Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 This is starting to feel like a gender reveal party for ppp squad!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: When has the chairmen been part of a hearing where someone says the President committed a crime? ... So you're just admitting you never watched ANY of the Trump/Russia hearings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Probably the most necessary and proper impeachment of them all. Trump is worse than Nixon for sure. This is way worse than lying about BJ and AJ was politically impeached. Trump is just a straight up criminal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: This was going to happen either way lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: They have nothing? They a first hand witness saying the President, Vice President and Secretary of State were all part of a conspiracy to get a foreign government to do a quid pro quo, digging up dirt on a political opponent in exchange for a meeting and money that had already been allocated to them by congress. you do understand they testified that the President told them, "no quid pro quo", right. what you are grasping at are conclusions drawn by someone. the facts are that it was stated several times that there was no quid pro quo. we also have others whose opinion was that there was no quid pro quo. be honest and stop being led by your biases. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, jrober38 said: They have nothing? They a first hand witness saying the President, Vice President and Secretary of State were all part of a conspiracy to get a foreign government to do a quid pro quo, digging up dirt on a political opponent in exchange for a meeting and money that had already been allocated to them by congress. And the AG. Don't forget, you have to get Barr out of office, too. So the President, VP, SecState, and AG were all part of the conspiracy. And Kavanaugh. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Here Nunes goes with the conspiracy theories. That's all the GOP has left at this point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Stop acting like his interpretation of the situation is not valuable evidence just because it isn’t direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be just as damning. people who attack the procedural aspects of evidence, and confuse it for substance, are sneaky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Thing is, I'd still sooner trust a guy who says "I came to this conclusion because..." than I would people who say "Well, that's the gossip I've heard!" As long as the first guy can explain the "because..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: When has the chairmen been part of a hearing where someone says the President committed a crime? a special investigation? never. please tell me you realize that the chairman has a severe conflict of interest here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Here Nunes goes with the conspiracy theories. That's all the GOP has left at this point. Conspiracy theories like... Trump is an asset of Russia and worked with Putin to steal an election? You mean that kind of conspiracy theory? The very one Schiff said he had MORE than circumstantial evidence to support it before not one, not two, but THREE federal investigations debunked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He admitted he's not a first hand witness to anything of the sort exactly what i commented. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: you do understand they testified that the President told them, "no quid pro quo", right. what you are grasping at are conclusions drawn by someone. the facts are that it was stated several times that there was no quid pro quo. we also have others whose opinion was that there was no quid pro quo. be honest and stop being led by your biases. This isn't even remotely true. Everyone up until now has said they never heard directly it was a quid pro quo. None of them ever had any direct contact with Trump. Sondland had a direct line to Trump, and he has said that it was a quid pro quo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 7 minutes ago, jrober38 said: They have nothing? They a first hand witness saying the President, Vice President and Secretary of State were all part of a conspiracy to get a foreign government to do a quid pro quo, digging up dirt on a political opponent in exchange for a meeting and money that had already been allocated to them by congress. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Why didn't Nunes investigate when they had (and lost badly) the House majority? This is just whataboutism nonsense 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: ya ya Family portrait of Tibs, Bob, and Gary Busey? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: This isn't even remotely true. Everyone up until now has said they never heard directly it was a quid pro quo. None of them ever had any direct contact with Trump. Sondland had a direct line to Trump, and he has said that it was a quid pro quo. ... He said Trump never said that directly to him, and that he presumed it. Difference. But that requires you to be honest 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Devon, who ya talking about? Say it! LOL!!! Won't even use Manafort's name! Rudy visited that criminal in jail before going to Ukraine, sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: ... He said Trump never said that directly to him, and that he presumed it. Difference. But that requires you to be honest I think its pretty obvious at this point he only sees what he wants to see 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts