Jump to content

Nightmare scenario: Josh Allen?


KDIGGZ

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Buffalo30 said:

Why has any expert/NFL scout fallen in love with him?  Of course his size, mobility, ability to throw the home run ball and he has shown glimpses of the Arron Rodgers throwing out of the pocket down the field.  Every single QB in this class needs to get better.  Nobody is good enough right now.  Why not take the guy with the highest potential, especially since he doesn't have to start right away.

 

I'd say - and I've heard scouts say - every college QB needs to get better.   That's why, despite all their expertise and and hours of due diligence, scouting departments still decide upon the wrong QB year after year.  It's hard to predict which QB will improve in the ways needed, and which won't.  

 

Personally, I am concerned about Allen.  Guys who weren't productive in college usually aren't productive in the pros.  Then again, I'd have been concerned about any of these guys because of the high fail rate of 1st round QBs.   That all have shortcomings they may fail to overcome.

 

Even an amazing talent evaluator like Bill Walsh was wrong almost as often as he was right.  I won't pretend to know what to expect from Allen.   I just cross my fingers and hope for the best.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

I'd say - and I've heard scouts say - every college QB needs to get better.   That's why, despite all their expertise and and hours of due diligence, scouting departments still decide upon the wrong QB year after year.  It's hard to predict which QB will improve in the ways needed, and which won't.  

 

Personally, I am concerned about Allen.  Guys who weren't productive in college usually aren't productive in the pros.  Then again, I'd have been concerned about any of these guys because of the high fail rate of 1st round QBs.   That all have shortcomings they may fail to overcome.

 

Even an amazing talent evaluator like Bill Walsh was wrong almost as often as he was right.  I won't pretend to know what to expect from Allen.   I just cross my fingers and hope for the best.   

That's all we can do, root for the kid instead of tearing him down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

Well, we know it's not statistically-based.

 

3rd option that it could be based upon?

 

 

Well gosh, I'm not an NFL scout or GM, so I can't say for sure.

 

And neither are you, so dont talk as if you have such authority on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, noacls said:

Not as bad as this thread. Rosen was not picked get over it

 

I have no love or hate of Rosen.

 

I had one desire for this draft. Just don't take Josh Allen.

 

People are free to think I'm wrong, but no one can say that statistics don't make this look like an abominable pick.

 

Cardale Jones had a good arm. How did that work out? Losman.... The list is never ending. 

33 minutes ago, McBean said:

I can’t wait to bump some of these posts in 3 years. Going to be great.

 

Yeah, just like the guy who told us that Rudolph was going at 12. He's going to check back on that, too.

Edited by Kemp
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good read. But if accurate, if his college stats indicate it is extremely unlikely he will be a quality starting quarterback, this will go down in history as the worst pick in the Bills history.  As that means that the Bills will have nothing to show for the first, third, and fourth picks this year, when they desperately needed them to rebuild their offensive line, linebackers, and wide receivers.

 

And if Rosen becomes a great qb, well, it may be a quick end to the new Bills era.

 

Really hoping that the Bills saw something definitive in Allen, and that they were fully aware of how poor his college stats were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2018 at 9:25 AM, sleeby said:

Here, I think many here may be well advised to brush up on this ahead of thursday:

  • Shock. ...
  • Denial. ...
  • Anger. ...
  • Bargaining. ...
  • Grieving. ...
  • Acceptance.

Was just going to post something similar. Most of us have arrived to the acceptance stage of grief, but I still hate the pick. Allen is a Buffalo Bill now, so I'll root for him, no question, and hope he develops into an outlier, defying every "bust" statistic along the way, but I have my doubts. I just don't think he has the mind that makes the game easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

Well gosh, I'm not an NFL scout or GM, so I can't say for sure.

 

And neither are you, so dont talk as if you have such authority on the matter.

 

I know that statistics don't lie and can't be fudged. Only opinions can.

 

I have zero authority on the matter, but anyone who looks at the stats I linked to and believes math is no longer a science, just doesn't understand reality.

 

Allen could turn out to be the exception to the rule, but that doesn't change the fact that the rule exists and it has proven to be very reliable as a predictor of success.

 

Those who attacked me as a troll are missing the point. It's not my opinion that he is unlikely to work out. It's the "opinion" of mathematics.

 

If that makes people angry or upset with me is unimportant to me. Your gripe is with math. 

 

It's amazing to me that anyone can read that article and be confident on how this will play out well. I also realize that at least some of those who ridiculed the posted stats never read them, because it's a long and in-depth analysis, that some didn't have the time to read before dismissing it, so those folks are phonies.

Like everyone else, I hope it's wrong on Allen, but experience teaches that the favorite comes in way more than the longshot.

Edited by Kemp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

I know that statistics don't lie and can't be fudged. Only opinions can.

 

 

But they can be used to draw false conclusions.  I posted this in the Allen thread, but seems relevant here:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

Most of us have arrived to the acceptance stage of grief, but I still hate the pick. 

 

Yep.  I'm at acceptance now as well.  

 

I'm not confident he'll be able to fix his footwork any more than Manuel was able to.   But time will tell and 2-3 years goes by pretty quickly.     We'll just have to hope this time it works out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No not a nightmare scenario, not at all. Unlike EJ, who in most years would be a 3-4 round prospect at best, Allen is legit as a 1st round prospect. It should have been obvious (and it was to some) that EJ just couldn't do it. Allen's tape has given plenty of evidence that he can. He just has to do it more often. And that should be a question of discipline and repetition, which is what coaches are for. He has all the tools. Just needs to learn how to better use them. And that's why so many pro talent evaluators like him (not because they are stupid). I'm a Rosen guy but if you go with Beane's approach and philosophy (the same approach that yielded Edmunds) you cannot really complain about his taking Allen. Time to get behind this young man. If he pans out he will be really really good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2018 at 3:16 PM, zevo said:

I am going to love reading this board when Allen is the pick 

 

Some of the tantrums have been pretty good but I expected more actually.

Edited by QCity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

I know that statistics don't lie and can't be fudged. Only opinions can.

 

I have zero authority on the matter, but anyone who looks at the stats I linked to and believes math is no longer a science, just doesn't understand reality.

 

Allen could turn out to be the exception to the rule, but that doesn't change the fact that the rule exists and it has proven to be very reliable as a predictor of success.

 

Those who attacked me as a troll are missing the point. It's not my opinion that he is unlikely to work out. It's the "opinion" of mathematics.

 

If that makes people angry or upset with me is unimportant to me. Your gripe is with math. 

 

It's amazing to me that anyone can read that article and be confident on how this will play out well. I also realize that at least some of those who ridiculed the posted stats never read them, because it's a long and in-depth analysis, that some didn't have the time to read before dismissing it, so those folks are phonies.

Like everyone else, I hope it's wrong on Allen, but experience teaches that the favorite comes in way more than the longshot.

Nope.  It's not math, it's proper use of statistics.  And since football is almost the definition of a multivariate function picking one thing like completion percentage has little meaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

Nope.  It's not math, it's proper use of statistics.  And since football is almost the definition of a multivariate function picking one thing like completion percentage has little meaning.

 

Your point would be valid if that was the only stat cited in the linked article. It makes me wonder if you read it, because there are many different kinds of stats cited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Your point would be valid if that was the only stat cited in the linked article. It makes me wonder if you read it, because there are many different kinds of stats cited.

Well, yes I did look at it.  And to properly analyze such information sophisticated multivariate analysis would need to be done.  

 

Football is the ultimate in multiple variables.  What is the quality of your receivers, the quality of your protection schemes?  What type of offense is run?  Quality of defenses?

 

I picked completion percentage because so many people harp on this.  It stands to reason that completion percentages have increased over the years since so many college teams have gone to spread offenses. Receivers are more open, and QB have an easy time completing passes.  Allen as I understand it played in more of a pro style offense.  As did Rosen I believe, and I wanted Rosen as our pick because I feel he's farther advanced.  Andceven with both playing a similar style, there are still dozens of variables to consider when trying to compare.

 

We will see how Allen does.  They key for him, really for any QB coming into the league, is whether they can process things such that the game slows down.  Some compare Allen to JP; JP could never adjust mentally to the NFL; he couldn't get the game to slow down.  Hopefully Allen does.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2018 at 9:25 AM, sleeby said:

Here, I think many here may be well advised to brush up on this ahead of thursday:

  • Shock. ...
  • Denial. ...
  • Anger. ...
  • Bargaining. ...
  • Grieving. ...
  • Acceptance.

Where does being so convinced he's going to be a bust that you start looking at 2019 top QB prospects shortly after Allen was taken fit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Where does being so convinced he's going to be a bust that you start looking at 2019 top QB prospects shortly after Allen was taken fit?

 

Sounds like bargaining to me.  You're probably bargaining with the situation as " well, AJ is starting this year anyhow and we do still need more OL and WR adds yet so between Allen, N8 P and the guy we get in round 1 next spring something will bear fruit before the rest of the squad is ready to commence kicking ass."

 

Mind you, these are not.my thoughts.  I was pissed in the moment but then seeing Rosen act like a thin skinned and spoiled turd before and after he was drafted at 10 I realized we had dodged a bullet there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...