Jump to content

Colts Running Game could limit Bills offense


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MarkyMannn said:

Bass doesn't go wide right from 47 yards out

 

That Giants SB25 D sold all out to stop the pass.  And they did because we were stubborn enough to play right into it.  Recall TT had a ton of yards and that was all we had to do.  Run EVERY down

 

Yup.  Should have been draw play after draw play until they respected it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

How does your last paragraph point change if both Diggs and Beasley are out, which is looking like an actual possibility?  

 

I would be extremely concerned if Stefon Diggs does not play.  I think we would be OK without Cole Beasley.

 

However, reports are that both guys practiced yesterday.  And Diggs has stated that he 100% will play on Saturday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

Ok, I know we (and I) are all pumped to wipe these guys out tomorrow, but since Indy

-- has perhaps the best Oline Bills have seen in a while  (just as the Giants did in SB 25), 

-- a limited QB (just as the Giants did with Hostetler) 

-- has solid , big, ground and pound productive RBs (just like NYG with Ottis Anderson)

-- a playcaller who was there on the sidelines for SB25

 

Won't Reich just  play ugly ball, run the ball 40+ times behind that O line, throw short quick passes (they do this anyway) and thereby limit the Bills to 8 or 9 possessions in the game, just as Parcells did in SB 25?   Bills play 90%+ 5 dbs and a fairly lightweight front 6 , discouraging the pass (successfully) and demanding that the opposition run the ball? 

 

 I mean you can't score if you don't have the ball-- this is what happened in SB25.   Game ended up being way closer than it should have been, as the Giants had the ball for 2/3 of the game.   In the absence of Star, Quinton Nelson will absolutely maul any of the Bills D lineman.  

 

Sorry, I guess I am too old and remember how the Giants kept that game so close.   For sure, if Bruce just gets Hostetler to drop that ball in the end zone the game tide shifts, but in the absence of turnovers and ST magic, I can see the Colts making this game slow, ugly and close.   What say you?   The comparisons of the what the Giants did and what the Colts potentially have the tools to do to slow down a high flying offensive team seem a little too tight for comfort.  

 

Go Bills!  

you think the game will play out where the Colts can run 40 times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mjt328 said:

 

I would be extremely concerned if Stefon Diggs does not play.  I think we would be OK without Cole Beasley.

 

However, reports are that both guys practiced yesterday.  And Diggs has stated that he 100% will play on Saturday.

 

Diggs is playing.  McD smokescreen 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:

The Colts are coming off 6 bad quarters of football and just barely beat the worst team in the league.  If not for the Bills knocking the ever-loving snot out of the Dols, they would have missed the playoffs.  While they should in no way be taken lightly, I think this was the best first round matchup the Bills could have asked for and I expect a win.

 

But but but what about the Bills losing to the Chiefs in the 1966 AFL Championship game?

They had an Otis on their team too!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this narrative is flawed.  The running team still needs to score more than the passing team.

 

If the Bills would normally have 10 possessions and they are held to 6, the Colts would also have about 6 possessions.  If the Bills score TDs on 3 then the Colts need to score on 4.  It becomes a lower scoring game but the mat still works in the Bills favor.

 

What does make a difference is the Colts defense.  If they can get a few turnovers and hold the Bills to FGs, then their offense may be able to carry the day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ProcessTruster said:

Ok, ok everyone, I am convinced.   Colts are toast. 

 

 

Funny.  Here in Indy they feel like this is in the bag for them.  Taylor will carry them to victory.  Bills run defense  better be stout and unyeilding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nitro said:

Funny.  Here in Indy they feel like this is in the bag for them.  Taylor will carry them to victory.  Bills run defense  better be stout and unyeilding.  

When i was looking on their boards they were saying they were going to get blown out?  That their defense couldnt stop allen - especially the secondary.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

Ok, I know we (and I) are all pumped to wipe these guys out tomorrow, but since Indy

-- has perhaps the best Oline Bills have seen in a while  (just as the Giants did in SB 25), 

-- a limited QB (just as the Giants did with Hostetler) 

-- has solid , big, ground and pound productive RBs (just like NYG with Ottis Anderson)

-- a playcaller who was there on the sidelines for SB25

 

Won't Reich just  play ugly ball, run the ball 40+ times behind that O line, throw short quick passes (they do this anyway) and thereby limit the Bills to 8 or 9 possessions in the game, just as Parcells did in SB 25?   Bills play 90%+ 5 dbs and a fairly lightweight front 6 , discouraging the pass (successfully) and demanding that the opposition run the ball? 

 

 I mean you can't score if you don't have the ball-- this is what happened in SB25.   Game ended up being way closer than it should have been, as the Giants had the ball for 2/3 of the game.   In the absence of Star, Quinton Nelson will absolutely maul any of the Bills D lineman.  

 

Sorry, I guess I am too old and remember how the Giants kept that game so close.   For sure, if Bruce just gets Hostetler to drop that ball in the end zone the game tide shifts, but in the absence of turnovers and ST magic, I can see the Colts making this game slow, ugly and close.   What say you?   The comparisons of the what the Giants did and what the Colts potentially have the tools to do to slow down a high flying offensive team seem a little too tight for comfort.  

 

Go Bills!  

Change ur name to Trocess Pruster maybe?  But seriously that only works if were sloppy with turnovers, which we havent been, and if we cant compensate with our own forced turnovers, and were 3rd in the league in takeaways.  Deep breath and relax. TRUST THE PROCESS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the back of Reich's mind will always be the lesson he learned from 2 games. 

 

1. Super bowl 25.  The Giants ran the ball and kept it away from our O.  

 

2. The Comeback Game.  Anyone looking back on that game or if you were to watch it again, aside from saying how ridiculous Reed and Reich were that day, you have to ask how in the heck does Houston just stop running the ball and milking clock?

 

 

I want the Bills to put 7 and 8 guys up all day daring them to beat us with Trey Burton and Hilton.  They'll try and use Pittman thinking they got an advantage over there on us but I'll take my chances. 

 

And guarantee the Colts front has preached all week their front is going to try and dictate their will on us.  

 

D-line better be freaking ready.  And the LBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Drew21PA said:

When i was looking on their boards they were saying they were going to get blown out?  That their defense couldnt stop allen - especially the secondary.

 

 

I live here and that is not what people are saying on the radio or television.  

36 minutes ago, inaugural balls said:

 

What happens when they're (Colts) down 24 -7 in the 2nd qtr? 

The is optimistic out look is appreciated.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...