Jump to content

What position you feel we need the most.


What position is the biggest need  

232 members have voted

  1. 1. What position is our biggest need

    • High End RB Any Top tier maybe via draft
    • Fast WR Field Stretcher
    • OG Dynamic Run Blocker.
    • DE/EDGE Blitzer Fast and sets the edge.
    • Pure Coverage OLB that can handle TE


Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Gugny said:

We still haven't replaced Andre Roberts.  

 

Getting a solid return man should definitely be top priority.  We can't count on the draft to fill that hole.

 

Agreed. I absolutely HATE our team's neglect of Special Teams.

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to fix the poll - we need nothing.  Everything is covered.

 

If a DE becomes available or a young TE could we sign - yep, but we could also go into the season as positioned with our draft picks and UDFAs and be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

I wanted to vote for 4 of the 5 choices but went with edge.   It’s weird to say of a team that went to the AFC championship game but the Bills have several big needs.

We got pretty lucky and caught 4 teams towards the end that were starting to collapse. I’m not expecting 13-4 this season. 11-6 sounds right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CB should have been on there instead of WR.

9 hours ago, The Governor said:

We got pretty lucky and caught 4 teams towards the end that were starting to collapse. I’m not expecting 13-4 this season. 11-6 sounds right.

According to adjusted team DVOA (offense and defense) the Bills finished second. Their record was not a fluke. Given this is the same team with a few minor upgrades, there's no reason to expect a 6 or 7 seed in the AFC.

 

2021 schedule:

Vs. MIA - W

Vs. NE - W

Vs. NYJ - W

Vs. HOU - W

Vs. IND - L (have to put Ls somewhere)

Vs. ATL - W

Vs. Car - W

Vs. PIT - W

@ JAX - W

@ KC - L? I don't want to write this

@ MIA - W

@ NE - W

@ NO - W

@ NYJ - W

@ TB - L

@ TEN - W

 

+ Possible 17th game. Who else are they losing to here? NO with Jameis? Maybe one of MIA or NE. Maybe TEN if they don't need that last game. I think 3 losses is a good bet.

Edited by Boxcar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another good CB is the biggest need imo and it wasn't even a choice. It would be great to have a sack master but another good CB would also increase sacks and is more of a vital need at this time.

 Bills were middle of the pack in sacks but around 6th in QB pressure, better coverage will = more sacks and better overall defense, a sack master would be the icing on the cake.

 

 

Edited by Turk71
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2021 at 1:37 PM, JoPoy88 said:

Most one-sided poll I’ve ever seen here. 


2 days later it’s still ridiculously one-sided. I like the rare consensus.

15 hours ago, Boxcar said:

CB should have been on there instead of WR.

According to adjusted team DVOA (offense and defense) the Bills finished second. Their record was not a fluke. Given this is the same team with a few minor upgrades, there's no reason to expect a 6 or 7 seed in the AFC.

 

2021 schedule:

Vs. MIA - W

Vs. NE - W

Vs. NYJ - W

Vs. HOU - W

Vs. IND - L (have to put Ls somewhere)

Vs. ATL - W

Vs. Car - W

Vs. PIT - W

@ JAX - W

@ KC - L? I don't want to write this

@ MIA - W

@ NE - W

@ NO - W

@ NYJ - W

@ TB - L

@ TEN - W

 

+ Possible 17th game. Who else are they losing to here? NO with Jameis? Maybe one of MIA or NE. Maybe TEN if they don't need that last game. I think 3 losses is a good bet.


we’re more likely to lose to Tennessee than Indy. The 17th game will be against WFT. So that’s probably a win too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the choices, I picked DE.

 

I'd add the best outcome would be a DE who can *consistently* generate pressure either through brute strength and/or excellent technique. 

 

I don't think lightweight DEs that rely just on speed work well - today's tackles are strong and quick and can negate that speed advantage most of the time.  

 

I still would like a blue chip prospect at TE.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dpberr said:

Of the choices, I picked DE.

 

I'd add the best outcome would be a DE who can *consistently* generate pressure either through brute strength and/or excellent technique. 

 

I don't think lightweight DEs that rely just on speed work well - today's tackles are strong and quick and can negate that speed advantage most of the time.  

 

I still would like a blue chip prospect at TE.  

 

 

Having a TE like Kelce would be a dream come true for me. Its a dream I've been having for years and years.

 

Some physicality at the other end of Josh Allens passes to take the finesse out of the Bills passing attack would be most beneficial IMO. The position has been neglected so long I'm not sure Buffalo knows what a real pass catching TE even looks like in my humble opinion.

 

Its the Pitts, If you ask me...

Edited by Figster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DL, whether it's inside or outside they gotta get younger there. I know this group of DE and edge guys doesn't have any standouts, most guys are gonna need some time. I'm not sure on DT. Maybe they like the Barmore kid from Bama? Admittedly I haven't read up too much on the prospects this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...