CSBill Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 (edited) Hey, she owns the teams, puts up a few million dollars to make it work, I would say she can do whatever she wants. Edited June 27, 2020 by CSBill 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 Based upon the tempest in a teapot this has created, I really think Mrs. P. needs to wear pink headphones every game, and a coach randomly selected will also have a similarly coloured set. She can be listening to the broadcast crew; the coach will be carrying on as always with usual procedures. The unfounded speculation on here regarding her 'coaching' ought to be good for a three page thread after every home game. Better yet, I'm going to suggest Mark Davis for the Raiders start this practice. Kim Pegula ? > Mark Davis ? ? ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 14 hours ago, nucci said: of course she can. Doesn't make it right Is there a moral issue here? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 12 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Personally I hate it!! The less involved the owner is the better. Like Snyder and Jerrah. Sorry, it was too easy KJ. You know I’m a fan. Anyway, I don’t see the harm. It’s not like she was telling McD what to do. She just wanted to experience the chaos. Must be a Joker fan. Why so Serious? My favorite bad guy from all of those Batman movies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 31 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: Based upon the tempest in a teapot this has created, I really think Mrs. P. needs to wear pink headphones every game, and a coach randomly selected will also have a similarly coloured set. She can be listening to the broadcast crew; the coach will be carrying on as always with usual procedures. The unfounded speculation on here regarding her 'coaching' ought to be good for a three page thread after every home game. Better yet, I'm going to suggest Mark Davis for the Raiders start this practice. Kim Pegula ? > Mark Davis ? ? ? Nothing like waking up on a Saturday to a sarcastic and funny Ridgeway post. You always keep me laughing Ridge. I actually had that dork now in Vegas with the worst haircut on the planet (he must have loved Dumb and Dumber), that stupid jumpsuit, wearing a pink Headset. That visual is chilling to say the least. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 1 hour ago, CSBill said: Is there a moral issue here? No, just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 14 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Personally I hate it!! The less involved the owner is the better. Involved is not listening and learning. Involved is making game day decisions. IMO the more an owner knows the better. I agree they should not be making game day decisions but knowing more is always good. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 This just in! Robert Kraft is rumoured to be donning a headset for all Patriot games. Although not actively coaching, he is purported to be offering 'incentives' to players during the game for outstanding performance. Nothing like the owner giving his players a hand for their hard work. ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 18 hours ago, The Wiz said: I get the feeling she's was just listening and not chiming in with her personnel preferences on 3rd and long. No issue with it. She demanded more laterals and FB fly patterns 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 9 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: She demanded more laterals and FB fly patterns ? Those who live by the 'home run throwback' die by the 'home run throwback'...? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Personally I hate it!! The less involved the owner is the better. It depends on the character of the involvement. If Kim starts calling plays and Terry starts making draft picks, there's a huge problem. But going to games, attending practices, and even wearing headsets simply shows they're interested and care about what's going on. I'd rather have engaged (but not meddling) ownership than absentee owners. And, c'mon Kirby, if you owned the Bills, you wouldn't want to listen in at least once? Edited June 27, 2020 by hondo in seattle 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 3 hours ago, machine gun kelly said: Like Snyder and Jerrah. Sorry, it was too easy KJ. You know I’m a fan. Anyway, I don’t see the harm. It’s not like she was telling McD what to do. She just wanted to experience the chaos. Must be a Joker fan. Why so Serious? My favorite bad guy from all of those Batman movies. 2 hours ago, Just Joshin' said: Involved is not listening and learning. Involved is making game day decisions. IMO the more an owner knows the better. I agree they should not be making game day decisions but knowing more is always good. I guess I just look at it as she’s one step closer to having a button to call plays. The owner’s role is to entertain politicians and business people on a game day. It’s not to hear a conversation between McDermott, Daboll and Allen. It’s not to wait outside for autographs. This really isn’t a big deal but it just confirms what I already believed. We have super fans as owners. That’s not a compliment. Super fans make players and coaches uncomfortable. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 Pics or it didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 (edited) 17 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said: It depends on the character of the involvement. If Kim starts calling plays and Terry starts making draft picks, there's a huge problem. But going to games, attending practices, and even wearing headsets simply shows they're interested and care about what's going on. I'd rather have engaged (but not meddling ownership than absentee owners. And, c'mon Kirby, if you owned the Bills, you wouldn't want to listen in at least once? Lol, I really wouldn’t. I would be so cognizant of micromanaging that wouldn’t be on the agenda. Edited June 27, 2020 by Kirby Jackson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 16 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Lol, I really wouldn’t. I would be so cognizant of micromanaging that wouldn’t be on the agenda. Then you're a better man than I am. I'd absolutely wear a headset at least once if I owned the Bills. The BN reports that Kim was talked into it by the VP of IT who told her, "If you really want to what's going on on the field, you need to be on the headset." That makes me think he's been on the headset. And that makes me wonder, who else has been on headsets? Maybe it's not uncommon for the coaches to have silent eavesdroppers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dopey Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 (edited) So that's why Duke was targeted 12 times in that game. Fire her!!! Never mind, she can do what she wants. Edited June 27, 2020 by Dopey 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 41 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Lol, I really wouldn’t. I would be so cognizant of micromanaging that wouldn’t be on the agenda. There's another term for that. And medication. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 28 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said: Then you're a better man than I am. I'd absolutely wear a headset at least once if I owned the Bills. The BN reports that Kim was talked into it by the VP of IT who told her, "If you really want to what's going on on the field, you need to be on the headset." That makes me think he's been on the headset. And that makes me wonder, who else has been on headsets? Maybe it's not uncommon for the coaches to have silent eavesdroppers. He’s definitely been on the headsets. That’s kind of his job though at some level. He needs to make sure everything is flowing on game day. There are a bunch of people I’m sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: Lol, I really wouldn’t. I would be so cognizant of micromanaging that wouldn’t be on the agenda. Ah come on dude. Like Jerry said, I wouldn’t own the team if I couldn’t be the President. That job rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 19 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Personally I hate it!! The less involved the owner is the better. I think the issue is, this isn’t like a Buscotti who lets his football people do football things, but takes an afternoon to experience what game day is like. When it comes to this, you can’t separate it from the constant meddling from the Pegula’s. Especially on the Sabre’s side. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts