Jump to content

Final Vote—All States, Progress in counting


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, snafu said:

 

It may not be that difficult. 

The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election.

— Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day

— They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. 

 

So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. 

 

 

Not allowed to count votes received after election day maybe. Biden doesn't need any of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Gun said:

Only if you believe there was no ballot fraud in Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, etc

 

The fraud is so vast, it will be exposed and Biden will not be in the WH

 

 

 

Literally everything you posted in the thread earlier was proven wrong. Nice of you to show up again.

 

306 is what Trump won with in 2016.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

This isn't 1986 or 1994.  Times change.   People change as well.    :doh:

 

again, the effects are still being felt from those bills.  it's not like they just had an effect on those years.  the dems just spent four years labeling trump bad for minorities and turned hypocrites by electing a guy who has a far worse history on minorities.  you want to vote for a democrat...all for it. but don't label the right racists or bad for minorities when you go and put this guy in office. 

Edited by aristocrat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

It may not be that difficult. 

The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election.

— Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day

— They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. 

 

So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. 

 

 

In PA all of those "late ballots" have been sequestered and have not been counted at all. It doesn't change anything. There is a BIG difference between counting those that were received after Tuesday and counting days after the election. The conservative media has purposely been blurring these lines to make it seem like the ballots counted in PA right now have been received AFTER Tuesday.

Edited by nkreed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

It may not be that difficult. 

The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election.

— Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day

— They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. 

 

So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. 

 

 

SCOTUS didn't want to change the election rules set up by the state legislatures...all Republican BTW.  This was planned all along.  Because of covid Dems would choose to vote by mail.  Those votes would not be allowed to be counted until after election day so Trump would lead on election day.  Now that those votes are being counted and Trump's lead is disappearing, he's claiming fraud.  It's nonsense but he's betting his followers and the packed courts will buy it.  Most aren't that naive.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

It may not be that difficult. 

The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election.

— Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day

— They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. 

 

So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. 

 

 

 

PA has segregated the votes that came in after Election Day.  Those votes currently number only a few thousand.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Wait, if Biden is ahead, shouldn’t the ballot counting be stopped immediately?

 

Doesn't that sound nuts?  It should if you are in favor of elections

 

The funny part is, Biden has been ahead the entire time Trump has called for counting to stop. His aides had to explain to him that if they called the election when he tweeted his demand, Biden would still win. Which shows Trump has no real complaint, he's just trying to stir chaos. Most anti-American President in history.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HeHateMe said:

The slow painful vote counting leading to the demise of Trump this week has been something special..  

I guess you and your friends are going to be real disappointed when 10's of thousands of Biden votes are deemed illegal and Trump goes back to the WH! 

Edited by Big Gun
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...