Jump to content

Trade Rumors? (only Rumors)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Next year’s Bills pick is trending to be really high. That will help them with the trade. Maybe another reason the Bills keep saying how far away they are. 

 

Cle gets guice qb and lb or something. We get 4 picks in the next couple rounds to fill holes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Unsubstantiated, but Carl Falk (Rochester radio) mentioned a text suggesting Pats are trying to move up for Rosen.

I think this bothers me more than us not getting a QB

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

I don't think there's any way they can get to 1 without giving up the 2019 1st.  They can certainly throw picks at it to equal value, but looking at how Cleveland stands I don't think there's any way they move without that premium asset.  We hold cards in terms to value, but they own the pick, if the Giants Darnold interest is legit, we are paying their price.

Except the Browns are going to take Allen either way. They can either take the assets offered and get pick 2 or just take Allen at 1. The 2019 1st HAS to be the absolute last asset added. The scenario Hokie laid out makes a ton of sense.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Except the Browns are going to take Allen either way. They can either take the assets offered and get pick 2 or just take Allen at 1. The 2019 1st HAS to be the absolute last asset added. The scenario Hokie laid out makes a ton of sense.

 

 

They take Allen anyway, the Giants take Darnold, the Jets take Baker and we are left hoping the Broncos don't take Rosen, who we may not even want.  In my mind the 2019 1st is the difference between Darnold and over drafting Rudolph.  It's a necessary concession.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Is starting my draft drinking 10 days early wrong? Cuz I’m not gonna make it otherwise.

 

My gf is due next Saturday and I have this feeling that I will have to choose between watching our child being born or the draft. I mean it is our second kid and I was there for the first one!  There is a tv in the room though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aristocrat said:

 

My gf is due next Saturday and I have this feeling that I will have to choose between watching our child being born or the draft. I mean it is our second kid and I was there for the first one!  There is a tv in the room though. 

What service provider do you have when it comes to cell service? Verizon you get the NFL network for free. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

My gf is due next Saturday and I have this feeling that I will have to choose between watching our child being born or the draft. I mean it is our second kid and I was there for the first one!  There is a tv in the room though. 

 

 

Congrats!

 

Mine is due in mid May, no early arrivals!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

They take Allen anyway, the Giants take Darnold, the Jets take Baker and we are left hoping the Broncos don't take Rosen, who we may not even want.  In my mind the 2019 1st is the difference between Darnold and over drafting Rudolph.  It's a necessary concession.

It’s not though. Why would the Browns just take Allen when they can trade down a spot and get him? They can turn around and trade 12 & 35 for 6 and get Chubb. They basically get the guys that they were taking at 1 & 4 and turn the 35th pick into the 22nd pick. It’s a no-brainer for Cleveland.

Edited by Kirby Jackson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

They take Allen anyway, the Giants take Darnold, the Jets take Baker and we are left hoping the Broncos don't take Rosen, who we may not even want.  In my mind the 2019 1st is the difference between Darnold and over drafting Rudolph.  It's a necessary concession.

 

If we’re able to keep all the seconds and later picks i think we’re an 8 win team and perhaps better if those picks play well. A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

My gf is due next Saturday and I have this feeling that I will have to choose between watching our child being born or the draft. I mean it is our second kid and I was there for the first one!  There is a tv in the room though. 

Boy or girl?? Because you need to name the baby after our new qb. I’m sure your gf won’t mind. Sam works for either. There is always Rosie too. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Boy or girl?? Because you need to name the baby after our new qb. I’m sure she won’t OBD. Sam works for either. There is always Rosie too. 

 

We don’t the gender. I’ve thought about that for the middle name lol. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

It’s not though. Why would the Browns just take Allen when they can trade down a apot and get him? They can turn around and trade 12 & 35 for 6 and get Chubb. They basically get the guys that they were taking at 1 & 4 and turn the 35th pick into the 22nd pick. It’s a no-brainer for Cleveland.

 

 

You are assume McBeane would be willing to pick at 1 then take the next 100 picks off.  I think if they do make the move to 1 they'll want to plug in as many pieces on offense as possible to build an infrastructure to allow a QB to succeed.  I agree with you, I'd rather have the premium pick, but I think it would be a deal breaker for Cleveland and I don't know our guys wouldn't value the depth of picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

You are assume McBeane would be willing to pick at 1 then take the next 100 picks off.  I think if they do make the move to 1 they'll want to plug in as many pieces on offense as possible to build an infrastructure to allow a QB to succeed.  I agree with you, I'd rather have the premium pick, but I think it would be a deal breaker for Cleveland and I don't know our guys wouldn't value the depth of picks.

No, he would pick again at 56 or 65. The Bills are not going to just throw in a top 10 pick (which it almost certainly will be). They learned a lesson from the Texans. They may include the 2nd next year but it is entirely possible that the Bills win 5 games or less. They will add an elite talent in a loaded draft in 2019. 

 

This regime is ALWAYS looking at the big picture. They won’t don’t something foolish like that. They will give Cleveland an offer that is an easy decision and they will take it or won’t (assuming the Giants are good). The scenario that Hokie pitched above has every team leaving with the guy that they would take without a trade. It leaves Cleveland and the Giants with significant assets as well.

 

The Giants and Browns absolutely can’t overplay their hands or they are going to end up with the same guy without the assets. It’s the same thing that the 49ers did to the Bears last year. They took what they could get so that the Bears could take Trubisky. If the Bears declined the 49ers were taking Thomas anyways. This is the point that we are missing. There is a good deal of leverage from the Bills too. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

Don't worry, Ben Allbright is here to stop the fun.

 

When my wife comes home from work and asks if I've been drinking and I've already had a half bottle of Pinot, I tend to laugh.  It's my tell.

Edited by stony
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

Don't worry, Ben Allbright is here to stop the fun.

 

Not saying the 3 way trade is happening, but the fact that his source would indicate anything about the Brown's draft strategy this close to the draft means his source probably knows nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Seems like 22 would have to be in the mix. No way Browns just give away a 1st round pick and only end up with 1.

 

I think it would be:

Bills get 1

Browns get 2, 12, 53 and 2019 2nd

Giants get 4, 22 and 96

No way Cleveland moves down from 1 and 4 to pick up 2, 12, and a couple 2nds. That makes zero sense. The Jets gave up 3 2nds to move up 3 spots, and 1 is pick 37.  Cleveland drop 1 and 8 spots at the top of the 1st round for 53 and a 2 next year. Dumbest trade ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

They take Allen anyway, the Giants take Darnold, the Jets take Baker and we are left hoping the Broncos don't take Rosen, who we may not even want.  In my mind the 2019 1st is the difference between Darnold and over drafting Rudolph.  It's a necessary concession.

 

Why do people want Darnold over Rosen? I don’t ger it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Domdab99 said:

 

Why do people want Darnold over Rosen? I don’t ger it. 

 

 

I don't think that's a conversation the team is having.  I think it's Darnold vs Allen.  We don't seem to be the only team in the league having the Darnold vs Allen debate either.  Personally, if we are giving up a lot, I'd much rather it be for Darnold.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I’m calling BS on Allbright having a Browns source who actually knows what’s happening 

I follow Allbright but his smugness is getting to the point of overbearing.

 

The guy is starting to feel like an inflated incarcerated bob.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Domdab99 said:

 

Why do people want Darnold over Rosen? I don’t ger it. 

it is probably personality based. Rosen seems to be very passionate and opinionated about non-football things, whereas Darnold seems more the "eat, sleep and breathe football" type of guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Domdab99 said:

 

Why do people want Darnold over Rosen? I don’t ger it. 

Darnold is creative when the pocket breaks down and is durable.  The concerns about personality with Rosen are overblown, but I don't think Darnold has any of those question marks.  Rosen has injury concerns and poor pocket awareness.  You can easily make a case in the other direction, but it's not patently ridiculous to favor Darnold.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I’m calling BS on Allbright having a Browns source who actually knows what’s happening 

He seems like a clown

4 minutes ago, swnybillsfan said:

it is probably personality based. Rosen seems to be very passionate and opinionated about non-football things, whereas Darnold seems more the "eat, sleep and breathe football" type of guy.

I disagree with this. The durability and concussions is the biggest red flag imo And I'm a Rosen guy

Edited by horned dogs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...