BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 9 minutes ago, B-Man said: Shallow response. IT"S NOT just the media. It's the "progressive " response.................aimed at dividing the country and that's G*D Damned important. Guns - everyone gets a gun - you get a gun - you get a gun - everyone gets a gun. Nothing will change until YOU get a bullet and you over there gets a bullet - and everyone gets a bullet!!! Hell - not even the killing of 20 kids moved the needle for the death cult. When will Republicans become adults and discuss meaningful changes to gun legislation? You have no issues wanting to steal people’s voting rights, gay rights and abortion rights... but don’t you dare touch my gun. The GQP is the party of death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, BillStime said: Guns - everyone gets a gun - you get a gun - you get a gun - everyone gets a gun. Nothing will change until YOU get a bullet and you over there gets a bullet - and everyone gets a bullet!!! Hell - not even the killing of 20 kids moved the needle for the death cult. When will Republicans become adults and discuss meaningful changes to gun legislation? You have no issues wanting to steal people’s voting rights, gay rights and abortion rights... but don’t you dare touch my gun. The GQP is the party of death. Even shallower response. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, B-Man said: Even shallower response. You are on the wrong side of every issue. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 40 minutes ago, B-Man said: Shallow response. IT"S NOT just the media. It's the "progressive " response.................aimed at dividing the country and that's G*D Damned important. No, we want to unite the country behind gun control. You are using race/religion to divide people. You are the swallow one, as always 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, we want to unite the country behind gun control. They replied. Said no. Stop using Islamic Extremism to suspend American's Rights----Libs circa 2001 Quote You are using race/religion to divide people. Why the reference to him being white and likely a Trump voter before any facts were known? Why did we "need to know" he was white so fast? Edited March 23, 2021 by Big Blitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: 1) They replied. Said no. Stop using Islamic Extremism to suspend American Rights----Libs circa 2001 2) Why the reference to him being white and likely a Trump voter before any facts were known? Why did we "need to know" he was white so fast? 1) Lol, you mean Republican Bush passing Patriot act? 2) Some media outlet did that? Which one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Just now, Tiberius said: 1) Lol, you mean Republican Bush passing Patriot act? Biden to. Just now, Tiberius said: 2) Some media outlet did that? Which one? All of them. Literally all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: 1) Biden to. 2)All of them. Literally all of them. 1) So not just liberals as you said. In fact, mostly conservatives. Most Islamophobes are Conservatives. See Muslim Ban 2) Examples? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 2 hours ago, SectionC3 said: We’ll have to look into the particulars of this particular mass shooting. The answer probably is that some people may have died, but the casualty count would have been lower b/c the shooter couldn’t fire as many shots as quickly as he did. But, in the meantime, let’s keep on circulating military-grade weapons among a society that believes in QAnon, hoaxes, “Stop the Steal,” etc. Seems like a really good plan that definitely won’t backfire on anyone. So you’re saying someone with a handgun with 5 additional clips ready to go would not have killed as many people? Again it ain’t the weapon it’s the gray matter between the ears of the shooter(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Guns - everyone gets a gun - you get a gun - you get a gun - everyone gets a gun. Nothing will change until YOU get a bullet and you over there gets a bullet - and everyone gets a bullet!!! Hell - not even the killing of 20 kids moved the needle for the death cult. When will Republicans become adults and discuss meaningful changes to gun legislation? You have no issues wanting to steal people’s voting rights, gay rights and abortion rights... but don’t you dare touch my gun. The GQP is the party of death. What meaningful changes would you suggest? Who here is against voting and gay rights?? And abortion rights? Talk about the party of death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 52 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So you’re saying someone with a handgun with 5 additional clips ready to go would not have killed as many people? Again it ain’t the weapon it’s the gray matter between the ears of the shooter(s). Sure. Whatever you say. Never mind that having to the slaughter to change clips provides opportunity for intervention. But let’s keep on letting people run around with military grade weapons and blame the mass shooting on the shooters. Maybe we could even get some hollow point bullets out there (it’s not the bullets that kill people, right?) and some handheld nuclear devices to bring mutual assured destruction to suburbia. I bet that neighbor across the street will not let the dog out at 6a against my wishes if he knows that I can turn his lawn (and the dog) into a sheet of glass. Groovy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Sure. Whatever you say. Never mind that having to the slaughter to change clips provides opportunity for intervention. But let’s keep on letting people run around with military grade weapons and blame the mass shooting on the shooters. Maybe we could even get some hollow point bullets out there (it’s not the bullets that kill people, right?) and some handheld nuclear devices to bring mutual assured destruction to suburbia. I bet that neighbor across the street will not let the dog out at 6a against my wishes if he knows that I can turn his lawn (and the dog) into a sheet of glass. Groovy. If you would like Congress to pass a law...please call your representative and ask them to pass one. Simple enough. Next topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Gun industry is protected from being sued even though they literally make a product designed to kill people. This needs to be repealed https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful_Commerce_in_Arms_Act The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a United States law that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: Gun sales have probably taken off in last 24 hours. Mission accomplished for NRA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: What meaningful changes would you suggest? Who here is against voting and gay rights?? And abortion rights? Talk about the party of death. Please don't tell me you're pro-life when you allow folks to commit gun murders every freakn day because of an unregulated ammo/gun market. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Please don't tell me you're pro-life when you allow folks to commit gun murders every freakn day because of an unregulated ammo/gun market. Lol, yup, pro-life but against health care. Go figure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 38 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Sure. Whatever you say. Never mind that having to the slaughter to change clips provides opportunity for intervention. But let’s keep on letting people run around with military grade weapons and blame the mass shooting on the shooters. Maybe we could even get some hollow point bullets out there (it’s not the bullets that kill people, right?) and some handheld nuclear devices to bring mutual assured destruction to suburbia. I bet that neighbor across the street will not let the dog out at 6a against my wishes if he knows that I can turn his lawn (and the dog) into a sheet of glass. Groovy. Sure, whatever you say of course, but what happens when the next crazed gunman comes in with the 5 clips, someone intervenes between clips 3 & 4 and only 6 souls are lost. The gun control crowd sits back and says...what? I’m personal anti-nuclear weaponry, hand held or mounted on a Jeep Gladiator/2016 Toyota Prius btw. What a sad day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 17 minutes ago, BillStime said: Or because he was an anti American muslim scumbag that would have got a gun somewhere else to commit murder. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/03/23/alleged-boulder-colorado-gunman-ahmad-alissa/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 The Judge overturned the Boulder ban because it is NOT constitutional for a City to pass separate bans. But let's not include that in your outrage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Too bad there isn’t constitutional language mandating that it’s as easy or difficult to own or possess a gun as it is to vote, but they MUST be the same. At least something would get fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Too bad there isn’t constitutional language mandating that it’s as easy or difficult to own or possess a gun as it is to vote, but they MUST be the same. At least something would get fixed. The law banning gun manufacturers from civil suits is unconstitutional. The reason it was passed is because it’s obvious these companies are selling human killing devices. I hope the Dems repeal that horrible law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownNgold Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The law banning gun manufacturers from civil suits is unconstitutional. The reason it was passed is because it’s obvious these companies are selling human killing devices. I hope the Dems repeal that horrible law Who would be liable if a drunk driver killed somebody? The liquor manufacturer or the car company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Heartbreaking... How is it possible to heal when there’s trauma over and over and over and over again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: The law banning gun manufacturers from civil suits is unconstitutional. The reason it was passed is because it’s obvious these companies are selling human killing devices. I hope the Dems repeal that horrible law So someone uses a product to harm another in a manner that the product is not meant and the company is responsible? You are a lawyers best friend, good hearted but unable to put any intelligent thought into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, BrownNgold said: Who would be liable if a drunk driver killed somebody? The liquor manufacturer or the car company. it really all depends. Can you describe the race of the driver and the victim, and then the political parties that the two respective companies support? Those are all required to help form the narrative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: it really all depends. Can you describe the race of the driver and the victim, and then the political parties that the two respective companies support? Those are all required to help form the narrative. A bit sarcastic but true to the point. Isn't it wonderful to live in a time where politics and virtue signaling are the determining factors in all circumstances and situations? Edited March 23, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, BrownNgold said: Who would be liable if a drunk driver killed somebody? The liquor manufacturer or the car company. There are indeed laws on the books implicating multiple parties being responsible for a drunk driver. Bars and restaurants who over serve being one of them. If the drunk driver is under age and left a house party of a friend - in some states - the parents are held liable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownNgold Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 34 minutes ago, BillStime said: There are indeed laws on the books implicating multiple parties being responsible for a drunk driver. Bars and restaurants who over serve being one of them. If the drunk driver is under age and left a house party of a friend - in some states - the parents are held liable. So if you do something wrong you can be held responsible, but if you manufacture something that can be miss used you are fine right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 5 minutes ago, BrownNgold said: So if you do something wrong you can be held responsible, but if you manufacture something that can be miss used you are fine right? Why are some manufactures who distribute explosive or toxic materials subject to strict liability; and not gun manufactures? We all know why... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownNgold Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 15 minutes ago, BillStime said: Why are some manufactures who distribute explosive or toxic materials subject to strict liability; and not gun manufactures? We all know why... If you wouldn't mind could you name one of these manufacturers that are liable for their product after it is sold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 16 minutes ago, BrownNgold said: If you wouldn't mind could you name one of these manufacturers that are liable for their product after it is sold. Any major chemical company; pyrotechnics or tobacco company... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownNgold Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: Any major chemical company; pyrotechnics or tobacco company... So if I someone buys a tanker load of chemical and dumps it in the river is the chemical company liable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Just now, BrownNgold said: So if I someone buys a tanker load of chemical and dumps it in the river is the chemical company liable? Yes. What happened to Purdue Pharma? You know, the company that produced OxyContin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownNgold Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 11 minutes ago, BillStime said: Yes. What happened to Purdue Pharma? You know, the company that produced OxyContin? Guess I should get a refund on my hazwopper course then. Because I'm fairly certain who ever dumps chemicals into the environment are getting the fine and will be billed for cleanup. Also Purde Pharma committed fraud by mislabeling products. So yes they should be held liable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 9 hours ago, ALF said: Here's his picture and what his brother thought about him https://www.thedailybeast.com/boulder-colorado-cops-identify-king-soopers-supermarket-massacre-suspect-as-ahmad-alissa If his brother knew he was mentally ill , how did he get access to a AR-15 type gun ? Since he was part of a well regulated militia ....he had the right to bear arms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 2 minutes ago, BrownNgold said: Guess I should get a refund on my hazwopper course then. Because I'm fairly certain who ever dumps chemicals into the environment are getting the fine and will be billed for cleanup. Also Purde Pharma committed fraud by mislabeling products. So yes they should be held liable. Of course you're missing the point that these industries are highly regulated. But why not gun/ammo manufacturers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 5 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Sure. Whatever you say. Never mind that having to the slaughter to change clips provides opportunity for intervention. But let’s keep on letting people run around with military grade weapons and blame the mass shooting on the shooters. Maybe we could even get some hollow point bullets out there (it’s not the bullets that kill people, right?) and some handheld nuclear devices to bring mutual assured destruction to suburbia. I bet that neighbor across the street will not let the dog out at 6a against my wishes if he knows that I can turn his lawn (and the dog) into a sheet of glass. Groovy. Have you ever seen someone change clips? It’s pretty amazing how fast. But if taking away the scary guns will help you sleep at night have at it. But if it doesn’t, then what? So you take away the scary guns you assume these shootings will subside? The mental healthy of the shooters plays no part in this? I’m pretty sure you take away the scary guns these mentally ill people will still kill. Demons don’t care the caliber or the level of scary. I love hollow points. If im going to protect myself from someone breaking in to my house I want the best ammo to take them out. Yes bullets kill people but how many bullets have killed that are either in someone’s closet or in a loaded weapon that’s not racked? I think even you know the answer to that one. Regarding your nuclear device comment. You went down with your ship on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 49 minutes ago, BrownNgold said: If you wouldn't mind could you name one of these manufacturers that are liable for their product after it is sold. McDonald’s? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts