Jump to content

Chick Fil A Banned From Buffalo Airport


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Evidently this is becoming more common. What a sad state of affairs. 

 

https://www.newsweek.com/operator-buffalo-niagara-international-upset-vendor-decision-ban-chick-fil-1388375

 

It's really unfortunate, but the reality is that this is less about Chick Fil A and its Christian owner, and more about money. The far left donates tens of millions of dollars to anyone who even sniffs at the idea of being pro-LGBQT. 

 

You'll notice you're eight paragraphs into the article before you hear the name Sean Ryan. This is the state legislator who pushed for the ban.

 

Sean is of the mindset that a Christian-based company -- a compnay that is repeatedly reported as first on the scene of disasters like fires, floods, or hurricanes, handing out free food and drink --  is actually spreading hate and discrimination. His campaign war chest is likely heavily padded right now, and is probably growing with each campaign mailer he sends out about his accomplishment.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

It's really unfortunate, but the reality is that this is less about Chick Fil A and its Christian owner, and more about money. The far left donates tens of millions of dollars to anyone who even sniffs at the idea of being pro-LGBQT. 

 

You'll notice you're eight paragraphs into the article before you hear the name Sean Ryan. This is the state legislator who pushed for the ban.

 

Sean is of the mindset that a Christian-based company -- a compnay that is repeatedly reported as first on the scene of disasters like fires, floods, or hurricanes, handing out free food and drink --  is actually spreading hate and discrimination. His campaign war chest is likely heavily padded right now, and is probably growing with each campaign mailer he sends out about his accomplishment.

It's just absurd to me that the notion of intolerance of others beliefs is exclusively applied to conservatives. Basically if you have a different opinion than the liberal mindset your labeled a hate group which is extremely inaccurate and unfair. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

It's just absurd to me that the notion of intolerance of others beliefs is exclusively applied to conservatives. Basically if you have a different opinion than the liberal mindset your labeled a hate group which is extremely inaccurate and unfair. 

 

it provides a family oriented place with good quality fast food

 

why would liberals want anything to do with family?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

It's just absurd to me that the notion of intolerance of others beliefs is exclusively applied to conservatives. Basically if you have a different opinion than the liberal mindset your labeled a hate group which is extremely inaccurate and unfair. 

we should probably relabel the two wings of the bird. the tolerant and the intolerant.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

It's just absurd to me that the notion of intolerance of others beliefs is exclusively applied to conservatives. Basically if you have a different opinion than the liberal mindset your labeled a hate group which is extremely inaccurate and unfair. 

 

 

The Left: "Be tolerant of what we say or else we'll get you!"

 

 

This is ridiculous and will end in a law suit. (the San Antonio airport is already being investigated for religious discrimination) The government cannot discriminate against a company based on the beliefs of it's owners in so far as the beliefs do not cause the company to discriminate in hiring practices. It's utter bull####. 

 

 

In reality though, this has nothing to do with religion or even with discrimination... The New York politicians just got word that a restaurant opening would lead to more jobs in the community, and they needed to shut that ***** down....

Edited by whatdrought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason I could see CF not being a good fit at an airport (any airport) is if the airport had few restaurant options, and the Sunday closing impacting that. IOW if the airport has (let's say) 5 restaurants in an airport to serve X number of people daily, and if Sunday is a big flight day at the airport and now only Y number of customers can be served,  then CF would not be a good fit. 

But, to bar them from an airport due to their Christian believes (and walking the walk behind those beliefs)? Isn't that discrimination based on faith? 

When I read about this when it happened and the local political guy crowing about it, I just shook my head.  People are stupid. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it provides a family oriented place with good quality fast food

 

why would liberals want anything to do with family?

 

That is one of the positive things about it. Pretty much every Chick-fil-A I ever went to was a clean decent establishment where you don't have to worry about finding some smack head in the bathroom shooting up or the employees outside smoking cigarettes prior to screwing up your order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

It's just absurd to me that the notion of intolerance of others beliefs is exclusively applied to conservatives. Basically if you have a different opinion than the liberal mindset your labeled a hate group which is extremely inaccurate and unfair. 

 

The reason you see this almost exclusively applied to conservatives is because the progressive left specifically chooses this strategy.

 

Progressives do not believe in individual accountability and responsibility. They do not believe you are smart enough to take care of yourself. So they create labels, and assign those labels to you in an effort to communicate what is either right or wrong with your existence. 

 

You're not a follower of Christ. You're anti-LGBQT.

 

You're not a skeptic. You're a denier.

 

Your not a person who sees people for their character and not their skin-color. You're an alt-right white nationalist.

 

You're not a person who only believes abortion is only acceptable in cases of rape or health of mother/child: You're a misogynist.

 

You're not a person who understands the difference between a hand out and a hand up. You're a racist.

 

You're not a person who doesn't  agree with liberal policies. You're a Nazi.

 

On and on it goes.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

That is one of the positive things about it. Pretty much every Chick-fil-A I ever went to was a clean decent establishment where you don't have to worry about finding some smack head in the bathroom shooting up or the employees outside smoking cigarettes prior to screwing up your order.

 

 been twice, never saw the big deal but accept its a decent place to take the kids

 

 

18 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

You're not a follower of Christ. You're anti-LGBQT.

 

 

 

Nice of people who have nothing but total contempt for the Bible to preach at believers for doing what they do.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a great opportunity for a Chick-Fil-A Site right across Genesee Street at the airport entrance.

On Google Maps (maybe not updated) there's a perfect spot where Budget Rent-a-Car used to be.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, row_33 said:

Nice of people who have nothing but total contempt for the Bible to preach at believers for doing what they do.

 

Many who criticize call themselves Christians. They simply don't understand that Christ would be the first to welcome the LGBTQ crowd wherever he was. 

 

Of course, Nancy Pelosi considers herself a devout Christian, and is fully in favor of third-term abortion. Look at Bishop Strickland jumping on Cuomo. 

 

Most of the left have principles right up to the moment someone is writing them a check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Many who criticize call themselves Christians. They simply don't understand that Christ would be the first to welcome the LGBTQ crowd wherever he was. 

 

Of course, Nancy Pelosi considers herself a devout Christian, and is fully in favor of third-term abortion. Look at Bishop Strickland jumping on Cuomo. 

 

Most of the left have principles right up to the moment someone is writing them a check.

 

Jesus welcomed all kinds who had faith, some didn't repent on the spot, some didn't even ask to be healed, one ratted him out after being healed, 1 in 10 came back to thank him after being healed one time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Many who criticize call themselves Christians. They simply don't understand that Christ would be the first to welcome the LGBTQ crowd wherever he was. 

 

Of course, Nancy Pelosi considers herself a devout Christian, and is fully in favor of third-term abortion. Look at Bishop Strickland jumping on Cuomo. 

 

Most of the left have principles right up to the moment someone is writing them a check.

2

 

I wasnt aware that any Catholic priest had the moral clarity and courage to actually speak up against infanticide, the new age pope is too worried about lecturing the world on immigration, the evils of capitalism and climate change.  Meanwhile, like his predecessors trying to move the pedophiles around to hide them as if it was a shell game.

Edited by RoyBatty is alive
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

I wasnt aware that any Catholic priest had the moral clarity and courage to actually speak up against infanticide, the new age pope is too worried about lecturing the world on immigration, the evils of capitalism and climate change.  Meanwhile, like his predecessors trying to move the pedophiles around to hide them as if it was a shell game.

I don't disagree with you on much of that but would suggest a much narrower brush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

I wasnt aware that any Catholic priest had the moral clarity and courage to actually speak up against infanticide, the new age pope is too worried about lecturing the world on immigration, the evils of capitalism and climate change.  Meanwhile, like his predecessors trying to move the pedophiles around to hide them as if it was a shell game.

 

there is a Gospel to preach to believers and the unregenerate, involves concepts of sin and redemption and sancitification.

 

nah.......... don't need that in their church....

 

 

gotta be groovy and keep with the hipsters and their political concerns....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

there is a Gospel to preach to believers and the unregenerate, involves concepts of sin and redemption and sancitification.

 

nah.......... don't need that in their church....

 

 

3

The overwhelming evidence shows the church wasn't interested in the redemption of the pedophiles, their major concern was in covering their arse, hiding the evidence, shuffling priest around meanwhile putting more innocent victims, mostly the young and most vulnerable at continued risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

The overwhelming evidence shows the church wasn't interested in the redemption of the pedophiles, their major concern was in covering their arse, hiding the evidence, shuffling priest around meanwhile putting more innocent victims, mostly the young and most vulnerable at continued risk. 

 

I went through this with 6 people in my life as victims and it has shown up in a few work files as well.

 

The demand that a person completely renounce marriage in order to serve in the clergy, if they had any inkling to form a marriage, is inhuman.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

The only reason I could see CF not being a good fit at an airport (any airport) is if the airport had few restaurant options, and the Sunday closing impacting that. IOW if the airport has (let's say) 5 restaurants in an airport to serve X number of people daily, and if Sunday is a big flight day at the airport and now only Y number of customers can be served,  then CF would not be a good fit. 

But, to bar them from an airport due to their Christian believes (and walking the walk behind those beliefs)? Isn't that discrimination based on faith? 

When I read about this when it happened and the local political guy crowing about it, I just shook my head.  People are stupid. 

 

And this just shows how dumb politicians are.  Say it's because of the Sunday closure but deep down it's because they're.....GASP......religious.  Oh and BTW I am a huge non-believer.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

And this just shows how dumb politicians are.  Say it's because of the Sunday closure but deep down it's because they're.....GASP......religious.  Oh and BTW I am a huge non-believer.  

 

they would make enough $$$ Mon-Sat to pay off the rental obligations with ease.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

they would make enough $$$ Mon-Sat to pay off the rental obligations with ease.

 

 

 

But if like Buffalo_Gal stated that being closed on Sunday could be a negative impact on people choosing to fly from that specific airport. That could be the reason they say.  But no...they have to play the Christians are bad card. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

an airport is going to fear that Sunday traffic will be affected by people because CFA isn't open that day?

 

sorry.... the airport is viewed as a Galleria Mall alternative for lazing around?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

But if like Buffalo_Gal stated that being closed on Sunday could be a negative impact on people choosing to fly from that specific airport. That could be the reason they say.  But no...they have to play the Christians are bad card. 

The other 4 restaurants would gladly pick up the slack, even if they knew they would have to add on staff on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The other 4 restaurants would gladly pick up the slack, even if they knew they would have to add on staff on Sunday.

 

Of course they would.  But it's not about the other businesses it's about the level of service the guests would be getting due to a reduction in services offered.  You can add all the staff you want you can't add seats.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, row_33 said:

an airport is going to fear that Sunday traffic will be affected by people because CFA isn't open that day?

 

sorry.... the airport is viewed as a Galleria Mall alternative for lazing around?

 

i think your looking at it wrong.

 

it's not that traffic would be affected by people not being able to be served by CFA on Sundays, it's that their flyers wouldn't be adequately served. slight difference but worth noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i think your looking at it wrong.

 

it's not that traffic would be affected by people not being able to be served by CFA on Sundays, it's that their flyers wouldn't be adequately served. slight difference but worth noting.

 

thanks

 

so airports are now concerned about the adequacy of food I'm forced to eat while held there waiting for hours, with CNN blaring the whole time?

 

is this the same argument on Sunday Shopping where they told stories of people having to do without a living room couch because stores weren't open on Sundays?

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

you mean people would say "i'll take a limo to Pearson in Toronto to fly out on a  Sunday because CFA isn't open in the Buffalo airport"?

 

 

 

Ummmmm Rochester??   But my original point was they could have always used the service reason for saying to to CFA instead of going with the Jesus Bad route. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Many who criticize call themselves Christians. They simply don't understand that Christ would be the first to welcome the LGBTQ crowd wherever he was. 

 

Of course, Nancy Pelosi considers herself a devout Christian, and is fully in favor of third-term abortion. Look at Bishop Strickland jumping on Cuomo. 

 

Most of the left have principles right up to the moment someone is writing them a check.

 

Actually, Pelosi's hypocricy is slightly worse.  She theoretically is not merely a non-denominational Christian whose faith doesn't particularly have a view on abortion but rather a devout Catholic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

Actually, Pelosi's hypocricy is slightly worse.  She theoretically is not merely a non-denominational Christian whose faith doesn't particularly have a view on abortion but rather a devout Catholic.

 

sort of strange that not a single rule is imposed on people claiming this denomination

 

one friend just went in with his new fiancee and got his first marriage (20 years and 4 kids) annulled on the spot, like it never happened, it was a mistake...

 

wow, that's living easy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taro T said:

 

Actually, Pelosi's hypocricy is slightly worse.  She theoretically is not merely a non-denominational Christian whose faith doesn't particularly have a view on abortion but rather a devout Catholic.

 

Good catch. I wrote Christian, but I meant Catholic. Which, as you said, is worse for her.

 

But people like Pelosi and Cuomo are Catholics for the money. And shame on the Catholic church for backing them. Every bit the hypocrite that Pelosi and Cuomo are.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, row_33 said:

Jesus welcomed all kinds who had faith, some didn't repent on the spot, some didn't even ask to be healed, one ratted him out after being healed, 1 in 10 came back to thank him after being healed one time.

 

Yes, but did 4 out of 5 dentists recommend him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I don’t give a s**t who anyone marries or wants to marry. However ,If a Chick Fil A wants to donate to a religious organization or some other nonsense, who cares ? This is a bad look for Buffalo imo. Do they serve good food for a decent price and have clean stores ? ( in this case the answer is yes) Great, sign them up ! As far as I know, Chick Fil A will hire and serve anybody so what’s the problem? Embarrassing for the city and Delaware North. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAUNCHES INVESTIGATION INTO CHICK-FIL-A BANS:

 

 

“The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) announced on Friday that it will investigate whether two airports violated federal law or transportation regulations by denying a contract to Chick-fil-A on religious grounds.”

.

 

Again the ole "we believe in diversity and tolerance as long as we agree with you."  So ***** phony. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...