Domestic terrorist attack in Wisconsin

[Unforgiven]

Black Man Stabbed 'Random' White AutoZone Employee in the Neck After Watching Police Shooting Videos

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/08/27/black-man-stabbed-random-white-autozone-employee-in-the-neck-after-watching-police-shooting-videos-n855810

 

WLTZ News reporter Robbie Watson posted on Facebook after the arraignment. “Hatchett smiles telling Detective he chose white man at random and stabbed him in the neck. Victim’s critical and traumatized by attack according to court testimony.”

 

chirp chirp goes the communist media

 

Edited August 29, 2020 by Unforgiven

[TakeYouToTasker]

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

[Unforgiven]

Rand Paul: Threats from DC Mob Were ‘F— You Up,’ ‘Kill You’ 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/08/28/rand-paul-threats-from-dc-mob-were-f-you-up-kill-you/

 

aka domestic terrorism

 

[Niagara Bill]

2 hours ago, Reality Check said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case in point...the Marxist. 

2 hours ago, Reality Check said:

 

 

 

 

 

The Marxist again

[GG]

3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

But it's vitally important to note that he may not be a Communist, because ....

[bilzfancy]

6 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

and now Satan's demons are doing the same to him

[Rob's House]

Tim Pool:

 

Kyle Rittenhouse is a good example of why I decided to vote for Trump

Violent extremists were destroying people's lives for months, 30 people were killed

Democrats rejected Federal assistance every time Trump offered it

Media lied about Trump deploying "secret police."

 

Finally some kid from a nearby town, about 20 minutes drive, decides to go up and protect businesses and offer medical support o people, even the rioters

He was threatened and shot at.

 

Now the media is saying the 3 convicted felons, the extremists are the good guys

Several people died in the CHAZ and no one has been caught.

It has to stop now.

 

Democrats have proven completely unable to do anything about it and we can't even get a full throated condemnation from Biden or Kamala.

Local Democrats have dont nothing and in some cases ordered cops to stand down.

 

The DA in Multonomah (Portland) is even allowing people who assault officers to walk.

NYC, Chicago, and Fort Worth have done similar.

 

This nightmare experiment in allowing violent extremists to attack innocent people needs to end and so far only Trump has shown willingness to do something about it.

DHS has target those they have jurisdiction over.

But Trump has NOT intervened in local affairs.

 

Joe Biden Is A Coward.

Hiding in his basement.

***** if I vote for that .

 

The Far Left is responsible for 32 deaths and Democrats quite literally defended this and called for more.

https://t.co/6WGlkboMLn

 

They kept saying "protester" because they are gaslighting us.

These were protests for about one or two days.

I praised them when they happened

But for months its been violence and chaos.

 

I'm sick of the media lies about "peaceful protesters."

And I'm furious I had to wake up to see a man crying as he lay dying.

The Democrats have failed and it's time to let Trump stop this.

Even WI Governor Evers agreed and finally accepted Federal Law Enforcement.

 

Trump has his problems

But he is better suited to fix the economy and deal with the extremists plaguing not just our streets but our cultural institutions.

Joe Biden is a Coward hiding in his basement.

I'll vote for the ####### over the coward.

fin/

[bdutton]

17 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

Please post links when you can.  ?

[TakeYouToTasker]

6 minutes ago, bdutton said:

Please post links when you can.  ?

It’s all over Twitter, and other social media.

Edited August 29, 2020 by TakeYouToTasker

[Koko78]

36 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

 

Now that's hard to believe. The Huffington Post ran a completely-believable story featuring a quote from his girlfriend saying, “'He was one of the most amazing people,' Huber’s girlfriend, Hannah Gittings, said at a gathering Wednesday night near the location where he was killed. 'He took down an armed gunman with nothing but his ***** skateboard, and he took that ***** bullet.'” 

 

As for the other doofus, "Rosenbaum, known by friends and family as 'Jojo,' was a jokester and 'loved his daughter very much,' his sister told the Chicago Sun-Times."

 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/victims-kenosha-jacob-blake-protest_n_5f4801a3c5b64f17e13a9546

 

 

They were wonderful defenders of the people. Oh, whoops:

Quote

Online arrest records show Huber was arrested several times on battery, drugs and other charges. Rosenbaum had an open criminal case on battery, disorderly conduct and domestic abuse charges, according to the Wisconsin Circuit Court website. His previous record could not immediately be confirmed.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/ny-kenosha-victims-identified-as-anthony-huber-joseph-rosenbaum-20200827-zvrsv7fpqfftlmjyrtjrmg5wwa-story.html

Edited August 29, 2020 by Koko78

[SectionC3]

1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Update:  woman are coming forward in bunches to accuse Anthony Huber, the second individual killed, who hit Rittenhouse in the head and face with a blunt object while he was prone, a convicted woman beater, of drugging and raping them.

Only in your demented eyes would that justify the death penalty administered by an armed child in a scenario completely unrelated to those allegations.  Pro-death penalty = fake Christian. 

[B-Man]

TOO SOON?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

WHY THIS STUFF ISN’T HAPPENING IN RED AREAS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Rob's House]

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Only in your demented eyes would that justify the death penalty administered by an armed child in a scenario completely unrelated to those allegations.  Pro-death penalty = fake Christian. 

 

It's not a penalty, it's self-defense.

 

Yous should know that. As a matter of fact, you do know that. Yet here you are spewing this bullsh!t.

Edited August 29, 2020 by Rob's House

[Reality Check]

7 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

Case in point...the Marxist. 

The Marxist again

 

[Reality Check]

6 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Only in your demented eyes would that justify the death penalty administered by an armed child in a scenario completely unrelated to those allegations.  Pro-death penalty = fake Christian. 

 

[Niagara Bill]

1 hour ago, Reality Check said:

 

The Marxist shows up again

[Reality Check]

8 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

The Marxist shows up again

 

[Niagara Bill]

51 minutes ago, Reality Check said:

 

And another quick Marxist post....

 We know what you are and soon will know who you are.

[Tiberius]

20 hours ago, bilzfancy said:

Yep. Who is more anti-Semitic then democrats, just look to the "squad"

Oh, did they inspire the shooting at the tree of life synagogue? 

[Kemp]

20 hours ago, Gary M said:

 

Fire until the threat is neutralized.

 

I wasn't there and from the video can't see what the officer saw, but as long as he was trying to retrieve the weapon I would fire.

 

Maybe he should have obey the lawful command of the officer?

 

 

 

Remember all those great Westerns where the hero put 7 in the back of the bad guy?

It's refreshing that a Trump supporter would admit that it's okay for a member of the government to execute a citizen. All while decrying the government's intrusion ino the personal lives of citizens. 

 

When I was younger, I wondered how people accepted dictatorships so readily. Trump supporters have shown how it works. Declare a man above the law and follow him into your own self-destruction.
 

 
 

[Kemp]

20 hours ago, bilzfancy said:

I posted 1 shot, in the nuts, good to know you support sexual abusers, yet you mock a caregiver, tells me all I need to know about you

 

Someone accused of sexual  abuse deserves a bullet to the groin?

 

President Trump will not be happy with your opinion.

Are you so stupid that you don't understand the connection?

 

Do you believe that only some of the accused deserve it?

Bet you trhink you're a law and order guy, right?

People like you deserve to get what you think is justice.

20 hours ago, Gary M said:

 

When they ignore a lawful order from an officer and reach for a weapon, yes.

 

 

So, if you took 7 in the back and the cop said he felt in danger before doing it, you'd agree? 

Sure you would.

19 hours ago, Golden Goat said:

 

First, Hemp: Apologize to the disabled folks you disparaged.. ****ing hypocrite.

 

 

Didn't think you could. The mentally weak never can.

[Kemp]

18 hours ago, westside2 said:

One in the back of the head would be just fine.

 

Love when Trump supporters admit that the government should be allowed to execute people. Bring on the dictatorship. Won't it be fun?

 

Republicans used to the say the opposite. It's good that the truth is coming from the lips of those folks. Bad for the country, though. But who cares?

11 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Did I say he committed it? I said he was under arrest for it which is exactly what he was. Just cause he got shot doesn’t clear him of the arrest.  And I made no mention of the shooting.  My gf gets convicts as a nurse once in a while and you better believe I’d want some guy accused of sec assault handcuffed.  

 

Trump was accused multiple times. Should he be handcuffed?

 

Or should black people live under a different set of laws than orange people?

[Chef Jim]

11 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Someone accused of sexual  abuse deserves a bullet to the groin?

 

Of course not. That’s not why he was shot.  But you knew that. 

[SoCal Deek]

Justify to clarify before you all go off the rails today....like every day:

 

First, the President has zero jurisdictional authority over local police departments in this country. 
 

Second, in each of these cases the ‘victims’ were defying lawful and appropriate commands from peace officers who were simply responding to a call for assistance. 

[Kemp]

17 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Of course not. That’s not why he was shot.  But you knew that. 

 

Tell me why he REALLY got shot 7 times in the back?

 

Why wasn't he tackled by the cops?

 

Tased?

 

Even shot just once, which would still be illegal?

 

Why 7 times?

 

You know that there is no legit answer, yet you don't care, because this isn't about justice, to you.

 

 

[snafu]

3 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Tell me why he REALLY got shot 7 times in the back?

 

Why wasn't he tackled by the cops?

 

Tased?

 

Even shot just once, which would still be illegal?

 

Why 7 times?

 

You know that there is no legit answer, yet you don't care, because this isn't about justice, to you.

 

 

 

Just so you have your facts straight,  he fought with the cops and was tased.  Then he went to his car to apparently retrieve something.

Do you know this already, or are you arguing something without knowing what happened?

 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Justify to clarify before you all go off the rails today....like every day:

 

First, the President has zero jurisdictional authority over local police departments in this country. 
 

Second, in each of these cases the ‘victims’ were defying lawful and appropriate commands from peace officers who were simply responding to a call for assistance. 

 

...he does have this at his disposal, but I'm sure his advisors advise against it as too heavy handed....MSM is already going crazy when he sends minimal Fed help....

 

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007) that empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection and rebellion.

 

The act provides a "statutory exception" to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.^[1][2]

 

Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse.

Edited August 29, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy

[Kemp]

Just now, snafu said:

 

Just so you have your facts straight,  he fought with the cops and was tased.  Then he went to his car to apparently retrieve something.

Do you know this already, or are you arguing something without knowing what happened?

 

 

For the 20th or so time.

 

Should a cop be allowed to put 7 bullets in the back of someone other than in a case where that person poses a threat where he is pointing a loaded gun at people?

 

If you think yes, then you really don't even understand the concept of self-defense and you should have no complaints living under a police state.

 

How pathetic is that?

[SoCal Deek]

Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...he does have this at his disposal, but I'm sure his advisors advise against it as too heavy handed.....

 

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007) that empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection and rebellion.

 

The act provides a "statutory exception" to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.^[1][2]

 

Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse.

That’s nice, but not really the point. Yes, the President can act in response in times of crisis. But he cannot proactively become, direct, or usurp the local government. 

[snafu]

5 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

For the 20th or so time.

 

Should a cop be allowed to put 7 bullets in the back of someone other than in a case where that person poses a threat where he is pointing a loaded gun at people?

 

If you think yes, then you really don't even understand the concept of self-defense and you should have no complaints living under a police state.

 

How pathetic is that?

 

Angry Kemp...

I live in a State with Police, not a Police State.

You stated “why wasn’t he tackled by the cops?”  He was.  Didn’t stop him.

You asked why wasn’t he “tased”.  He was.  Kept going. 

You asked those things as though they are acceptable alternatives to shooting.  I agree with you.  However, there were tried, and they failed to subdue the guy.  

Do you know what happened next? It doesn’t seem so.  You seem ignorant of the actual facts. And you appear to think every cop-suspect situation is the same. And you appear to believe that cops shouldn’t act actual humans — they aren’t permitted to eff up.

 

I was just pointing out that you got your facts wrong and assumed that the cop just took out his gun and shot the guy without any events leading up to the incident.  Yes, I agree that seven shots is excessive.  I also believe that the guy should have been a lot more compliant and it would have never escalated to the point it did.  If you don’t agree with that, then (in your own words) you’re either stupid or evil.

 

 

 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

19 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

That’s nice, but not really the point. Yes, the President can act in response in times of crisis. But he cannot proactively become, direct, or usurp the local government. 

 

...my apology.....did not mean to contradict what you posted relative to local authorities.....thought I read (but probably wrong) that it is in individual State Charters to provide safety for its citizenry.......perhaps you can weigh in.....if, IF so, many states are in violation....

[Doc]

10 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Only in your demented eyes would that justify the death penalty administered by an armed child in a scenario completely unrelated to those allegations.  Pro-death penalty = fake Christian. 

 

It's not a justification.  But it explains why someone would be stupid (or if you prefer, unable to control his impulses) enough to assault a guy with a rifle. 

 

35 minutes ago, snafu said:

Just so you have your facts straight,  he fought with the cops and was tased.  Then he went to his car to apparently retrieve something.

Do you know this already, or are you arguing something without knowing what happened?

 

Most sane people would have emptied their clip into him as well.

[BillStime]

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

It's not a justification.  But it explains why someone would be stupid (or if you prefer, unable to control his impulses) enough to assault a guy with a rifle. 

 

 

Most sane people would have emptied their clip into him as well.

[Doc]

That cartoon be Trump being a match and everyone listening being a gas can.  It's true: the left can't meme.

[SoCal Deek]

30 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...my apology.....did not mean to contradict what you posted relative to local authorities.....thought I read (but probably wrong) that it is in individual State Charters to provide safety for its citizenry.......perhaps you can weigh in.....if, IF so, many states are in violation....

You’re focused on the rioting. I’m focused on what touches off the rioting in the first place. Trump has no control over officers in Wisconsin. He doesn’t provide local police services. Nor does he have any idea where the next officer involved shooting will occur. I’ll bet a million dollars that no one guessed Kenosha Wisconsin.

[SectionC3]

18 minutes ago, Doc said:

Most sane people would have emptied their clip into him as well.

 

Yup.  Completely justified to do that.  Rule of law!

[BillStime]

19 minutes ago, Doc said:

That cartoon be Trump being a match and everyone listening being a gas can.  It's true: the left can't meme.

The right can’t write.

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re focused on the rioting. I’m focused on what touches off the rioting in the first place. Trump has no control over officers in Wisconsin. He doesn’t provide local police services. Nor does he have any idea where the next officer involved shooting will occur. I’ll bet a million dollars that no one guessed Kenosha Wisconsin.

 

...I'd have to up that bet......and despite being trained, NO ONE knows who is the next police officer to erupt, the next alleged "peaceful demonstrator" to erupt, the next mass murderer to surface, your fine, cordial next door neighbor who murdered his family, a trained postal worker who "went postal in a killing spree", et al......we're talking about the predictability response of one's gray matter...good luck with that.............

[SectionC3]

2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...I'd have to up that bet......and despite being trained, NO ONE knows who is the next police officer to erupt, the next alleged "peaceful demonstrator" to erupt, the next mass murderer to surface, your fine, cordial next door neighbor who murdered his family, a trained postal worker who "went postal in a killing spree", et al......we're talking about the predictability response of one's gray matter...good luck with that.............

Only solution: more guns for everyone.  And heavily armed children.