suburbs, in the hills, and perhaps even in the air.  None of that has come to pass because of President Biden.  Victory over Antifa has been overwhelming.  We haven’t heard a word from Antifa since President Biden won the election and took office.  Thank you, Mr. President, for crushing Antifa.  Hopefully now all those who trembled at the mention of the word can feel safe in their homes and on their streets. 

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2021 at 3:28 PM, SectionC3 said:

 

Your use of tense is perfect.  Donald Trump and his acolytes were afraid of Antifa.  Trump even hid in the bunker when Antifa was nearby.  With Joe Biden in charge, Antifa has been crushed.  So now no one is afraid of Antifa.  It’s been a total victory over Antifa on land, in air, and even at sea.  

 

Screaming for attention from Internet losers?  Hardly.  You guys have yet to realize that you’re the punch line.  Be it HCQ, Antifa, Ivermectin, fetuses, whatever, you take the bait every time. 

 

Could it have been that Antifa was a group put forth or paid kind of like the BS dossier by those that couldn't stand the previous president until they caused enough BS to change peoples votes to get a man that they thought would do better ?

 

Then they stopped demonstrating and showing up which made it only look as if Biden had done something to defeat them ? Sounds a little more plausible to me .

 

Inquiring minds want to know but the others just follow the agenda . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

Didn't they just cause a half a million in damage during a recent riot in Portland?

 

 

Yes.

 

The Antifa articles are usually in the "Liberal Protests" thread.

 


 

On 10/14/2021 at 11:19 AM, B-Man said:

 

Anarchists ?................oh, you misspelled Antifa.

 

Portland police: Anarchists damage businesses in downtown Portland; damage in excess of $500K

 

https://www.kptv.com/news/portland-police-anarchists-damage-businesses-in-downtown-portland-damage-in-excess-of-500k/article_5cfee8e0-2c75-11ec-9bcc-9f690414fd4b.html?block_id=994431|

 

 

Facts do not matter to Section.

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2021 at 2:09 PM, T master said:

 

Could it have been that Antifa was a group put forth or paid kind of like the BS dossier by those that couldn't stand the previous president until they caused enough BS to change peoples votes to get a man that they thought would do better ?

 

Then they stopped demonstrating and showing up which made it only look as if Biden had done something to defeat them ? Sounds a little more plausible to me .

 

Inquiring minds want to know but the others just follow the agenda . 

Hey, look at you Chicken Little! Admitting Trump lost fair and square. Nice! Now you go off making other conspiracy theories, though. So who paid all those people in your little theory there? 

 

So you are complaining the protests stopped after you complained about the protests? Kind of mindless, but par for the course with you, idiot that you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Hey, look at you Chicken Little! Admitting Trump lost fair and square. Nice! Now you go off making other conspiracy theories, though. So who paid all those people in your little theory there? 

 

So you are complaining the protests stopped after you complained about the protests? Kind of mindless, but par for the course with you, idiot that you are. 

 

Well we all know and it's been proven that Hillary and quite possibly the DNC paid for the BS dossier and it has been proven totally false by more than one investigation . 

 

It has also been said the Soros money could have been in play for the Anita actions we all know he with many other hated Trump and would do most anything to get him out of office because he wouldn't play by the rules laid down like Joe & the rest do but i haven't seen any hard proof of that but it sure wouldn't surprise me he's been trying to ruin the US for quite some time .

 

Also seeing as Monsanto or (MonSatan) big pharma and many other huge corporations more than likely put plenty of money in the back door of the gov't to get their products legal through the likes of the FDA & the EPA it wouldn't surprise me if some of those "Super Groups" that donate money to presidential campaigns had their money behind certain candidates to help them out .

 

I may have a bit of a chicken little out look in me because i look at the possibilities of crooked happenings that surround the gov't for years which you seem to always over look or fill in the blanks with your chicken S**T made up BS beliefs which you follow from those who tell you how to think because once again you are a follower and believe the lies they tell . 

 

Plus the fact that your nuts never dropped during puberty to challenge the lies of your leaders or to become a real man and use your head for something other than a hat rack as to not believe every thing your told by someone that wants to control you by telling you what is best for you by doing things his or their way . 

 

But there's hope one day you may grow a  set and see just how crooked they are but i won't be holding my breath for that ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, T master said:

 

Well we all know and it's been proven that Hillary and quite possibly the DNC paid for the BS dossier and it has been proven totally false by more than one investigation . 

 

It has also been said the Soros money could have been in play for the Anita actions we all know he with many other hated Trump and would do most anything to get him out of office because he wouldn't play by the rules laid down like Joe & the rest do but i haven't seen any hard proof of that but it sure wouldn't surprise me he's been trying to ruin the US for quite some time .

 

Also seeing as Monsanto or (MonSatan) big pharma and many other huge corporations more than likely put plenty of money in the back door of the gov't to get their products legal through the likes of the FDA & the EPA it wouldn't surprise me if some of those "Super Groups" that donate money to presidential campaigns had their money behind certain candidates to help them out .

 

I may have a bit of a chicken little out look in me because i look at the possibilities of crooked happenings that surround the gov't for years which you seem to always over look or fill in the blanks with your chicken S**T made up BS beliefs which you follow from those who tell you how to think because once again you are a follower and believe the lies they tell . 

 

Plus the fact that your nuts never dropped during puberty to challenge the lies of your leaders or to become a real man and use your head for something other than a hat rack as to not believe every thing your told by someone that wants to control you by telling you what is best for you by doing things his or their way . 

 

But there's hope one day you may grow a  set and see just how crooked they are but i won't be holding my breath for that ...

That was begun by Republicans as opposition research, so ... And Trump and his kissing up to Putin is well documented so suspicion of Trump's corrupt nature with Putin is very much warranted, but you go and run with your little mindless nonesesne 

3 minutes ago, T master said:

 

 

 

It has also been said the Soros money could have been in play for the Anita actions we all know he with many other hated Trump and would do most anything to get him out of office because he wouldn't play by the rules laid down like Joe & the rest do but i haven't seen any hard proof of that but it sure wouldn't surprise me he's been trying to ruin the US for quite some time .

 

Could have? Who said that? The same antisemites that pushed that murderer to shoot up the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburg after it was claimed Soros was paying migrants to "come replace us." 

 

You spew so much hate in such little threads. Shame on you! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That was begun by Republicans as opposition research, so ... And Trump and his kissing up to Putin is well documented so suspicion of Trump's corrupt nature with Putin is very much warranted, but you go and run with your little mindless nonesesne 

Could have? Who said that? The same antisemites that pushed that murderer to shoot up the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburg after it was claimed Soros was paying migrants to "come replace us." 

 

You spew so much hate in such little threads. Shame on you! 

 

WTF did that come from ?

 

The antisemites are in the democratic party up in Michigan & Minnesota better known as the squad another thing the sitting Pres. has no balls to confront .

 

What hate ? you just like twisting S**T to fit what you want it to ! I never said any thing about hating anything or anybody but that's how you role turn it around as to not make you look so bad or stupid your self yet those you voted for won't confront the antisemitism with in your own ranks pretty much par .

 

But that hate is fine but because i write "It's been said the Soros money COULD HAVE BEEN IN PLAY"  not was in play but COULD that is hate ?

 

Twist away Tibs with every reply typed your blind faith in those you support & voted for is more apparent than ever  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...