Jump to content

The Thread To Vent On Nancy Pelosi & Her Hubris


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 


A scarf over half her face is a good look for Nancy. ?

P.S. I want the blue Hermes scarf she has on in the tweet below. The only thing making me rethink that is "Hillary Clinton's seal of approval." A fashionista, Hillary ain't.
 


 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  FIFY.

Oh ya, if they let the states and locals start laying off workers this whole things gets a lot worse. 

 

I suspect a lot of those of Social Security and medicare just don't care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

But what do the Federal Reserve Police think?

 

Be nice. Besides, you're thinking of the FBI Police. Calling up the Federal Reserve is for military operations.

35 minutes ago, Uncle Joe said:

So is Bill still playing the sax while the economy crashes?
 

 

With his buddy Epstein not killing himself, it sounds like Bubba doesn't have much else to wrap his lips around.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2020 at 11:32 AM, B-Man said:

Where's Count Floyd???

Dr. Tongue's House of 3D Plastic Surgery

AaaaaaaOuuuuuuuu

It'll scare the pants right off of you.....or dress (or pantsuit)....whatever you're wearing.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....I missed the memo....how could the Dems think this crustacean is the face of House leadership?.....sad part is here multi-trillion dollar bill passes the House because not ONE Dem House member has the gonads to vote against her due to obvious reprisals.....our "dirty democracy" in full bloom.....we're screwed.......

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

....I missed the memo....how could the Dems think this crustacean is the face of House leadership?.....sad part is here multi-trillion dollar bill passes the House because not ONE Dem House member has the gonads to vote against her due to obvious reprisals.....our "dirty democracy" in full bloom.....we're screwed.......

 

We need 5 individuals in Washington in order to get good government.  Those are the Pres, house and senate majority and minority leaders.  The rest will fall in line.  If we could get 5 people that had a real willingness to work together on things of which both parties should agree, we could get some good results. 

 

Nancy represents the absolute worst in politics. It's a shame that her party put her there again as speaker and keeps her there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

We need 5 individuals in Washington in order to get good government.  Those are the Pres, house and senate majority and minority leaders.  The rest will fall in line.  If we could get 5 people that had a real willingness to work together on things of which both parties should agree, we could get some good results. 

 

Nancy represents the absolute worst in politics. It's a shame that her party put her there again as speaker and keeps her there. 

 

Good luck with that.

 

Plus, Squirt Bottle has been devoured by the racist extreme radical left ideologues and she bows at their every demand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/14/2020 at 3:05 PM, Tiberius said:

Oh ya, if they let the states and locals start laying off workers this whole things gets a lot worse. 

 

I suspect a lot of those of Social Security and medicare just don't care. 

I'm on social security and my mom is on both.  Things haven't changed a bit for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Well, that's pretty interesting.

 

Quote

Section 5

1: Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

 

4: Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

 

This provision can be quite easily read to mean that 1.) There's no such thing as a quorum online; 2.) Doing online remote voting is adjourning the House to somewhere other than the Capitol; and 3.) The Senate is not going to agree to adjourn to anywhere other than the Capitol.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nancy taught them everything they know.

 

 

Numerous Former Pelosi Aides Lobbying For Companies Seeking Benefits Related To Coronavirus, Report Says

by Hank Berrien

 

Original Article

 

 

 And for the record, a bunch of former Trump appointees did the same thing

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2020 at 8:37 PM, Koko78 said:

 

4: Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days,

First, Adjourn means to suspend until another time. A Quorum is 50 plus 1 members present at the place and time for ANY official meeting. This is an important concept to try and stop the backroom crap we've come to love so much... 

Roberts Rules for Dummies               BTW, only so I don't have to dig through the real copy.... 

What about this part of Section 5? Doesn't it demand the House needs the Senate approval to adjourn? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...