Jump to content

CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

Journalism died in 2008.

I suggest it was on life support long before then. We were all too young to realize it.

 

Kennedy was Camelot.

Carter was a good hearted peanut farmer.

Clinton was the first black president, hip, and cool.

Obama was transformational.

 

But....

Nixon was a paranoid crook

Reagan was an old, senile, actor.

Ford was a clutz.

Bush was a war loving  cowboy.

Trump is a moronic racist!

 

Do you recognize the pattern? This is what we were all taught in public schools. This is what the National told us.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...incredibly astonishing to see the likes of Matthews, Lemon, Scarborough, Williams, etc deteriorate daily despite thinking they actually espouse journalism..."good night Chet.....good night David".....sorry guys......RIP........

  Sad to think that the best of broadcast journalism was 50 years ago with Huntley-Brinkley.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I suggest it was on life support long before then. We were all too young to realize it.

 

Kennedy was Camelot.

Carter was a good hearted peanut farmer.

Clinton was the first black president, hip, and cool.

Obama was transformational.

 

But....

Nixon was a paranoid crook

Reagan was an old, senile, actor.

Ford was a clutz.

Bush was a war loving  cowboy.

Trump is a moronic racist!

 

Do you recognize the pattern? This is what we were all taught in public schools. This is what the National told us.

 

 

Sickening, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Yes it is. I’ve only now started to get it. Someone older than me may remember Presidents before Kennedy. I can only go back that far. 

 

Reagan was my first memory as President and I thought he was as smooth as they come.

 

He took the criticism like a boss and fought back with dry human. 

 

I hated Bush number one

 

I actually like Bill Clinton.

 

I hated Bush number 2.

 

And Obama was the worst President this country ever saw, but you would never know it if you followed MSM.

 

Trump fights back against these MSM morons and makes me laugh while doing it, so there is never a dull moment. My parents told me I met Trump as a kid and I idolized him, but I don't remember it at all, so I don't buy it that my parents told me this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Njbuff

My list says nothing about my personal feelings about any of those Presidents. I was too young to form an informed opinion of half of them. But you can’t argue with my brief recap of how each was characterized by the national media and by default what our public school teachers told us about each one. 

I think you’ll agree it’s too long of a list to be a coincidence.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Yes it is. I’ve only now started to get it. Someone older than me may remember Presidents before Kennedy. I can only go back that far. 

 

I have vague recollections of reading articles describing Ike as basically being old and out-of-touch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

The MSM needs to be shut down.

 

This rhetoric cannot continue.

 

The protection of the left and bastardization of everyone else needs to stop and stop now.

 

What was once cute and funny (the way the MSM bashes everyone not on the left) is totally out of control.

 

This is the rhetoric that is fueling the domestic terrorists, not the President.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

The MSM needs to be shut down.

 

This rhetoric cannot continue.

 

The protection of the left and bastardization of everyone else needs to stop and stop now.

 

What was once cute and funny (the way the MSM bashes everyone not on the left) is totally out of control.

 

This is the rhetoric that is fueling the domestic terrorists, not the President.

So, you are advocating eliminating a free press? Short of that it may be possible to tweak our libel laws in order to hold our press to at least a modicum of the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

So, you are advocating eliminating a free press? Short of that it may be possible to tweak our libel laws in order to hold our press to at least a modicum of the truth.

An honest press my friend.

Edited by njbuff
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Bush was a war loving  cowboy.

 

Not sure about the cowboy part.  He's a Yankee.  A Connecticut Yankee.  The worst kind.

9 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Yes it is. I’ve only now started to get it. Someone older than me may remember Presidents before Kennedy. I can only go back that far. 

 

Where does LBJ fit in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

I think Psychology is going to be working overtime in short order.

 

My, these people are out of their fvcking minds.

 

Do any of those POS's realize that Stephen Miller is Jewish? Holy Shyt.

Edited by njbuff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need to do any fact-checking on our stories it's all those other fake news sites that need to improve their journalism oh wait:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/black-families-once-lived-off-their-southern-farmland-their-descendants-are-struggling-to-hold-onto-it/2019/07/22/37b3132a-a975-11e9-86dd-d7f0e60391e9_story.html

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nanker said:

Touche!

Christy actually reveals that he owns a gun!

 

What the actual *****?

 

Anyhow, Cuomo's dipshittery aside, that was a cleverly-worded question by the lady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

We don't need to do any fact-checking on our stories it's all those other fake news sites that need to improve their journalism oh wait:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/black-families-once-lived-off-their-southern-farmland-their-descendants-are-struggling-to-hold-onto-it/2019/07/22/37b3132a-a975-11e9-86dd-d7f0e60391e9_story.html

 

 

 

I love the correction they added, which is basically "We were wrong."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Wonder if any of them ever step back and ask why when they do objectively present information that the interpretation of events that they come away with isn't the same as a significant portion of their audience/ the public?  If not, why not?

 

Shouldn't they be interested in WHY they feel (yes, that word was chosen intentionally) the need to spin what could/ should be presented objectively?

 

If their interpretation of events is correct, shouldn't the events speak for themselves and others will come to that same conclusion?

 

And regardless of which side of an issue someone believes they're on, if they can access the source material they can take the spin out entirely.

 

 

Edited by Taro T
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taro T said:

 

Wonder if any of them ever step back and ask why when they do objectively present information that the interpretation of events that they come away with isn't the same as a significant portion of their audience/ the public?  If not, why not?

 

Shouldn't they be interested in WHY they feel (yes, that word was chosen intentionally) the need to spin what could/ should be presented objectively?

 

If their interpretation of events is correct, shouldn't the events speak for themselves and others will come to that same conclusion?

 

And regardless of which side of an issue someone believes they're on, if they can access the source material they can take the spin out entirely.

 

 

I don’t believe everything I read or hear but this may be part of the answer you’re looking for: Mark Levin cites a long, long, long list of the ex-Obama and ex-Clinton administration staff who are now high up in the traditional media sources you’re depending on to provide unbiased news. Once you understand the fact they are NOT trying to give you unbiased news this all makes a lot more sense. Those that are commonly referred to as the Main Street Media are actually just a clown car of Democratic Party operatives laying heavy spin on an unsuspecting electorate. It’s actually brilliant!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I don’t believe everything I read or hear but this may be part of the answer you’re looking for: Mark Levin cites a long, long, long list of the ex-Obama and ex-Clinton administration staff who are now high up in the traditional media sources you’re depending on to provide unbiased news. Once you understand the fact they are NOT trying to give you unbiased news this all makes a lot more sense. Those that are commonly referred to as the Main Street Media are actually just a clown car of Democratic Party operatives laying heavy spin on an unsuspecting electorate. It’s actually brilliant!

 

Totally get that the partisan operatives are going to partisan operate, so to speak.  But not all of the "journalists" that believe objectivity is passe come out of the political ranks.

 

And further, one of the (if not the) best talking head of the last 20-30 years was Tim Russert who was Chief of Staff for Moynahan and also had held a high ranking position as an advisor in Mario Cuomo's regime.  He'd hold everybody's feet to the fire regardless of affiliation.  We need more like him, regardless of their background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

Totally get that the partisan operatives are going to partisan operate, so to speak.  But not all of the "journalists" that believe objectivity is passe come out of the political ranks.

 

And further, one of the (if not the) best talking head of the last 20-30 years was Tim Russert who was Chief of Staff for Moynahan and also had held a high ranking position as an advisor in Mario Cuomo's regime.  He'd hold everybody's feet to the fire regardless of affiliation.  We need more like him, regardless of their background.

 

Tim Russert died in June of 2008.  And no one held Obama's feet to the fire.  Coincidence?  #ClintonBodyCount

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...it won't....they believe they are a "credible news source"....go figure......same with PMSNBC......

 

It’s all mind-numbing.

 

I should go back to being the most non-political person ever, it’s a lot easier on the mind.

 

I guess with the Bills and Devils sucking for so long, I needed another interest.

 

I hope both my teams are good so I have absolutely no focus on politics whatsoever. ?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...