Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

When did I say that?

 

There was tons of wrong doing by Clinton. She should have never been the nominee. The system was rigged in her favour to cover for a completely flawed candidate with excessive baggage. 

 

I'm also pointing out that if you think Clinton should have been locked up, you're a hypocrite if you continue on as a Trump supporter. You can't have it both ways (which is all anyone seems to try and do in politics anymore) and preach "rule of law" regarding Clinton and ignore the "rule of law for Trump.

 

They're both crooks. 

The scrutiny Trump has been under tells me you and the rest of the Schiff crowd ain't got Schiff on Trump... Russia collusion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where did that go?

 

Back to the rule of law... The law only is relevant against Republicans, you just proved that in your own remarks above you idiot....

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Democrats KNOW this is going nowhere! They’re using my tax dollars to bloody up their political opponent prior to an election because as many of them have already said, on the record, if they don’t impeach him he’s going to get re-elected. Politics at its worst. Bring it on! He’s going to win in a LANDSLIDE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cinga said:

The scrutiny Trump has been under tells me you and the rest of the Schiff crowd ain't got Schiff on Trump... Russia collusion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where did that go?

 

Back to the rule of law... The law only is relevant against Republicans, you just proved that in your own remarks above you idiot....

 

LMAO

 

Such a hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Gary Busey said:

True - why was Nunes on the phone with someone as corrupt as Parnas? Why didn't Nunes disclose this information? 

 

 

 

I'm sure it was just something completely innocent that didn't need to be reported to anyone. You know, like helping him fill out a whistleblower complaint.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:


Trump was under a FISA for over a year, along with his entire inner circle. He was subjected to the most invasive, no-expense-spared investigation from the Department of Justice and the US Intelligence Community in history — not to mention the unofficial investigation he endured at the hand of the media and his politician competition. 
 

He came out clean. 
 

By definition he is not a crook. 
 

How do you think Hillary would fare if subjected to the same scrutiny? She’d be hanged for treason for selling SAPs to our enemies, not to mention many other crimes of state. 

 

One is not like the other. Time to wake up. 

I think jrobs is lost in the shadow world of emotional crookery, whereby if a massive investigation (indisputable) of unprecedented scope (indisputable), with unlimited power to investigate and refer for prosecution everything from jaywalking to process crimes to personal income tax evasion (indisputable), which involves a disproportionate show of force relative to accusations (indisputable) and involves DOJ officials leaking to major media outlets time/place and scope of quasi-military operations for a man pushing 70 (indisputable) results in absolutely 0.00 counts of criminal activity for the subject of the investigation, well by gosh the victim in the scheme is obviously a crook because a jrobs finds him distasteful. 
 

As bad as all this abhorrent politicking has been,  the only certainty that lies ahead is escalation. You simply can’t allow the opposition party to stab you repeatedly in the eye socket, allow the conditions to remain for exactly the same type of wrangling to happen next time without responding.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Trump’s personal attorney is in jail right now for hush money payments for Trump. Trump is individual number one as a co conspirator. Go ahead, pretend you know nothing about that. All ears! All sh it is more like it. 

The guy who said there was a quid pro quo, that’s who you are talking about? ?

 

 


hahaha. You are such a buffoon.  Seriously, quit while you’re behind, way behind. 
 

Russian Collusion - FAIL

Russian Investigation Obstruction - FAIL

Campaign Finance Violations - FAIL

Quid Pro Quo w/ Ukraine - FAIL

Bribery - FAIL

Extortion - FAIL

 

I know I’m missing like 10 emergency breaking news walls are closing in scandals, but you get the point. 
 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dubs said:


hahaha. You are such a buffoon.  Seriously, quit while you’re behind, way behind. 
 

Russian Collusion - FAIL

Russian Investigation Obstruction - FAIL

Campaign Finance Violations - FAIL

Quid Pro Quo w/ Ukraine - FAIL

Bribery - FAIL

Extortion - FAIL

 

I know I’m missing like 10 emergency breaking news walls are closing in scandals, but you get the point. 
 

 

 

 

Anyone else remember how Trump is SO not in jail for paying "hush money" to Stormy Daniels, that Daniels ended up paying his legal fees?  

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's because their plan, and only option left, is what DC Tom has been predicting for years. They're trying to discredit the entire party to get ahead of what's coming. 

 

That's not because they care about saving the country, or even their own party. But it's because they are trying to save their own asses. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you have a legit crisis you may:

 

1) confront it directly, realize the true nature of mankind, learn from another experience, the goal being going forward as a productive entity ; or

 

2) dive into the sawdust of the past and nurse every fault of others and regurgitate every slight, fingerpointing and justifying everything you did

 

you can start with 2 and eventually realize 1 is healthier

 

it’s up to you

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dubs said:


hahaha. You are such a buffoon.  Seriously, quit while you’re behind, way behind. 
 

Russian Collusion - Cover up successful 

Russian Investigation Obstruction - Cover up

successful 

Campaign Finance Violations - Michael Cohen says hi! 

Quid Pro Quo w/ Ukraine - He is literally being impeached, you know. 

Bribery - Same 

Extortion - Same

 

10 hours ago, dubs said:

 

I know I’m missing like 10 emergency breaking news walls are closing in scandals, but you get the point. 
 

 

 

You ask for a crime, I showed you one, and you answer with this nonsense? You simply deny all the crimes. You are dishonest. Having a jury of Republicans senators doesn't make Trump innocent. 

 

I suppose OJ didn't murder anyone, right? 

 

I suppose Trump University wasn't a scam either, huh? 

4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Much closer scrutiny to what really happened in the 2016 election. 

 

Which will be very, very bad for some of the loudest screamers at the moment in the news cycle. 

(But I can't speak for Tom, that's me)

Another Horowitz report?!?! :nana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's because their plan, and only option left, is what DC Tom has been predicting for years. They're trying to discredit the entire party to get ahead of what's coming. 

 

That's not because they care about saving the country, or even their own party. But it's because they are trying to save their own asses. 

 

What have I been predicting?

 

Only two things I can think of are 1) Democrats eventually trying to outlaw the Democratic party as a hate group, and 2) a civil war.  Neither of which has anything to do with Schiff leaking private phone records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

What have I been predicting?

 

Only two things I can think of are 1) Democrats eventually trying to outlaw the Democratic party as a hate group, and 2) a civil war.  Neither of which has anything to do with Schiff leaking private phone records.

More likely the law simply catches up to Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

What have I been predicting?

 

Democrats eventually trying to outlaw the Democratic party as a hate group.

 

That would be par for the course given how Schiff has been acting.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Did you inherit any of the slaves your ancient Nazi forebearers owned and ***** ed in Virginia?

 

He can't run forever, and once his political power ends, he loses his biased "jury" of senators 

Heck, after he loses the election, even you guys will want to throw him under the bus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Er, I think you missed the Franklin Templeton + Ukrainian Money Laundering + Schiffy part of that tweet. 

 


I would of had to go to Twitter to read that.  My point is there have been lots of “stay tuned” comments from both sides that have offered up little or nothing. Just as they left has been saying “we’ve got him this time!” the right has had the same. How many posts has DR had this year stating “the Dems are going down!”?  They are still here. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:


I would of had to go to Twitter to read that.  My point is there have been lots of “stay tuned” comments from both sides that have offered up little or nothing. Just as they left has been saying “we’ve got him this time!” the right has had the same. How many posts has DR had this year stating “the Dems are going down!”?  They are still here. 


Hannity's ticktock? Paul Sperry's breaking?  Yes, it can get old.  Click-bait headlines are the bane of our existence these days.  I have been following for close to three years and I know I am impatient for  this to come to indictments and trials for the soft-coup brigade. 

And, you did not see the tweet I embedded in that post?  You quoted it, so I thought you read it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hannity's ticktock? Paul Sperry's breaking?  Yes, it can get old.  Click-bait headlines are the bane of our existence these days.  I have been following for close to three years and I know I am impatient for  this to come to indictments and trials for the soft-coup brigade. 

And, you did not see the tweet I embedded in that post?  You quoted it, so I thought you read it. 


Yes I read it. What does investing in FT have to do with the Ukrainian money laundering?  Lots of people invest with FT. I thought there was more to to the story on Twitter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chef Jim said:


Yes I read it. What does investing in FT have to do with the Ukrainian money laundering?  Lots of people invest with FT. I thought there was more to to the story on Twitter. 


Ah, they have been (FT) implicated in billions of dollars of money laundering (there is an enormous world-wide money laundering scandal going on right now that the American press is completely ignoring). The details are in PPP somewhere, or try duckduckgo for some European news stories.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrat Impeachment report is Adam Schiff’s latest dud

by Michael Goodwin

 

Original Article

 

Say this for Rep. Adam Schiff: His imagination is vivid and he has a flair for the dramatic. If only he had more respect for facts and a tighter tether to reality. The California attack dog is, in real life, a frustrated writer of rejected screenplays, and he’s produced another dud in the Democrats’ impeachment report.

 

Released Tuesday, it offers nothing new of significance, but that didn’t stop Schiff from hyping the contents as something akin to the second coming of Richard Nixon. While the vast majority of Americans found something other to do than watch the mind-numbing hours of public testimony

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

You ask for a crime, I showed you one, and you answer with this nonsense? You simply deny all the crimes. You are dishonest. Having a jury of Republicans senators doesn't make Trump innocent. 

 

I suppose OJ didn't murder anyone, right? 

 

I suppose Trump University wasn't a scam either, huh? 

Another Horowitz report?!?! :nana:


You didn’t share a single crime of Trump. 
 

seriously, with all the scrutiny and vitriol from the Democrats, why haven’t they tried to impeach him based on Michael Cohen’s crimes, if what you say is true. 
 

Let me save you some time, the answer is because they can’t prove any crime that trump committed. 
 

DR has said it a thousand times, at least, and it’s true. You’ve dug in so hard on this that you’re blinded. 
 

I honestly don’t care very much about Donald Trump. What I do care about is the uncovering of how corrupt Washington DC is and it’s exposure to the citizens of this country. I’d feel the same way if Pete B or Obama or anyone exposed this. 
 

what we are seeing is how far the establishment will go to protect their own lives that’s funded by taxpayer dollars and brokered through influence peddling and lack of accountability. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...