Jump to content

CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


There are people that watch CNN? :blink: I thought all their ratings came from the airport televisions? ?‍♂️

 

A guy walked out of the gym recently and said to the front desk "can you please show something other than CNN?"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KRC said:

 

Pretty much.

 

 

 

The people that watch CNN are not going to care. If anything, they will call him a hero for his "patriotic" actions to get Trump out of office. Everyone else will just think, "CNN is still on the air?"

 

Exactly this.  There is absolutely no tipping point where any of those on the hardcore left begin to see things even a little bit for what they are.  Not even a smidgen of wrongdoing by the D's and their media lapdogs will ever be acknowledged  This is true 12th of never stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


There are people that watch CNN? :blink: I thought all their ratings came from the airport televisions? ?‍♂️

Good point. Just who is deciding what’s on those airport TVs anyway. When was the last time you saw one on Fox News ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Foxx said:

unless part II has anything better, this is pretty much a nothing burger.

 

Agree, I expected something much more damning than what was heard.  Not news that Zucker hates Trump and that they have an anti-Trump agenda in their reporting each day.  That's pretty obvious from what they produce.  The culture of the media is no secret. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Good point. Just who is deciding what’s on those airport TVs anyway. When was the last time you saw one on Fox News ?

CNN Actually had a contract with most of the airports. They provided the cable and TVs in exchange for controlling the channel. I read recently that some airports are finally telling them where to put their CNN and going with other options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gary Busey said:

 

He received in excess of 60 million votes, all from people wise enough to know his tax returns were irrelevant.  Didn’t matter one way or the other, wouldn’t change anything. 
 

But now, of course, the opponent is seeking to rewrite the rules, and use every trick in the book to grab his returns. Big govt run amok. Falls right in line with Russiagate, Obstructiongate and ukraineamania. Let’s see how it plays out in the next election—when served up with a healthy dose of declassification of files targeting the enemy.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

He received in excess of 60 million votes, all from people wise enough to know his tax returns were irrelevant.  Didn’t matter one way or the other, wouldn’t change anything. 
 

But now, of course, the opponent is seeking to rewrite the rules, and use every trick in the book to grab his returns. Big govt run amok. Falls right in line with Russiagate, Obstructiongate and ukraineamania. Let’s see how it plays out in the next election—when served up with a healthy dose of declassification of files targeting the enemy.  

 

is it the 12th yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gary Busey said:

 

 

Given all of the irresponsible acts by the media and the political opposition, why on earth would he release his tax returns?  They (media and political opposition) have proven over and over again that they can't/won't call balls and strikes but will rather use any information to push and create false narratives and run wild with them. 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might explain CNN’s chyron management of late more than anything else. The testimony of a CNN insider long promoted by Project Veritas ahead of an official release has emerged earlier today, along with a recorded conference call from network president Jeff Zucker. In the call, Zucker tells his team to stay focused on impeachment and to stop treating Lindsey Graham objectively, along with other bon mots that call CNN’s claims of fair news reporting into question:

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gary Busey said:

 

is it the 12th yet?

 

That's not your shtick. Stop stealing other people's gimmicks.

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

Breaking news!!!!

 

line 210 on his tax return is said to be a suspicious amount according to our single unidentified source to CNN!!!!!!!!!!! 

 

Don't forget the line items labeled "campaign finance payoffs to whores" and "income derived from foreign bribes".

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

Don't forget the line items labeled "campaign finance payoffs to whores" and "income derived from foreign bribes".

 

Should be easy to find, as it is right above "money paid to foreign agents to get dirt on a political opponent's campaign." We saw that on Hillary's tax returns.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Don't forget the line items labeled "campaign finance payoffs to whores" and "income derived from foreign bribes".

 

 

the line that says "my illegal loans from Putin that makes me a slave to him forever and ever"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DID CNN LET WARREN PLANT HER CONTRIBUTOR IN AUDIENCE?

 

Well, well, it turns out, that the guy asking Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) the setup question about same-sex marriage during CNN’s LGBT Town Hall was a maxxed-out donor to her 2018 Senate campaign.

 

CNN’s Chris Cuomo said nothing about that important fact when he introduced Morgan Cox of Dallas to ask Warren what she would say to somebody who told her they believe marriage is only between one man and one woman. Warren’s snarky response went viral, of course. But maybe Cuomo honestly didn’t know that detail. Odds are good somebody at CNN knew beforehand because, surely, they background questioners.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the tax authorities accept the situation, often after extensive discussion with complex and multi-company situations, it isn't to be reopened by people to debate all over again....

 

oh yes, i guess it can, so CNN can go on 24/7 over each line of a return that has been accepted by tax authorities

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

......I'm SHOCKED..............

 

CNN debate slammed by critics, candidates: ‘Damaged the network's credibility even further’

By Brian Flood | Fox News

 

CNN’s Democratic presidential debate was criticized by everyone from media watchdogs to the candidates themselves following Tuesday’s showdown — with complaints ranging from perceived favoritism of Sen. Elizabeth Warren to attacks on the specific questions asked by moderators.

“The network is under heavy criticism from the left and right today, and rightly so,” Concha said. “Its pursuit of sizzle over steak and focus on social issues over truly substantiate matters – economy, jobs, opioid crisis, border crisis, all-things China – has damaged the network's credibility even further.”

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-debate

 

 

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

ROGER SIMON: CNN Cements Its Bias Reputation at Tuesday’s Debate.

 

 

Just think of CNN and MSNBC as closed-circuit TV for the Beltway swamp, and it all makes sense.

 
 
 
 
,

 

...NOT buying it....Donna told me otherwise..................

Donna Brazile praises 'substantive' Democrat debate

Oct. 16, 2019

 

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6095240097001/#sp=show-clips

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...